Press Plays The Victim Card After Body-Slamming Republican Wins

The Pinheads in the media claim that Trump caused that Montana candidate to body-slam that journalist.
They had very little to say about the violence at Berkeley and all of the Blacks going around parts of the country beating people up. They feel that when a journalist got aggressive and got assaulted by a guy who lost his cool, this is all Trump's fault.

No, America is pissed off about the despicable comments that leaders like F**k Schumer and Crazy Auntie Maxine Waters, screaming for impeachment before the man even took office.

We're pissed off because of the we can't watch the news without throwing a brick thru our televisions.


Don Lemon is a gay, racist piece of shit.

Gays learn to lie at an early age out of necessity.

This in turn makes them easy targets for manipulation.
 
So two weeks ago conservatives were beside themselves when people resorted to physical violence at Berkeley but now think it just fine for a political candidate.

You have to marvel at how far the Republican party has fallen. There is no bottom either, they crawl under the barrel and then start digging to reach the sewer. This is a party and cohort of people that have no compass at all anymore. They have given up on morals and truth and instead cling to lies and situational morality. Where they decide what is moral based on a situation. If you are old enough to have watched this evolution of conservatives it is stunning. They are hollow people now. There is no foundation.
How far they've fallen? The run most of the government in most of the country.
These fuckers are delusional.

Politicians aren't leaders they represent us so if one day we are pro gay then the next day the politicians who represent us will be pro gay. They don't lead. They go to washington to do what we have asked them to do.

So these rwnj politicians, including Trump because Trump is a birther, are a representation of who we are. Greedy ignorant Americans.
 
Oh? Exactly what did that reporter do to instigate violence against him?

Burst into a private interview, shoved a mic into the candidate's face and began shouting questions. I'd have broken his arm.

"Gosh Officer, I thought his recorder was a knife, so I reacted." :laugh:
That you have to lie about what happened reveals the reporter did nothing at all to instigate violence against him.

People on site confirmed the behavior.
Link to the quote you gave? Oh, and based on the witnesses accounts, Gianforte was charged with assault.
Charged does no equal convicted. The charges will be dropped. You hate that don't you?
Why do you think I hate your delusions. No charges have been dropped.
 
So two weeks ago conservatives were beside themselves when people resorted to physical violence at Berkeley but now think it just fine for a political candidate.

You have to marvel at how far the Republican party has fallen. There is no bottom either, they crawl under the barrel and then start digging to reach the sewer. This is a party and cohort of people that have no compass at all anymore. They have given up on morals and truth and instead cling to lies and situational morality. Where they decide what is moral based on a situation. If you are old enough to have watched this evolution of conservatives it is stunning. They are hollow people now. There is no foundation.
How far they've fallen? The run most of the government in most of the country.
These fuckers are delusional.

Politicians aren't leaders they represent us so if one day we are pro gay then the next day the politicians who represent us will be pro gay. They don't lead. They go to washington to do what we have asked them to do.

So these rwnj politicians, including Trump because Trump is a birther, are a representation of who we are. Greedy ignorant Americans.
As opposed to greedy ignorant foreigners that come here to rip us off....of which the Democrats support 100%.
 
No twit.....in order for a Stand Your Ground claim you have to show you feared death or great bodily harm.......I know you are stupid...but you should really do more research...

The guy body slammed him to the ground. Are you telling me that reporter wasn't afraid for his life as he was being slammed to the ground?

If it were a black man who assaulted the reporter maybe it'd be different, right?
Observe the absolute desperation of this leftist here. He is stuck grasping for straws, trying desperately to gain the moral high ground. As you'll note, leftists cannot stick to the topic because they will lose. So here this guy is, blabbering on about what if it was a fucking black guy who bodyslammed him. Because that is there go to, when their amygdala is rubbed raw..bring out the race or sex or tranny or faggot or class card.

This is when you know they've got nothing and the best thing you could do is dismiss his stupid pleas and not even address it.

There was no black guy, this involved white men in arguably the whitest state in the Union.

