Q1 2019 watch - if under 3.0% - where is Trump’s economic miracle - can Trump beat O’s 2.9% ever?

[Faun]

Provide the names of the economist and prove me wrong


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Any economist on Fox News

Name one


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Why??

Because you are lying about them, which is why you cannot do so


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

No I’m not

So you say, but you can’t prove your claims.

 

[Jitss617]

Any economist on Fox News

Name one


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Why??

Because you are lying about them, which is why you cannot do so


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

No I’m not

Yes you are, that is why you can’t name one. You are just making shit up...which is all you ever do. You never once support anything you post.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

If you want to fight economist go right ahead I’m not an economist I just agree with them

 

[Jitss617]

No it means when democrats stopped attacking George Bush they actually did there job, it wasn’t great but anyone could have take 10% unemployment and reduced it.
Problem is democrats cant govern with a republican president. All they do is attack. Use the media as propaganda and sit back and wait for the election.

So that means trump if he had cooperation with democrats unemployment should be around 1%
Absolutely amazing the job he is doing.. he was sent from god.

Is that like all the cooperation Repubs gave Obama??

Republicans never obstrutucted like dems do to republicans not even close

LOLOL

You’re actually getting nuttier.

The Republicans' Plan for the New President

On the night of Barack Obama’s inauguration, a group of top GOP luminaries quietly gathered in a Washington steakhouse to lick their wounds and ultimately create the outline of a plan for how to deal with the incoming administration.

“The room was filled. It was a who’s who of ranking members who had at one point been committee chairmen, or in the majority, who now wondered out loud whether they were in the permanent minority,” Frank Luntz, who organized the event, told FRONTLINE.

Among them were Senate power brokers Jim DeMint, Jon Kyl and Tom Coburn, and conservative congressmen Eric Cantor, Kevin McCarthy and Paul Ryan.

After three hours of strategizing, they decided they needed to fight Obama on everything. The new president had no idea what the Republicans were planning.​

Lol yea fight him on socialism which they did

LOLOL

Troll says, obstruction is wonderful when his side does it.

I would agree obstructing socialism is a great thing

 

[Faun]

Name one


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Why??

Because you are lying about them, which is why you cannot do so


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

No I’m not

Yes you are, that is why you can’t name one. You are just making shit up...which is all you ever do. You never once support anything you post.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

If you want to fight economist go right ahead I’m not an economist I just agree with them

No one’s fighting any economists since you can’t prove any of them said what you claim.

 

[Faun]

Is that like all the cooperation Repubs gave Obama??

Republicans never obstrutucted like dems do to republicans not even close

LOLOL

You’re actually getting nuttier.

The Republicans' Plan for the New President

On the night of Barack Obama’s inauguration, a group of top GOP luminaries quietly gathered in a Washington steakhouse to lick their wounds and ultimately create the outline of a plan for how to deal with the incoming administration.

“The room was filled. It was a who’s who of ranking members who had at one point been committee chairmen, or in the majority, who now wondered out loud whether they were in the permanent minority,” Frank Luntz, who organized the event, told FRONTLINE.

Among them were Senate power brokers Jim DeMint, Jon Kyl and Tom Coburn, and conservative congressmen Eric Cantor, Kevin McCarthy and Paul Ryan.

After three hours of strategizing, they decided they needed to fight Obama on everything. The new president had no idea what the Republicans were planning.​

Lol yea fight him on socialism which they did

LOLOL

Troll says, obstruction is wonderful when his side does it.

I would agree obstructing socialism is a great thing

And I believe obstructing cults is good, which is what the right has become.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Name one


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Why??

Because you are lying about them, which is why you cannot do so


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

No I’m not

Yes you are, that is why you can’t name one. You are just making shit up...which is all you ever do. You never once support anything you post.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

If you want to fight economist go right ahead I’m not an economist I just agree with them

You are lying, no economist has said what you claim. Until such time as you can provide proof you will forever be known as a proud liar.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Jitss617]

Any economist on Fox News

Name one


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Why??

Because you are lying about them, which is why you cannot do so


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

No I’m not

So you say, but you can’t prove your claims.

Def not

 

[Faun]

Why??

Because you are lying about them, which is why you cannot do so


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

No I’m not

Yes you are, that is why you can’t name one. You are just making shit up...which is all you ever do. You never once support anything you post.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

If you want to fight economist go right ahead I’m not an economist I just agree with them

You are lying, no economist has said what you claim. Until such time as you can provide proof you will forever be known as a proud liar.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

That’s already been established.

 

[AntonToo]

More blatant bullshit from you.

How did Obama add 9.3 Trillion exactly? You will NEVER be able answer that, because the premise is bullshit.

Obama made Bush look like a budget hawk.

