President Trump has given 80% of top jobs to men...greatest president ever




Good. Last thing we need is a president trying to pick people based on gender or color, rather than ability.

By “ability” you mean his relatives and close buddies . Aka “white mans affirmative action “.


What are you talking about? Very few white men personally know Trump.


I certainly don't.
 



Good. Last thing we need is a president trying to pick people based on gender or color, rather than ability.

By “ability” you mean his relatives and close buddies . Aka “white mans affirmative action “.
No doubt about it. You are either a fool or a troll. Maybe both.

You are the fool. Trumps nominations and hires have been laughably embarrassing .

Are you going to tell me Jared Kushner is qualified for his position?
 



Good. Last thing we need is a president trying to pick people based on gender or color, rather than ability.

By “ability” you mean his relatives and close buddies . Aka “white mans affirmative action “.
No doubt about it. You are either a fool or a troll. Maybe both.
An insult to fools and trolls everywhere.
 



Good. Last thing we need is a president trying to pick people based on gender or color, rather than ability.

By “ability” you mean his relatives and close buddies . Aka “white mans affirmative action “.
No doubt about it. You are either a fool or a troll. Maybe both.
An insult to fools and trolls everywhere.

Name calling is all you got ?

How about we talk of the great hiring trump does. Forget about the record turnover at the whitehouse .
 



Good. Last thing we need is a president trying to pick people based on gender or color, rather than ability.

By “ability” you mean his relatives and close buddies . Aka “white mans affirmative action “.
No doubt about it. You are either a fool or a troll. Maybe both.
An insult to fools and trolls everywhere.

Name calling is all you got ?

How about we talk of the great hiring trump does. Forget about the record turnover at the whitehouse .
You're slipping down into the well again timmie, I didn't call you any name. But what does it matter what the gender of who Trump hires is? Why are you so fixated on identity politics? Besides, according the you libs, it shouldn't matter if he hires men or women because they can be fluid gender where they are men one and women the next. Right timbo?
 
What's wrong with the statement " President Trump nominated 408 men and only 80 women for "top jobs"? That's right, so-called "top jobs" aren't defined. As a matter of fact Newsweek doesn't even attempt to qualify "top jobs" by pay scale. The Ambassador to the U.N. is a woman. The press secretary is a woman. Newsweek apparently went through every position in the administration and used their own secret gender based formula to determine their own version of "top jobs" regardless of pay grade or status. That's how they get away with fake news.
 
Good. Last thing we need is a president trying to pick people based on gender or color, rather than ability.

By “ability” you mean his relatives and close buddies . Aka “white mans affirmative action “.
No doubt about it. You are either a fool or a troll. Maybe both.
An insult to fools and trolls everywhere.

Name calling is all you got ?

How about we talk of the great hiring trump does. Forget about the record turnover at the whitehouse .
You're slipping down into the well again timmie, I didn't call you any name. But what does it matter what the gender of who Trump hires is? Why are you so fixated on identity politics? Besides, according the you libs, it shouldn't matter if he hires men or women because they can be fluid gender where they are men one and women the next. Right timbo?


If he did hire more women, they would be women who are trump supporters.


That really going to make a difference to you?
 
By “ability” you mean his relatives and close buddies . Aka “white mans affirmative action “.
No doubt about it. You are either a fool or a troll. Maybe both.
An insult to fools and trolls everywhere.

Name calling is all you got ?

How about we talk of the great hiring trump does. Forget about the record turnover at the whitehouse .
You're slipping down into the well again timmie, I didn't call you any name. But what does it matter what the gender of who Trump hires is? Why are you so fixated on identity politics? Besides, according the you libs, it shouldn't matter if he hires men or women because they can be fluid gender where they are men one and women the next. Right timbo?


If he did hire more women, they would be women who are trump supporters.


That really going to make a difference to you?
:dunno:
 



Good. Last thing we need is a president trying to pick people based on gender or color, rather than ability.

By “ability” you mean his relatives and close buddies . Aka “white mans affirmative action “.
No doubt about it. You are either a fool or a troll. Maybe both.
An insult to fools and trolls everywhere.

Name calling is all you got ?

How about we talk of the great hiring trump does. Forget about the record turnover at the whitehouse .
Presidents George W Bush, Bill Clinton and Obama saw greater turnover than Trump in the years after they won a second term. Trump is merely getting it out of the way early.
 
About 32% of cabinet positions were held by women in Clinton's first term and about 35% of cabinet level positions were held by women in Hussein's first term. President Trump is pretty close to average and since President Trump has only been in office for 15 months and is met with an incredible obstructionist democrat minority it's a wonder that any of his nominations male or female have been approved.
 

Forum List

Back
Top