Proof of Russian Collusion!!!!

[ClosedCaption]

I didnt get the job.

Why not?

....The left....

 

[kaz]

I didnt get the job.

Why not?

....The left....

It was BBBBBBBBBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

... The left....

 

[NYcarbineer]

Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.


Of course they have no proof, but, the Democrats have authored this mantra:

“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”[ Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill, folks. Remember the left's battle cry: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." You simply need to make a harsh, totally unfounded charge, and that's reason enough to investigate. ]



Hence, their argument has more twists and turns in that position than in Nadia Comaneci's floor routine!




But.....there is documented evidence of exactly that: offers to have foreign influence change the course of United States elections!!!


It's by the Democrats.


" It was a May 14, 1983 letter from the head of the KGB, Viktor Chebrikov, to the head of the USSR, the odious Yuri Andropov, with the highest level of classification. Chebrikov relayed to Andropov an offer from Senator Ted Kennedy, presented by Kennedy’s old friend and law-school buddy, John Tunney, a former Democratic senator from California, to reach out to the Soviet leadership at the height of a very hot time in the Cold War. According to Chebrikov, Kennedy was deeply troubled by the deteriorating relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, which he believed was bringing us perilously close to nuclear confrontation. Kennedy, according to Chebrikov, blamed this situation not on the Soviet leadership but on the American president---Ronald Reagan. Not only was the USSR not to blame, but, said Chebrikov, Kennedy was, quite the contrary, “very impressed” with Andropov.

The thrust of the letter is that Reagan had to be stopped, meaning his alleged aggressive defense policies, which then ranged from the Pershing IIs to the MX to SDI, and even his re-election bid, needed to be stopped. It was Ronald Reagan who was the hindrance to peace. That view of Reagan is consistent with things that Kennedy said and wrote at the time, including articles in sources like Rolling Stone (March 1984) and in a speeches like his March 24, 1983 remarks on the Senate floor the day after Reagan’s SDI speech, which he lambasted as “misleading Red-Scare tactics and reckless Star Wars schemes.”

Even more interesting than Kennedy’s diagnosis was the prescription: According to Chebrikov, Kennedy suggested a number of PR moves to help the Soviets in terms of their public image with the American public. He reportedly believed that the Soviet problem was a communication problem, resulting from an inability to counter Reagan’s (not the USSR’s) “propaganda.” If only Americans could get through Reagan’s smokescreen and hear the Soviets’ peaceful intentions." http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=30980



Just one more proof of the adage....'to know what the Democrats are doing, listen to what they blame the other side for."

The dingbat who voted for a Birther now wants to school us on unfounded charges.

Priceless.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.


Of course they have no proof, but, the Democrats have authored this mantra:

“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”[ Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill, folks. Remember the left's battle cry: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." You simply need to make a harsh, totally unfounded charge, and that's reason enough to investigate. ]



Hence, their argument has more twists and turns in that position than in Nadia Comaneci's floor routine!




But.....there is documented evidence of exactly that: offers to have foreign influence change the course of United States elections!!!


It's by the Democrats.


" It was a May 14, 1983 letter from the head of the KGB, Viktor Chebrikov, to the head of the USSR, the odious Yuri Andropov, with the highest level of classification. Chebrikov relayed to Andropov an offer from Senator Ted Kennedy, presented by Kennedy’s old friend and law-school buddy, John Tunney, a former Democratic senator from California, to reach out to the Soviet leadership at the height of a very hot time in the Cold War. According to Chebrikov, Kennedy was deeply troubled by the deteriorating relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, which he believed was bringing us perilously close to nuclear confrontation. Kennedy, according to Chebrikov, blamed this situation not on the Soviet leadership but on the American president---Ronald Reagan. Not only was the USSR not to blame, but, said Chebrikov, Kennedy was, quite the contrary, “very impressed” with Andropov.

The thrust of the letter is that Reagan had to be stopped, meaning his alleged aggressive defense policies, which then ranged from the Pershing IIs to the MX to SDI, and even his re-election bid, needed to be stopped. It was Ronald Reagan who was the hindrance to peace. That view of Reagan is consistent with things that Kennedy said and wrote at the time, including articles in sources like Rolling Stone (March 1984) and in a speeches like his March 24, 1983 remarks on the Senate floor the day after Reagan’s SDI speech, which he lambasted as “misleading Red-Scare tactics and reckless Star Wars schemes.”

