Poverty reached FIFTY-YEAR HIGH under obama

[HereWeGoAgain]

Facts are inconveniant to the Left. they run around all day making pathetic excuses for their failures and trying to resell FAILURE as success.


That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record
www.washingtontimes.com/.../obamas-rhetoric-o...

• Cached
• Similar

The Washington Times
Loading...
Jan 7, 2014 - That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record ... reduced the jobless rate to 7 percent from a high of 10 percent four years ago.

yeah, couldn't have anything to do with the wingnut congress that has obstructed for 61/2 years...

damn, you're stupid, boy.

What exactly did they "obstruct"?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nope, Gipped, you know better. Much better.

Supporting the RINOs are you?

Don't change the subject Fakey. Please prove that your Messiah hasn't gotten pretty much everything he has wanted.

Don't have to. He did not. You know better. Since it is your assertion, go for it.

As an aside, you are as silly as Redfish.

You think you can make an assertion and demand others to rebut you with evidence.

 

[gipper]

Nope, Gipped, you know better. Much better.

Supporting the RINOs are you?

Don't change the subject Fakey. Please prove that your Messiah hasn't gotten pretty much everything he has wanted.

Don't have to. He did not. You know better. Since it is your assertion, go for it.

As an aside, you are as silly as Redfish.

You think you can make an assertion and demand others to rebut you with evidence.

No...NO....NO Fakey.

I posted "Jesus...congress has given BO everything he has wanted."

Fakey posted "Now you just outright lie. If we adopted libertarian economics, we would increase worldwide poverty by 15% in six months."

You claim I am lying. What did I lie about Fakey?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nope, Gipped, you know better. Much better.

Supporting the RINOs are you?

Don't change the subject Fakey. Please prove that your Messiah hasn't gotten pretty much everything he has wanted.

Don't have to. He did not. You know better. Since it is your assertion, go for it.

As an aside, you are as silly as Redfish.

You think you can make an assertion and demand others to rebut you with evidence.

No...NO....NO Fakey.

I posted "Jesus...congress has given BO everything he has wanted."

Fakey posted "Now you just outright lie. If we adopted libertarian economics, we would increase worldwide poverty by 15% in six months."

You claim I am lying. What did I lie about Fakey?

Because you can't support your premise. You know it, I know it.

Tell us again where there is no far right reactionary plot against America. That always cracks up the Board, Gipped.

 

[gipper]

Nope, Gipped, you know better. Much better.

Supporting the RINOs are you?

Don't change the subject Fakey. Please prove that your Messiah hasn't gotten pretty much everything he has wanted.

Don't have to. He did not. You know better. Since it is your assertion, go for it.

As an aside, you are as silly as Redfish.

You think you can make an assertion and demand others to rebut you with evidence.

No...NO....NO Fakey.

I posted "Jesus...congress has given BO everything he has wanted."

Fakey posted "Now you just outright lie. If we adopted libertarian economics, we would increase worldwide poverty by 15% in six months."

You claim I am lying. What did I lie about Fakey?

Because you can't support your premise. You know it, I know it.

Tell us again where there is no far right reactionary plot against America. That always cracks up the Board, Gipped.

Fakey you claim I lied. What did I lie about?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nope, Gipped, you know better. Much better.

Supporting the RINOs are you?

Don't change the subject Fakey. Please prove that your Messiah hasn't gotten pretty much everything he has wanted.

Don't have to. He did not. You know better. Since it is your assertion, go for it.

As an aside, you are as silly as Redfish.

You think you can make an assertion and demand others to rebut you with evidence.

No...NO....NO Fakey.

I posted "Jesus...congress has given BO everything he has wanted."

Fakey posted "Now you just outright lie. If we adopted libertarian economics, we would increase worldwide poverty by 15% in six months."

You claim I am lying. What did I lie about Fakey?

Because you can't support your premise. You know it, I know it.

Tell us again where there is no far right reactionary plot against America. That always cracks up the Board, Gipped.

Fakey you claim I lied. What did I lie about?

You can't support your assertion, and if you won't, then you have lied, Gipped.

Snap to it, son. Trot out your evidence.

 

[gipper]

Don't change the subject Fakey. Please prove that your Messiah hasn't gotten pretty much everything he has wanted.

