Proof of Russian Collusion!!!!

The CIA needs to de-classify the presentation on the Russian Hacking they gave to Congress in Sept.


How....exactly....did the Russians help Trump win?


How?


Nothing in the leaked emails....who ever leaked them.....was denied.

Nothing.

I want to know what McConnell didn't want the citizens to know too, so hopefully we'll get to see the documentation before the alleged beneficiary of their aid takes office.



Hmmm.....you linked to this:
How....exactly....did the Russians help Trump win?
How?

Nothing in the leaked emails....who ever leaked them.....was denied.
Nothing.



How about responding to it.

The classified briefing was given to Congress back in September. I think we'll find out soon enough for me. We'll survive the Groper Elect too.
 
The CIA needs to de-classify the presentation on the Russian Hacking they gave to Congress in Sept.


How....exactly....did the Russians help Trump win?


How?


Nothing in the leaked emails....who ever leaked them.....was denied.

Nothing.

I want to know what McConnell didn't want the citizens to know too, so hopefully we'll get to see the documentation before the alleged beneficiary of their aid takes office.



Hmmm.....you linked to this:
How....exactly....did the Russians help Trump win?
How?

Nothing in the leaked emails....who ever leaked them.....was denied.
Nothing.



How about responding to it.

The classified briefing was given to Congress back in September. I think we'll find out soon enough for me. We'll survive the Groper Elect too.


Asked on two occasions.....
Hmmm.....you linked to this:
How....exactly....did the Russians help Trump win?
How?

Nothing in the leaked emails....who ever leaked them.....was denied.
Nothing.
How about responding to it.


You won't, so one is led to conclude that you can't.

There is no basis for your whining other than what a previous poster suggested....your chagrin at the terrible and unexpected beating your side took.


Meditate on it.
 
Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.


Of course they have no proof, but, the Democrats have authored this mantra:

“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”[ Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill, folks. Remember the left's battle cry: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." You simply need to make a harsh, totally unfounded charge, and that's reason enough to investigate. ]



Hence, their argument has more twists and turns in that position than in Nadia Comaneci's floor routine!




But.....there is documented evidence of exactly that: offers to have foreign influence change the course of United States elections!!!


It's by the Democrats.


" It was a May 14, 1983 letter from the head of the KGB, Viktor Chebrikov, to the head of the USSR, the odious Yuri Andropov, with the highest level of classification. Chebrikov relayed to Andropov an offer from Senator Ted Kennedy, presented by Kennedy’s old friend and law-school buddy, John Tunney, a former Democratic senator from California, to reach out to the Soviet leadership at the height of a very hot time in the Cold War. According to Chebrikov, Kennedy was deeply troubled by the deteriorating relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, which he believed was bringing us perilously close to nuclear confrontation. Kennedy, according to Chebrikov, blamed this situation not on the Soviet leadership but on the American president---Ronald Reagan. Not only was the USSR not to blame, but, said Chebrikov, Kennedy was, quite the contrary, “very impressed” with Andropov.

The thrust of the letter is that Reagan had to be stopped, meaning his alleged aggressive defense policies, which then ranged from the Pershing IIs to the MX to SDI, and even his re-election bid, needed to be stopped. It was Ronald Reagan who was the hindrance to peace. That view of Reagan is consistent with things that Kennedy said and wrote at the time, including articles in sources like Rolling Stone (March 1984) and in a speeches like his March 24, 1983 remarks on the Senate floor the day after Reagan’s SDI speech, which he lambasted as “misleading Red-Scare tactics and reckless Star Wars schemes.”

Even more interesting than Kennedy’s diagnosis was the prescription: According to Chebrikov, Kennedy suggested a number of PR moves to help the Soviets in terms of their public image with the American public. He reportedly believed that the Soviet problem was a communication problem, resulting from an inability to counter Reagan’s (not the USSR’s) “propaganda.” If only Americans could get through Reagan’s smokescreen and hear the Soviets’ peaceful intentions." http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=30980



Just one more proof of the adage....'to know what the Democrats are doing, listen to what they blame the other side for."