Even more interesting than Kennedy’s diagnosis was the prescription: According to Chebrikov, Kennedy suggested a number of PR moves to help the Soviets in terms of their public image with the American public. He reportedly believed that the Soviet problem was a communication problem, resulting from an inability to counter Reagan’s (not the USSR’s) “propaganda.” If only Americans could get through Reagan’s smokescreen and hear the Soviets’ peaceful intentions." http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=30980



Just one more proof of the adage....'to know what the Democrats are doing, listen to what they blame the other side for."

Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.


Of course they have no proof, but, the Democrats have authored this mantra:

“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”[ Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill, folks. Remember the left's battle cry: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." You simply need to make a harsh, totally unfounded charge, and that's reason enough to investigate. ]



Hence, their argument has more twists and turns in that position than in Nadia Comaneci's floor routine!




But.....there is documented evidence of exactly that: offers to have foreign influence change the course of United States elections!!!


It's by the Democrats.


" It was a May 14, 1983 letter from the head of the KGB, Viktor Chebrikov, to the head of the USSR, the odious Yuri Andropov, with the highest level of classification. Chebrikov relayed to Andropov an offer from Senator Ted Kennedy, presented by Kennedy’s old friend and law-school buddy, John Tunney, a former Democratic senator from California, to reach out to the Soviet leadership at the height of a very hot time in the Cold War. According to Chebrikov, Kennedy was deeply troubled by the deteriorating relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, which he believed was bringing us perilously close to nuclear confrontation. Kennedy, according to Chebrikov, blamed this situation not on the Soviet leadership but on the American president---Ronald Reagan. Not only was the USSR not to blame, but, said Chebrikov, Kennedy was, quite the contrary, “very impressed” with Andropov.

The thrust of the letter is that Reagan had to be stopped, meaning his alleged aggressive defense policies, which then ranged from the Pershing IIs to the MX to SDI, and even his re-election bid, needed to be stopped. It was Ronald Reagan who was the hindrance to peace. That view of Reagan is consistent with things that Kennedy said and wrote at the time, including articles in sources like Rolling Stone (March 1984) and in a speeches like his March 24, 1983 remarks on the Senate floor the day after Reagan’s SDI speech, which he lambasted as “misleading Red-Scare tactics and reckless Star Wars schemes.”

Even more interesting than Kennedy’s diagnosis was the prescription: According to Chebrikov, Kennedy suggested a number of PR moves to help the Soviets in terms of their public image with the American public. He reportedly believed that the Soviet problem was a communication problem, resulting from an inability to counter Reagan’s (not the USSR’s) “propaganda.” If only Americans could get through Reagan’s smokescreen and hear the Soviets’ peaceful intentions." http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=30980



Just one more proof of the adage....'to know what the Democrats are doing, listen to what they blame the other side for."

Tell us about Clinton being a rapist, as you've said repeatedly,

based on unfounded charges.

 

[Ame®icano]

Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.

I'm liking how you guys just call 17 different intel agencies "the left" and think that means something.

The leftist media is really a propaganda arm for the elites, The Wall Street, special interests, Democrats, and globalists. They're like Bagdad Bob.

Hillary said 17 intelligence agencies ”confirmed” Russia is trying to influence our election. Straight up lie.

The “17 agencies that actually confirmed” it was the Russians? Well it turns out that was only one guy, namely James Clapper, the head of US intelligence. The same man who committed perjury before congress after his NSA surveillance program was leaked. He issued a statement that included the phrase:

We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.

More? The very next sentence is also of interest:

Some states have also recently seen scanning and probing of their election-related systems, which in most cases originated from servers operated by a Russian company. However, we are not now in a position to attribute this activity to the Russian Government.

Homeland Security Statement

Read it. The word “confirmed” does not appear anywhere in this statement.

So when Hillary stated the “17 intelligence agencies have confirmed” I was anticipating what that would turn up in the “fact checking” apparatus, which allegedly exists to objectively test the assertions of both candidates in real time. The “fact checking” around this statement would be comical if not infuriatingly Orwellian. The ABC called it a "true fact” but it's not true.

So, other then leftists being leftists, what else is new?

 

[jc456]

Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.

I'm liking how you guys just call 17 different intel agencies "the left" and think that means something.

it's all unsubstantiated right? you have proof?

