Oh, am I? Please cite my post, or posts plural, where I say Jesus is good with racism so I can address my
Holy shit Correll! You’re still on this burning churches narrative?! I addressed that yesterday and you ignored my points. The issue isn’t about a president taking a stance against burning churches. We are unified in being against burning churches. You know damn well what the issues are over with this situation. It’s being laid out for you over and over again. If you can’t have an honest debate then what the hell are you doing here? Trolling? Do betterLook at all that deflection.Unity is a two way street.
From a Trump supporter. Correct. What part of that is confusing to you?
You people are divisive. Not us, not Trump.
As this example shows to the nth degree.
Perhaps if you held the posters I quoted (and you deleted) accountable for their words with the same tenacity with which you complain about those who dare to criticize Trump, you could be taken seriously.
Right now, all you can really see is one side of this. Zero empathy, just like Trump.
I'm not asking you to disavow some list of anti-white racists before I accept your support on the controversial stance of NOT BURNING CHURCHES.
Rightwinger is actually quite racist against whites. Have I every shoved quotes from him in your face and demanded that you do "hold him accountable" for his misdeeds?
You have choices and you make them, and then find reasons for them afterwards.
Your side is choosing to tear America apart.
People are dying in the streets and you are continuing to refuse to unite on ANYTHING.
You do realize that this will only get worse, if you continue to do more of the same, right?
You absolutely refuse to hold your side accountable. I'm not afraid to hold my side accountable.
You're not to be taken seriously.
No deflection. YOu made a point, and I addressed it seriously and honestly.
You are supporting division to the point that you can't support Trump on NOT BURNING CHURCHES.
Unity does not require complete agreement or satisfaction on all issues. If so, unity would never occur.
I cited one person, M. Budde, who claimed there was no damage done to the church.
You still haven’t posted a quote or video of her saying that. I’ve read her quote about trump and the USA Today article you posted and nowhere did she lie about the fire. I’ve still got my money on you taking it out of context and that’s why you won’t post a quote of what you’re talking about. Either that or you’re simply parroting fake news
You’re being dishonest thinking this issue was simply a church visit... it was everything that surrounded the visitYes, that would be one issue among many.If you include eligible voters who didn't vote, only about 26% of eligible voters actually voted for him in 2016.I think he cares about himself and tries to wrap himself on the flag to pander to his supporters. If he truly cared about America he would at least try to represent ALL of America and not only the 30% that support him while demonizing the rest.This is a moment in which the country needs a leader with great, sincere empathy.So I’m either a liar or a racist huh? That’s an interesting analysis. Don’t know why I would waste my time explaining my case to somebody so narrow minded. How about you just go on assuming both and carry on dismissing everything I say
they thought it would trigger the Left and start a big fight and his supporters would love it. As the Left bitched about Trump being at church with a bible they could make that the debate and fight back by calling the Left unhinged and focusing on meaningless stuff as communities burn. These are the divisive little fires that Trump lites all the time. It’s how he diverts the heat of bad press to a different fight that he feels better about fighting. Usually from serious stuff to petty stuff in his wheel house.It still blows my mind that he thought that standing there with someone's Bible and a stern look on his face was going to accomplish something.
2 corinthians told the chosen one to hold it backwards & upside down for that stellar photo op....
View attachment 345431
I wonder what the goal was. I wonder what his staff was thinking when they saw him doing that.
None to be found in this White House.
President Trump cares a lot about America, that much is clear.
So he figures that's all he needs to pander to. He may be right, we'll see. But he doesn't give a shit about the rest.
Speaking out against burning churches is not pandering to 26% of the country.
Exceptions prove the rule.
Your anti-Trump hate and anger are making you see completely reasonable acts, is an insanely dark light.
What exactly, is "surrounding" Trump's visit to the Church, that is sooooo terrible to justify your hysteria?
how about this cartoon boy:
Breaking|Jun 2, 2020,12:25pm EDT
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
Tommy BeerForbes Staff
Business
TOPLINE
Rev. Gini Gerbasi, who serves as rector at a neighboring church, said armored police forcibly removed her and other priests from the patio of Saint John's Episcopal Church, shortly before President Trump was photographed in front of Saint John's holding a bible.
At approximately 6:40 pm, police suddenly began to expel peaceful demonstrators from the park, firing tear gas and flash grenades to disperse the crowd.
Gerbasi said that a short time later, police in riot gear started "pushing on to the patio of St. John's," and that people around her began crying out in pain, claiming to be shot with non-lethal projectiles.
"I'm there in my little pink sweater in my collar, my gray hair up in a ponytail, my reading glasses on," said Gerbas, as she and others were forced to flee the scene.
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
he didn't give a damn about the church.
You had a choice between unifying around an anti-burning church message
or attacking the President.
YOu choose to be divisive.
Nothing will ever please you. YOu are full of hate and anger.
it was a photo op.
i'm attacking yer chosen one for gassing american citizens, flashbanging american citizens, on american soil - who WERE PEACEFULLY protesting & exercising their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to do so.
he didn't go inside. he held that bible upside down, & backwards & admitted it wasn't even his.
he's not religious. he never was. never will be.
& he was playing to the evangelisticals because he knows he's starting to lose some of them. besides the fucking racist POS, he needs the bible thumpers to
vote for him.
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, would you be supporting his message? LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue. It is something everyone can support. It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest. You are the one making an issue out of this.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
^
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
a photo op for his campaign. by using the pomp & circumstance, but not using the reality behind the scenes that got him there....
typical of a snake oil salesman.
if he cared about places of worship - he wouldn't have bombed that mosque in iran that was directly against the geneva convention.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, ...
you mean by gassing & flashbanging PEACEFUL PROTESTERS NOT INVOLVED AT ALL WITH THAT CHURCH BURNING.
would you be supporting his message?
that wasn't his message. his message was for the thumpers to still vote for him come november - cause he needs them bigley.
LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
you are so full of adoration for yer chosen one, that you are giving donny a huuuuuuuuuuge pass as he took a shit all over the 1st amendment.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
sure it is. it was just a show & nothing more. a means to an end. he's a fucking hypocrite & doesn't care about ANY place of worship. see my reply re: #1
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue.
not exclusively, no. but this time, it was ... for the chosen one.
It is something everyone can support.
yep, for real reasons. not for a photo op.
It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest.
yep. except that photo op did not involve any civil unrest.
& when it was done with violence on the chosen one's part - against peaceful protesters, so his base would get a hard on for him - it sickens those who saw it for what it was.
You are the one making an issue out of this.
donny's answer to clear the way for his photo op by gassing & flash banging peaceful protesters exercising their constitutional right to free speech & peaceful assembly to petition grievences against the gov'ment is one hell of an issue.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
lol.... ^^^ TRIGGERED ^^^
1. Your assumptions about his motives are noted. I already addressed your side's impressive ability to come up with "Reasons" for your division.
2. He is not religious, but he is against burning churches. That you find that hard to believe, is just you being bat shit crazy.
3. Telling a race baiting asshole to shove their wacism up their ass, is not being triggered, it is a normal and healthy response, you fucking asshole.
4. Also, fuck you, you piece of shit.
i've watched donny in action for 40 years. i know exactly of which i speak. he was NEVER interested in church burnings until now.
if he has a history of speaking out when it's happened in the past - you would have a point. he never did, so the only point you are making is how you will adore him until the day he croaks.
oh ya.... you are SO triggered.
He wasn't President before. It was not his job to address them before. Who would care what some real estate guy from New York City has to say about some church arson?
I am not triggered. You called me a name, so I called you names back. Your confusion about how that works is just you being a stupid whore. FUCK OFF.
he spoke out about many issues. including 9/11 & invading iraq when he was just the manwhore of NYC.
you are always triggered, CB.
Your expectation that you should be able to call me names and still get civil discourse from me,
is you being a piece of shit.
YOU replied to me FIRST on this thread.
YOU called ME a name FIRST on this thread.
MY point stands.
YOU are triggered.
Holy shit Correll! You’re still on this burning churches narrative?! I addressed that yesterday and you ignored my points. The issue isn’t about a president taking a stance against burning churches. We are unified in being against burning churches. You know damn well what the issues are over with this situation. It’s being laid out for you over and over again. If you can’t have an honest debate then what the hell are you doing here? Trolling? Do betterLook at all that deflection.Unity is a two way street.
From a Trump supporter. Correct. What part of that is confusing to you?
You people are divisive. Not us, not Trump.
As this example shows to the nth degree.
Perhaps if you held the posters I quoted (and you deleted) accountable for their words with the same tenacity with which you complain about those who dare to criticize Trump, you could be taken seriously.
