[POLL] - Liberals, how much is a "fair share?" - Taxes

What's the "fair share?"


  • Total voters
    113
What is fair is always what a liberal considers fair under the guidelines that it is someone else's fair share.

And what is fair to the American Taliban is no responsibility for anything.

Name an American that locks little girls into schools, sets the building on fire and reads the Koran praising Allah as the girls scream while they are burned alive like the Taliban does.
You live in LA LA land and take for granted that you live in the greatest nation on earth.
Move if you do not like it here.
Delta is ready when you are.
Comparing anything American to the Taliban is a fraud that only a fool parrots.

In PMS's world view, declining to open the floodgates for more federal borrowing is the equivalent of cutting off an infidel's head.
 
The military is more than half of our discretionary budget.

The entire budget is "discretionary," as if that was actual relevant to this discussion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Here's a not surprising bit of ignorance.

You mean here's someone who isn't fooled by libturd propaganda. The theory that some government spending is "discretionary" while other spending is "mandatory" is total bullshit. It's even dumber to believe that defense spending is in the former category rather than the later. It's just a way for libturds to cow the voters into believing that certain sacred cows can't be touched. The fact is that Congress changes what we spend on Social Security and Medicare all the time. Obama just took a $700 billion whack out of Medicare when the ACA act passed. Congress can cut Social Security and Medicare anytime it wants to. It's purely up to their "discretion."
 
You're one of the imbeciles that I count on. You are the poster boy for the Fox Opinions cult.

All of the insurance companies had a free choice. Grandfather or new. They all chose. Some to grandfather, some not.

Wrong, asshole, they had no choice. Obamacare took away their choices. Obamacare forced them to cover people with pre-exisitng conditions. Obamacare forced them to cover "children" up to 26 years of age. It forced them to make every policy include, obstetrics, birth control, abortion, sex change operations, psychiatric care, and a host of other expensive additions.

You have to be a totally brain damaged Obama fluffer to believe they had any choice in the matter.



Not when government gets in the way, moron.



Who is "they?" I thought you supported increasing competition, not eliminating it.

Their customers, like they do as an electorate, will decide the winners and losers.

Not if Obamacare remains in place. The whole point of Obamacare is taking choice away from consumers.

Yes it does. The choice of getting screwed by the insurance company. The choice of dumping your health care costs on others.

We're all getting screwed 10 times worse by Obamacare then any insurance company ever thought of screwing anyone.

The whole point of Obamacare is to dump the insurance costs of some on others. Why am I going to have to pay for abortions, birth control and sex change operations? Are those part of my insurance costs?

The truth almost always turns out to be exactly the opposite of what you post, PMS.

Funny, isn't it?
 
We need a flat tax and a fiscally conservative and limited government which has its budget under control, coupled with worker's unions that are actually involved with those they are representing in order to negotiate what a fair wage is between the employer and employee without having mindless legislators suggesting they know better what a fair wage is, having no knowledge of the job or the profits earned and then forcing their decision through the coercion of force.

We need business to perform in a way that competes with the rest of the world. They have forgotten how.

They haven't forgotten how. It's just that government keeps cutting them off at the knees. No matter how many times you try to pin the blame on it, the fact is that business isn't responsible for this crummy economy. Obama is.
 
Where did they lose them?

It's good that we have competition for health insurance. If you don't like your insurance company, buy from another.

Obamacare is destroying competition, not creating it. Government is what prevented competition in the first place. The only "uncompetitive" markets are the ones where government outlaws competition.

What you wish was true. None of it is though. Your brain has been washed clean of your eighth grade education.

Are you going to claim FOX news has brainwashed me?

One thing we've learned since your tenure here began: truth is the exact opposite of whatever you post.
 
Government helps competive businesses by making a fair field for smaller companies.

In exactly the same manner that Crocodiles help Wildebeests cross rivers.

:lame2:

One of the better things that came out of the early 20th century is the government can break apart abusive corporations.

Yeah, I noticed that with TARP..

You don't HAVE to be a fucking retard to be a leftist...

Oh wait, yeah, I guess you do...

Thank god this reforms of the early 20 century occurred ;) No one company should be able to control the market!

Now they some more work too do ;) I wish the government would break the airlines up and the banks.
 
Last edited:
Government helps competive businesses by making a fair field for smaller companies.

In exactly the same manner that Crocodiles help Wildebeests cross rivers.

:lame2:

One of the better things that came out of the early 20th century is the government can break apart abusive corporations.

Yeah, I noticed that with TARP..

You don't HAVE to be a fucking retard to be a leftist...

Oh wait, yeah, I guess you do...

Thank god that the reforms of the early 20 century occurred ;) No one company should be able to control the market!

Now they do have some work too do ;) I wish the government would break the airlines up and the banks.

There were no "reforms." There was only a massive power grab by the so-called "progressives."

Why would you want to break up the airlines? There's only about 150 of them.
 
What is fair is always what a liberal considers fair under the guidelines that it is someone else's fair share.

And what is fair to the American Taliban is no responsibility for anything.

Name an American that locks little girls into schools, sets the building on fire and reads the Koran praising Allah as the girls scream while they are burned alive like the Taliban does.
You live in LA LA land and take for granted that you live in the greatest nation on earth.
Move if you do not like it here.
Delta is ready when you are.
Comparing anything American to the Taliban is a fraud that only a fool parrots.

