Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It would be helpful if you even had some rough idea of how much basic science you do not possess.
As to calling me a liar for posting facts you do not understand, shove your head up your ass and jump.
You sound like a climategate denier.Get back in your room, deniers. Nobody wants to see your circle jerks out in public. It's gross.
It would be helpful if you even had some rough idea of how much basic science you do not possess.
As to calling me a liar for posting facts you do not understand, shove your head up your ass and jump.
I call you a liar because that's what you are.
A fraud and a liar, a jihadist member of a sick death worshiping cult.
I've asked you to show the relationship between CO2 and temperature and you show charts with no temperature axis, which tells me you're a liar, for claiming you successfully posted said chart, and a moron
What lie do you believe I have told you Ian?
Well, I'm not asking for that exactly. I'm referring to surface warming not atmospheric warming.It would be helpful if you even had some rough idea of how much basic science you do not possess.
As to calling me a liar for posting facts you do not understand, shove your head up your ass and jump.
I call you a liar because that's what you are.
A fraud and a liar, a jihadist member of a sick death worshiping cult.
I've asked you to show the relationship between CO2 and temperature and you show charts with no temperature axis, which tells me you're a liar, for claiming you successfully posted said chart, and a moron
With "Agrees" from jc456, BillyBoy and Political Chic. So we have four people - one of whom claims to be working on a doctorate in meteorology - who demand an experiment showing how CO2 causes heating of the atmosphere. But when shown the absorption spectra of CO2: spectral radiance vs wavelength, insist they have not been given what they demanded. Billy Boy, why don't you explain the problem to one of your professors and ask him if he knows how to get the information out of me.
Wei, I'm not asking for that exactly. I'm referring to surface warming not atmospheric warming.It would be helpful if you even had some rough idea of how much basic science you do not possess.
As to calling me a liar for posting facts you do not understand, shove your head up your ass and jump.
I call you a liar because that's what you are.
A fraud and a liar, a jihadist member of a sick death worshiping cult.
I've asked you to show the relationship between CO2 and temperature and you show charts with no temperature axis, which tells me you're a liar, for claiming you successfully posted said chart, and a moron
With "Agrees" from jc456, BillyBoy and Political Chic. So we have four people - one of whom claims to be working on a doctorate in meteorology - who demand an experiment showing how CO2 causes heating of the atmosphere. But when shown the absorption spectra of CO2: spectral radiance vs wavelength, insist they have not been given what they demanded. Billy Boy, why don't you explain the problem to one of your professors and ask him if he knows how to get the information out of me.
Now Ian, you are engaged in lying. No, not going to fry us, going to make things a bit unpleasant.Wei, I'm not asking for that exactly. I'm referring to surface warming not atmospheric warming.It would be helpful if you even had some rough idea of how much basic science you do not possess.
As to calling me a liar for posting facts you do not understand, shove your head up your ass and jump.
I call you a liar because that's what you are.
A fraud and a liar, a jihadist member of a sick death worshiping cult.
I've asked you to show the relationship between CO2 and temperature and you show charts with no temperature axis, which tells me you're a liar, for claiming you successfully posted said chart, and a moron
With "Agrees" from jc456, BillyBoy and Political Chic. So we have four people - one of whom claims to be working on a doctorate in meteorology - who demand an experiment showing how CO2 causes heating of the atmosphere. But when shown the absorption spectra of CO2: spectral radiance vs wavelength, insist they have not been given what they demanded. Billy Boy, why don't you explain the problem to one of your professors and ask him if he knows how to get the information out of me.
yup. a few years ago it was all about surface warming from the near 50% of CO2 radiation being bounced back. and then 50% of that, and 50%...... 1 + 1/2 +1/4 +1/8....= 2 . CO2 had magically doubled the energy and was going to fry us all. you dont hear that too much anymore. where is konrad?
Hahahaha dude the stupid bugs bit youNow Ian, you are engaged in lying. No, not going to fry us, going to make things a bit unpleasant.Wei, I'm not asking for that exactly. I'm referring to surface warming not atmospheric warming.It would be helpful if you even had some rough idea of how much basic science you do not possess.