Right now, all you can really see is one side of this. Zero empathy, just like Trump.
I'm not asking you to disavow some list of anti-white racists before I accept your support on the controversial stance of NOT BURNING CHURCHES.
Rightwinger is actually quite racist against whites. Have I every shoved quotes from him in your face and demanded that you do "hold him accountable" for his misdeeds?
You have choices and you make them, and then find reasons for them afterwards.
Your side is choosing to tear America apart.
People are dying in the streets and you are continuing to refuse to unite on ANYTHING.
You do realize that this will only get worse, if you continue to do more of the same, right?
You absolutely refuse to hold your side accountable. I'm not afraid to hold my side accountable.
You're not to be taken seriously.
No deflection. YOu made a point, and I addressed it seriously and honestly.
You are supporting division to the point that you can't support Trump on NOT BURNING CHURCHES.
Unity does not require complete agreement or satisfaction on all issues. If so, unity would never occur.
Your post absolutely displays you being triggered. You can’t restrain yourself from profanity and petty insults. That’s text book trigger. Sorry.You’re being dishonest thinking this issue was simply a church visit... it was everything that surrounded the visitYes, that would be one issue among many.If you include eligible voters who didn't vote, only about 26% of eligible voters actually voted for him in 2016.I think he cares about himself and tries to wrap himself on the flag to pander to his supporters. If he truly cared about America he would at least try to represent ALL of America and not only the 30% that support him while demonizing the rest.This is a moment in which the country needs a leader with great, sincere empathy.So I’m either a liar or a racist huh? That’s an interesting analysis. Don’t know why I would waste my time explaining my case to somebody so narrow minded. How about you just go on assuming both and carry on dismissing everything I say
they thought it would trigger the Left and start a big fight and his supporters would love it. As the Left bitched about Trump being at church with a bible they could make that the debate and fight back by calling the Left unhinged and focusing on meaningless stuff as communities burn. These are the divisive little fires that Trump lites all the time. It’s how he diverts the heat of bad press to a different fight that he feels better about fighting. Usually from serious stuff to petty stuff in his wheel house.It still blows my mind that he thought that standing there with someone's Bible and a stern look on his face was going to accomplish something.
2 corinthians told the chosen one to hold it backwards & upside down for that stellar photo op....
View attachment 345431
I wonder what the goal was. I wonder what his staff was thinking when they saw him doing that.
None to be found in this White House.
President Trump cares a lot about America, that much is clear.
So he figures that's all he needs to pander to. He may be right, we'll see. But he doesn't give a shit about the rest.
Speaking out against burning churches is not pandering to 26% of the country.
Exceptions prove the rule.
Your anti-Trump hate and anger are making you see completely reasonable acts, is an insanely dark light.
What exactly, is "surrounding" Trump's visit to the Church, that is sooooo terrible to justify your hysteria?
how about this cartoon boy:
Breaking|Jun 2, 2020,12:25pm EDT
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
Tommy BeerForbes Staff
Business
TOPLINE
Rev. Gini Gerbasi, who serves as rector at a neighboring church, said armored police forcibly removed her and other priests from the patio of Saint John's Episcopal Church, shortly before President Trump was photographed in front of Saint John's holding a bible.
At approximately 6:40 pm, police suddenly began to expel peaceful demonstrators from the park, firing tear gas and flash grenades to disperse the crowd.
Gerbasi said that a short time later, police in riot gear started "pushing on to the patio of St. John's," and that people around her began crying out in pain, claiming to be shot with non-lethal projectiles.
"I'm there in my little pink sweater in my collar, my gray hair up in a ponytail, my reading glasses on," said Gerbas, as she and others were forced to flee the scene.
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
he didn't give a damn about the church.
You had a choice between unifying around an anti-burning church message
or attacking the President.
YOu choose to be divisive.
Nothing will ever please you. YOu are full of hate and anger.
it was a photo op.
i'm attacking yer chosen one for gassing american citizens, flashbanging american citizens, on american soil - who WERE PEACEFULLY protesting & exercising their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to do so.
he didn't go inside. he held that bible upside down, & backwards & admitted it wasn't even his.
he's not religious. he never was. never will be.
& he was playing to the evangelisticals because he knows he's starting to lose some of them. besides the fucking racist POS, he needs the bible thumpers to
vote for him.
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, would you be supporting his message? LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue. It is something everyone can support. It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest. You are the one making an issue out of this.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
^
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
a photo op for his campaign. by using the pomp & circumstance, but not using the reality behind the scenes that got him there....
typical of a snake oil salesman.
if he cared about places of worship - he wouldn't have bombed that mosque in iran that was directly against the geneva convention.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, ...
you mean by gassing & flashbanging PEACEFUL PROTESTERS NOT INVOLVED AT ALL WITH THAT CHURCH BURNING.
would you be supporting his message?
that wasn't his message. his message was for the thumpers to still vote for him come november - cause he needs them bigley.
LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
you are so full of adoration for yer chosen one, that you are giving donny a huuuuuuuuuuge pass as he took a shit all over the 1st amendment.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
sure it is. it was just a show & nothing more. a means to an end. he's a fucking hypocrite & doesn't care about ANY place of worship. see my reply re: #1
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue.
not exclusively, no. but this time, it was ... for the chosen one.
It is something everyone can support.
yep, for real reasons. not for a photo op.
It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest.
yep. except that photo op did not involve any civil unrest.
& when it was done with violence on the chosen one's part - against peaceful protesters, so his base would get a hard on for him - it sickens those who saw it for what it was.
You are the one making an issue out of this.
donny's answer to clear the way for his photo op by gassing & flash banging peaceful protesters exercising their constitutional right to free speech & peaceful assembly to petition grievences against the gov'ment is one hell of an issue.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
lol.... ^^^ TRIGGERED ^^^
1. Your assumptions about his motives are noted. I already addressed your side's impressive ability to come up with "Reasons" for your division.
2. He is not religious, but he is against burning churches. That you find that hard to believe, is just you being bat shit crazy.
3. Telling a race baiting asshole to shove their wacism up their ass, is not being triggered, it is a normal and healthy response, you fucking asshole.
4. Also, fuck you, you piece of shit.
i've watched donny in action for 40 years. i know exactly of which i speak. he was NEVER interested in church burnings until now.
if he has a history of speaking out when it's happened in the past - you would have a point. he never did, so the only point you are making is how you will adore him until the day he croaks.
oh ya.... you are SO triggered.
He wasn't President before. It was not his job to address them before. Who would care what some real estate guy from New York City has to say about some church arson?
I am not triggered. You called me a name, so I called you names back. Your confusion about how that works is just you being a stupid whore. FUCK OFF.
he spoke out about many issues. including 9/11 & invading iraq when he was just the manwhore of NYC.
you are always triggered, CB.
Your expectation that you should be able to call me names and still get civil discourse from me,
is you being a piece of shit.
YOU replied to me FIRST on this thread.
YOU called ME a name FIRST on this thread.
MY point stands.
YOU are triggered.
As fairly normal for a lib, you are such an asshole, you do it, without even realizing that you do it.
I don't care. I'm not giving you a pass, because you are so fucking stupid, that you don't even realize what a fucking asshole you are.
Stupidity is not an excuse for you being asshole.
That is not triggered, you fucking moron, that is me giving you the treatment that you have earned.
But he's a Trumpian unifier!Your post absolutely displays you being triggered. You can’t restrain yourself from profanity and petty insults. That’s text book trigger. Sorry.You’re being dishonest thinking this issue was simply a church visit... it was everything that surrounded the visitYes, that would be one issue among many.If you include eligible voters who didn't vote, only about 26% of eligible voters actually voted for him in 2016.I think he cares about himself and tries to wrap himself on the flag to pander to his supporters. If he truly cared about America he would at least try to represent ALL of America and not only the 30% that support him while demonizing the rest.This is a moment in which the country needs a leader with great, sincere empathy.So I’m either a liar or a racist huh? That’s an interesting analysis. Don’t know why I would waste my time explaining my case to somebody so narrow minded. How about you just go on assuming both and carry on dismissing everything I say
they thought it would trigger the Left and start a big fight and his supporters would love it. As the Left bitched about Trump being at church with a bible they could make that the debate and fight back by calling the Left unhinged and focusing on meaningless stuff as communities burn. These are the divisive little fires that Trump lites all the time. It’s how he diverts the heat of bad press to a different fight that he feels better about fighting. Usually from serious stuff to petty stuff in his wheel house.It still blows my mind that he thought that standing there with someone's Bible and a stern look on his face was going to accomplish something.
2 corinthians told the chosen one to hold it backwards & upside down for that stellar photo op....