This post got fifteen - FIFTEEN -- accolades.

More proof this place is just a GOP circle-jerk. Democrats, you have zero margin for error. Can't fight Putin in Syria because that's being the "founder of ISIS". Can't fight ISIS with Assad/Putin, because that's "soft on Russia."

But the GOP? Fuck it, grab a few pussies, appoint Vladimir's personal RimJobber as secretary of state, and it's all good in the hood! #VoterIntegrity #NotForUs #CinnamonHitlerAllTheWay


Syria is not a threat to the US , never was , never will.

The US became involved in Syria because the Obama administration and Hillary were , somehow, COMPELLED to defend Israel. They wanted Bibi to retain the Golan Heights and by weakening Syria it could not RETALIATE against Israel when the latter attacked Iran. The US has no constitutional authority to engage in that type of foreign and military policy.

Grabbing the pussy of a consenting adult is the most wonderful feeling in this world. There is NOTHING better. You should try it sometime.

.

The Groper Elect's actions of grabbing pussy because he is a star and bragging about it make him a creepy fellow.
 
Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.


Of course they have no proof, but, the Democrats have authored this mantra:

“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”[ Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill, folks. Remember the left's battle cry: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." You simply need to make a harsh, totally unfounded charge, and that's reason enough to investigate. ]



Hence, their argument has more twists and turns in that position than in Nadia Comaneci's floor routine!




But.....there is documented evidence of exactly that: offers to have foreign influence change the course of United States elections!!!


It's by the Democrats.


" It was a May 14, 1983 letter from the head of the KGB, Viktor Chebrikov, to the head of the USSR, the odious Yuri Andropov, with the highest level of classification. Chebrikov relayed to Andropov an offer from Senator Ted Kennedy, presented by Kennedy’s old friend and law-school buddy, John Tunney, a former Democratic senator from California, to reach out to the Soviet leadership at the height of a very hot time in the Cold War. According to Chebrikov, Kennedy was deeply troubled by the deteriorating relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, which he believed was bringing us perilously close to nuclear confrontation. Kennedy, according to Chebrikov, blamed this situation not on the Soviet leadership but on the American president---Ronald Reagan. Not only was the USSR not to blame, but, said Chebrikov, Kennedy was, quite the contrary, “very impressed” with Andropov.

The thrust of the letter is that Reagan had to be stopped, meaning his alleged aggressive defense policies, which then ranged from the Pershing IIs to the MX to SDI, and even his re-election bid, needed to be stopped. It was Ronald Reagan who was the hindrance to peace. That view of Reagan is consistent with things that Kennedy said and wrote at the time, including articles in sources like Rolling Stone (March 1984) and in a speeches like his March 24, 1983 remarks on the Senate floor the day after Reagan’s SDI speech, which he lambasted as “misleading Red-Scare tactics and reckless Star Wars schemes.”

Even more interesting than Kennedy’s diagnosis was the prescription: According to Chebrikov, Kennedy suggested a number of PR moves to help the Soviets in terms of their public image with the American public. He reportedly believed that the Soviet problem was a communication problem, resulting from an inability to counter Reagan’s (not the USSR’s) “propaganda.” If only Americans could get through Reagan’s smokescreen and hear the Soviets’ peaceful intentions." http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=30980



Just one more proof of the adage....'to know what the Democrats are doing, listen to what they blame the other side for."


This post got fifteen - FIFTEEN -- accolades.

More proof this place is just a GOP circle-jerk. Democrats, you have zero margin for error. Can't fight Putin in Syria because that's being the "founder of ISIS". Can't fight ISIS with Assad/Putin, because that's "soft on Russia."