I'm trying to help you realize a politician assaulting someone is not right, cool or justified. If I give you an example of how black men get shot for attacking people, maybe that will help you realize what idiots you are being. The reporter should have shot the politician. If I were a reporter I'd get my concealed weapons permit and shoot a fucker if he touched me.
Body slamming an asshole invading your space is justified for anyone, politicians included.
No it is not. And do you have evidence he invaded his space? Funny you rwnj's keep asking for evidence but you don't need any to believe the reporter was invading his space.

Republicans being hypocrites is nothing new.
its right next to your evidence he was body slammed n feared for his,life.
 
Well, another eyewitness.

From now on Reporters should carry guns and if any politicians or bodyguards touch them they should blow them away. Stand your ground. They feared for their lives.

Or does stand your ground only work if you shoot a black man?


No twit.....in order for a Stand Your Ground claim you have to show you feared death or great bodily harm.......I know you are stupid...but you should really do more research...

The guy body slammed him to the ground. Are you telling me that reporter wasn't afraid for his life as he was being slammed to the ground?

If it were a black man who assaulted the reporter maybe it'd be different, right?
Observe the absolute desperation of this leftist here. He is stuck grasping for straws, trying desperately to gain the moral high ground. As you'll note, leftists cannot stick to the topic because they will lose. So here this guy is, blabbering on about what if it was a fucking black guy who bodyslammed him. Because that is there go to, when their amygdala is rubbed raw..bring out the race or sex or tranny or faggot or class card.

This is when you know they've got nothing and the best thing you could do is dismiss his stupid pleas and not even address it.

There was no black guy, this involved white men in arguably the whitest state in the Union.

I'm trying to help you realize a politician assaulting someone is not right, cool or justified. If I give you an example of how black men get shot for attacking people, maybe that will help you realize what idiots you are being. The reporter should have shot the politician. If I were a reporter I'd get my concealed weapons permit and shoot a fucker if he touched me.
Stop lying. Self defense is justified for ANYBODY threatened.
 
fagboy.jpg
 
Here's what I'm taking from this latest dimocrat outrage.

Parties/candidates have platforms, so this voter has decided to approach elections with a platform too. Mine is very simple, just one plank. Any candidate who body slams or otherwise takes on a media puke or group of pukes gets my vote. Period.
Lot of people have that platform now. He raised a $100K immediately after the incident.

You guys know he's going to have to pay that reporter for assaulting him. So don't try to pretend what he did was right or justified. He may have still won the election but he's going to pay in court.

And it's probably going to be the taxpayers who pay.
He shouldn't have to pay him a dime. Maybe journalists should get insurance for when they hassle people and get in their space and get what is coming to them?

Again, I don't think you mean that. Because if this was your wife or grandmother and they got body slammed you would have a different opinion.

You can not physically assault someone because they are putting a microphone in your face or because you don't like their questions. If you think it is lawful then I don't know what to say because you just aren't being reasonable or intellectually honest.

What are defenses to charges of assault and battery?
In order to establish self-defense, an accused must generally show: a threat of unlawful force or harm against them; a real, honest perceived fear of harm to themselves (there must be a reasonable basis for this perceived fear); no harm or provocation on their part; and.

So please at least tell me you know what this politician did was wrong. If not then I put you in the retard category.
 
Yes the evidence he invaded his personal space is he shoved the recorder in his face, the recording is evidence.

What are defenses to charges of assault and battery?
In order to establish self-defense, an accused must generally show: a threat of unlawful force or harm against them; a real, honest perceived fear of harm to themselves (there must be a reasonable basis for this perceived fear); no harm or provocation on their part; and.

WRONG! You are wrong wrong wrong daddyo.
 
From now on Reporters should carry guns and if any politicians or bodyguards touch them they should blow them away. Stand your ground. They feared for their lives.

Or does stand your ground only work if you shoot a black man?


No twit.....in order for a Stand Your Ground claim you have to show you feared death or great bodily harm.......I know you are stupid...but you should really do more research...

The guy body slammed him to the ground. Are you telling me that reporter wasn't afraid for his life as he was being slammed to the ground?