View attachment 345431
I wonder what the goal was. I wonder what his staff was thinking when they saw him doing that.
None to be found in this White House.
President Trump cares a lot about America, that much is clear.
So he figures that's all he needs to pander to. He may be right, we'll see. But he doesn't give a shit about the rest.
Speaking out against burning churches is not pandering to 26% of the country.
Exceptions prove the rule.
Your anti-Trump hate and anger are making you see completely reasonable acts, is an insanely dark light.
What exactly, is "surrounding" Trump's visit to the Church, that is sooooo terrible to justify your hysteria?
how about this cartoon boy:
Breaking|Jun 2, 2020,12:25pm EDT
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
Tommy BeerForbes Staff
Business
TOPLINE
Rev. Gini Gerbasi, who serves as rector at a neighboring church, said armored police forcibly removed her and other priests from the patio of Saint John's Episcopal Church, shortly before President Trump was photographed in front of Saint John's holding a bible.
At approximately 6:40 pm, police suddenly began to expel peaceful demonstrators from the park, firing tear gas and flash grenades to disperse the crowd.
Gerbasi said that a short time later, police in riot gear started "pushing on to the patio of St. John's," and that people around her began crying out in pain, claiming to be shot with non-lethal projectiles.
"I'm there in my little pink sweater in my collar, my gray hair up in a ponytail, my reading glasses on," said Gerbas, as she and others were forced to flee the scene.
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
he didn't give a damn about the church.
You had a choice between unifying around an anti-burning church message
or attacking the President.
YOu choose to be divisive.
Nothing will ever please you. YOu are full of hate and anger.
it was a photo op.
i'm attacking yer chosen one for gassing american citizens, flashbanging american citizens, on american soil - who WERE PEACEFULLY protesting & exercising their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to do so.
he didn't go inside. he held that bible upside down, & backwards & admitted it wasn't even his.
he's not religious. he never was. never will be.
& he was playing to the evangelisticals because he knows he's starting to lose some of them. besides the fucking racist POS, he needs the bible thumpers to
vote for him.
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, would you be supporting his message? LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue. It is something everyone can support. It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest. You are the one making an issue out of this.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
^
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
a photo op for his campaign. by using the pomp & circumstance, but not using the reality behind the scenes that got him there....
typical of a snake oil salesman.
if he cared about places of worship - he wouldn't have bombed that mosque in iran that was directly against the geneva convention.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, ...
you mean by gassing & flashbanging PEACEFUL PROTESTERS NOT INVOLVED AT ALL WITH THAT CHURCH BURNING.
would you be supporting his message?
that wasn't his message. his message was for the thumpers to still vote for him come november - cause he needs them bigley.
LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
you are so full of adoration for yer chosen one, that you are giving donny a huuuuuuuuuuge pass as he took a shit all over the 1st amendment.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
sure it is. it was just a show & nothing more. a means to an end. he's a fucking hypocrite & doesn't care about ANY place of worship. see my reply re: #1
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue.
not exclusively, no. but this time, it was ... for the chosen one.
It is something everyone can support.
yep, for real reasons. not for a photo op.
It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest.
yep. except that photo op did not involve any civil unrest.
& when it was done with violence on the chosen one's part - against peaceful protesters, so his base would get a hard on for him - it sickens those who saw it for what it was.
You are the one making an issue out of this.
donny's answer to clear the way for his photo op by gassing & flash banging peaceful protesters exercising their constitutional right to free speech & peaceful assembly to petition grievences against the gov'ment is one hell of an issue.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
lol.... ^^^ TRIGGERED ^^^
1. Your assumptions about his motives are noted. I already addressed your side's impressive ability to come up with "Reasons" for your division.
2. He is not religious, but he is against burning churches. That you find that hard to believe, is just you being bat shit crazy.
3. Telling a race baiting asshole to shove their wacism up their ass, is not being triggered, it is a normal and healthy response, you fucking asshole.
4. Also, fuck you, you piece of shit.
i've watched donny in action for 40 years. i know exactly of which i speak. he was NEVER interested in church burnings until now.
if he has a history of speaking out when it's happened in the past - you would have a point. he never did, so the only point you are making is how you will adore him until the day he croaks.
oh ya.... you are SO triggered.
He wasn't President before. It was not his job to address them before. Who would care what some real estate guy from New York City has to say about some church arson?
I am not triggered. You called me a name, so I called you names back. Your confusion about how that works is just you being a stupid whore. FUCK OFF.
he spoke out about many issues. including 9/11 & invading iraq when he was just the manwhore of NYC.
you are always triggered, CB.
Your expectation that you should be able to call me names and still get civil discourse from me,
is you being a piece of shit.
YOU replied to me FIRST on this thread.
YOU called ME a name FIRST on this thread.
MY point stands.
YOU are triggered.
As fairly normal for a lib, you are such an asshole, you do it, without even realizing that you do it.
I don't care. I'm not giving you a pass, because you are so fucking stupid, that you don't even realize what a fucking asshole you are.
Stupidity is not an excuse for you being asshole.
That is not triggered, you fucking moron, that is me giving you the treatment that you have earned.
Your post absolutely displays you being triggered. You can’t restrain yourself from profanity and petty insults. That’s text book trigger. Sorry.You’re being dishonest thinking this issue was simply a church visit... it was everything that surrounded the visitYes, that would be one issue among many.If you include eligible voters who didn't vote, only about 26% of eligible voters actually voted for him in 2016.I think he cares about himself and tries to wrap himself on the flag to pander to his supporters. If he truly cared about America he would at least try to represent ALL of America and not only the 30% that support him while demonizing the rest.This is a moment in which the country needs a leader with great, sincere empathy.So I’m either a liar or a racist huh? That’s an interesting analysis. Don’t know why I would waste my time explaining my case to somebody so narrow minded. How about you just go on assuming both and carry on dismissing everything I say
they thought it would trigger the Left and start a big fight and his supporters would love it. As the Left bitched about Trump being at church with a bible they could make that the debate and fight back by calling the Left unhinged and focusing on meaningless stuff as communities burn. These are the divisive little fires that Trump lites all the time. It’s how he diverts the heat of bad press to a different fight that he feels better about fighting. Usually from serious stuff to petty stuff in his wheel house.It still blows my mind that he thought that standing there with someone's Bible and a stern look on his face was going to accomplish something.
2 corinthians told the chosen one to hold it backwards & upside down for that stellar photo op....
View attachment 345431
I wonder what the goal was. I wonder what his staff was thinking when they saw him doing that.
None to be found in this White House.
President Trump cares a lot about America, that much is clear.
So he figures that's all he needs to pander to. He may be right, we'll see. But he doesn't give a shit about the rest.
Speaking out against burning churches is not pandering to 26% of the country.
Exceptions prove the rule.
Your anti-Trump hate and anger are making you see completely reasonable acts, is an insanely dark light.
What exactly, is "surrounding" Trump's visit to the Church, that is sooooo terrible to justify your hysteria?
how about this cartoon boy:
Breaking|Jun 2, 2020,12:25pm EDT
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
Tommy BeerForbes Staff
Business
TOPLINE
Rev. Gini Gerbasi, who serves as rector at a neighboring church, said armored police forcibly removed her and other priests from the patio of Saint John's Episcopal Church, shortly before President Trump was photographed in front of Saint John's holding a bible.
At approximately 6:40 pm, police suddenly began to expel peaceful demonstrators from the park, firing tear gas and flash grenades to disperse the crowd.
Gerbasi said that a short time later, police in riot gear started "pushing on to the patio of St. John's," and that people around her began crying out in pain, claiming to be shot with non-lethal projectiles.
"I'm there in my little pink sweater in my collar, my gray hair up in a ponytail, my reading glasses on," said Gerbas, as she and others were forced to flee the scene.
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
he didn't give a damn about the church.
You had a choice between unifying around an anti-burning church message
or attacking the President.
YOu choose to be divisive.
Nothing will ever please you. YOu are full of hate and anger.
it was a photo op.
i'm attacking yer chosen one for gassing american citizens, flashbanging american citizens, on american soil - who WERE PEACEFULLY protesting & exercising their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to do so.
he didn't go inside. he held that bible upside down, & backwards & admitted it wasn't even his.
he's not religious. he never was. never will be.
& he was playing to the evangelisticals because he knows he's starting to lose some of them. besides the fucking racist POS, he needs the bible thumpers to
vote for him.