 

[ClosedCaption]

The leftist media is really a propaganda arm for the elites, The Wall Street, special interests, Democrats, and globalists. They're like Bagdad Bob.

Hillary said 17 intelligence agencies ”confirmed” Russia is trying to influence our election. Straight up lie.

Yes that is a lie one told by you. She said 17 intel agencies confirmed Russia was behind the hacks. Not this bs you just made up

 

[jc456]

I didnt get the job.

Why not?

....The left....

shame on them

 

[jc456]

The leftist media is really a propaganda arm for the elites, The Wall Street, special interests, Democrats, and globalists. They're like Bagdad Bob.

Hillary said 17 intelligence agencies ”confirmed” Russia is trying to influence our election. Straight up lie.

Yes that is a lie one told by you. She said 17 intel agencies confirmed Russia was behind the hacks. Not this bs you just made up

17 intel agencies have proof that voters were intimidated? Name the voters.

BTW, the 2.3 million popular vote count by hillary above trump failed to get the message.

 

[buckeye45_73]

I just love it now democrats care about it

1 Russia
2 cybersecurity
3 emails


So maybe theyll.want to help us find hillarys emails and say it was treason for her to have such a set up.

They are clueless, they think they can m politicize an issue or make.one up and it blows up in their face.

they had everything they have today, minus the loss. And they did absolutely nothing. NOTHING!!! So really, how important was it for them when they thought it was a win? Not at all. Hypocrites, each and everyone of them. They even sent out talking points, I've been watching it on all the news channels, all the same sound bites. Every fking one of em. Even the socialist students have the sound bites, so they recruited the college flunkies.

Yeah its normal, Lakhota does.the same shit. Just words, these people dont know shit!!!!!

 

[oreo]

Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.


Of course they have no proof, but, the Democrats have authored this mantra:

“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”[ Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill, folks. Remember the left's battle cry: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." You simply need to make a harsh, totally unfounded charge, and that's reason enough to investigate. ]



Hence, their argument has more twists and turns in that position than in Nadia Comaneci's floor routine!




But.....there is documented evidence of exactly that: offers to have foreign influence change the course of United States elections!!!


It's by the Democrats.


" It was a May 14, 1983 letter from the head of the KGB, Viktor Chebrikov, to the head of the USSR, the odious Yuri Andropov, with the highest level of classification. Chebrikov relayed to Andropov an offer from Senator Ted Kennedy, presented by Kennedy’s old friend and law-school buddy, John Tunney, a former Democratic senator from California, to reach out to the Soviet leadership at the height of a very hot time in the Cold War. According to Chebrikov, Kennedy was deeply troubled by the deteriorating relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, which he believed was bringing us perilously close to nuclear confrontation. Kennedy, according to Chebrikov, blamed this situation not on the Soviet leadership but on the American president---Ronald Reagan. Not only was the USSR not to blame, but, said Chebrikov, Kennedy was, quite the contrary, “very impressed” with Andropov.

The thrust of the letter is that Reagan had to be stopped, meaning his alleged aggressive defense policies, which then ranged from the Pershing IIs to the MX to SDI, and even his re-election bid, needed to be stopped. It was Ronald Reagan who was the hindrance to peace. That view of Reagan is consistent with things that Kennedy said and wrote at the time, including articles in sources like Rolling Stone (March 1984) and in a speeches like his March 24, 1983 remarks on the Senate floor the day after Reagan’s SDI speech, which he lambasted as “misleading Red-Scare tactics and reckless Star Wars schemes.”

Even more interesting than Kennedy’s diagnosis was the prescription: According to Chebrikov, Kennedy suggested a number of PR moves to help the Soviets in terms of their public image with the American public. He reportedly believed that the Soviet problem was a communication problem, resulting from an inability to counter Reagan’s (not the USSR’s) “propaganda.” If only Americans could get through Reagan’s smokescreen and hear the Soviets’ peaceful intentions." http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=30980



Just one more proof of the adage....'to know what the Democrats are doing, listen to what they blame the other side for."

The Problem you have is that it's not Democrats who are leading the front line on this. It is JOHN McCAIN and LINDSEY GRAHAM--both Republicans whom are privy to the information coming out of the Senate Intelligence committee. I have never seen such a look of disgust like this on John McCain's face before. Clearly he knows something. And he's never been one to make shit up.

