Poll: Do You Agree With Dr. Rand Paul That Dr. Anthony Fauci Lied to Congress Regarding NIH Funding Gain of Function Research in Wuhan?

Do You Agree With Dr. Rand Paul That Dr. Anthony Fauci Lied to Congress Regarding NIH Funding


  • Total voters
    139
Their testy exchange, where each accused the other of lying is here.



It would be helpful to watch the whole thing in order to cast an informed vote.

Basically, Rand Paul uses Fauci's own testimony, a paper from one of the Wuhan virologists stating that the research was being funded by NIH, and the NIH's own definition of "gain of function" to make the case that Fauci lied.

Fauci defended himself by saying that Dr. Paul does not know what he is talking about and he is the one who is lying (effectively, "nuh-uh").

Your vote will be publicly viewable, and you cannot change your vote.

Fauci: Narcissistic psychopath & Democrat CovidScam terrorist.
 
Ok if you say so

But there has been a lot of charges and denials about the wuhan bio lab

Are you still completely clueless and not leaning one way or the other?
And ....... you still have no proof the Wuhan lab juiced that Coronavirus.

Fauci: If the point that you are making is that the grant that was funded as a sub-award from EcoHealth to Wuhan created SARS-COV2,
that's where you are getting... let me finish...


Paul: We don't know. We don't know if it came from the lab but all the evidence is pointing that it came from the lab.
 
And ....... you still have no proof the Wuhan lab juiced that Coronavirus.

Fauci: If the point that you are making is that the grant that was funded as a sub-award from EcoHealth to Wuhan created SARS-COV2,
that's where you are getting... let me finish...
Paul: We don't know. We don't know if it came from the lab but all the evidence is pointing that it came from the lab.
Its believing you know all the answers.
 
The faith in Fauci as shown by the fundamentalists here is an amazing thing to watch.


"What would Fauci do?"

fauci-maskless-640x480.jpg
 
And ....... you still have no proof the Wuhan lab juiced that Coronavirus.

Fauci: If the point that you are making is that the grant that was funded as a sub-award from EcoHealth to Wuhan created SARS-COV2,
that's where you are getting... let me finish...
Paul: We don't know. We don't know if it came from the lab but all the evidence is pointing that it came from the lab.
Juiced the Virus? Are you trying to say that we don't know that the Wuhan lab weaponized the covid bat virus? Ummm....it is now accepted as fact that the wuhan lab is both the source of the virus release and that thusly weaponized it to make it spread between humans.

In nature, the virus does not spread human to human. Only the strain from the Wuhan lab (now known to be the source) spread human to human.
 
Juiced the Virus? Are you trying to say that we don't know that the Wuhan lab weaponized the covid bat virus? Ummm....it is now accepted as fact that the wuhan lab is both the source of the virus release and that thusly weaponized it to make it spread between humans.

In nature, the virus does not spread human to human. Only the strain from the Wuhan lab (now known to be the source) spread human to human.
LOLOL

I just quoted Rand Paul admitting we don't know. You're demented to think you do know.

:abgg2q.jpg:
 
Juiced the Virus? Are you trying to say that we don't know that the Wuhan lab weaponized the covid bat virus? Ummm....it is now accepted as fact that the wuhan lab is both the source of the virus release and that thusly weaponized it to make it spread between humans.

In nature, the virus does not spread human to human. Only the strain from the Wuhan lab (now known to be the source) spread human to human.
It’s not possible to claim that SARS-CoV-2 does not spread human-to-human in nature, because there are no places in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that show deliberate human manipulation where it should show, and thus most of the scientific community refuting the lab escape scenario. Paul nails Fauci on something more profound: funding gain-of-function research that did not escape from Wuhan lab, though was proceeding with Chinese military assistance and approval since long before 2011, funding an experienced, already-in-process, gain-of-function lab.

Paul has used nature as a weapon to expose Fau Chi’s deception and lies. To have funded a single dime to Wuhan Institute, from 2003-2021, especially with its military ties, was by default to fund gain-of-function research. Just because there are military secrets does not mean that Americans should pay for them with 600,000+ lives.
 
@Faun
It’s not possible to claim that SARS-CoV-2 does not spread human-to-human in nature, because there are no places in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that show deliberate human manipulation where it should show, and thus most of the scientific community refuting the lab escape scenario. Paul nails Fauci on something more profound: funding gain-of-function research that did not escape from Wuhan lab, though was proceeding with Chinese military assistance and approval since long before 2011, funding an experienced, already-in-process, gain-of-function lab.

Paul has used nature as a weapon to expose Fau Chi’s deception and lies. To have funded a single dime to Wuhan Institute, from 2003-2021, especially with its military ties, was by default to fund gain-of-function research. Just because there are military secrets does not mean that Americans should pay for them with 600,000+ lives.
So prove it. What are you waiting for?
 
Yes i know. I read over it. Nothing alluding to gain of function in the abstract. In fact, it wasn't what they were doing. They were basically trying to build a sars family tree.

Repeating Rand's claim isn't support for it. And i am not seeing support for his claims in that paper. They weren't developing gain of function for new viruses. They used a gain of function to speed up the experiment, not to develop new viruses. Nor were they developing gain of function techniques (an acceptable form of which is used in every virus lab on Earth, apparently). So no, it was not funding of gain of function research.

Basically...stop me if you've heard this one... Rand doesn't know what the hell he is talking about.
>Nothing alluding to gain of function in the abstract.

What an absolutely ridiculous comment.

The paper discusses how they modified bat viruses which could not previously infect humans, enabling them to infect humans.
 

Forum List

Back
Top