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, would you be supporting his message? LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue. It is something everyone can support. It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest. You are the one making an issue out of this.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
^
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
a photo op for his campaign. by using the pomp & circumstance, but not using the reality behind the scenes that got him there....
typical of a snake oil salesman.
if he cared about places of worship - he wouldn't have bombed that mosque in iran that was directly against the geneva convention.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, ...
you mean by gassing & flashbanging PEACEFUL PROTESTERS NOT INVOLVED AT ALL WITH THAT CHURCH BURNING.
would you be supporting his message?
that wasn't his message. his message was for the thumpers to still vote for him come november - cause he needs them bigley.
LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
you are so full of adoration for yer chosen one, that you are giving donny a huuuuuuuuuuge pass as he took a shit all over the 1st amendment.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
sure it is. it was just a show & nothing more. a means to an end. he's a fucking hypocrite & doesn't care about ANY place of worship. see my reply re: #1
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue.
not exclusively, no. but this time, it was ... for the chosen one.
It is something everyone can support.
yep, for real reasons. not for a photo op.
It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest.
yep. except that photo op did not involve any civil unrest.
& when it was done with violence on the chosen one's part - against peaceful protesters, so his base would get a hard on for him - it sickens those who saw it for what it was.
You are the one making an issue out of this.
donny's answer to clear the way for his photo op by gassing & flash banging peaceful protesters exercising their constitutional right to free speech & peaceful assembly to petition grievences against the gov'ment is one hell of an issue.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
lol.... ^^^ TRIGGERED ^^^
1. Your assumptions about his motives are noted. I already addressed your side's impressive ability to come up with "Reasons" for your division.
2. He is not religious, but he is against burning churches. That you find that hard to believe, is just you being bat shit crazy.
3. Telling a race baiting asshole to shove their wacism up their ass, is not being triggered, it is a normal and healthy response, you fucking asshole.
4. Also, fuck you, you piece of shit.
i've watched donny in action for 40 years. i know exactly of which i speak. he was NEVER interested in church burnings until now.
if he has a history of speaking out when it's happened in the past - you would have a point. he never did, so the only point you are making is how you will adore him until the day he croaks.
oh ya.... you are SO triggered.
He wasn't President before. It was not his job to address them before. Who would care what some real estate guy from New York City has to say about some church arson?
I am not triggered. You called me a name, so I called you names back. Your confusion about how that works is just you being a stupid whore. FUCK OFF.
he spoke out about many issues. including 9/11 & invading iraq when he was just the manwhore of NYC.
you are always triggered, CB.
Your expectation that you should be able to call me names and still get civil discourse from me,
is you being a piece of shit.
YOU replied to me FIRST on this thread.
YOU called ME a name FIRST on this thread.
MY point stands.
YOU are triggered.
As fairly normal for a lib, you are such an asshole, you do it, without even realizing that you do it.
I don't care. I'm not giving you a pass, because you are so fucking stupid, that you don't even realize what a fucking asshole you are.
Stupidity is not an excuse for you being asshole.
That is not triggered, you fucking moron, that is me giving you the treatment that you have earned.
But he's a Trumpian unifier!Your post absolutely displays you being triggered. You can’t restrain yourself from profanity and petty insults. That’s text book trigger. Sorry.You’re being dishonest thinking this issue was simply a church visit... it was everything that surrounded the visitYes, that would be one issue among many.If you include eligible voters who didn't vote, only about 26% of eligible voters actually voted for him in 2016.I think he cares about himself and tries to wrap himself on the flag to pander to his supporters. If he truly cared about America he would at least try to represent ALL of America and not only the 30% that support him while demonizing the rest.This is a moment in which the country needs a leader with great, sincere empathy.So I’m either a liar or a racist huh? That’s an interesting analysis. Don’t know why I would waste my time explaining my case to somebody so narrow minded. How about you just go on assuming both and carry on dismissing everything I say
they thought it would trigger the Left and start a big fight and his supporters would love it. As the Left bitched about Trump being at church with a bible they could make that the debate and fight back by calling the Left unhinged and focusing on meaningless stuff as communities burn. These are the divisive little fires that Trump lites all the time. It’s how he diverts the heat of bad press to a different fight that he feels better about fighting. Usually from serious stuff to petty stuff in his wheel house.It still blows my mind that he thought that standing there with someone's Bible and a stern look on his face was going to accomplish something.
2 corinthians told the chosen one to hold it backwards & upside down for that stellar photo op....
View attachment 345431
I wonder what the goal was. I wonder what his staff was thinking when they saw him doing that.
None to be found in this White House.
President Trump cares a lot about America, that much is clear.
So he figures that's all he needs to pander to. He may be right, we'll see. But he doesn't give a shit about the rest.
Speaking out against burning churches is not pandering to 26% of the country.
Exceptions prove the rule.
Your anti-Trump hate and anger are making you see completely reasonable acts, is an insanely dark light.
What exactly, is "surrounding" Trump's visit to the Church, that is sooooo terrible to justify your hysteria?
how about this cartoon boy:
Breaking|Jun 2, 2020,12:25pm EDT
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
Tommy BeerForbes Staff
Business
TOPLINE
Rev. Gini Gerbasi, who serves as rector at a neighboring church, said armored police forcibly removed her and other priests from the patio of Saint John's Episcopal Church, shortly before President Trump was photographed in front of Saint John's holding a bible.
At approximately 6:40 pm, police suddenly began to expel peaceful demonstrators from the park, firing tear gas and flash grenades to disperse the crowd.
Gerbasi said that a short time later, police in riot gear started "pushing on to the patio of St. John's," and that people around her began crying out in pain, claiming to be shot with non-lethal projectiles.
"I'm there in my little pink sweater in my collar, my gray hair up in a ponytail, my reading glasses on," said Gerbas, as she and others were forced to flee the scene.
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
he didn't give a damn about the church.
You had a choice between unifying around an anti-burning church message
or attacking the President.
YOu choose to be divisive.
Nothing will ever please you. YOu are full of hate and anger.
it was a photo op.
i'm attacking yer chosen one for gassing american citizens, flashbanging american citizens, on american soil - who WERE PEACEFULLY protesting & exercising their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to do so.
he didn't go inside. he held that bible upside down, & backwards & admitted it wasn't even his.
he's not religious. he never was. never will be.
& he was playing to the evangelisticals because he knows he's starting to lose some of them. besides the fucking racist POS, he needs the bible thumpers to
vote for him.
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, would you be supporting his message? LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue. It is something everyone can support. It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest. You are the one making an issue out of this.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
^
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
a photo op for his campaign. by using the pomp & circumstance, but not using the reality behind the scenes that got him there....
typical of a snake oil salesman.
if he cared about places of worship - he wouldn't have bombed that mosque in iran that was directly against the geneva convention.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, ...
you mean by gassing & flashbanging PEACEFUL PROTESTERS NOT INVOLVED AT ALL WITH THAT CHURCH BURNING.
would you be supporting his message?
that wasn't his message. his message was for the thumpers to still vote for him come november - cause he needs them bigley.
LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
you are so full of adoration for yer chosen one, that you are giving donny a huuuuuuuuuuge pass as he took a shit all over the 1st amendment.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
sure it is. it was just a show & nothing more. a means to an end. he's a fucking hypocrite & doesn't care about ANY place of worship. see my reply re: #1
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue.
not exclusively, no. but this time, it was ... for the chosen one.
It is something everyone can support.
yep, for real reasons. not for a photo op.
It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest.
yep. except that photo op did not involve any civil unrest.
& when it was done with violence on the chosen one's part - against peaceful protesters, so his base would get a hard on for him - it sickens those who saw it for what it was.
You are the one making an issue out of this.
donny's answer to clear the way for his photo op by gassing & flash banging peaceful protesters exercising their constitutional right to free speech & peaceful assembly to petition grievences against the gov'ment is one hell of an issue.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
lol.... ^^^ TRIGGERED ^^^
1. Your assumptions about his motives are noted. I already addressed your side's impressive ability to come up with "Reasons" for your division.
2. He is not religious, but he is against burning churches. That you find that hard to believe, is just you being bat shit crazy.
3. Telling a race baiting asshole to shove their wacism up their ass, is not being triggered, it is a normal and healthy response, you fucking asshole.
4. Also, fuck you, you piece of shit.
i've watched donny in action for 40 years. i know exactly of which i speak. he was NEVER interested in church burnings until now.
if he has a history of speaking out when it's happened in the past - you would have a point. he never did, so the only point you are making is how you will adore him until the day he croaks.
oh ya.... you are SO triggered.
He wasn't President before. It was not his job to address them before. Who would care what some real estate guy from New York City has to say about some church arson?
I am not triggered. You called me a name, so I called you names back. Your confusion about how that works is just you being a stupid whore. FUCK OFF.
he spoke out about many issues. including 9/11 & invading iraq when he was just the manwhore of NYC.
you are always triggered, CB.