As to calling me a liar for posting facts you do not understand, shove your head up your ass and jump.
I call you a liar because that's what you are.
A fraud and a liar, a jihadist member of a sick death worshiping cult.
I've asked you to show the relationship between CO2 and temperature and you show charts with no temperature axis, which tells me you're a liar, for claiming you successfully posted said chart, and a moron
With "Agrees" from jc456, BillyBoy and Political Chic. So we have four people - one of whom claims to be working on a doctorate in meteorology - who demand an experiment showing how CO2 causes heating of the atmosphere. But when shown the absorption spectra of CO2: spectral radiance vs wavelength, insist they have not been given what they demanded. Billy Boy, why don't you explain the problem to one of your professors and ask him if he knows how to get the information out of me.
yup. a few years ago it was all about surface warming from the near 50% of CO2 radiation being bounced back. and then 50% of that, and 50%...... 1 + 1/2 +1/4 +1/8....= 2 . CO2 had magically doubled the energy and was going to fry us all. you dont hear that too much anymore. where is konrad?
Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag
Figure 3. Monthly March ice extent for 1979 to 2015 shows a decline of 2.6% per decade relative to the 1981 to 2010 average.
Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center
High-resolution image
Figure 4. The plot shows Arctic air temperature anomalies at the 925 hPa level in degrees Celsius for March 2015. Yellows and reds indicate higher than average temperatures; blues and purples indicate lower than average temperatures.
Credit: NSIDC courtesy NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Physical Sciences Division
High-resolution image
This is what is the proof of the experiment that we are at present conducting on this planet.
It would be helpful if you even had some rough idea of how much basic science you do not possess.
As to calling me a liar for posting facts you do not understand, shove your head up your ass and jump.
I call you a liar because that's what you are.
A fraud and a liar, a jihadist member of a sick death worshiping cult.
I've asked you to show the relationship between CO2 and temperature and you show charts with no temperature axis, which tells me you're a liar, for claiming you successfully posted said chart, and a moron
With "Agrees" from jc456, BillyBoy and Political Chic. So we have four people - one of whom claims to be working on a doctorate in meteorology - who demand an experiment showing how CO2 causes heating of the atmosphere. But when shown the absorption spectra of CO2: spectral radiance vs wavelength, insist they have not been given what they demanded. Billy Boy, why don't you explain the problem to one of your professors and ask him if he knows how to get the information out of me.
Now Ian, you are engaged in lying. No, not going to fry us, going to make things a bit unpleasant.Wei, I'm not asking for that exactly. I'm referring to surface warming not atmospheric warming.It would be helpful if you even had some rough idea of how much basic science you do not possess.
As to calling me a liar for posting facts you do not understand, shove your head up your ass and jump.
I call you a liar because that's what you are.
A fraud and a liar, a jihadist member of a sick death worshiping cult.
I've asked you to show the relationship between CO2 and temperature and you show charts with no temperature axis, which tells me you're a liar, for claiming you successfully posted said chart, and a moron
With "Agrees" from jc456, BillyBoy and Political Chic. So we have four people - one of whom claims to be working on a doctorate in meteorology - who demand an experiment showing how CO2 causes heating of the atmosphere. But when shown the absorption spectra of CO2: spectral radiance vs wavelength, insist they have not been given what they demanded. Billy Boy, why don't you explain the problem to one of your professors and ask him if he knows how to get the information out of me.
yup. a few years ago it was all about surface warming from the near 50% of CO2 radiation being bounced back. and then 50% of that, and 50%...... 1 + 1/2 +1/4 +1/8....= 2 . CO2 had magically doubled the energy and was going to fry us all. you dont hear that too much anymore. where is konrad?
Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag
Figure 3. Monthly March ice extent for 1979 to 2015 shows a decline of 2.6% per decade relative to the 1981 to 2010 average.
Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center
High-resolution image
Figure 4. The plot shows Arctic air temperature anomalies at the 925 hPa level in degrees Celsius for March 2015. Yellows and reds indicate higher than average temperatures; blues and purples indicate lower than average temperatures.
Credit: NSIDC courtesy NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Physical Sciences Division
High-resolution image
This is what is the proof of the experiment that we are at present conducting on this planet.