kiwiman127
Comfortably Moderate
You want the middle class to be revitalized, reduce taxes and regulations so companies can manufacture more in this country. As manufacturing goes so goes the middle class.
Corporate America is seeing record profits, yet they are not including their employed wage earners in the financial end of their success. It's so obvious, it baffles one's mind how you came to such an outlandish conclusion.
You are talking about trickle down which hasn't worked. You say welfare hasn't worked, What does welfare have to do with working wage earners? They are earning their wages, they are not sitting on their ass looking for a hand out. Or is it that workers deserving to be rewarded for the contribution to a company's success now welfare?
View attachment 36010
First of all, Kiwi...when you use the term "trickle down" you immediately send the message that you are totally ignorant about economics and business in general. There is no such thing...it's a term used by progressives to mock supply side economics. Profits trickle up...not down! Employed wage earners get paid their wage whether a profit is made or not...they don't make what is left over after companies take what they see fit.
Actually Oldstyle, I use trickle down for a good reason.
It seems every solution for lifting the Middle Class up that is offered from the right, involves helping the groups that are financially superior to the Middle Class. That is because in theory, when those groups are helped and gain more wealth, then those groups will help the Middle Class (create more jobs/raise wages). Wouldn't that involve trickle down?
There was a time when businesses did reward their employees because the business had good earning. What was that?
Look at the graph below. We see in earlier years companies compensated their employees much more generously than they do now, That was trickle down. Note that this trend reversed itself. That is the trickle up you mentioned. One can certainly see when things changed.
"Employed wage earners get paid their wage whether a profit is made or not...they don't make what is left over after companies take what they see fit" If there are no profits, companies downsize or cut hours of their workforce, it's against the law not to pay their workers.
By the way, when I went to college where I got my degree in Business Administration and Marketing, I did take three quarters of econ. I was also a General Manager of a chain of men's clothing stores. When business was good, the employees were rewarded either by raises or by bonuses.. The saying "a happy employee is a good employee" is true in my book. When business was soft, we worked with fewer employees.
Anyway, take a look at the graph, it says a lot.
View attachment 36020
I'm curious then, Kiwiman...when business was bad did you tell your employees that they had to give back part of the wages that they made so that the corporation could maintain their profits? I'm guessing that was a no?
If there were no profits your employees still got paid. It's why the whole "trickle down" thing is laughably inaccurate. Profits trickle up. If I start a business, I have to pay for the space I'm going to run the business out of...I have to hire and train my staff...I have to pay for advertising to let the public know that I exist...I have to buy the raw materials to make my product or perform my service. I have to get permits and licenses from various governmental entities before they'll let me open the doors. All this takes place before the first dollar comes back into the business. I'm risking large amounts of capital on the anticipation of making a profit. So where is it that your supposed "trickle down" takes place?
Oldstyle, I mentioned that when we had a good year, people got raises and people got very generous bonuses. Also, we had people who wanted to be there because we took good care of the employees. When times were tougher, inventory levels were decreased before we had to lay off people. In most cases the employees were hired back after short layoffs. And because people wanted to be there they were good employees and went out of their way to provide excellent customer service. The employees felt they were part of comapny and were treated like family, not like "just an employee.
That company was in business over a 120 years before they sold off their stores to stores and in many cases, the stores were sold to the employees.
Those days were the good old days, there aren't many companies that operate like that anymore.