If it were a black man who assaulted the reporter maybe it'd be different, right?
Observe the absolute desperation of this leftist here. He is stuck grasping for straws, trying desperately to gain the moral high ground. As you'll note, leftists cannot stick to the topic because they will lose. So here this guy is, blabbering on about what if it was a fucking black guy who bodyslammed him. Because that is there go to, when their amygdala is rubbed raw..bring out the race or sex or tranny or faggot or class card.

This is when you know they've got nothing and the best thing you could do is dismiss his stupid pleas and not even address it.

There was no black guy, this involved white men in arguably the whitest state in the Union.

I'm trying to help you realize a politician assaulting someone is not right, cool or justified. If I give you an example of how black men get shot for attacking people, maybe that will help you realize what idiots you are being. The reporter should have shot the politician. If I were a reporter I'd get my concealed weapons permit and shoot a fucker if he touched me.
Stop lying. Self defense is justified for ANYBODY threatened.
Self defense from an unarmed journalist?

:lmao:
 
Well, another eyewitness.

From now on Reporters should carry guns and if any politicians or bodyguards touch them they should blow them away. Stand your ground. They feared for their lives.

Or does stand your ground only work if you shoot a black man?


No twit.....in order for a Stand Your Ground claim you have to show you feared death or great bodily harm.......I know you are stupid...but you should really do more research...

The guy body slammed him to the ground. Are you telling me that reporter wasn't afraid for his life as he was being slammed to the ground?

If it were a black man who assaulted the reporter maybe it'd be different, right?
Observe the absolute desperation of this leftist here. He is stuck grasping for straws, trying desperately to gain the moral high ground. As you'll note, leftists cannot stick to the topic because they will lose. So here this guy is, blabbering on about what if it was a fucking black guy who bodyslammed him. Because that is there go to, when their amygdala is rubbed raw..bring out the race or sex or tranny or faggot or class card.

This is when you know they've got nothing and the best thing you could do is dismiss his stupid pleas and not even address it.

There was no black guy, this involved white men in arguably the whitest state in the Union.

I'm trying to help you realize a politician assaulting someone is not right, cool or justified. If I give you an example of how black men get shot for attacking people, maybe that will help you realize what idiots you are being. The reporter should have shot the politician. If I were a reporter I'd get my concealed weapons permit and shoot a fucker if he touched me.
I have an even better idea.
Quit being a rudely offensive twit and nobody will body-slam you.
 
Here's what I'm taking from this latest dimocrat outrage.

Parties/candidates have platforms, so this voter has decided to approach elections with a platform too. Mine is very simple, just one plank. Any candidate who body slams or otherwise takes on a media puke or group of pukes gets my vote. Period.
Lot of people have that platform now. He raised a $100K immediately after the incident.

You guys know he's going to have to pay that reporter for assaulting him. So don't try to pretend what he did was right or justified. He may have still won the election but he's going to pay in court.

And it's probably going to be the taxpayers who pay.
He shouldn't have to pay him a dime. Maybe journalists should get insurance for when they hassle people and get in their space and get what is coming to them?

Again, I don't think you mean that. Because if this was your wife or grandmother and they got body slammed you would have a different opinion.

You can not physically assault someone because they are putting a microphone in your face or because you don't like their questions. If you think it is lawful then I don't know what to say because you just aren't being reasonable or intellectually honest.

What are defenses to charges of assault and battery?
In order to establish self-defense, an accused must generally show: a threat of unlawful force or harm against them; a real, honest perceived fear of harm to themselves (there must be a reasonable basis for this perceived fear); no harm or provocation on their part; and.

So please at least tell me you know what this politician did was wrong. If not then I put you in the retard category.
The topic of the thread is the left playing the victim card. Your posts are spot on.
 
wasnt hillary the original birther?

I don't think she was nor people in her campaign, but some of her supporters were. So she didn't have to get her hands dirty. It's nice to have people carrying your water, isn't it?

