President Tiny Hands LIED about counterprotesters not having permit

[jknowgood]

Why is a domestic terrorist organization like the white nationalists be given a permit?

The same reason the queers get one. It's a free country.

 

[Aldo Raine]

Their event permit did not allow them to block "fire lanes, vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow."

It seems the Dodge did most of the blocking in this lil shit show.

Nooo...pretty sure it cleared out the street.

Ya good point, bet your proud.

Nah..just flabbergasted that antifa members wonder why they get their shit pushed in after being dicks for so long.

How cool, maybe you Nazi can fix a vehicle up Mad Max style for the next klans meeting to inflict maximum damage.

 

[Norman]

Their event permit did not allow them to block "fire lanes, vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow."

It seems the Dodge did most of the blocking in this lil shit show.

Nooo...pretty sure it cleared out the street.

Ya good point, bet your proud.

Nah..just flabbergasted that antifa members wonder why they get their shit pushed in after being dicks for so long.

How cool, maybe you Nazi can fix a vehicle up Mad Max style for the next klans meeting to inflict maximum damage.

It's noted how close your delusions are to the recent occurrences in Barcelona, perhaps you should perform some self-reflecting.

 

[jon_berzerk]

President Trump’s false claim that counterprotesters lacked a permit

The Facts


Walt Heinecke, a professor at the University of Virginia, told Moyer that he received a “special events certificate of approval” for events at McGuffey Park and Justice Park — sites blocks from Emancipation Park, where white nationalists had a permit for a Saturday rally. A car allegedly driven by James Alex Fields Jr. rammed into counterprotesters, killing a 32-year-old woman, on Fourth Street, which runs adjacent to Justice Park.

Trump again misleads his sheeple with bad information.

hazel nut once again demonstrating he is indeed a nut

--LOL

no permit for the area they moved too

--LOL

 

[xotoxi]

President Trump’s false claim that counterprotesters lacked a permit

The Facts


Walt Heinecke, a professor at the University of Virginia, told Moyer that he received a “special events certificate of approval” for events at McGuffey Park and Justice Park — sites blocks from Emancipation Park, where white nationalists had a permit for a Saturday rally. A car allegedly driven by James Alex Fields Jr. rammed into counterprotesters, killing a 32-year-old woman, on Fourth Street, which runs adjacent to Justice Park.

Trump again misleads his sheeple with bad information.

See...this is what happens when you speak about an issue when you haven't gotten all of the facts.

Hopefully Trump learns from his mistake.

 

[Lakhota]

 

[martybegan]

The Comrade said they did not have a permit. It lied, again, and again, and again, and again again, and again, and again, and again again, and again, and again, and again again, and again, and again, and again.

They didn't have a permit for emancipation park.

 

[martybegan]

The Comrade said they did not have a permit. It lied, again, and again, and again, and again again, and again, and again, and again again, and again, and again, and again again, and again, and again, and again.

Their permit was for areas far removed from where the protest was taking place.

Read the link. The white supremacists got a permit to hold their rally in a public park. Because it was in a public park, other people could go there if they wanted, even if it was to protest the rally. And, there are no restrictions on access for the sidewalks and roads leading to the public park. Those are public access ways to the park.

However if they appear to disrupt the permitted rally they can be considered an unlawful assembly and be asked to leave.

 

[martybegan]

People defending someone that ran a car over a crowd of people on an American street.

Conservatism you have been outed by your own actions.

Who's defending that guy?

 

[martybegan]

Shouldn't the so-called constitutional conservatives be telling us that nowhere in the Constitution does it say you need a permit to exercise your right of assembly?

That is indeed the case, however as long as permits are issued expeditiously, only are needed when you have large groups involved, and are not restricted due to content one can see the reasonableness of letting local agencies know ahead of time when a large protest is going to occur.

 

[iceberg]

Read your own connection you bloody simpering fool. They had no legal permit for Emancipation Park. They blocked the only two exits for the rally attendees.

Did YOU bother to read the whole link? Counter protesters didn't need a permit to be in the park.

From the link....................

Charlottesville spokeswoman Miriam I. Dickler told Moyer that only one permit was issued for Emancipation Park — the one received by white nationalists staging the “Unite the Right” rally. However, counterprotesters did not need permits to protest that rally, she said.


“Please bear in mind that people do not need a permit to enter a public park, even when another event is scheduled to take place there, nor are they required to have one to be on streets or sidewalks adjacent to or outside the park,” Dickler said in an email.

Per the spokeswoman, people don't need a permit to enter a public park, even when another event is taking place there. And, they don't need one for the streets or sidewalks adjacent either.

