LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
"They said Kool Aid! They're mean!"
Gawd...
.
Nope. That's you being intentionally obtuse and failing to undestand the issue.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"They said Kool Aid! They're mean!"
Gawd...
.
"They said Kool Aid! They're mean!"
Gawd...
.
The PC Police have full tilt drama queen over freaking Kool Aid.It's freaking Kool Aid, who cares? The left can make anything "racist"
The PC Police have full tilt drama queen over freaking Kool Aid.It's freaking Kool Aid, who cares? The left can make anything "racist"
You can't make this shit up.
.
i agree with that. wow. since the past is the past it is hard to rewrite it. But the fact remains, if one doesn't know about something, guess what they have no idea to avoid it. It is quite simple.How many people have to hear about this to qualify for your "widely known" label?
I dunno. I'm leaving the interpretation wide open.
BINGO!! So no number will never fit your definition of "widely known" so this entire thread is a folly
Is there some reason you don't want the analysis? I left it wide open and impartial, which means I'm wide open to being shown to be a tiny minority. And I'm fine with that.
Dude, go ahead and analyze. Since you dont know what number of people have to hear about something for it to be widely known I'm curious how you're going to analyze anything. But go ahead.
PS. No matter how many people have heard of it it wont ever make you hear of it in past tense.
The OP is the first I've heard of it. Sounds pretty stupid to me.![]()
I have only heard of it as a stereotype for gullible people.
i agree with that. wow. since the past is the past it is hard to rewrite it. But the fact remains, if one doesn't know about something, guess what they have no idea to avoid it. It is quite simple.How many people have to hear about this to qualify for your "widely known" label?
I dunno. I'm leaving the interpretation wide open.
BINGO!! So no number will never fit your definition of "widely known" so this entire thread is a folly
Is there some reason you don't want the analysis? I left it wide open and impartial, which means I'm wide open to being shown to be a tiny minority. And I'm fine with that.
Dude, go ahead and analyze. Since you dont know what number of people have to hear about something for it to be widely known I'm curious how you're going to analyze anything. But go ahead.
PS. No matter how many people have heard of it it wont ever make you hear of it in past tense.
well you've heard of it now right? Isn't that amazing how that works? When you haven't heard of something and then do, you now know about that something.The OP is the first I've heard of it. Sounds pretty stupid to me. Hell I don't even know who Brian Kilmeade is.![]()
I have heard the stereotype. I think it was the movie Friday where Chris Tucker's character says something along the lines of, "You know I have Kool-Aid".![]()
The PC Police have full tilt drama queen over freaking Kool Aid.It's freaking Kool Aid, who cares? The left can make anything "racist"
You can't make this shit up.
.
It is clear that the drama queen is you. Maybe we need a poll?
Most stereotypes, they're the windmills I tilt at on this forum........The OP is the first I've heard of it. Sounds pretty stupid to me.![]()
It does, doesn't it? You can say that about many stereotypes, though.
Never heard of it. I knew poor people drink it a lot....it's cheap and mixed with water it tastes good.
Yes, but it was more of stereotype more associated with poor people. As a poor kid it was a staple in our house.
Here's at least two comments as a stereotype for "poor". I've never considered that either, although if I thought about it, Kool Aid would not be something I'd expect in a rich person's house -- obviously it's not Perrier -- but the reverse didn't occur to me.
I suspect what this poll might ferret out is not so much how many of us heard of this one or that one, but how seriously we lean on stereotype in general. I have to admit, I'm not one to take them seriously.
I have only heard of it as a stereotype for gullible people.
That's the only meaning I was aware of too, and until the Kilmeade thread spurred me to look it up, I didn't know it was connected to Jim Jones. I knew the meaning only from the context I see it used on the internet but never knew the derivation of it.
So it's been educational.
Figured that out all by yourself or did you need help?well you've heard of it now right? Isn't that amazing how that works? When you haven't heard of something and then do, you now know about that something.The OP is the first I've heard of it. Sounds pretty stupid to me. Hell I don't even know who Brian Kilmeade is.![]()
Never heard of it. I knew poor people drink it a lot....it's cheap and mixed with water it tastes good.
Yes, but it was more of stereotype more associated with poor people. As a poor kid it was a staple in our house.
Here's at least two comments as a stereotype for "poor". I've never considered that either, although if I thought about it, Kool Aid would not be something I'd expect in a rich person's house -- obviously it's not Perrier -- but the reverse didn't occur to me.
I suspect what this poll might ferret out is not so much how many of us heard of this one or that one, but how seriously we lean on stereotype in general. I have to admit, I'm not one to take them seriously.
It is way cheaper than pop and it masked the crude taste of our well water.