Using Budget years Bush II added a far higher percent than Obama did


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Bush added $4.9 trillion (actually less). Obama added $9.3 trillion (actually more).

Actually thats BULLSHIT.

Actually, it's reality.

Go here......

Debt to the Penny (Daily History Search Application)

Look at Jan 20, 2001---Jan 20, 2009---Jan 20, 2017.

Do the math.

You didn't actually respond to what I said. (you've cut out the most important part of it)

Is chronic assholism preventing you from doing that?

 

[Faun]

Name one


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Why??

Because you are lying about them, which is why you cannot do so


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

No I’m not

So you say, but you can’t prove your claims.

Def not

You can deny it all you want, but the facts speak for themselves; and the facts reveal you can’t prove your claims.

 

[Jitss617]

Why??

Because you are lying about them, which is why you cannot do so


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

No I’m not

Yes you are, that is why you can’t name one. You are just making shit up...which is all you ever do. You never once support anything you post.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

If you want to fight economist go right ahead I’m not an economist I just agree with them

You are lying, no economist has said what you claim. Until such time as you can provide proof you will forever be known as a proud liar.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Peter morici

 

[Jitss617]

Why??

Because you are lying about them, which is why you cannot do so


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

No I’m not

So you say, but you can’t prove your claims.

Def not

You can deny it all you want, but the facts speak for themselves; and the facts reveal you can’t prove your claims.

Just did

 

[Faun]

Because you are lying about them, which is why you cannot do so


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

No I’m not

So you say, but you can’t prove your claims.

Def not

You can deny it all you want, but the facts speak for themselves; and the facts reveal you can’t prove your claims.

Just did

LOLOL

Where did you prove an economist said what you claim he said?

You’re lying again.

 

[Jitss617]

No I’m not

So you say, but you can’t prove your claims.

Def not

You can deny it all you want, but the facts speak for themselves; and the facts reveal you can’t prove your claims.

Just did

LOLOL

Where did you prove an economist said what you claim he said?

You’re lying again.

Peter moric

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Obama made Bush look like a budget hawk.

Using Budget years Bush II added a far higher percent than Obama did


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Bush added $4.9 trillion (actually less). Obama added $9.3 trillion (actually more).

Actually thats BULLSHIT.

Actually, it's reality.

Go here......

Debt to the Penny (Daily History Search Application)

Look at Jan 20, 2001---Jan 20, 2009---Jan 20, 2017.

Do the math.

You didn't actually respond to what I said. (you've cut out the most important part of it)

Is chronic assholism preventing you from doing that?

Yeah, love that bullshit chart from CBPP.
So much better than the actual numbers.

 

[Faun]

So you say, but you can’t prove your claims.

Def not

You can deny it all you want, but the facts speak for themselves; and the facts reveal you can’t prove your claims.

Just did

LOLOL

Where did you prove an economist said what you claim he said?

You’re lying again.

Peter moric

Why would I argue with Peter Morici? He says, “Mr. Trump’s focus on NAFTA is misplaced.”

Peter Morici: How to fix the trade deficit ... and why it's critically important to do so

If you were gonna blindly throw out the name of an economist, don’t you think it would have been a good idea to choose one who actually said what you attributed to him?

 

[Jitss617]

Def not

You can deny it all you want, but the facts speak for themselves; and the facts reveal you can’t prove your claims.

Just did

LOLOL

Where did you prove an economist said what you claim he said?

You’re lying again.

Peter moric

Why would I argue with Peter Morici? He says, “Mr. Trump’s focus on NAFTA is misplaced.”

Peter Morici: How to fix the trade deficit ... and why it's critically important to do so

If you were gonna blindly throw out the name of an economist, don’t you think it would have been a good idea to choose one who actually said what you attributed to him?

He also said it’s a great deal for he American people lol
Maybe he wants to change a piece of it he should run for president lol

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Pilot1, post: 22184095

Why does the Left (Democrats, Progressives, Liberals, the Media) constantly ROUTE AGAINST America, and the economic well being of its citizens?

Don’t know about you but I am rooting for the health and economic well being of middle working class Americans and all those who work and study hard but have not joined the middle class as of yet.

i don’t believe that TrumpO’s class need anything from me that could improve their well
being including more breaks on their so-called tax burden.

This thread is in part about how the TrumpO tax cuts were much too generous to the wealthy and corporations and have failed to produce the touted success.

Once again Trickle Down is a code word for Pissing On.

That’s what I’m against. The little guy being pissed on over and over again as too many little guys keep falling for the dog whistle crap that sucks in so many older white voters.

Can you discuss the subject of this thread or are you limited to making shit up about Democrats on and on.