Yeah, the white supremacists did get their permit to hold a rally. But, the people who showed up to protest their rally didn't need a permit, because it's a public park.

so they showed up to peacefully protest. right? anything else is not legal.

are we in agreement here?

 

[iceberg]

Shouldn't the so-called constitutional conservatives be telling us that nowhere in the Constitution does it say you need a permit to exercise your right of assembly?

That is indeed the case, however as long as permits are issued expeditiously, only are needed when you have large groups involved, and are not restricted due to content one can see the reasonableness of letting local agencies know ahead of time when a large protest is going to occur.

the 2 permits never should have been provided like they were. that's just asking for trouble.

that said, the left is already touting they didn't need one to crash the party so again - above the law cause they're right. and stuff.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Shouldn't the so-called constitutional conservatives be telling us that nowhere in the Constitution does it say you need a permit to exercise your right of assembly?

That is indeed the case, however as long as permits are issued expeditiously, only are needed when you have large groups involved, and are not restricted due to content one can see the reasonableness of letting local agencies know ahead of time when a large protest is going to occur.

I guess then you can see the reasonableness of requiring a background check before you sell someone a gun.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Read your own connection you bloody simpering fool. They had no legal permit for Emancipation Park. They blocked the only two exits for the rally attendees.

Did YOU bother to read the whole link? Counter protesters didn't need a permit to be in the park.

From the link....................

Charlottesville spokeswoman Miriam I. Dickler told Moyer that only one permit was issued for Emancipation Park — the one received by white nationalists staging the “Unite the Right” rally. However, counterprotesters did not need permits to protest that rally, she said.


“Please bear in mind that people do not need a permit to enter a public park, even when another event is scheduled to take place there, nor are they required to have one to be on streets or sidewalks adjacent to or outside the park,” Dickler said in an email.

Per the spokeswoman, people don't need a permit to enter a public park, even when another event is taking place there. And, they don't need one for the streets or sidewalks adjacent either.

Yeah, the white supremacists did get their permit to hold a rally. But, the people who showed up to protest their rally didn't need a permit, because it's a public park.

so they showed up to peacefully protest. right? anything else is not legal.

are we in agreement here?

Both sides had violent components, so that's a wash.

What isn't a wash is the difference between being FOR white supremacy or AGAINST it.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Charlottesville’s Democrat Mayor and VA’s Democrat Governor Terry McAuliffe(total sleaze bag) are who authorize the Neo-Nazi parade. They are trying to instigate race riots to increase racial tensions and Democrat voter turn-out.

 

[Auld Phart]

FANTASTIC!!!

another comedian weighs in.

Will she top her ridiculous comment about being able to see Russia from her front porch?

 

[martybegan]

Shouldn't the so-called constitutional conservatives be telling us that nowhere in the Constitution does it say you need a permit to exercise your right of assembly?

That is indeed the case, however as long as permits are issued expeditiously, only are needed when you have large groups involved, and are not restricted due to content one can see the reasonableness of letting local agencies know ahead of time when a large protest is going to occur.

the 2 permits never should have been provided like they were. that's just asking for trouble.

that said, the left is already touting they didn't need one to crash the party so again - above the law cause they're right. and stuff.

you don't need a permit to counter-protest, unless it is an organized one.

 

[martybegan]

Shouldn't the so-called constitutional conservatives be telling us that nowhere in the Constitution does it say you need a permit to exercise your right of assembly?

That is indeed the case, however as long as permits are issued expeditiously, only are needed when you have large groups involved, and are not restricted due to content one can see the reasonableness of letting local agencies know ahead of time when a large protest is going to occur.

I guess then you can see the reasonableness of requiring a background check before you sell someone a gun.

As long as it is done instantaneously, yes. I have never said quick background checks are unconstitutional.

The one NYC does is, where it takes 3-6 months to complete.

 

[iceberg]

Shouldn't the so-called constitutional conservatives be telling us that nowhere in the Constitution does it say you need a permit to exercise your right of assembly?

That is indeed the case, however as long as permits are issued expeditiously, only are needed when you have large groups involved, and are not restricted due to content one can see the reasonableness of letting local agencies know ahead of time when a large protest is going to occur.

the 2 permits never should have been provided like they were. that's just asking for trouble.

that said, the left is already touting they didn't need one to crash the party so again - above the law cause they're right. and stuff.

you don't need a permit to counter-protest, unless it is an organized one.

my understanding is they had a permit to rally "close by" and decided to raid the neighbors party and tell them how violent they are.

1st - needed a permit, 2nd no. but in either case i'm pretty sure the violence on either side was not "permitted".

 

[OldLady]

Maybe because the Nazi's also moved?