Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In comparison to the hundreds of millions that you claim, 1/2 million is a small amount. You don't understand that?500 thou is a drop in the bucket
oh now it is only a small amount --LOL
i only needed to post one
face it you make yourself look more retarded by the post
i needed to only show you one fuck head
one btw the clintons bragged about killing the story
The Hillary Clinton emails are the gift that keeps on giving — particularly when it comes to Russia.
In one of the long-ago released WikiLeaks emails that has yet to garner much public attention, members of Clinton’s team bragged about successfully censoring a story tying a $500,000 speech former President Bill Clinton gave in Moscow to Hillary’s opposition to the Magnitsky Act.
The Magnitsky Act — a suite of sanctions against Russian banking officials named for a lawyer who died in Russian custody, according to Breitbart — has re-entered the news as its purportedly behind a Russian lawyer’s meeting with Donald Trump Jr. last summer.
“With the help of the research team, we killed a Bloomberg story trying to link HRC’s opposition to the Magnitsky bill to a $500,000 speech that WJC gave in Moscow,” the email reads, referring to the former president by the initials that stand for William Jefferson Clinton.
The $500,000 speech has typically been linked to a deal with Uranium One approved by Clinton’s State Department. In a 2015 New York Times piece, the paper reported that “(a)t the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family.
“Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One … shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.”
However, the conflicts of interest mentioned in the Uranium One case and the censored Bloomberg article aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive — both involve the Clintons, and their hunger for wealth and power.
Leaked Email Reveals Clinton Team Bragging About Censorship
Typically been linked? By who? More RWNJs like you?
oh now you are rambling on like the retard you are
the foundation was loaded with pay for play deals
Judicial Watch: New Abedin Emails Reveal Additional Instances of Clinton Donors Receiving Special Treatment from Clinton Department of State
JULY 14, 2017
Judicial Watch: New Abedin Emails Reveal Additional Instances of Clinton Donors Receiving Special Treatment from Clinton Department of State - Judicial Watch
Here are just 3 of Judicial Watches fake stories. I have dozens more if you need them
DHS Quietly Moving, Releasing 'Vanloads' of 'Illegal Aliens' Away from Border
FALSE: 'Islamic Refugee' Arrested with Plans to Blow Up Gas Pipeline
FACT CHECK: Did the IRS 'Fast Track' Tax-Exempt Status for 'After School Satan' Clubs?
Continuing the QFLS:
Liberals: What is more egregious to you: Hillary Clinton granting the Russians twenty percent of USA uranium (regardless of whether you even concede a bribe occurred) or The Trump campaign briefly entertaining a legally admitted Russian lawyer lobbying for a law change?
Question For Liberals Series
Question For Liberals #1
Question For Liberals #2
Hillary Clinton didn't grant the Russians 20% of US uranium. Your question is based on a lie, as usual.
She signed off on the deal quite literally as secretary of state. I'm sure you have some cooked-up denial that gets her off the hook for that.
I see you a falling for another of Trump's lies. He is the POTUS, and the real information is available to him 24/7. It's a shame he is too stupid to even find out the truth.
Was she the only, or even the main one to sign off on it, or was she only one of 9 different members on the committee that approved the deal? Did she have veto power to stop the deal if she wanted to? Do you really think that uranium can or will ever be exported from the US? Find the answer to these questions, and then get back with me. Here is a good place to start.
FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?
Despite transfer of ownership, the uranium remained in the U.S.
A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statement by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
NRC’s review of the transfer of control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will
remain the licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize danger to life or property. The review also determined that the licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.
Snopes; might as well be madeupmonkeyshit.com
Five Clinton-Russia Bombshells Progressives Yawned Over
.1. Hillary Clinton approved the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia and nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.
While Hillary Clinton’s State Department was one of eight agencies to review and sign off on the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia — then-Secretary of State Clinton herself was the only agency head whose family foundation received $145 million in donations from multiple people connected to the uranium deal, as reported by the New York Times.
While Hillary Clinton’s State Department was one of eight agencies to review and sign off on the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia — then-Secretary of State Clinton herself was the only agency head whose family foundation received $145 million in donations from multiple people connected to the uranium deal, as reported by the New York Times.
Note- her agency- was one of 8 agencies- that had to approve the deal.
No indication that Hillary Clinton ever provided State Department approval herself- nor did the State Department approval alone approve the deal.
Your question starts off with a lie.
Why did you feel it necessary to lie in order to attack Clinton?
'quite literally'Continuing the QFLS:
Liberals: What is more egregious to you: Hillary Clinton granting the Russians twenty percent of USA uranium (regardless of whether you even concede a bribe occurred) or The Trump campaign briefly entertaining a legally admitted Russian lawyer lobbying for a law change?
Question For Liberals Series
Question For Liberals #1
Question For Liberals #2
Hillary Clinton didn't grant the Russians 20% of US uranium. Your question is based on a lie, as usual.
She signed off on the deal quite literally as secretary of state. t.
Well then show us her signature on the deal.
In comparison to the hundreds of millions that you claim, 1/2 million is a small amount. You don't understand that?
i needed to only show you one fuck head
one btw the clintons bragged about killing the story
The Hillary Clinton emails are the gift that keeps on giving — particularly when it comes to Russia.
In one of the long-ago released WikiLeaks emails that has yet to garner much public attention, members of Clinton’s team bragged about successfully censoring a story tying a $500,000 speech former President Bill Clinton gave in Moscow to Hillary’s opposition to the Magnitsky Act.