But the GOP? Fuck it, grab a few pussies, appoint Vladimir's personal RimJobber as secretary of state, and it's all good in the hood! #VoterIntegrity #NotForUs #CinnamonHitlerAllTheWay


Syria is not a threat to the US , never was , never will.

The US became involved in Syria because the Obama administration and Hillary were , somehow, COMPELLED to defend Israel. They wanted Bibi to retain the Golan Heights and by weakening Syria it could not RETALIATE against Israel when the latter attacked Iran. The US has no constitutional authority to engage in that type of foreign and military policy.

Grabbing the pussy of a consenting adult is the most wonderful feeling in this world. There is NOTHING better. You should try it sometime.

.

The Groper Elect's actions of grabbing pussy because he is a star and bragging about it make him a creepy fellow.


Speaking of creepy....did you vote for the rapist, Bill Clinton?
 
When we hack others including allies, perhaps being hacked should be expected.
Wrong as usual. All this is is just another lame attempt by liberal cry babies and the media to undermine Trump.

It's just more proof of what I've been saying for decades -- dimocraps are scum

Afteer the election, it was -- What....?? Riots, burning, looting, assaulting people that voted for Trump.

That didn't work so dimocrap SCUM started in with the recount/ That didn't work so --

They started threatening Electoral College Members' lives.

That didn't work so they started this shit with trying to get Electors to defect.

That ain't working so good so now they're getting the CIA to lie about the RUSSIANS!!!!!!! That didn't work yet, so now they're now trying to get the liars at the CIA to 'brief' the Electors before they cast their votes....

People -- I shit you not. dimocraps are absolute SCUM.

They are the lowest form of life to ever exist on the Planet. They deserve nothing.

NOTHING.
 
Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.


Of course they have no proof, but, the Democrats have authored this mantra:

“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”[ Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill, folks. Remember the left's battle cry: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." You simply need to make a harsh, totally unfounded charge, and that's reason enough to investigate. ]



Hence, their argument has more twists and turns in that position than in Nadia Comaneci's floor routine!




But.....there is documented evidence of exactly that: offers to have foreign influence change the course of United States elections!!!


It's by the Democrats.


" It was a May 14, 1983 letter from the head of the KGB, Viktor Chebrikov, to the head of the USSR, the odious Yuri Andropov, with the highest level of classification. Chebrikov relayed to Andropov an offer from Senator Ted Kennedy, presented by Kennedy’s old friend and law-school buddy, John Tunney, a former Democratic senator from California, to reach out to the Soviet leadership at the height of a very hot time in the Cold War. According to Chebrikov, Kennedy was deeply troubled by the deteriorating relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, which he believed was bringing us perilously close to nuclear confrontation. Kennedy, according to Chebrikov, blamed this situation not on the Soviet leadership but on the American president---Ronald Reagan. Not only was the USSR not to blame, but, said Chebrikov, Kennedy was, quite the contrary, “very impressed” with Andropov.

The thrust of the letter is that Reagan had to be stopped, meaning his alleged aggressive defense policies, which then ranged from the Pershing IIs to the MX to SDI, and even his re-election bid, needed to be stopped. It was Ronald Reagan who was the hindrance to peace. That view of Reagan is consistent with things that Kennedy said and wrote at the time, including articles in sources like Rolling Stone (March 1984) and in a speeches like his March 24, 1983 remarks on the Senate floor the day after Reagan’s SDI speech, which he lambasted as “misleading Red-Scare tactics and reckless Star Wars schemes.”

Even more interesting than Kennedy’s diagnosis was the prescription: According to Chebrikov, Kennedy suggested a number of PR moves to help the Soviets in terms of their public image with the American public. He reportedly believed that the Soviet problem was a communication problem, resulting from an inability to counter Reagan’s (not the USSR’s) “propaganda.” If only Americans could get through Reagan’s smokescreen and hear the Soviets’ peaceful intentions." http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=30980



Just one more proof of the adage....'to know what the Democrats are doing, listen to what they blame the other side for."