Re the guy in Montana, what we saw there is another example of what's going on across the country. You got 2 candidates that are lousy choices and you gotta pick one so you go with the one you can live with over the one you'd rather not. Yeah, the GOP guy is a jerk but who the hell wants a freakin' socialist representing you unless youlive in a deep blue state? You sure as hell don't if you live in Montana.
 
Here's what I'm taking from this latest dimocrat outrage.

Parties/candidates have platforms, so this voter has decided to approach elections with a platform too. Mine is very simple, just one plank. Any candidate who body slams or otherwise takes on a media puke or group of pukes gets my vote. Period.
Lot of people have that platform now. He raised a $100K immediately after the incident.

You guys know he's going to have to pay that reporter for assaulting him. So don't try to pretend what he did was right or justified. He may have still won the election but he's going to pay in court.

And it's probably going to be the taxpayers who pay.
He shouldn't have to pay him a dime. Maybe journalists should get insurance for when they hassle people and get in their space and get what is coming to them?

Again, I don't think you mean that. Because if this was your wife or grandmother and they got body slammed you would have a different opinion.

You can not physically assault someone because they are putting a microphone in your face or because you don't like their questions. If you think it is lawful then I don't know what to say because you just aren't being reasonable or intellectually honest.

What are defenses to charges of assault and battery?
In order to establish self-defense, an accused must generally show: a threat of unlawful force or harm against them; a real, honest perceived fear of harm to themselves (there must be a reasonable basis for this perceived fear); no harm or provocation on their part; and.

So please at least tell me you know what this politician did was wrong. If not then I put you in the retard category.
You went from "What if it were a black?" to "what if it were your mother or grandmother?".

Do you realize what you are doing?
 
No twit.....in order for a Stand Your Ground claim you have to show you feared death or great bodily harm.......I know you are stupid...but you should really do more research...

The guy body slammed him to the ground. Are you telling me that reporter wasn't afraid for his life as he was being slammed to the ground?

If it were a black man who assaulted the reporter maybe it'd be different, right?
Observe the absolute desperation of this leftist here. He is stuck grasping for straws, trying desperately to gain the moral high ground. As you'll note, leftists cannot stick to the topic because they will lose. So here this guy is, blabbering on about what if it was a fucking black guy who bodyslammed him. Because that is there go to, when their amygdala is rubbed raw..bring out the race or sex or tranny or faggot or class card.

This is when you know they've got nothing and the best thing you could do is dismiss his stupid pleas and not even address it.

There was no black guy, this involved white men in arguably the whitest state in the Union.

I'm trying to help you realize a politician assaulting someone is not right, cool or justified. If I give you an example of how black men get shot for attacking people, maybe that will help you realize what idiots you are being. The reporter should have shot the politician. If I were a reporter I'd get my concealed weapons permit and shoot a fucker if he touched me.
Stop lying. Self defense is justified for ANYBODY threatened.
Self defense from an unarmed journalist?

:lmao:
Dufus has no idea how many of can cause great bodily harm unarmed.
 
Yes the evidence he invaded his personal space is he shoved the recorder in his face, the recording is evidence.

What are defenses to charges of assault and battery?
In order to establish self-defense, an accused must generally show: a threat of unlawful force or harm against them; a real, honest perceived fear of harm to themselves (there must be a reasonable basis for this perceived fear); no harm or provocation on their part; and.

WRONG! You are wrong wrong wrong daddyo.
You don't know if I'm wrong or not, goofball. Doesn't matter how many times you say otherwise.
 
wasnt hillary the original birther?

I don't think she was nor people in her campaign, but some of her supporters were. So she didn't have to get her hands dirty. It's nice to have people carrying your water, isn't it?

Re the guy in Montana, what we saw there is another example of what's going on across the country. You got 2 candidates that are lousy choices and you gotta pick one so you go with the one you can live with over the one you'd rather not. Yeah, the GOP guy is a jerk but who the hell wants a freakin' socialist representing you unless youlive in a deep blue state? You sure as hell don't if you live in Montana.
What we have are election results based upon the fact Americans are sick of the elite ruling class snobs.
 

Forum List

Back
Top