Don't have to. He did not. You know better. Since it is your assertion, go for it.

As an aside, you are as silly as Redfish.

You think you can make an assertion and demand others to rebut you with evidence.

No...NO....NO Fakey.

I posted "Jesus...congress has given BO everything he has wanted."

Fakey posted "Now you just outright lie. If we adopted libertarian economics, we would increase worldwide poverty by 15% in six months."

You claim I am lying. What did I lie about Fakey?

Because you can't support your premise. You know it, I know it.

Tell us again where there is no far right reactionary plot against America. That always cracks up the Board, Gipped.

Fakey you claim I lied. What did I lie about?

You can't support your assertion, and if you won't, then you have lied, Gipped.

Snap to it, son. Trot out your evidence.

So Obama has only four vetoes so far and none were overturned by Congress. That alone proves my assertion. If your dreaded and feared Rs were truly adversarial, why would Big Ears have only four vetoes?

 

[JakeStarkey]

That proves nothing. Show us everything that Obama was given by Congress. That or you are lying, Gipped.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Facts are inconveniant to the Left. they run around all day making pathetic excuses for their failures and trying to resell FAILURE as success.


That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record
www.washingtontimes.com/.../obamas-rhetoric-o...

• Cached
• Similar

The Washington Times
Loading...
Jan 7, 2014 - That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record ... reduced the jobless rate to 7 percent from a high of 10 percent four years ago.

Not exactly a ringing endorsement of Socialism...is it?

 

[gipper]

That proves nothing. Show us everything that Obama was given by Congress. That or you are lying, Gipped.

He was given everything Fakey...because Congress stopped nothing.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

So.....

Does everyone agree poverty is at a fifty year high ?

 

[bodecea]

Facts are inconveniant to the Left. they run around all day making pathetic excuses for their failures and trying to resell FAILURE as success.


That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record
www.washingtontimes.com/.../obamas-rhetoric-o...

• Cached
• Similar

The Washington Times
Loading...
Jan 7, 2014 - That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record ... reduced the jobless rate to 7 percent from a high of 10 percent four years ago.

Don't you get paid enough to post here?

 

[JakeStarkey]

So.....

Does everyone agree poverty is at a fifty year high ?

Not in percentages, no.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Facts are inconveniant to the Left. they run around all day making pathetic excuses for their failures and trying to resell FAILURE as success.


That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record
www.washingtontimes.com/.../obamas-rhetoric-o...

• Cached
• Similar

The Washington Times
Loading...
Jan 7, 2014 - That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record ... reduced the jobless rate to 7 percent from a high of 10 percent four years ago.

Not true.

The True US Poverty Rate Is 4.5%, Not 14.5%

 

[JakeStarkey]

Facts are inconveniant to the Left. they run around all day making pathetic excuses for their failures and trying to resell FAILURE as success.


That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record
www.washingtontimes.com/.../obamas-rhetoric-o...

• Cached
• Similar

The Washington Times
Loading...
Jan 7, 2014 - That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record ... reduced the jobless rate to 7 percent from a high of 10 percent four years ago.

Not true.

The True US Poverty Rate Is 4.5%, Not 14.5%

If it were the latter, then it would be half of the rate in 1960.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Facts are inconveniant to the Left. they run around all day making pathetic excuses for their failures and trying to resell FAILURE as success.


That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record
www.washingtontimes.com/.../obamas-rhetoric-o...

• Cached
• Similar

The Washington Times
Loading...
Jan 7, 2014 - That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record ... reduced the jobless rate to 7 percent from a high of 10 percent four years ago.

Not true.

The True US Poverty Rate Is 4.5%, Not 14.5%

If it were the latter, then it would be half of the rate in 1960.

They calculate the poverty rate while leaving out most of the poverty programs that the poor get to alleviate their poverty,

and then they use those numbers to attack the poverty programs. It's insane.

 

[MisterBeale]

Facts are inconveniant to the Left. they run around all day making pathetic excuses for their failures and trying to resell FAILURE as success.


That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record
www.washingtontimes.com/.../obamas-rhetoric-o...

• Cached
• Similar

The Washington Times
Loading...
Jan 7, 2014 - That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record ... reduced the jobless rate to 7 percent from a high of 10 percent four years ago.

