Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mostly druggies and hard core alkies. They aren't victims, they made bad choices in life. enabling them is the worst thing you can do. For those too insane for the street, the street is the last place they need to be. States need to step up but we need to get over the idea that it's wrong to institutionalize people.Sadly, we don't have proper help for the mentally ill here in the US anymore, and that is what many of the homeless suffer from.
And until we start taking care of them, they have nowhere to go.Many are mentally ill, so wise choices don't always come easy.Mostly druggies and hard core alkies. They aren't victims, they made bad choices in life.
They are probably all self medicating and their mental health issues are not unrelated. I don't buy the victim hood argument except for maybe a small percent that need to be in a locked home. Lots of them just don't want to work. Some panhandlers don't do too bad with income. One guy called Medved's show and talked about how he made about 10k a year.I agree with you, except that many of those alkies and druggies are self medicating, due to mental health issues. There is a certain number that it is due to bad choices, but many are due to things outside their control.
Yep, clearly citizens wanting to put an end to suffering on the streets are 'criminals', god forbid the homeless getting jobs or getting back on their feet.Ridiculous to try and help them...it's as if there were some religion that said to do that or something.
They need to step it up and make loitering illegal too. If you enable bums you will get more bums. I don't blame them for wanting the pee soaked bums somewhere else.
Progressive nutbags live their lives in a wallow of anger.This has happened in West Palm Beach as well, and Dallas. I know there are cities in Ca and Wa doing the same.
it angers me.
What is embarrassing? The city passed ordinances, he violated them.
You didn't read the article fully.
He has tried to abide by the laws over and over so the city keeps passing new ordinances to make it basically impossible for him to do it.
This time they passed an ordinance that says he must also supply a bathroom.
The context/back story is this guy wants to feed them where they are - which just happens to be be in populated areas (imagine that)...and the city does not want him to feed them outdoors - better to feed them where people can't see it.
It is ridiculous.
Yep, clearly citizens wanting to put an end to suffering on the streets are 'criminals', god forbid the homeless getting jobs or getting back on their feet.Ridiculous to try and help them...it's as if there were some religion that said to do that or something.
Yep, clearly citizens wanting to put an end to suffering on the streets are 'criminals', god forbid the homeless getting jobs or getting back on their feet.Ridiculous to try and help them...it's as if there were some religion that said to do that or something.
You don't end suffering by ringing a dinner bell.
The charity helps train the homeless, and hopefully give them life skills so they can find a job.Yep, clearly citizens wanting to put an end to suffering on the streets are 'criminals', god forbid the homeless getting jobs or getting back on their feet.Ridiculous to try and help them...it's as if there were some religion that said to do that or something.
You don't end suffering by ringing a dinner bell.
Dude come on what are you talking about here.500 feet - you guys realize how far that is? IN A CITY??
Can't be within 500 feet of ANY residence..now..just where is that supposed to be in a large city??? Where can you set yourself up and NOT be almost two football fields from ANY residence??
Then the citizens need to overturn this ordinance or vote the bastards out.If a private citizen, using his own resources, wants to feed whoever he likes - he should be able to do so.