The other thing you need to be concerned about-is. While we have all complained about Obama being slow to react--requiring almost 100% proof of something before he makes a move. Obviously someone has stuck something under his nose that he could not ignore--to issue an executive order like this. Trump is the first REPUBLICAN President Elect in this nations history, where Republicans and a sitting Democrat President are questioning the motives on how he got elected, and that should scare the shit out of you Trumpsters.

An article in the New York Times was released--on this collusion.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/11/world/europe/trump-campaign-russia.html?_r=0

So there is NO DOUBT that -politicians in support of Trump were in contact with Russian officials. We know that.

If they can prove collusion with a Foreign adversary to sway our election, this could easily be considered TREASON.

And judging that his Secretary of State pick, whom is the former CEO of Exon Mobile--and a friend of Vladmir Putin--who would stand to profit greatly by the US lifting sanctions, Trump just keeps nailing his own coffin shut.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.

I'm liking how you guys just call 17 different intel agencies "the left" and think that means something.

it's all unsubstantiated right? you have proof?

Of course they don't have proof.
Even the nihilist house organ, the NYSlimes admits that....


1. "The C.I.A.’s conclusion does not appear to be the product of specific new intelligence obtained since the election, several American officials, including some who had read the agency’s briefing, said on Sunday. Rather, it was an analysis of what many believe is overwhelming circumstantial evidence — evidence that others feel does not support firm judgments — that the Russians put a thumb on the scale for Mr. Trump, and got their desired outcome."

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/11/us/politics/cia-judgment-intelligence-russia-hacking-evidence.html


" ....does not appear to be the product of specific new intelligence..."

What???? A guess????


" many believe"????

Now....there's a decision you can count on!

"....evidence that others feel does not support firm judgments..."




2. Sooo....the conclusion is based on four things:

a. a determined effort to shield the hurt feelings of Liberals

b. Any alternative to Trump

c. a guess.

d. the assiduous use of the Magic 8-Ball



3. But....you can believe it....just like you can believe this:

"U.S. Agencies See No Move by Iran to Build a Bomb" U.S. Agencies See No Move by Iran to Build a Bomb

Yup.....take it to the bank!!!!

 

[jc456]

Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.

I'm liking how you guys just call 17 different intel agencies "the left" and think that means something.

it's all unsubstantiated right? you have proof?

Of course they don't have proof.
Even the nihilist house organ, the NYSlimes admits that....


1. "The C.I.A.’s conclusion does not appear to be the product of specific new intelligence obtained since the election, several American officials, including some who had read the agency’s briefing, said on Sunday. Rather, it was an analysis of what many believe is overwhelming circumstantial evidence — evidence that others feel does not support firm judgments — that the Russians put a thumb on the scale for Mr. Trump, and got their desired outcome."

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/11/us/politics/cia-judgment-intelligence-russia-hacking-evidence.html


" ....does not appear to be the product of specific new intelligence..."

What???? A guess????


" many believe"????

Now....there's a decision you can count on!

"....evidence that others feel does not support firm judgments..."




2. Sooo....the conclusion is based on four things:

a. a determined effort to shield the hurt feelings of Liberals like you.

b. Any alternative to Trump

c. a guess.

d. the assiduous use of the Magic 8-Ball



3. But....you can believe it....just like you can believe this:

"U.S. Agencies See No Move by Iran to Build a Bomb" U.S. Agencies See No Move by Iran to Build a Bomb

Yup.....take it to the bank!!!!

so you're saying the 17 agencies had this information ahead of the elections and did absolutely nothing with it? What happened to the commander and chief that runs those agencies, was he asleep?

BTW, why is it so important today?

 

[buckeye45_73]

PC why are you failing Math class?

PC: The teacher is a....a liberal!

PC why did you fail your driving test?

PC: The test was from the left!

yada yada yada

Well.when youre taught that 2+2=5 in school by libtards, it can happen.

Facts don matter.only self-esteem, which has evolved into the safe space,.trigger warning culture where grades dont mean anything.

 

[jc456]

PC why are you failing Math class?

PC: The teacher is a....a liberal!

PC why did you fail your driving test?

PC: The test was from the left!

yada yada yada

Well.when youre taught that 2+2=5 in school by libtards, it can happen.

Facts don matter.only self-esteem, which has evolved into the safe space,.trigger warning culture where grades dont mean anything.

nor does winning and losing obviously.