Both are extreme right wing cults. Your point is that some in the Taliban are more extreme than many American conservatives.

Point granted.
 
So easy to be a liberal when you are plundering and spending the money earned by other people.
But hey, socialism is great up until you run out of money.
And we ran out long ago.

First of all I dare say that I have, at least, contributed and earned as much as you have.

Second, the biggest evidence of our financial situation comes in the form of debt. The debt comes from our experiment with conservative policies.
 
And what is fair to the American Taliban is no responsibility for anything.

Name an American that locks little girls into schools, sets the building on fire and reads the Koran praising Allah as the girls scream while they are burned alive like the Taliban does.
You live in LA LA land and take for granted that you live in the greatest nation on earth.
Move if you do not like it here.
Delta is ready when you are.
Comparing anything American to the Taliban is a fraud that only a fool parrots.

In PMS's world view, declining to open the floodgates for more federal borrowing is the equivalent of cutting off an infidel's head.

I don't like having to borrow. I like business leaders doing their job of growing until there is a well paying job for every American who wants one. Much of the borrowing that's been done is making up for businesses failure to do that job.
 
In exactly the same manner that Crocodiles help Wildebeests cross rivers.

:lame2:



Yeah, I noticed that with TARP..

You don't HAVE to be a fucking retard to be a leftist...

Oh wait, yeah, I guess you do...

Thank god that the reforms of the early 20 century occurred ;) No one company should be able to control the market!

Now they do have some work too do ;) I wish the government would break the airlines up and the banks.

There were no "reforms." There was only a massive power grab by the so-called "progressives."

Why would you want to break up the airlines? There's only about 150 of them.

What power was grabbed by who?
 
Obamacare is destroying competition, not creating it. Government is what prevented competition in the first place. The only "uncompetitive" markets are the ones where government outlaws competition.

What you wish was true. None of it is though. Your brain has been washed clean of your eighth grade education.

Are you going to claim FOX news has brainwashed me?

One thing we've learned since your tenure here began: truth is the exact opposite of whatever you post.

There is not the slightest doubt that Fox Opinions has brainwashed you. You are a parrot.
 
We need a flat tax and a fiscally conservative and limited government which has its budget under control, coupled with worker's unions that are actually involved with those they are representing in order to negotiate what a fair wage is between the employer and employee without having mindless legislators suggesting they know better what a fair wage is, having no knowledge of the job or the profits earned and then forcing their decision through the coercion of force.

We need business to perform in a way that competes with the rest of the world. They have forgotten how.

They haven't forgotten how. It's just that government keeps cutting them off at the knees. No matter how many times you try to pin the blame on it, the fact is that business isn't responsible for this crummy economy. Obama is.

When did the Great Recession start?
 
Government helps competive businesses by making a fair field for smaller companies.

One of the better things that came out of the early 20th century is the government can break apart abusive corporations.

Wow. Someone sure brainwashed you into the perfect little leftist government drone, didn't they?

No. Fox Opinions brain washed you onto a well trained American Taliban extremist.

Did I wave a Snausage over your nose, Fido? Go back to your kennel and lick your balls until I call you.
 
Obamacare is destroying competition, not creating it. Government is what prevented competition in the first place. The only "uncompetitive" markets are the ones where government outlaws competition.

What you wish was true. None of it is though. Your brain has been washed clean of your eighth grade education.

Are you going to claim FOX news has brainwashed me?

One thing we've learned since your tenure here began: truth is the exact opposite of whatever you post.

Oh, we've learned something else from him:

"Fox! FOX! FOOOOoooooxxxxx!!!"
 
We need business to perform in a way that competes with the rest of the world. They have forgotten how.

They haven't forgotten how. It's just that government keeps cutting them off at the knees. No matter how many times you try to pin the blame on it, the fact is that business isn't responsible for this crummy economy. Obama is.

When did the Great Recession start?

It didn't become "The Great Recession" until Obama's economic policies kicked in.
 
The entire budget is "discretionary," as if that was actual relevant to this discussion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Here's a not surprising bit of ignorance.

You mean here's someone who isn't fooled by libturd propaganda. The theory that some government spending is "discretionary" while other spending is "mandatory" is total bullshit. It's even dumber to believe that defense spending is in the former category rather than the later. It's just a way for libturds to cow the voters into believing that certain sacred cows can't be touched. The fact is that Congress changes what we spend on Social Security and Medicare all the time. Obama just took a $700 billion whack out of Medicare when the ACA act passed. Congress can cut Social Security and Medicare anytime it wants to. It's purely up to their "discretion."

Actually discretionary means approved each year by an appropriations bill and mandatory means required by existing law.

Not surprised that you didn't know that.
 
What you wish was true. None of it is though. Your brain has been washed clean of your eighth grade education.

Are you going to claim FOX news has brainwashed me?

One thing we've learned since your tenure here began: truth is the exact opposite of whatever you post.

Oh, we've learned something else from him:

"Fox! FOX! FOOOOoooooxxxxx!!!"

The beauty of being a liberal is that you only need to learn a few knee-jerk responses to answer every question put to you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top