This post got fifteen - FIFTEEN -- accolades.

More proof this place is just a GOP circle-jerk. Democrats, you have zero margin for error. Can't fight Putin in Syria because that's being the "founder of ISIS". Can't fight ISIS with Assad/Putin, because that's "soft on Russia."

But the GOP? Fuck it, grab a few pussies, appoint Vladimir's personal RimJobber as secretary of state, and it's all good in the hood! #VoterIntegrity #NotForUs #CinnamonHitlerAllTheWay


Syria is not a threat to the US , never was , never will.

The US became involved in Syria because the Obama administration and Hillary were , somehow, COMPELLED to defend Israel. They wanted Bibi to retain the Golan Heights and by weakening Syria it could not RETALIATE against Israel when the latter attacked Iran. The US has no constitutional authority to engage in that type of foreign and military policy.

Grabbing the pussy of a consenting adult is the most wonderful feeling in this world. There is NOTHING better. You should try it sometime.

.

The Groper Elect's actions of grabbing pussy because he is a star and bragging about it make him a creepy fellow.


Not in my neck of the woods.

If the good lord made something better than pussy he kept for himself.


.
 
When we hack others including allies, perhaps being hacked should be expected.
Wrong as usual. All this is is just another lame attempt by liberal cry babies and the media to undermine Trump.

It's just more proof of what I've been saying for decades -- dimocraps are scum

Afteer the election, it was -- What....?? Riots, burning, looting, assaulting people that voted for Trump.

That didn't work so dimocrap SCUM started in with the recount/ That didn't work so --

They started threatening Electoral College Members' lives.

That didn't work so they started this shit with trying to get Electors to defect.

That ain't working so good so now they're getting the CIA to lie about the RUSSIANS!!!!!!! That didn't work yet, so now they're now trying to get the liars at the CIA to 'brief' the Electors before they cast their votes....

People -- I shit you not. dimocraps are absolute SCUM.

They are the lowest form of life to ever exist on the Planet. They deserve nothing.

NOTHING.


It would be neigh on impossible to argue that that party, the modern day Communist Party, does not incorporate the very lowest of ideals and values.

Not one defender of Ted Kennedy has appeared in the thread.
 
The CIA needs to de-classify the presentation on the Russian Hacking they gave to Congress in Sept.


How....exactly....did the Russians help Trump win?


How?


Nothing in the leaked emails....who ever leaked them.....was denied.

Nothing.

I want to know what McConnell didn't want the citizens to know too, so hopefully we'll get to see the documentation before the alleged beneficiary of their aid takes office.



Hmmm.....you linked to this:
How....exactly....did the Russians help Trump win?
How?

Nothing in the leaked emails....who ever leaked them.....was denied.
Nothing.



How about responding to it.

The classified briefing was given to Congress back in September. I think we'll find out soon enough for me. We'll survive the Groper Elect too.


Asked on two occasions.....
Hmmm.....you linked to this:
How....exactly....did the Russians help Trump win?
How?

Nothing in the leaked emails....who ever leaked them.....was denied.
Nothing.
How about responding to it.


You won't, so one is led to conclude that you can't.

There is no basis for your whining other than what a previous poster suggested....your chagrin at the terrible and unexpected beating your side took.


Meditate on it.


Remember , Hillary was using a PRIVATE SERVER, so if it was hacked, oh well.


.
 
Speaking of creepy....did you vote for the rapist, Bill Clinton?

Of course it did.

Touching a woman with her consent and approval is quite different than taking a woman against her will.

One's a Republican and the other one's a scum-sucking dimocrap piece of shit.

So of course he voted for the dimocrap. He is what he votes for..... Shit.
 
The CIA needs to de-classify the presentation on the Russian Hacking they gave to Congress in Sept.


How....exactly....did the Russians help Trump win?


How?


Nothing in the leaked emails....who ever leaked them.....was denied.