 

[Ame®icano]

The leftist media is really a propaganda arm for the elites, The Wall Street, special interests, Democrats, and globalists. They're like Bagdad Bob.

Hillary said 17 intelligence agencies ”confirmed” Russia is trying to influence our election. Straight up lie.

Yes that is a lie one told by you. She said 17 intel agencies confirmed Russia was behind the hacks. Not this bs you just made up

There is not one agency that came with a statement and said "confirmed". If there was, how about you name three of them and post the links to their statements?

I provided a link to the Homeland Security joint statement, straight out of Clapper's office. So what's the BS I "made up"?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.


Of course they have no proof, but, the Democrats have authored this mantra:

“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”[ Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill, folks. Remember the left's battle cry: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." You simply need to make a harsh, totally unfounded charge, and that's reason enough to investigate. ]



Hence, their argument has more twists and turns in that position than in Nadia Comaneci's floor routine!




But.....there is documented evidence of exactly that: offers to have foreign influence change the course of United States elections!!!


It's by the Democrats.


" It was a May 14, 1983 letter from the head of the KGB, Viktor Chebrikov, to the head of the USSR, the odious Yuri Andropov, with the highest level of classification. Chebrikov relayed to Andropov an offer from Senator Ted Kennedy, presented by Kennedy’s old friend and law-school buddy, John Tunney, a former Democratic senator from California, to reach out to the Soviet leadership at the height of a very hot time in the Cold War. According to Chebrikov, Kennedy was deeply troubled by the deteriorating relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, which he believed was bringing us perilously close to nuclear confrontation. Kennedy, according to Chebrikov, blamed this situation not on the Soviet leadership but on the American president---Ronald Reagan. Not only was the USSR not to blame, but, said Chebrikov, Kennedy was, quite the contrary, “very impressed” with Andropov.

The thrust of the letter is that Reagan had to be stopped, meaning his alleged aggressive defense policies, which then ranged from the Pershing IIs to the MX to SDI, and even his re-election bid, needed to be stopped. It was Ronald Reagan who was the hindrance to peace. That view of Reagan is consistent with things that Kennedy said and wrote at the time, including articles in sources like Rolling Stone (March 1984) and in a speeches like his March 24, 1983 remarks on the Senate floor the day after Reagan’s SDI speech, which he lambasted as “misleading Red-Scare tactics and reckless Star Wars schemes.”

Even more interesting than Kennedy’s diagnosis was the prescription: According to Chebrikov, Kennedy suggested a number of PR moves to help the Soviets in terms of their public image with the American public. He reportedly believed that the Soviet problem was a communication problem, resulting from an inability to counter Reagan’s (not the USSR’s) “propaganda.” If only Americans could get through Reagan’s smokescreen and hear the Soviets’ peaceful intentions." http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=30980



Just one more proof of the adage....'to know what the Democrats are doing, listen to what they blame the other side for."

The Problem you have is that it's not Democrats who are leading the front line on this. It is JOHN McCAIN and LINDSEY GRAHAM--both Republicans whom are privy to the information coming out of the Senate Intelligence committee. I have never seen such a look of disgust like this on John McCain's face before. Clearly he knows something. And he's never been one to make shit up.

The other thing you need to be concerned about-is. While we have all complained about Obama being slow to react--requiring almost 100% proof of something before he makes a move. Obviously someone has stuck something under his nose that he could not ignore--to issue an executive order like this. Trump is the first President Elect in this nations history, where Republicans and a sitting President are questioning the motives on how he got elected, and that should scare the shit out of you Trumpsters.

An article in the New York Times was released--on this collusion.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/11/world/europe/trump-campaign-russia.html?_r=0

So there is NO DOUBT that -politicians in support of Trump were in contact with Russian officials. We know that.

If they can prove collusion with a Foreign adversary to sway our election, this could easily be considered TREASON.

And judging that his Secretary of State pick, whom is the former CEO of Exon Mobile--and a friend of Vladmir Putin--who would stand to profit greatly by the US lifting sanctions, Trump just keeps nailing his own coffin shut.

The only treason on display is the work of Democrat Ted 'the murderer' Kennedy that I have revealed and documented.

Democrat treason.....the very same Democrats who destroyed our ability to collect intelligence, thus creating the openings for 9/11.




.... the Democrats/Liberals totally emasculated the intelligence agencies of America.

