- Thread starter
- #41
so you're saying the 17 agencies had this information ahead of the elections and did absolutely nothing with it? What happened to the commander and chief that runs those agencies, was he asleep?it's all unsubstantiated right? you have proof?Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.
I'm liking how you guys just call 17 different intel agencies "the left" and think that means something.
Of course they don't have proof.
Even the nihilist house organ, the NYSlimes admits that....
1. "The C.I.A.’s conclusion does not appear to be the product of specific new intelligence obtained since the election, several American officials, including some who had read the agency’s briefing, said on Sunday. Rather, it was an analysis of what many believe is overwhelming circumstantial evidence — evidence that others feel does not support firm judgments — that the Russians put a thumb on the scale for Mr. Trump, and got their desired outcome."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/11/us/politics/cia-judgment-intelligence-russia-hacking-evidence.html
" ....does not appear to be the product of specific new intelligence..."
What???? A guess????
" many believe"????
Now....there's a decision you can count on!
"....evidence that others feel does not support firm judgments..."
2. Sooo....the conclusion is based on four things:
a. a determined effort to shield the hurt feelings of Liberals like you.
b. Any alternative to Trump
c. a guess.
d. the assiduous use of the Magic 8-Ball
3. But....you can believe it....just like you can believe this:
"U.S. Agencies See No Move by Iran to Build a Bomb" U.S. Agencies See No Move by Iran to Build a Bomb
Yup.....take it to the bank!!!!
BTW, why is it so important today?
I'm saying no such thing.
There is no such evidence.
There is no such agreement.