Nothing.

I want to know what McConnell didn't want the citizens to know too, so hopefully we'll get to see the documentation before the alleged beneficiary of their aid takes office.



Hmmm.....you linked to this:
How....exactly....did the Russians help Trump win?
How?

Nothing in the leaked emails....who ever leaked them.....was denied.
Nothing.



How about responding to it.

The classified briefing was given to Congress back in September. I think we'll find out soon enough for me. We'll survive the Groper Elect too.


Asked on two occasions.....
Hmmm.....you linked to this:
How....exactly....did the Russians help Trump win?
How?

Nothing in the leaked emails....who ever leaked them.....was denied.
Nothing.
How about responding to it.


You won't, so one is led to conclude that you can't.

There is no basis for your whining other than what a previous poster suggested....your chagrin at the terrible and unexpected beating your side took.


Meditate on it.

The answer to your inquiry is in the classified briefing Congress got on the matter. Do you support the release of that information? Or are you just going to ask your trite questions again?
 
All the Russians did was give us FACTS.

They didn't make anything up. Every bit of it was FACT. Not one leak was ever contested by dimocrap scum.

Here's a thought dimocrap scum -- Try not being scum.

fucking low life pieces of shit
 
Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.


Of course they have no proof, but, the Democrats have authored this mantra:

“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”[ Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill, folks. Remember the left's battle cry: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." You simply need to make a harsh, totally unfounded charge, and that's reason enough to investigate. ]



Hence, their argument has more twists and turns in that position than in Nadia Comaneci's floor routine!




But.....there is documented evidence of exactly that: offers to have foreign influence change the course of United States elections!!!


It's by the Democrats.


" It was a May 14, 1983 letter from the head of the KGB, Viktor Chebrikov, to the head of the USSR, the odious Yuri Andropov, with the highest level of classification. Chebrikov relayed to Andropov an offer from Senator Ted Kennedy, presented by Kennedy’s old friend and law-school buddy, John Tunney, a former Democratic senator from California, to reach out to the Soviet leadership at the height of a very hot time in the Cold War. According to Chebrikov, Kennedy was deeply troubled by the deteriorating relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, which he believed was bringing us perilously close to nuclear confrontation. Kennedy, according to Chebrikov, blamed this situation not on the Soviet leadership but on the American president---Ronald Reagan. Not only was the USSR not to blame, but, said Chebrikov, Kennedy was, quite the contrary, “very impressed” with Andropov.

The thrust of the letter is that Reagan had to be stopped, meaning his alleged aggressive defense policies, which then ranged from the Pershing IIs to the MX to SDI, and even his re-election bid, needed to be stopped. It was Ronald Reagan who was the hindrance to peace. That view of Reagan is consistent with things that Kennedy said and wrote at the time, including articles in sources like Rolling Stone (March 1984) and in a speeches like his March 24, 1983 remarks on the Senate floor the day after Reagan’s SDI speech, which he lambasted as “misleading Red-Scare tactics and reckless Star Wars schemes.”

Even more interesting than Kennedy’s diagnosis was the prescription: According to Chebrikov, Kennedy suggested a number of PR moves to help the Soviets in terms of their public image with the American public. He reportedly believed that the Soviet problem was a communication problem, resulting from an inability to counter Reagan’s (not the USSR’s) “propaganda.” If only Americans could get through Reagan’s smokescreen and hear the Soviets’ peaceful intentions." http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=30980



Just one more proof of the adage....'to know what the Democrats are doing, listen to what they blame the other side for."


This post got fifteen - FIFTEEN -- accolades.

More proof this place is just a GOP circle-jerk. Democrats, you have zero margin for error. Can't fight Putin in Syria because that's being the "founder of ISIS". Can't fight ISIS with Assad/Putin, because that's "soft on Russia."