1. "The real aberration occurred in the mid-1970s when the United States granted its legislative branch the greatest control over intelligence matters of any Western nation, and overturned the system which had prevailed in the United States since the Founding.

2. The damage done to the CIA by this congressional oversight regime (Democrat-controlled Pike and Church Committees) is quite extensive. The committees increased the number of CIA officials subject to Senate confirmation, condemned the agency for its contacts with unscrupulous characters, prohibited any further contact with these bad characters, insisted that the United States not engage or assist in any coup which may harm a foreign leader, and overwhelmed the agency with interminable requests for briefings (some 600 alone in 1996).

3. ...[Democrat] members of Congress threatened to leak information in order to derail covert operations they found personally repugnant. Leaks are a recurring problem, as some member of Congress, or some staff member, demonstrated in the aftermath of the September 11th attack… Leaks have occurred repeatedly since the mid-1970s, and in very few cases has the offending party been disciplined. One of the Founding Fathers of the new oversight regime, former [Democrat] Representative Leo Ryan, held that leaks were an important tool in checking the “secret government.”

4. [C]hairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, [Democrat] Joseph Biden,…[t]he Delaware Democrat was one of seventeen Senators who voted in 1974 to ban all covert operations, and proudly noted during his 1988 campaign for president that he had threatened to “go public” with covert action plans by the Reagan administration, causing them to cancel the operations.

5. [Democrat] Congressional meddling is primarily responsible for this new CIA ethos, transforming it from an agency willing to take risks, and act at times in a Machiavellian manner, into just another sclerotic Washington bureaucracy. This cautious, legalistic attitude has crippled the agency’s effectiveness ...."
http://hnn.us/articles/380.html



Democrats.....working tirelessly to weaken America.

 

[jc456]

Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.


Of course they have no proof, but, the Democrats have authored this mantra:

“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”[ Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill, folks. Remember the left's battle cry: "The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it's the seriousness of the charge that matters." You simply need to make a harsh, totally unfounded charge, and that's reason enough to investigate. ]



Hence, their argument has more twists and turns in that position than in Nadia Comaneci's floor routine!




But.....there is documented evidence of exactly that: offers to have foreign influence change the course of United States elections!!!


It's by the Democrats.


" It was a May 14, 1983 letter from the head of the KGB, Viktor Chebrikov, to the head of the USSR, the odious Yuri Andropov, with the highest level of classification. Chebrikov relayed to Andropov an offer from Senator Ted Kennedy, presented by Kennedy’s old friend and law-school buddy, John Tunney, a former Democratic senator from California, to reach out to the Soviet leadership at the height of a very hot time in the Cold War. According to Chebrikov, Kennedy was deeply troubled by the deteriorating relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union, which he believed was bringing us perilously close to nuclear confrontation. Kennedy, according to Chebrikov, blamed this situation not on the Soviet leadership but on the American president---Ronald Reagan. Not only was the USSR not to blame, but, said Chebrikov, Kennedy was, quite the contrary, “very impressed” with Andropov.

The thrust of the letter is that Reagan had to be stopped, meaning his alleged aggressive defense policies, which then ranged from the Pershing IIs to the MX to SDI, and even his re-election bid, needed to be stopped. It was Ronald Reagan who was the hindrance to peace. That view of Reagan is consistent with things that Kennedy said and wrote at the time, including articles in sources like Rolling Stone (March 1984) and in a speeches like his March 24, 1983 remarks on the Senate floor the day after Reagan’s SDI speech, which he lambasted as “misleading Red-Scare tactics and reckless Star Wars schemes.”

Even more interesting than Kennedy’s diagnosis was the prescription: According to Chebrikov, Kennedy suggested a number of PR moves to help the Soviets in terms of their public image with the American public. He reportedly believed that the Soviet problem was a communication problem, resulting from an inability to counter Reagan’s (not the USSR’s) “propaganda.” If only Americans could get through Reagan’s smokescreen and hear the Soviets’ peaceful intentions." http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=30980



Just one more proof of the adage....'to know what the Democrats are doing, listen to what they blame the other side for."

The Problem you have is that it's not Democrats who are leading the front line on this. It is JOHN McCAIN and LINDSEY GRAHAM--both Republicans whom are privy to the information coming out of the Senate Intelligence committee. I have never seen such a look of disgust like this on John McCain's face before. Clearly he knows something. And he's never been one to make shit up.