Your expectation that you should be able to call me names and still get civil discourse from me,
is you being a piece of shit.
YOU replied to me FIRST on this thread.
YOU called ME a name FIRST on this thread.
MY point stands.
YOU are triggered.
As fairly normal for a lib, you are such an asshole, you do it, without even realizing that you do it.
I don't care. I'm not giving you a pass, because you are so fucking stupid, that you don't even realize what a fucking asshole you are.
Stupidity is not an excuse for you being asshole.
That is not triggered, you fucking moron, that is me giving you the treatment that you have earned.
Whatever you are “noting” is all wrong. I’m not walking anything back, I’m correcting your spin. I’ve explained several times now what the problem is... and the problem is not standing up against burning churches. As I said before, at this point you are either intentionally trolling or not taking the time to listen to what’s being said in critique of TrumpHoly shit Correll! You’re still on this burning churches narrative?! I addressed that yesterday and you ignored my points. The issue isn’t about a president taking a stance against burning churches. We are unified in being against burning churches. You know damn well what the issues are over with this situation. It’s being laid out for you over and over again. If you can’t have an honest debate then what the hell are you doing here? Trolling? Do betterLook at all that deflection.Unity is a two way street.
From a Trump supporter. Correct. What part of that is confusing to you?
You people are divisive. Not us, not Trump.
As this example shows to the nth degree.
Perhaps if you held the posters I quoted (and you deleted) accountable for their words with the same tenacity with which you complain about those who dare to criticize Trump, you could be taken seriously.
Right now, all you can really see is one side of this. Zero empathy, just like Trump.
I'm not asking you to disavow some list of anti-white racists before I accept your support on the controversial stance of NOT BURNING CHURCHES.
Rightwinger is actually quite racist against whites. Have I every shoved quotes from him in your face and demanded that you do "hold him accountable" for his misdeeds?
You have choices and you make them, and then find reasons for them afterwards.
Your side is choosing to tear America apart.
People are dying in the streets and you are continuing to refuse to unite on ANYTHING.
You do realize that this will only get worse, if you continue to do more of the same, right?
You absolutely refuse to hold your side accountable. I'm not afraid to hold my side accountable.
You're not to be taken seriously.
No deflection. YOu made a point, and I addressed it seriously and honestly.
You are supporting division to the point that you can't support Trump on NOT BURNING CHURCHES.
Unity does not require complete agreement or satisfaction on all issues. If so, unity would never occur.
Too late to walk it back, slade. He took the position and you libs attacked him.
Your excuses for your actions were noted.
YOu choose division and hate.
Attacking back in a barrage of profanity and insults is exactly what triggered isYour post absolutely displays you being triggered. You can’t restrain yourself from profanity and petty insults. That’s text book trigger. Sorry.You’re being dishonest thinking this issue was simply a church visit... it was everything that surrounded the visitYes, that would be one issue among many.If you include eligible voters who didn't vote, only about 26% of eligible voters actually voted for him in 2016.I think he cares about himself and tries to wrap himself on the flag to pander to his supporters. If he truly cared about America he would at least try to represent ALL of America and not only the 30% that support him while demonizing the rest.This is a moment in which the country needs a leader with great, sincere empathy.So I’m either a liar or a racist huh? That’s an interesting analysis. Don’t know why I would waste my time explaining my case to somebody so narrow minded. How about you just go on assuming both and carry on dismissing everything I say
they thought it would trigger the Left and start a big fight and his supporters would love it. As the Left bitched about Trump being at church with a bible they could make that the debate and fight back by calling the Left unhinged and focusing on meaningless stuff as communities burn. These are the divisive little fires that Trump lites all the time. It’s how he diverts the heat of bad press to a different fight that he feels better about fighting. Usually from serious stuff to petty stuff in his wheel house.It still blows my mind that he thought that standing there with someone's Bible and a stern look on his face was going to accomplish something.
2 corinthians told the chosen one to hold it backwards & upside down for that stellar photo op....
View attachment 345431
I wonder what the goal was. I wonder what his staff was thinking when they saw him doing that.
None to be found in this White House.
President Trump cares a lot about America, that much is clear.
So he figures that's all he needs to pander to. He may be right, we'll see. But he doesn't give a shit about the rest.
Speaking out against burning churches is not pandering to 26% of the country.
Exceptions prove the rule.
Your anti-Trump hate and anger are making you see completely reasonable acts, is an insanely dark light.
What exactly, is "surrounding" Trump's visit to the Church, that is sooooo terrible to justify your hysteria?
how about this cartoon boy:
Breaking|Jun 2, 2020,12:25pm EDT
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
Tommy BeerForbes Staff
Business
TOPLINE
Rev. Gini Gerbasi, who serves as rector at a neighboring church, said armored police forcibly removed her and other priests from the patio of Saint John's Episcopal Church, shortly before President Trump was photographed in front of Saint John's holding a bible.
At approximately 6:40 pm, police suddenly began to expel peaceful demonstrators from the park, firing tear gas and flash grenades to disperse the crowd.
Gerbasi said that a short time later, police in riot gear started "pushing on to the patio of St. John's," and that people around her began crying out in pain, claiming to be shot with non-lethal projectiles.
"I'm there in my little pink sweater in my collar, my gray hair up in a ponytail, my reading glasses on," said Gerbas, as she and others were forced to flee the scene.
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
he didn't give a damn about the church.
You had a choice between unifying around an anti-burning church message
or attacking the President.
YOu choose to be divisive.
Nothing will ever please you. YOu are full of hate and anger.
it was a photo op.
i'm attacking yer chosen one for gassing american citizens, flashbanging american citizens, on american soil - who WERE PEACEFULLY protesting & exercising their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to do so.
he didn't go inside. he held that bible upside down, & backwards & admitted it wasn't even his.
he's not religious. he never was. never will be.
& he was playing to the evangelisticals because he knows he's starting to lose some of them. besides the fucking racist POS, he needs the bible thumpers to
vote for him.
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, would you be supporting his message? LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue. It is something everyone can support. It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest. You are the one making an issue out of this.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
^
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
a photo op for his campaign. by using the pomp & circumstance, but not using the reality behind the scenes that got him there....
typical of a snake oil salesman.
if he cared about places of worship - he wouldn't have bombed that mosque in iran that was directly against the geneva convention.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, ...
you mean by gassing & flashbanging PEACEFUL PROTESTERS NOT INVOLVED AT ALL WITH THAT CHURCH BURNING.
would you be supporting his message?
that wasn't his message. his message was for the thumpers to still vote for him come november - cause he needs them bigley.
LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
you are so full of adoration for yer chosen one, that you are giving donny a huuuuuuuuuuge pass as he took a shit all over the 1st amendment.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
sure it is. it was just a show & nothing more. a means to an end. he's a fucking hypocrite & doesn't care about ANY place of worship. see my reply re: #1
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue.
not exclusively, no. but this time, it was ... for the chosen one.
It is something everyone can support.
yep, for real reasons. not for a photo op.
It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest.
yep. except that photo op did not involve any civil unrest.
& when it was done with violence on the chosen one's part - against peaceful protesters, so his base would get a hard on for him - it sickens those who saw it for what it was.
You are the one making an issue out of this.
donny's answer to clear the way for his photo op by gassing & flash banging peaceful protesters exercising their constitutional right to free speech & peaceful assembly to petition grievences against the gov'ment is one hell of an issue.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
lol.... ^^^ TRIGGERED ^^^
1. Your assumptions about his motives are noted. I already addressed your side's impressive ability to come up with "Reasons" for your division.
2. He is not religious, but he is against burning churches. That you find that hard to believe, is just you being bat shit crazy.
3. Telling a race baiting asshole to shove their wacism up their ass, is not being triggered, it is a normal and healthy response, you fucking asshole.
4. Also, fuck you, you piece of shit.
i've watched donny in action for 40 years. i know exactly of which i speak. he was NEVER interested in church burnings until now.
if he has a history of speaking out when it's happened in the past - you would have a point. he never did, so the only point you are making is how you will adore him until the day he croaks.
oh ya.... you are SO triggered.
He wasn't President before. It was not his job to address them before. Who would care what some real estate guy from New York City has to say about some church arson?
I am not triggered. You called me a name, so I called you names back. Your confusion about how that works is just you being a stupid whore. FUCK OFF.
he spoke out about many issues. including 9/11 & invading iraq when he was just the manwhore of NYC.
you are always triggered, CB.
Your expectation that you should be able to call me names and still get civil discourse from me,
is you being a piece of shit.
