Political question for Leftists. What do you not like about the Constitution?

[meaner gene]

That's an interpretation. The definition is:

a formal address or discourse delivered to an audience.
the communication or expression of thoughts in spoken words.

What you type here, isn't speech, unless the constitution can be interpreted to include it.

thats funny because reality says that its me saying it and no one else,,

its because youre trying to interpret it thats causing the confusion,,

Sorry, I have my audio turned all the way up and I don't hear any speech from you.

What you're doing here isn't covered by the literal of the 1st amendment.

 

[progressive hunter]

That's an interpretation. The definition is:

a formal address or discourse delivered to an audience.
the communication or expression of thoughts in spoken words.

What you type here, isn't speech, unless the constitution can be interpreted to include it.

thats funny because reality says that its me saying it and no one else,,

its because youre trying to interpret it thats causing the confusion,,

Sorry, I have my audio turned all the way up and I don't hear any speech from you.

What you're doing here isn't covered by the literal of the 1st amendment.

cant help youre an idiot with his fingers in his ears going lalalalalal

 

[progressive hunter]

That's an interpretation. The definition is:

a formal address or discourse delivered to an audience.
the communication or expression of thoughts in spoken words.

What you type here, isn't speech, unless the constitution can be interpreted to include it.

thats funny because reality says that its me saying it and no one else,,

its because youre trying to interpret it thats causing the confusion,,

Sorry, I have my audio turned all the way up and I don't hear any speech from you.

What you're doing here isn't covered by the literal of the 1st amendment.

and if you took the time to read the 1st you would see it says "press" not journalism,,, that means the printed word,,

 

[meaner gene]

If you want more, you have to allow the constitution to be interpreted to include items that did not exist at the time of its creation.

So pick a position, interpreted or absolute literal?

thats funny,, I didnt know our military still used flintlocks,,,

You haven't answered. Do you want what existed at the time the constitution was adopted, or what was later invented, and the constitution interpreted to include them?

 

[progressive hunter]

If you want more, you have to allow the constitution to be interpreted to include items that did not exist at the time of its creation.

So pick a position, interpreted or absolute literal?

thats funny,, I didnt know our military still used flintlocks,,,

You haven't answered. Do you want what existed at the time the constitution was adopted, or what was later invented, and the constitution interpreted to include them?

it wasnt restricted to the times,, just like the rest of it it was timeless,,

 

[meaner gene]

of course its literal and since you complain about the airforce and space force,, lets abolish them and combine them with the army and navy,,

That's unnecessary since the constitution is "interpreted" and now includes them as being so.

 

[rightwinger]

I’m cool with it as written

After all, Liberals did write the Constituition

No Founder agrees with the modern left. They WARNED us about you

Hate to tell you

They are all dead

Soon you will be too. What's your point. You claimed they agree with you. THAT IS A LIE. They fought a revolution against Statists

They fought a revolution against the Monarchy
A Monarchy supported by

The supporters of the State over the individual were conservatives IN THAT DAY.

The left has bastardized the language as they always do.

YOU are a supporter of a powerful government.

We support MINIMAL GOVERNMENT

The Founders opposed Statism. YOU support Statism

yes

I proudly support my Government. A Government Conservatives are trying to destroy

We support a RIGHT SIZED GOVERNMENT a size determined by We the People

Conservatives seek to remove that right from the people and put it in the hands of partisan legislatures

 

[meaner gene]

I dont comply with unlawful agencies,,

Even Scalia said the BATF was lawful and proper.

 

[progressive hunter]

of course its literal and since you complain about the airforce and space force,, lets abolish them and combine them with the army and navy,,

That's unnecessary since the constitution is "interpreted" and now includes them as being so.

ok then,, now take away the guns the military is currently using and give them flintlocks,,

 

[progressive hunter]

I dont comply with unlawful agencies,,

Even Scalia said the BATF was lawful and proper.

saying it doesnt change reality,, he gave an opinion that can be changed later by others,,

 

[meaner gene]

and if you took the time to read the 1st you would see it says "press" not journalism,,, that means the printed word,,

What you're doing here is not "printing". And you aren't using a "press"

Hence the literal would exclude what you're doing on the internet as not being "speech / spoken" or "press / printed"

The constitutiion says noting about freedom of "pixels"

 

[progressive hunter]

and if you took the time to read the 1st you would see it says "press" not journalism,,, that means the printed word,,

What you're doing here is not "printing". And you aren't using a "press"

Hence the literal would exclude what you're doing on the internet as not being "speech / spoken" or "press / printed"

The constitutiion says noting about freedom of "pixels"

your interpretation is whats causing your confusion,,

 

[meaner gene]

You haven't answered. Do you want what existed at the time the constitution was adopted, or what was later invented, and the constitution interpreted to include them?

it wasnt restricted to the times,, just like the rest of it it was timeless,,

Exactly, timeless means not changed over time.