Not true.

The True US Poverty Rate Is 4.5%, Not 14.5%

If it were the latter, then it would be half of the rate in 1960.

They calculate the poverty rate while leaving out most of the poverty programs that the poor get to alleviate their poverty,

and then they use those numbers to attack the poverty programs. It's insane.

What if in order to get those programs, you aren't allowed to get an education, you aren't allowed to look for a job, you aren't allowed to get married, you aren't allowed to find a better place to live, you aren't allowed to visit friends or relatives in other states, etc.

What sort of programs are these? Sounds like they are programs meant to trap people where they are, keep them tethered to these programs for survival, and keep them voting for the people that keep the programs as they are. You have to love the genius of the bureaucracy. It's self-perpetuating slavery. Down to the destruction of the host.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Facts are inconveniant to the Left. they run around all day making pathetic excuses for their failures and trying to resell FAILURE as success.


That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record
www.washingtontimes.com/.../obamas-rhetoric-o...

• Cached
• Similar

The Washington Times
Loading...
Jan 7, 2014 - That's rich: Poverty level under Obama breaks 50-year record ... reduced the jobless rate to 7 percent from a high of 10 percent four years ago.

Not true.

The True US Poverty Rate Is 4.5%, Not 14.5%

If it were the latter, then it would be half of the rate in 1960.

They calculate the poverty rate while leaving out most of the poverty programs that the poor get to alleviate their poverty,

and then they use those numbers to attack the poverty programs. It's insane.

What if in order to get those programs, you aren't allowed to get an education, you aren't allowed to look for a job, you aren't allowed to get married, you aren't allowed to find a better place to live, you aren't allowed to visit friends or relatives in other states, etc.

What sort of programs are these? Sounds like they are programs meant to trap people where they are, keep them tethered to these programs for survival, and keep them voting for the people that keep the programs as they are. You have to love the genius of the bureaucracy. It's self-perpetuating slavery. Down to the destruction of the host.

We have no such programs. Anyone who wants to use government programs to escape government assistance can do so.

 

[rdean]

Imagine that, a president being handed a live grenade who has to deal with an entire party that refuses to compromise. Tell me, what should Obama do to prevent this poverty? Tax cuts for the rich?

Hilarious. And Republicans believed after the deficit creating Bush Tax cuts, the two unpaid for wars and the failed economy, we were on the road to prosperity. We only needed to move a few more jobs to China. The millions moved there under Bush weren't enough. But the more than 40,000 factories closed was a good start.

Back from 2009, when Obama was sworn into office:

40,000 factories closed under Bush - Google Search

The Plight of American Manufacturing

Since 2001, the country has lost 42,400 factories, including 36 percent of factories that employ more than 1,000 workers (which declined from 1,479 to 947), and 38 percent of factories that employ between 500 and 999 employees (from 3,198 to 1,972). An additional 90,000 manufacturing companies are now at risk of going out of business.

Yet, total manufacturing gross domestic product in 2008 (at $1.64 trillion) represented 11.5 percent of U.S. economic output, down from 17 percent in 1999

---------------------------------------------------

And what have these Republican turds done since they tried to destroy the country? Doubled down. Blocked every jobs bill. Defunded education.

If there agenda isn't destroy America, I don't know what it is.

 

[jillian]

you dont know how to do anything but make a fool of yourself idiot

i specifically mentioned polices you blame for the "disaster" that DEMOCRATS VOTED FOR.......................not "jobs bills" that you dont know would have made a difference

Remember "SHOVEL-READY WASNT SO SHOVE-READY" LEFTARD??

your disaster, winger.... the result of baby bush and the other rightwqinguts crashing our economy and you freaks not getting out of the way to get things fixed. that said, our economy is far better now than 6 1/2 years ago despite you loons. I can see why you freaks hate that.

maybe if you weren't competing for jobs with people who can't speak English you wouldn't be so angry and dishonest.

but then again, someone of your clear lack of education and knowledge and ability/.... I can see why you feel angry.

creep.

so why didn't Obama's almost trillion dollar Recovery Act recover the economy....?

well, whining pigeon, it pretty much did. now iv you idiots would get rid of the sequester and stop cutting taxes for the top 1% and get the hell out of the way....... .