YOU replied to me FIRST on this thread.
YOU called ME a name FIRST on this thread.
MY point stands.
YOU are triggered.
As fairly normal for a lib, you are such an asshole, you do it, without even realizing that you do it.
I don't care. I'm not giving you a pass, because you are so fucking stupid, that you don't even realize what a fucking asshole you are.
Stupidity is not an excuse for you being asshole.
That is not triggered, you fucking moron, that is me giving you the treatment that you have earned.
No, it is not. "Triggered" implies an emotional reaction to something relatively innocent.
Being insulted by an asshole and insulting the said asshole(s) back, appropriately, is not being triggered.
Whatever you are “noting” is all wrong. I’m not walking anything back, I’m correcting your spin. I’ve explained several times now what the problem is... and the problem is not standing up against burning churches. As I said before, at this point you are either intentionally trolling or not taking the time to listen to what’s being said in critique of TrumpHoly shit Correll! You’re still on this burning churches narrative?! I addressed that yesterday and you ignored my points. The issue isn’t about a president taking a stance against burning churches. We are unified in being against burning churches. You know damn well what the issues are over with this situation. It’s being laid out for you over and over again. If you can’t have an honest debate then what the hell are you doing here? Trolling? Do betterLook at all that deflection.Unity is a two way street.
From a Trump supporter. Correct. What part of that is confusing to you?
You people are divisive. Not us, not Trump.
As this example shows to the nth degree.
Perhaps if you held the posters I quoted (and you deleted) accountable for their words with the same tenacity with which you complain about those who dare to criticize Trump, you could be taken seriously.
Right now, all you can really see is one side of this. Zero empathy, just like Trump.
I'm not asking you to disavow some list of anti-white racists before I accept your support on the controversial stance of NOT BURNING CHURCHES.
Rightwinger is actually quite racist against whites. Have I every shoved quotes from him in your face and demanded that you do "hold him accountable" for his misdeeds?
You have choices and you make them, and then find reasons for them afterwards.
Your side is choosing to tear America apart.
People are dying in the streets and you are continuing to refuse to unite on ANYTHING.
You do realize that this will only get worse, if you continue to do more of the same, right?
You absolutely refuse to hold your side accountable. I'm not afraid to hold my side accountable.
You're not to be taken seriously.
No deflection. YOu made a point, and I addressed it seriously and honestly.
You are supporting division to the point that you can't support Trump on NOT BURNING CHURCHES.
Unity does not require complete agreement or satisfaction on all issues. If so, unity would never occur.
Too late to walk it back, slade. He took the position and you libs attacked him.
Your excuses for your actions were noted.
YOu choose division and hate.
You know Trump is trying to divide, his supporters love him for it. How much consideration And airtime has he given to the Grievances of the millions of Americans who are out on the streets speaking out vs tough guy talk about the rioters? It’s obvious now where his heart is. He isn’t here for Americans he is here for his base. It’s a sad situation for AmericaBut he's a Trumpian unifier!Your post absolutely displays you being triggered. You can’t restrain yourself from profanity and petty insults. That’s text book trigger. Sorry.You’re being dishonest thinking this issue was simply a church visit... it was everything that surrounded the visitYes, that would be one issue among many.If you include eligible voters who didn't vote, only about 26% of eligible voters actually voted for him in 2016.I think he cares about himself and tries to wrap himself on the flag to pander to his supporters. If he truly cared about America he would at least try to represent ALL of America and not only the 30% that support him while demonizing the rest.This is a moment in which the country needs a leader with great, sincere empathy.So I’m either a liar or a racist huh? That’s an interesting analysis. Don’t know why I would waste my time explaining my case to somebody so narrow minded. How about you just go on assuming both and carry on dismissing everything I say
they thought it would trigger the Left and start a big fight and his supporters would love it. As the Left bitched about Trump being at church with a bible they could make that the debate and fight back by calling the Left unhinged and focusing on meaningless stuff as communities burn. These are the divisive little fires that Trump lites all the time. It’s how he diverts the heat of bad press to a different fight that he feels better about fighting. Usually from serious stuff to petty stuff in his wheel house.It still blows my mind that he thought that standing there with someone's Bible and a stern look on his face was going to accomplish something.
2 corinthians told the chosen one to hold it backwards & upside down for that stellar photo op....
View attachment 345431
I wonder what the goal was. I wonder what his staff was thinking when they saw him doing that.
None to be found in this White House.
President Trump cares a lot about America, that much is clear.
So he figures that's all he needs to pander to. He may be right, we'll see. But he doesn't give a shit about the rest.
Speaking out against burning churches is not pandering to 26% of the country.
Exceptions prove the rule.
Your anti-Trump hate and anger are making you see completely reasonable acts, is an insanely dark light.
What exactly, is "surrounding" Trump's visit to the Church, that is sooooo terrible to justify your hysteria?
how about this cartoon boy:
Breaking|Jun 2, 2020,12:25pm EDT
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
Tommy BeerForbes Staff
Business
TOPLINE
Rev. Gini Gerbasi, who serves as rector at a neighboring church, said armored police forcibly removed her and other priests from the patio of Saint John's Episcopal Church, shortly before President Trump was photographed in front of Saint John's holding a bible.
At approximately 6:40 pm, police suddenly began to expel peaceful demonstrators from the park, firing tear gas and flash grenades to disperse the crowd.
Gerbasi said that a short time later, police in riot gear started "pushing on to the patio of St. John's," and that people around her began crying out in pain, claiming to be shot with non-lethal projectiles.
"I'm there in my little pink sweater in my collar, my gray hair up in a ponytail, my reading glasses on," said Gerbas, as she and others were forced to flee the scene.
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
he didn't give a damn about the church.
You had a choice between unifying around an anti-burning church message
or attacking the President.
YOu choose to be divisive.
Nothing will ever please you. YOu are full of hate and anger.
it was a photo op.
i'm attacking yer chosen one for gassing american citizens, flashbanging american citizens, on american soil - who WERE PEACEFULLY protesting & exercising their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to do so.
he didn't go inside. he held that bible upside down, & backwards & admitted it wasn't even his.
he's not religious. he never was. never will be.
& he was playing to the evangelisticals because he knows he's starting to lose some of them. besides the fucking racist POS, he needs the bible thumpers to
vote for him.
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, would you be supporting his message? LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue. It is something everyone can support. It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest. You are the one making an issue out of this.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
^
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
a photo op for his campaign. by using the pomp & circumstance, but not using the reality behind the scenes that got him there....
typical of a snake oil salesman.
if he cared about places of worship - he wouldn't have bombed that mosque in iran that was directly against the geneva convention.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, ...
you mean by gassing & flashbanging PEACEFUL PROTESTERS NOT INVOLVED AT ALL WITH THAT CHURCH BURNING.
would you be supporting his message?
that wasn't his message. his message was for the thumpers to still vote for him come november - cause he needs them bigley.
LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
you are so full of adoration for yer chosen one, that you are giving donny a huuuuuuuuuuge pass as he took a shit all over the 1st amendment.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
sure it is. it was just a show & nothing more. a means to an end. he's a fucking hypocrite & doesn't care about ANY place of worship. see my reply re: #1
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue.
not exclusively, no. but this time, it was ... for the chosen one.
It is something everyone can support.
yep, for real reasons. not for a photo op.
It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest.
yep. except that photo op did not involve any civil unrest.
& when it was done with violence on the chosen one's part - against peaceful protesters, so his base would get a hard on for him - it sickens those who saw it for what it was.
You are the one making an issue out of this.
donny's answer to clear the way for his photo op by gassing & flash banging peaceful protesters exercising their constitutional right to free speech & peaceful assembly to petition grievences against the gov'ment is one hell of an issue.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
lol.... ^^^ TRIGGERED ^^^
1. Your assumptions about his motives are noted. I already addressed your side's impressive ability to come up with "Reasons" for your division.
2. He is not religious, but he is against burning churches. That you find that hard to believe, is just you being bat shit crazy.
3. Telling a race baiting asshole to shove their wacism up their ass, is not being triggered, it is a normal and healthy response, you fucking asshole.
4. Also, fuck you, you piece of shit.
i've watched donny in action for 40 years. i know exactly of which i speak. he was NEVER interested in church burnings until now.
if he has a history of speaking out when it's happened in the past - you would have a point. he never did, so the only point you are making is how you will adore him until the day he croaks.
oh ya.... you are SO triggered.
He wasn't President before. It was not his job to address them before. Who would care what some real estate guy from New York City has to say about some church arson?