Proud Democrat and I love my country,

if you were a democrat and loved your country you wouldn't be a democrat
my mothers a registered democrat and hadn't voted for one since JFK




I identify neither R or D
they can both go to hell THE LOT of em'

ya got 30 pages of nutin here
Like i said earlier president do not make an economy you can cut regulations , over regulate
over tax, have bad tax laws blah blha blah
ya really wanna help the middle class and working poor ?
Do Gooder socialism and crony capitalism is not the answer. government,LAWYERS AND "INTELLECTUALS" WHO NEVER DID A HARD DAYS WORK is never the answer .
More government is never the answer and that seems to be democrats answer for everything ...

ya want government to help the working poor ?
crack down on illegals wages will rise faster!

Not that im a fan of bush but during his admin an ice raid cracked down on a large chicken processing plant could of been in bama
what happened the next dew days ?

white and black Americans lined up for jobs

one thing the news has been reporting
People are working and finding higher paying jobs "the rubes "who are not wealthy farmers or business owners , or white collar middle class you like to put down mostly live in places where cost of living is lower were not talking east 81st st .. they can take 4,5,6,7 hundred dollar a week jobs and not have care in the world...some ARE ACTUALLY happy with a small steady paycheck or its a second income for a young family ...and some day they may be that Walgreen or burger king manager or put themselves through school or start a lil business of thier own .

locally here i can go by a business without seeing a help wanted sigh ...thier was even a machine shop advertising ON THE RADIO WE NEED Machinists

come on in

when they hit that voting booth in 2020 theyre not going to be thinking about obamas vs trump GDP

Things they do remember LIke single working moms who made slightly to much money and were paying for their own health insurance ....who could no longer afford it ....after she was told shed save money every year .

Know what they do like ?they like that if they get fiired or quit that shit job they can get another one IMMEDIATELY
they love that!
which is going on right now

You wanna be elitist leftarded types sometimes yas live with yer heads in the clouds .

YA wanna help the "lil people "
the lil hvac guy with 8 employees keep government out of his way.

the little mill or parts factory that has 40 employees get off the little guys back and he usually shines and everyone around them benefits.

get off their backs .....ya want government to help protect them ? PROTECT THEM from the government cryonyism and do gooder socialism AND THE FUCKIN LAWYERS

me and you are older and quite comfy ...we have white people problems.
you and your wife are getting closer to retirement ...you're probably going to leave those burbs you may sell that condo your daughter in or keep it as a rental property
probably got at least a half million to a million stashed blah blah blah
youre looking forward to grand kids

ME should i buy the vette in black? ...no black is hard to keep clean and oh yeah the guys are coming to start diggin the pool Monday or Tuesday ..weather permitting


wanna help the "less fortunate "
Stay outta the "little guys "way
Leave them alone ...leave the road open for opportunity

Some days Im sick of the lot yas
Eviscerate the proletariat!

 

[AntonToo]

Using Budget years Bush II added a far higher percent than Obama did


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Bush added $4.9 trillion (actually less). Obama added $9.3 trillion (actually more).

Actually thats BULLSHIT.

Actually, it's reality.

Go here......

Debt to the Penny (Daily History Search Application)

Look at Jan 20, 2001---Jan 20, 2009---Jan 20, 2017.

Do the math.

You didn't actually respond to what I said. (you've cut out the most important part of it)

Is chronic assholism preventing you from doing that?

Yeah, love that bullshit chart from CBPP.
So much better than the actual numbers.

What are the actual numbers of Bush policy contribution VS Obama policy contribution VS Trump policy contribution?

You never posted those numbers, you posted about correlation, NOT CAUSATION. And thats why they are bullshit.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

NotfooledbyW, post: 22183962

The point of this thread is......

(A) I wrote: ..... during Obama’s second term the phrase that you use ‘weak recovery’ ...has already been proven... to be a false narrative.

Thats as far as you were able to read:

Toddsterpatriot, post: 22184990

So you were lying when you said it was a false narrative. Thanks!

(B) The rest of what I wrote:

It is a false narrative ..........based on the current data coming from TrumpO’s current WEAK and ANEMIC economy.

(C) Do you know what current data is?

I’ll give you a clue. It has nothing to do with what happened 70 years ago in Post Waf industrial economies.

A+B+C=D

My point is: (a) because Trumpo has established that the entire Obama economy below 3.0% annual GDP growth was weak and anemic.

Plus (b) and we now know, with current data, that Trumpo did not get a full years growth above 3.0 during his first two years. And is not likely to get anywhere near it for the rest of his term.

Plus (c) TrumpO is presiding over a peak US economy at 2.9 % GDP which is no where considered to be weak or anemic.

EQUALS (d) If Trumpo’s economy is good or strong at max peak 2.9 GDP, then it must now also be true that Obama's 7 year recovery and share of the expansion was good or strong.

A trend of 2.5 average GDP is the new normal.

Obama is right there with TrumpO. There is no separation by the big mouth.