The other thing you need to be concerned about-is. While we have all complained about Obama being slow to react--requiring almost 100% proof of something before he makes a move. Obviously someone has stuck something under his nose that he could not ignore--to issue an executive order like this. Trump is the first President Elect in this nations history, where Republicans and a sitting President are questioning the motives on how he got elected, and that should scare the shit out of you Trumpsters.

An article in the New York Times was released--on this collusion.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/11/world/europe/trump-campaign-russia.html?_r=0

So there is NO DOUBT that -politicians in support of Trump were in contact with Russian officials. We know that.

If they can prove collusion with a Foreign adversary to sway our election, this could easily be considered TREASON.

And judging that his Secretary of State pick, whom is the former CEO of Exon Mobile--and a friend of Vladmir Putin--who would stand to profit greatly by the US lifting sanctions, Trump just keeps nailing his own coffin shut.

The only treason on display is the work of Democrat Ted 'the murderer' Kennedy that I have revealed and documented.

Democrat treason.....the very same Democrats who destroyed our ability to collect intelligence, thus creating the openings for 9/11.




.... the Democrats/Liberals totally emasculated the intelligence agencies of America.

1. "The real aberration occurred in the mid-1970s when the United States granted its legislative branch the greatest control over intelligence matters of any Western nation, and overturned the system which had prevailed in the United States since the Founding.

2. The damage done to the CIA by this congressional oversight regime (Democrat-controlled Pike and Church Committees) is quite extensive. The committees increased the number of CIA officials subject to Senate confirmation, condemned the agency for its contacts with unscrupulous characters, prohibited any further contact with these bad characters, insisted that the United States not engage or assist in any coup which may harm a foreign leader, and overwhelmed the agency with interminable requests for briefings (some 600 alone in 1996).

3. ...[Democrat] members of Congress threatened to leak information in order to derail covert operations they found personally repugnant. Leaks are a recurring problem, as some member of Congress, or some staff member, demonstrated in the aftermath of the September 11th attack… Leaks have occurred repeatedly since the mid-1970s, and in very few cases has the offending party been disciplined. One of the Founding Fathers of the new oversight regime, former [Democrat] Representative Leo Ryan, held that leaks were an important tool in checking the “secret government.”

4. [C]hairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, [Democrat] Joseph Biden,…[t]he Delaware Democrat was one of seventeen Senators who voted in 1974 to ban all covert operations, and proudly noted during his 1988 campaign for president that he had threatened to “go public” with covert action plans by the Reagan administration, causing them to cancel the operations.

5. [Democrat] Congressional meddling is primarily responsible for this new CIA ethos, transforming it from an agency willing to take risks, and act at times in a Machiavellian manner, into just another sclerotic Washington bureaucracy. This cautious, legalistic attitude has crippled the agency’s effectiveness ...."
http://hnn.us/articles/380.html



Democrats.....working tirelessly to weaken America.

you know what is sad about kennedy's crime, is the fact that the people of his state kept electing and reelecting a murderer. The left libturds have no morals.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Democrats have kicked up quite a fuss, claiming some sort of collusion between Trump supporters and some Russian efforts to get Mr. Trump elected.

I'm liking how you guys just call 17 different intel agencies "the left" and think that means something.

it's all unsubstantiated right? you have proof?

Awww, you guys are adorable all using the same dodge. It helps me to actually having to type it again so I'll just quote my response

You made a claim, so prove it. It is as simple as that. It's also as simple as...YOU CAN'T. Prove your position or STFU.

Can you tell me how I can show you information that is classified? That answer should be easy since you're requesting it

You made a claim. The burden of proof for your position is on you. So PROVE IT...you have the floor.

So you dont know. I rest my case.

You can't even surrender with grace. LOL

Maybe you need to take French.

How should I show you evidence thats classified?

There you go little guy.

 

[ClosedCaption]

The leftist media is really a propaganda arm for the elites, The Wall Street, special interests, Democrats, and globalists. They're like Bagdad Bob.

Hillary said 17 intelligence agencies ”confirmed” Russia is trying to influence our election. Straight up lie.

Yes that is a lie one told by you. She said 17 intel agencies confirmed Russia was behind the hacks. Not this bs you just made up

17 intel agencies have proof that voters were intimidated? Name the voters.

BTW, the 2.3 million popular vote count by hillary above trump failed to get the message.

No one said the voters were intimidated either. You live in your own reality