I am not triggered. You called me a name, so I called you names back. Your confusion about how that works is just you being a stupid whore. FUCK OFF.
he spoke out about many issues. including 9/11 & invading iraq when he was just the manwhore of NYC.
you are always triggered, CB.
Your expectation that you should be able to call me names and still get civil discourse from me,
is you being a piece of shit.
YOU replied to me FIRST on this thread.
YOU called ME a name FIRST on this thread.
MY point stands.
YOU are triggered.
As fairly normal for a lib, you are such an asshole, you do it, without even realizing that you do it.
I don't care. I'm not giving you a pass, because you are so fucking stupid, that you don't even realize what a fucking asshole you are.
Stupidity is not an excuse for you being asshole.
That is not triggered, you fucking moron, that is me giving you the treatment that you have earned.
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him choose to not be divisive. That is on the horse. That is what Free Will is about.
Attacking back in a barrage of profanity and insults is exactly what triggered isYour post absolutely displays you being triggered. You can’t restrain yourself from profanity and petty insults. That’s text book trigger. Sorry.You’re being dishonest thinking this issue was simply a church visit... it was everything that surrounded the visitYes, that would be one issue among many.If you include eligible voters who didn't vote, only about 26% of eligible voters actually voted for him in 2016.I think he cares about himself and tries to wrap himself on the flag to pander to his supporters. If he truly cared about America he would at least try to represent ALL of America and not only the 30% that support him while demonizing the rest.This is a moment in which the country needs a leader with great, sincere empathy.So I’m either a liar or a racist huh? That’s an interesting analysis. Don’t know why I would waste my time explaining my case to somebody so narrow minded. How about you just go on assuming both and carry on dismissing everything I say
they thought it would trigger the Left and start a big fight and his supporters would love it. As the Left bitched about Trump being at church with a bible they could make that the debate and fight back by calling the Left unhinged and focusing on meaningless stuff as communities burn. These are the divisive little fires that Trump lites all the time. It’s how he diverts the heat of bad press to a different fight that he feels better about fighting. Usually from serious stuff to petty stuff in his wheel house.It still blows my mind that he thought that standing there with someone's Bible and a stern look on his face was going to accomplish something.
2 corinthians told the chosen one to hold it backwards & upside down for that stellar photo op....
View attachment 345431
I wonder what the goal was. I wonder what his staff was thinking when they saw him doing that.
None to be found in this White House.
President Trump cares a lot about America, that much is clear.
So he figures that's all he needs to pander to. He may be right, we'll see. But he doesn't give a shit about the rest.
Speaking out against burning churches is not pandering to 26% of the country.
Exceptions prove the rule.
Your anti-Trump hate and anger are making you see completely reasonable acts, is an insanely dark light.
What exactly, is "surrounding" Trump's visit to the Church, that is sooooo terrible to justify your hysteria?
how about this cartoon boy:
Breaking|Jun 2, 2020,12:25pm EDT
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
Tommy BeerForbes Staff
Business
TOPLINE
Rev. Gini Gerbasi, who serves as rector at a neighboring church, said armored police forcibly removed her and other priests from the patio of Saint John's Episcopal Church, shortly before President Trump was photographed in front of Saint John's holding a bible.
At approximately 6:40 pm, police suddenly began to expel peaceful demonstrators from the park, firing tear gas and flash grenades to disperse the crowd.
Gerbasi said that a short time later, police in riot gear started "pushing on to the patio of St. John's," and that people around her began crying out in pain, claiming to be shot with non-lethal projectiles.
"I'm there in my little pink sweater in my collar, my gray hair up in a ponytail, my reading glasses on," said Gerbas, as she and others were forced to flee the scene.
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
he didn't give a damn about the church.
You had a choice between unifying around an anti-burning church message
or attacking the President.
YOu choose to be divisive.
Nothing will ever please you. YOu are full of hate and anger.
it was a photo op.
i'm attacking yer chosen one for gassing american citizens, flashbanging american citizens, on american soil - who WERE PEACEFULLY protesting & exercising their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to do so.
he didn't go inside. he held that bible upside down, & backwards & admitted it wasn't even his.
he's not religious. he never was. never will be.
& he was playing to the evangelisticals because he knows he's starting to lose some of them. besides the fucking racist POS, he needs the bible thumpers to
vote for him.
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, would you be supporting his message? LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue. It is something everyone can support. It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest. You are the one making an issue out of this.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
^
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
a photo op for his campaign. by using the pomp & circumstance, but not using the reality behind the scenes that got him there....
typical of a snake oil salesman.
if he cared about places of worship - he wouldn't have bombed that mosque in iran that was directly against the geneva convention.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, ...
you mean by gassing & flashbanging PEACEFUL PROTESTERS NOT INVOLVED AT ALL WITH THAT CHURCH BURNING.
would you be supporting his message?
that wasn't his message. his message was for the thumpers to still vote for him come november - cause he needs them bigley.
LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
you are so full of adoration for yer chosen one, that you are giving donny a huuuuuuuuuuge pass as he took a shit all over the 1st amendment.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
sure it is. it was just a show & nothing more. a means to an end. he's a fucking hypocrite & doesn't care about ANY place of worship. see my reply re: #1
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue.
not exclusively, no. but this time, it was ... for the chosen one.
It is something everyone can support.
yep, for real reasons. not for a photo op.
It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest.
yep. except that photo op did not involve any civil unrest.
& when it was done with violence on the chosen one's part - against peaceful protesters, so his base would get a hard on for him - it sickens those who saw it for what it was.
You are the one making an issue out of this.
donny's answer to clear the way for his photo op by gassing & flash banging peaceful protesters exercising their constitutional right to free speech & peaceful assembly to petition grievences against the gov'ment is one hell of an issue.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
lol.... ^^^ TRIGGERED ^^^
1. Your assumptions about his motives are noted. I already addressed your side's impressive ability to come up with "Reasons" for your division.
2. He is not religious, but he is against burning churches. That you find that hard to believe, is just you being bat shit crazy.
3. Telling a race baiting asshole to shove their wacism up their ass, is not being triggered, it is a normal and healthy response, you fucking asshole.
4. Also, fuck you, you piece of shit.
i've watched donny in action for 40 years. i know exactly of which i speak. he was NEVER interested in church burnings until now.
if he has a history of speaking out when it's happened in the past - you would have a point. he never did, so the only point you are making is how you will adore him until the day he croaks.
oh ya.... you are SO triggered.
He wasn't President before. It was not his job to address them before. Who would care what some real estate guy from New York City has to say about some church arson?
I am not triggered. You called me a name, so I called you names back. Your confusion about how that works is just you being a stupid whore. FUCK OFF.
he spoke out about many issues. including 9/11 & invading iraq when he was just the manwhore of NYC.
you are always triggered, CB.
Your expectation that you should be able to call me names and still get civil discourse from me,
is you being a piece of shit.
YOU replied to me FIRST on this thread.
YOU called ME a name FIRST on this thread.
MY point stands.
YOU are triggered.
As fairly normal for a lib, you are such an asshole, you do it, without even realizing that you do it.
I don't care. I'm not giving you a pass, because you are so fucking stupid, that you don't even realize what a fucking asshole you are.
Stupidity is not an excuse for you being asshole.
That is not triggered, you fucking moron, that is me giving you the treatment that you have earned.
No, it is not. "Triggered" implies an emotional reaction to something relatively innocent.
Being insulted by an asshole and insulting the said asshole(s) back, appropriately, is not being triggered.
Wow, changing the subject again?! I haven’t said a word about the constitution. Are you unable to follow the debate or are you that desperate that you need to fling in random subjects to the debate. Come on... do better.Whatever you are “noting” is all wrong. I’m not walking anything back, I’m correcting your spin. I’ve explained several times now what the problem is... and the problem is not standing up against burning churches. As I said before, at this point you are either intentionally trolling or not taking the time to listen to what’s being said in critique of TrumpHoly shit Correll! You’re still on this burning churches narrative?! I addressed that yesterday and you ignored my points. The issue isn’t about a president taking a stance against burning churches. We are unified in being against burning churches. You know damn well what the issues are over with this situation. It’s being laid out for you over and over again. If you can’t have an honest debate then what the hell are you doing here? Trolling? Do betterLook at all that deflection.Unity is a two way street.
From a Trump supporter. Correct. What part of that is confusing to you?
You people are divisive. Not us, not Trump.
As this example shows to the nth degree.
Perhaps if you held the posters I quoted (and you deleted) accountable for their words with the same tenacity with which you complain about those who dare to criticize Trump, you could be taken seriously.
Right now, all you can really see is one side of this. Zero empathy, just like Trump.
I'm not asking you to disavow some list of anti-white racists before I accept your support on the controversial stance of NOT BURNING CHURCHES.