But the GOP? Fuck it, grab a few pussies, appoint Vladimir's personal RimJobber as secretary of state, and it's all good in the hood! #VoterIntegrity #NotForUs #CinnamonHitlerAllTheWay


Syria is not a threat to the US , never was , never will.

The US became involved in Syria because the Obama administration and Hillary were , somehow, COMPELLED to defend Israel. They wanted Bibi to retain the Golan Heights and by weakening Syria it could not RETALIATE against Israel when the latter attacked Iran. The US has no constitutional authority to engage in that type of foreign and military policy.

Grabbing the pussy of a consenting adult is the most wonderful feeling in this world. There is NOTHING better. You should try it sometime.

.

The Groper Elect's actions of grabbing pussy because he is a star and bragging about it make him a creepy fellow.


Speaking of creepy....did you vote for the rapist, Bill Clinton?

No. Who did he rape? When were the charges filed against President Clinton for rape?
 
No. Who did he rape? When were the charges filed against President Clinton for rape?

Argued and argued a thousand times in here.

One thing about being a dimocrap scumbag, it doesn't take much theatrical talent for them to act stupid
 
How....exactly....did the Russians help Trump win?


How?


Nothing in the leaked emails....who ever leaked them.....was denied.

Nothing.

I want to know what McConnell didn't want the citizens to know too, so hopefully we'll get to see the documentation before the alleged beneficiary of their aid takes office.



Hmmm.....you linked to this:
How....exactly....did the Russians help Trump win?
How?

Nothing in the leaked emails....who ever leaked them.....was denied.
Nothing.



How about responding to it.

The classified briefing was given to Congress back in September. I think we'll find out soon enough for me. We'll survive the Groper Elect too.


Asked on two occasions.....
Hmmm.....you linked to this:
How....exactly....did the Russians help Trump win?
How?

Nothing in the leaked emails....who ever leaked them.....was denied.
Nothing.
How about responding to it.


You won't, so one is led to conclude that you can't.

There is no basis for your whining other than what a previous poster suggested....your chagrin at the terrible and unexpected beating your side took.


Meditate on it.

The answer to your inquiry is in the classified briefing Congress got on the matter. Do you support the release of that information? Or are you just going to ask your trite questions again?


Did you claim that Russia made Trump's victory possible?

If you'd like to retreat from that position at this time, that'd be fine.
 
Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.


Of course they have no proof, but, the Democrats have authored this mantra:

“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”[ Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill, folks. Remember the left's battle cry: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." You simply need to make a harsh, totally unfounded charge, and that's reason enough to investigate. ]



Hence, their argument has more twists and turns in that position than in Nadia Comaneci's floor routine!




But.....there is documented evidence of exactly that: offers to have foreign influence change the course of United States elections!!!


It's by the Democrats.


" It was a May 14, 1983 letter from the head of the KGB, Viktor Chebrikov, to the head of the USSR, the odious Yuri Andropov, with the highest level of classification. Chebrikov relayed to Andropov an offer from Senator Ted Kennedy, presented by Kennedy’s old friend and law-school buddy, John Tunney, a former Democratic senator from California, to reach out to the Soviet leadership at the height of a very hot time in the Cold War. According to Chebrikov, Kennedy was deeply troubled by the deteriorating relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, which he believed was bringing us perilously close to nuclear confrontation. Kennedy, according to Chebrikov, blamed this situation not on the Soviet leadership but on the American president---Ronald Reagan. Not only was the USSR not to blame, but, said Chebrikov, Kennedy was, quite the contrary, “very impressed” with Andropov.

The thrust of the letter is that Reagan had to be stopped, meaning his alleged aggressive defense policies, which then ranged from the Pershing IIs to the MX to SDI, and even his re-election bid, needed to be stopped. It was Ronald Reagan who was the hindrance to peace. That view of Reagan is consistent with things that Kennedy said and wrote at the time, including articles in sources like Rolling Stone (March 1984) and in a speeches like his March 24, 1983 remarks on the Senate floor the day after Reagan’s SDI speech, which he lambasted as “misleading Red-Scare tactics and reckless Star Wars schemes.”

