Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
The parents who's kids were killed following your rules? Seriously, you're evoking that as an argument for ... you? That your rules got them killed?
For the obvious reason that there is no specific assassination target at the schools. You're not a bright guy, Nat, that's butt obvious. I mean duh
Well, THAT should be real comforting to the parents from Sandy Hook.......Thanks !!!
Yes, they'll feel better with your strategy of not allowing guns meaning the shooter could safely go from room to room shooting people knowing he wouldn't face armed resistance. How many people did your strategy kill in Sandy Hook again?
More people are killed in gun accidents than mass shootings. Why would you welcome all those accidents into schools?
Silly question. Do you know of any political entity who is not surrounded by armed security when in close contact with the public?
Find a grown up to explain the original post to you...and then, by all means, come back (sober).
Knowledge reduces accidents.
Precisely the "rationale" used by N. Korea and Iran about having "knowledge" of nukes....
The parents who's kids were killed following your rules? Seriously, you're evoking that as an argument for ... you? That your rules got them killed?
As soon as I find my Moron-to-English dictionary, I'll try to decipher your post...Hang in there.
You have no reading comprehension. dumbassBy no means just because someone has a "gun" it does not mean they are going to shoot someone. Again, a tiny, tiny percentage of 1% of firearms are used in violent crimes... Dumbass
Notice how this right wing idiot addressed the original question???
(BTW, nitwit.....where did you get the above stat that only less than 1% of violent crimes involve a firearm?? are the 99% of violent crimes done with arrows?)
My bad. I mistook you for an adult. If you can find someone to explain it to you my question stands unanswered.
It being a "gun free zone" certainly stopped Adam Lanza...Yes, they'll feel better with your strategy of not allowing guns meaning the shooter could safely go from room to room shooting people knowing he wouldn't face armed resistance. How many people did your strategy kill in Sandy Hook again?
You're "right"...Had guns been allowed at Sandy Hook, a whole bunch of armed 6 years old could have killed Lanza before he had a chance to reload.....
Absolutely "brilliant" on your part, Kaz.....Is your Alzheimer nurse around?
You progressives use dead kids like the ones from Sandyhook to force your agenda on everybody...For the obvious reason that there is no specific assassination target at the schools. You're not a bright guy, Nat, that's butt obvious. I mean duh
So, it is YOUR contention that Trump is an assassination target at his rallies, but kids at schools are not....Again, comforting words that should make Sandy Hook parents feel much better.
Tens of millions of guns every day are not killing people… You dumbass motherfucker LOLMore people are killed in gun accidents than mass shootings. Why would you welcome all those accidents into schools?
Because there's no accounting for the abject stupidity of many right wingers.......
Here's a twist in their "rationale"......
"If everybody carried guns," they will say, "there would be less murderous mass shootings"
HOWEVER, I've often posed this rebuttal......
"If every country had a nuke [including Iran], would there then be LESS of a threat of a nuclear holocaust?
Firearms in the hands of law abiding people are harmless to innocent people...My bad. I mistook you for an adult. If you can find someone to explain it to you my question stands unanswered.
Yes, indeed you should debate ONLY with people of your same ilk......
The original question was a simple one....Since Trump wants to allow guns in schools, why doesn't he want guns at his rallies?
That's it...simple and forward........
You can either retort, "Well, Trump's life is much more worthy than some school kid." OR, "I don't have an answer."
You didn't know that guns aren't allowed in schools,
hey, dimwit....it is YOUR hero, Trump, that wants to now allow guns in school (you know, schools....some places that you must have seldom frequented.)
You progressives use dead kids like the ones from Sandyhook to force your agenda on everybody...For the obvious reason that there is no specific assassination target at the schools. You're not a bright guy, Nat, that's butt obvious. I mean duh
So, it is YOUR contention that Trump is an assassination target at his rallies, but kids at schools are not....Again, comforting words that should make Sandy Hook parents feel much better.
My bad. I mistook you for an adult. If you can find someone to explain it to you my question stands unanswered.
Yes, indeed you should debate ONLY with people of your same ilk......
The original question was a simple one....Since Trump wants to allow guns in schools, why doesn't he want guns at his rallies?
That's it...simple and forward........
You can either retort, "Well, Trump's life is much more worthy than some school kid." OR, "I don't have an answer."
Firearms in the hands of law abiding people are harmless to innocent people...
Hey, moron, Most murderers are law abiding the day BEFORE the commit murder......(Is this cretin for real?)