Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gain of Function is a buzzword Rand Paul picked up off of Ted Cruz"Gain of Function" is the very reason we are in this vaccine or no vaccine dilemma. They created this mess and all who were involved should be in prison including Fauci.
That's called American ingenuity and enterprise, dintya know?lRand Paul didnt like the existing board of ophthalmology, so he create his own board of ophthalmology and certified himself.
Fauci had his chance to teach, for a solid year he did nothing but flip flop on everything he said.Gain of Function is a buzzword Rand Paul picked up off of Ted Cruz
Neither knows what it means
MAYBE if they let Fauci get a word in edgewise, he could teach them
Their testy exchange, where each accused the other of lying is here.
It would be helpful to watch the whole thing in order to cast an informed vote.
Basically, Rand Paul uses Fauci's own testimony, a paper from one of the Wuhan virologists stating that the research was being funded by NIH, and the NIH's own definition of "gain of function" to make the case that Fauci lied.
Fauci defended himself by saying that Dr. Paul does not know what he is talking about and he is the one who is lying (effectively, "nuh-uh").
Your vote will be publicly viewable, and you cannot change your vote.
Their testy exchange, where each accused the other of lying is here.
It would be helpful to watch the whole thing in order to cast an informed vote.
Basically, Rand Paul uses Fauci's own testimony, a paper from one of the Wuhan virologists stating that the research was being funded by NIH, and the NIH's own definition of "gain of function" to make the case that Fauci lied.
Fauci defended himself by saying that Dr. Paul does not know what he is talking about and he is the one who is lying (effectively, "nuh-uh").
Your vote will be publicly viewable, and you cannot change your vote.
I don't have a medical degree, but the subject matter is not so complicated to be understood by relatively intelligent people.Optometrist passing as an expert on infectious diseases
DOCTOR Fauci called him on it
”You don’t know what you are talking about”
Eye doctors have to go to medical school just like "Doctor" Faulsi.
Screwing around with Mutant viruses is dangerous. Turning that research over to a Communist country is treason.I don't have a medical degree, but the subject matter is not so complicated to be understood by relatively intelligent people.
"Gain of Function" is not really complicated subject matter, and whether funding was provided for certain research seems to be well established, as acknowledged by the author of the research.
So the only question seems to be, is making a virus that does not infect humans capable of infecting humans through laboratory manipulation, gain of function?
It seems pretty clear that it is, and Fauci admits that is what was done, but he disputes the labeling of it as "gain of function."
Why do so many people here agree with Fauci and think it is not? No one has explained that yet.
Fauci lied. He did not believe it.Fauci did not lie to Congress.
and as AzogtheDefiler has told us...a lie isn't a lie if the person lying believes it. At least that is how he defends his ever-loving devotion to mara-lard-ass.
Are you white?Previous post is yet another maga fuckup brought to you by Angry White Fuckups, Inc.
I have posted an article on subject which you disagree with.That is not a helpful post and is redundant with your vote.
I would love to hear some well-articulated thoughts about why people agree with Fauci that he did not lie to Congress.
So far, rightwinger has given some reasons. His main point seems to be that Fauci is better qualified than Paul to determine what is gain of function and what is not. While true, it's not very convincing.
otto105 tried, but I don't see how his link is responsive. The quote from Dr. Stanely Perlman does not support any claim that gain of function research was not funded. There are other qualified doctors who are on record stating Fauci did fund GOF. For example...
MSN
www.msn.com
JackOfNoTrades said there is no evidence, but the evidence is presented in post #1. Dispute it, if you can, please.
It would be nice if someone could argue why NIH did not provide funding (fat chance), and/or why the funded research is not considered to be "gain of function." I've yet to hear anyone articulate that, including Fauci.
How much?Betcha Falsi winds up in jail for mass murder and lying about GOF.
He helped murder millions so he could line his pockets.Fauci lied.
He is an evil POS.
When you take a small amount of virus and grow it in a lab to study it… that’s gain of function
Can that create problems? It can and care needs to be taken but that is the only way to study virus’
Did the NIH give money to Ecohealth? Yes. Did Ecohealth give money to the Wuhan lab? Yes
Was it provided for Gof F ? No
Was Gof F the cause of the outbreak? There is no evidence that it did.