Even more interesting than Kennedy’s diagnosis was the prescription: According to Chebrikov, Kennedy suggested a number of PR moves to help the Soviets in terms of their public image with the American public. He reportedly believed that the Soviet problem was a communication problem, resulting from an inability to counter Reagan’s (not the USSR’s) “propaganda.” If only Americans could get through Reagan’s smokescreen and hear the Soviets’ peaceful intentions." http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=30980



Just one more proof of the adage....'to know what the Democrats are doing, listen to what they blame the other side for."


This post got fifteen - FIFTEEN -- accolades.

More proof this place is just a GOP circle-jerk. Democrats, you have zero margin for error. Can't fight Putin in Syria because that's being the "founder of ISIS". Can't fight ISIS with Assad/Putin, because that's "soft on Russia."

But the GOP? Fuck it, grab a few pussies, appoint Vladimir's personal RimJobber as secretary of state, and it's all good in the hood! #VoterIntegrity #NotForUs #CinnamonHitlerAllTheWay


Syria is not a threat to the US , never was , never will.

The US became involved in Syria because the Obama administration and Hillary were , somehow, COMPELLED to defend Israel. They wanted Bibi to retain the Golan Heights and by weakening Syria it could not RETALIATE against Israel when the latter attacked Iran. The US has no constitutional authority to engage in that type of foreign and military policy.

Grabbing the pussy of a consenting adult is the most wonderful feeling in this world. There is NOTHING better. You should try it sometime.

.

The Groper Elect's actions of grabbing pussy because he is a star and bragging about it make him a creepy fellow.


Speaking of creepy....did you vote for the rapist, Bill Clinton?

No. Who did he rape? When were the charges filed against President Clinton for rape?


Clinton Misogyny - Sex
Juanita Broaddrick (AR)- rape
Eileen Wellstone (Oxford) - rape
Elizabeth Ward Gracen - rape - quid pro quo, post incident intimidation
Regina Hopper Blakely - "forced himself on her, biting, bruising her"
Kathleen Willey (WH) - sexual assault, intimidations, threats
Sandra Allen James (DC) - sexual assault
22 Year Old 1972 (Yale) - sexual assault
Kathy Bradshaw (AK) - sexual assault
Cristy Zercher - unwelcomed sexual advance, intimidations
Paula Jones (AR) - unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
Carolyn Moffet -unwelcomed sexual advance, exposure, bordering on sexual assault
1974 student at University of Arkansas - unwelcomed physical contact
1978-1980 - seven complaints per Arkansas state troopers
Monica Lewinsky - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Gennifer Flowers - quid pro quo, post incident character assault
Dolly Kyle Browning - post incident character assault
Sally Perdue - post incident threats
Betty Dalton - rebuffed his advances, married to one of his supporters
Denise Reeder - apologetic note scanned
CLINTON'S ROGUES GALLERY:

And...just recently: "Leslie Millwee says that on two of the alleged occasions, Clinton groped her while he rubbed himself against her and reached climax." EXCLUSIVE VIDEO INTERVIEW: New Bill Clinton Sexual Assault Accuser Goes Public for the First Time - Breitbart
 
No. Who did he rape? When were the charges filed against President Clinton for rape?

Argued and argued a thousand times in here.

One thing about being a dimocrap scumbag, it doesn't take much theatrical talent for them to act stupid


It was Blind Boo who asked that question
 
Did you claim that Russia made Trump's victory possible?

If you'd like to retreat from that position at this time, that'd be fine.

Didn't make that claim so I hardly feel the need to retreat from it. I always said it was Hillary's election to lose. I think she could have pulled out the Rust belt states if she had chosen Bernie over Tim even with the Russian hacking and whatever else they did to interfere.
 

Forum List

Back
Top