Rightwinger is actually quite racist against whites. Have I every shoved quotes from him in your face and demanded that you do "hold him accountable" for his misdeeds?
You have choices and you make them, and then find reasons for them afterwards.
Your side is choosing to tear America apart.
People are dying in the streets and you are continuing to refuse to unite on ANYTHING.
You do realize that this will only get worse, if you continue to do more of the same, right?
You absolutely refuse to hold your side accountable. I'm not afraid to hold my side accountable.
You're not to be taken seriously.
No deflection. YOu made a point, and I addressed it seriously and honestly.
You are supporting division to the point that you can't support Trump on NOT BURNING CHURCHES.
Unity does not require complete agreement or satisfaction on all issues. If so, unity would never occur.
Too late to walk it back, slade. He took the position and you libs attacked him.
Your excuses for your actions were noted.
YOu choose division and hate.
You people can always find some excuse for your division and hate.
THe stated reasons are utter shit. Like your pretend concern about the Constitution. From people who would shit can the first and second amendments in a heartbeat, if they could, and suddenly we are supposed to pretend to take your concern for the Constitution seriously?
LOL!!!!
You are so full of hate, that you can't even support DON'T BURN CHURCHES, if the message comes from the other side.
You know Trump is trying to divide, his supporters love him for it. How much consideration And airtime has he given to the Grievances of the millions of Americans who are out on the streets speaking out vs tough guy talk about the rioters? It’s obvious now where his heart is. He isn’t here for Americans he is here for his base. It’s a sad situation for AmericaBut he's a Trumpian unifier!Your post absolutely displays you being triggered. You can’t restrain yourself from profanity and petty insults. That’s text book trigger. Sorry.You’re being dishonest thinking this issue was simply a church visit... it was everything that surrounded the visitYes, that would be one issue among many.If you include eligible voters who didn't vote, only about 26% of eligible voters actually voted for him in 2016.I think he cares about himself and tries to wrap himself on the flag to pander to his supporters. If he truly cared about America he would at least try to represent ALL of America and not only the 30% that support him while demonizing the rest.This is a moment in which the country needs a leader with great, sincere empathy.So I’m either a liar or a racist huh? That’s an interesting analysis. Don’t know why I would waste my time explaining my case to somebody so narrow minded. How about you just go on assuming both and carry on dismissing everything I say
they thought it would trigger the Left and start a big fight and his supporters would love it. As the Left bitched about Trump being at church with a bible they could make that the debate and fight back by calling the Left unhinged and focusing on meaningless stuff as communities burn. These are the divisive little fires that Trump lites all the time. It’s how he diverts the heat of bad press to a different fight that he feels better about fighting. Usually from serious stuff to petty stuff in his wheel house.It still blows my mind that he thought that standing there with someone's Bible and a stern look on his face was going to accomplish something.
2 corinthians told the chosen one to hold it backwards & upside down for that stellar photo op....
View attachment 345431
I wonder what the goal was. I wonder what his staff was thinking when they saw him doing that.
None to be found in this White House.
President Trump cares a lot about America, that much is clear.
So he figures that's all he needs to pander to. He may be right, we'll see. But he doesn't give a shit about the rest.
Speaking out against burning churches is not pandering to 26% of the country.
Exceptions prove the rule.
Your anti-Trump hate and anger are making you see completely reasonable acts, is an insanely dark light.
What exactly, is "surrounding" Trump's visit to the Church, that is sooooo terrible to justify your hysteria?
how about this cartoon boy:
Breaking|Jun 2, 2020,12:25pm EDT
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
Tommy BeerForbes Staff
Business
TOPLINE
Rev. Gini Gerbasi, who serves as rector at a neighboring church, said armored police forcibly removed her and other priests from the patio of Saint John's Episcopal Church, shortly before President Trump was photographed in front of Saint John's holding a bible.
At approximately 6:40 pm, police suddenly began to expel peaceful demonstrators from the park, firing tear gas and flash grenades to disperse the crowd.
Gerbasi said that a short time later, police in riot gear started "pushing on to the patio of St. John's," and that people around her began crying out in pain, claiming to be shot with non-lethal projectiles.
"I'm there in my little pink sweater in my collar, my gray hair up in a ponytail, my reading glasses on," said Gerbas, as she and others were forced to flee the scene.
Before Trump's Photo-Op, Police Forcibly Removed Priest From Church Grounds
he didn't give a damn about the church.
You had a choice between unifying around an anti-burning church message
or attacking the President.
YOu choose to be divisive.
Nothing will ever please you. YOu are full of hate and anger.
it was a photo op.
i'm attacking yer chosen one for gassing american citizens, flashbanging american citizens, on american soil - who WERE PEACEFULLY protesting & exercising their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to do so.
he didn't go inside. he held that bible upside down, & backwards & admitted it wasn't even his.
he's not religious. he never was. never will be.
& he was playing to the evangelisticals because he knows he's starting to lose some of them. besides the fucking racist POS, he needs the bible thumpers to
vote for him.
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, would you be supporting his message? LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue. It is something everyone can support. It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest. You are the one making an issue out of this.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
^
1. It was a photo op. One about NOT BURNING CHURCHES. You are attacking him for it.
a photo op for his campaign. by using the pomp & circumstance, but not using the reality behind the scenes that got him there....
typical of a snake oil salesman.
if he cared about places of worship - he wouldn't have bombed that mosque in iran that was directly against the geneva convention.
2. If he had not cleared a protest before hand, ...
you mean by gassing & flashbanging PEACEFUL PROTESTERS NOT INVOLVED AT ALL WITH THAT CHURCH BURNING.
would you be supporting his message?
that wasn't his message. his message was for the thumpers to still vote for him come november - cause he needs them bigley.
LOL!!! You are so full of hate, that you can't support a message of DON'T BURN CHURCHES. Indeed, you can't even just let it pass.
you are so full of adoration for yer chosen one, that you are giving donny a huuuuuuuuuuge pass as he took a shit all over the 1st amendment.
3. His lack of personal religion is irrelevant to this "issue". You don't have to be religious to be against BURNING CHURCHES.
sure it is. it was just a show & nothing more. a means to an end. he's a fucking hypocrite & doesn't care about ANY place of worship. see my reply re: #1
4. Being ANTI-BURNING CHURCHES, is not an evangelical issue.
not exclusively, no. but this time, it was ... for the chosen one.
It is something everyone can support.
yep, for real reasons. not for a photo op.
It is just the type of simple, unifying message that a President should give, during a time of civil unrest.
yep. except that photo op did not involve any civil unrest.
& when it was done with violence on the chosen one's part - against peaceful protesters, so his base would get a hard on for him - it sickens those who saw it for what it was.
You are the one making an issue out of this.
donny's answer to clear the way for his photo op by gassing & flash banging peaceful protesters exercising their constitutional right to free speech & peaceful assembly to petition grievences against the gov'ment is one hell of an issue.
5. Shove your wacism up your ass, fucktard.
lol.... ^^^ TRIGGERED ^^^
1. Your assumptions about his motives are noted. I already addressed your side's impressive ability to come up with "Reasons" for your division.
2. He is not religious, but he is against burning churches. That you find that hard to believe, is just you being bat shit crazy.
3. Telling a race baiting asshole to shove their wacism up their ass, is not being triggered, it is a normal and healthy response, you fucking asshole.
4. Also, fuck you, you piece of shit.
i've watched donny in action for 40 years. i know exactly of which i speak. he was NEVER interested in church burnings until now.
if he has a history of speaking out when it's happened in the past - you would have a point. he never did, so the only point you are making is how you will adore him until the day he croaks.
oh ya.... you are SO triggered.
He wasn't President before. It was not his job to address them before. Who would care what some real estate guy from New York City has to say about some church arson?
I am not triggered. You called me a name, so I called you names back. Your confusion about how that works is just you being a stupid whore. FUCK OFF.
he spoke out about many issues. including 9/11 & invading iraq when he was just the manwhore of NYC.
you are always triggered, CB.
Your expectation that you should be able to call me names and still get civil discourse from me,
is you being a piece of shit.
YOU replied to me FIRST on this thread.
YOU called ME a name FIRST on this thread.
MY point stands.
YOU are triggered.
As fairly normal for a lib, you are such an asshole, you do it, without even realizing that you do it.
I don't care. I'm not giving you a pass, because you are so fucking stupid, that you don't even realize what a fucking asshole you are.
Stupidity is not an excuse for you being asshole.
That is not triggered, you fucking moron, that is me giving you the treatment that you have earned.
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him choose to not be divisive. That is on the horse. That is what Free Will is about.