 

[meaner gene]

ok then,, now take away the guns the military is currently using and give them flintlocks,,

You had that right long before Heller V DC.

 

[meaner gene]

The constitutiion says noting about freedom of "pixels"

your interpretation is whats causing your confusion,,

The interpretation is what gives me freedom of "pixels" Without it, the government and not just twitter or facebook could ban Trump from posting.

 

[progressive hunter]

You haven't answered. Do you want what existed at the time the constitution was adopted, or what was later invented, and the constitution interpreted to include them?

it wasnt restricted to the times,, just like the rest of it it was timeless,,

Exactly, timeless means not changed over time.

it must be hard being you,,

not knowing what to think until someone else tells you,,

 

[meaner gene]

Exactly, timeless means not changed over time.

it must be hard being you,,

not knowing what to think until someone else tells you,,

Yes i'm a slave to Daniel Webster, and how he told me what words actually mean.

While you are free to use "alternate facts" or "alternate definitions"

 

[progressive hunter]

Exactly, timeless means not changed over time.

it must be hard being you,,

not knowing what to think until someone else tells you,,

Yes i'm a slave to Daniel Webster, and how he told me what words actually mean.

thats your problem then,, they change the definition of words over time and it causes the original context to be lost,,

like I said,
it must be really hard being you,,

 

[Carl in Michigan]

so when do I get my military grade guns??

Based on when the constitution was written, you can have a flintlock musket or a blunderbuss.

Without interpretation, you have no right to something that did not exist when they wrote it.

So you dont support the Second Amendment. Thank you

I’m cool with it as written

After all, Liberals did write the Constituition

No Founder agrees with the modern left. They WARNED us about you

Hate to tell you

They are all dead

Soon you will be too. What's your point. You claimed they agree with you. THAT IS A LIE. They fought a revolution against Statists

They fought a revolution against the Monarchy
A Monarchy supported by

The supporters of the State over the individual were conservatives IN THAT DAY.

The left has bastardized the language as they always do.

YOU are a supporter of a powerful government.

We support MINIMAL GOVERNMENT

The Founders opposed Statism. YOU support Statism

yes

I proudly support my Government. A Government Conservatives are trying to destroy

We support a RIGHT SIZED GOVERNMENT a size determined by We the People

Conservatives seek to remove that right from the people and put it in the hands of partisan legislatures

I support the government the FOUNDERS supported. I support LIMITING the power of government over the individual.

Fuck the government you support

 

[rightwinger]

so when do I get my military grade guns??

Based on when the constitution was written, you can have a flintlock musket or a blunderbuss.

Without interpretation, you have no right to something that did not exist when they wrote it.

So you dont support the Second Amendment. Thank you

I’m cool with it as written

After all, Liberals did write the Constituition

No Founder agrees with the modern left. They WARNED us about you

Hate to tell you

They are all dead

Soon you will be too. What's your point. You claimed they agree with you. THAT IS A LIE. They fought a revolution against Statists

They fought a revolution against the Monarchy
A Monarchy supported by

The supporters of the State over the individual were conservatives IN THAT DAY.

The left has bastardized the language as they always do.

YOU are a supporter of a powerful government.

We support MINIMAL GOVERNMENT

The Founders opposed Statism. YOU support Statism

yes

I proudly support my Government. A Government Conservatives are trying to destroy

We support a RIGHT SIZED GOVERNMENT a size determined by We the People

Conservatives seek to remove that right from the people and put it in the hands of partisan legislatures

I support the government the FOUNDERS supported. I support LIMITING the power of government over the individual.

Fuck the government you support

Our founders supported a government capable of governing a population of 3 million that was poorly educated, agrarian, ill informed and widely dispersed.

Their vision of what a Government should do does not fit the wealthiest nation on earth with 330 million people