The Magnitsky Act — a suite of sanctions against Russian banking officials named for a lawyer who died in Russian custody, according to Breitbart — has re-entered the news as its purportedly behind a Russian lawyer’s meeting with Donald Trump Jr. last summer.
“With the help of the research team, we killed a Bloomberg story trying to link HRC’s opposition to the Magnitsky bill to a $500,000 speech that WJC gave in Moscow,” the email reads, referring to the former president by the initials that stand for William Jefferson Clinton.
The $500,000 speech has typically been linked to a deal with Uranium One approved by Clinton’s State Department. In a 2015 New York Times piece, the paper reported that “(a)t the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family.
“Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One … shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.”
However, the conflicts of interest mentioned in the Uranium One case and the censored Bloomberg article aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive — both involve the Clintons, and their hunger for wealth and power.
Leaked Email Reveals Clinton Team Bragging About Censorship
Typically been linked? By who? More RWNJs like you?
oh now you are rambling on like the retard you are
the foundation was loaded with pay for play deals
Judicial Watch: New Abedin Emails Reveal Additional Instances of Clinton Donors Receiving Special Treatment from Clinton Department of State
JULY 14, 2017
Judicial Watch: New Abedin Emails Reveal Additional Instances of Clinton Donors Receiving Special Treatment from Clinton Department of State - Judicial Watch
Here are just 3 of Judicial Watches fake stories. I have dozens more if you need them
DHS Quietly Moving, Releasing 'Vanloads' of 'Illegal Aliens' Away from Border
FALSE: 'Islamic Refugee' Arrested with Plans to Blow Up Gas Pipeline
FACT CHECK: Did the IRS 'Fast Track' Tax-Exempt Status for 'After School Satan' Clubs?
so say you retard
the information comes from huma -emails
if you think it is false
take it up with huma and the state department
there are 448 pages of em
Huma Production 18 Archives - Judicial Watch
'quite literally'Continuing the QFLS:
Liberals: What is more egregious to you: Hillary Clinton granting the Russians twenty percent of USA uranium (regardless of whether you even concede a bribe occurred) or The Trump campaign briefly entertaining a legally admitted Russian lawyer lobbying for a law change?
Question For Liberals Series
Question For Liberals #1
Question For Liberals #2
Hillary Clinton didn't grant the Russians 20% of US uranium. Your question is based on a lie, as usual.
She signed off on the deal quite literally as secretary of state. t.
Well then show us her signature on the deal.
You think that the state dept. didn't have signed documents? And you don't think that something this important didn't have to have Hillary's sign-off whether verbal or written? I wouldn't doubt that it's written; but I'm not going to spend the better part of looking for it for a dupe like you.
If Hillary did actually sign a piece of paper, her signature would be just one of nine, and no more or less important than the others.
If Hillary did actually sign a piece of paper, her signature would be just one of nine, and no more or less important than the others.
The hell it isn't. The State Department is the president's right hand organization. And Hillary sure as shit had the power to approve or disapprove the deal regardless of the other agencies being signatories in whatever capacity. In fact, the whole eight agencies shit is just liberal spin. It definitely came down to one agency.
If Hillary did actually sign a piece of paper, her signature would be just one of nine, and no more or less important than the others.
The hell it isn't. The State Department is the president's right hand organization. And Hillary sure as shit had the power to approve or disapprove the deal regardless of the other agencies being signatories in whatever capacity. In fact, the whole eight agencies shit is just liberal spin. It definitely came down to one agency.
Where did you get that info? Link, or did you just pull it out of your ass?
I see the leftist fanatics are changing the subject and arguing minutiae, instead of answering the question.
It's about what I expected from people of their ilk.
Never said the State Department wasn't one of 9 different departments that had to sign off. Claims as specific as yours need a link.If Hillary did actually sign a piece of paper, her signature would be just one of nine, and no more or less important than the others.
The hell it isn't. The State Department is the president's right hand organization. And Hillary sure as shit had the power to approve or disapprove the deal regardless of the other agencies being signatories in whatever capacity. In fact, the whole eight agencies shit is just liberal spin. It definitely came down to one agency.
Where did you get that info? Link, or did you just pull it out of your ass?
You're a fucking moron if you think that major uranium decisions involving foreign entities don't have to be approved by the State Department. It's called common sense; I'm afraid you can't get that on a link, moron.
i needed to only show you one fuck head
one btw the clintons bragged about killing the story
The Hillary Clinton emails are the gift that keeps on giving — particularly when it comes to Russia.
In one of the long-ago released WikiLeaks emails that has yet to garner much public attention, members of Clinton’s team bragged about successfully censoring a story tying a $500,000 speech former President Bill Clinton gave in Moscow to Hillary’s opposition to the Magnitsky Act.
The Magnitsky Act — a suite of sanctions against Russian banking officials named for a lawyer who died in Russian custody, according to Breitbart — has re-entered the news as its purportedly behind a Russian lawyer’s meeting with Donald Trump Jr. last summer.
“With the help of the research team, we killed a Bloomberg story trying to link HRC’s opposition to the Magnitsky bill to a $500,000 speech that WJC gave in Moscow,” the email reads, referring to the former president by the initials that stand for William Jefferson Clinton.
The $500,000 speech has typically been linked to a deal with Uranium One approved by Clinton’s State Department. In a 2015 New York Times piece, the paper reported that “(a)t the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family.
“Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One … shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.”
However, the conflicts of interest mentioned in the Uranium One case and the censored Bloomberg article aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive — both involve the Clintons, and their hunger for wealth and power.
Leaked Email Reveals Clinton Team Bragging About Censorship
Typically been linked? By who? More RWNJs like you?
oh now you are rambling on like the retard you are
the foundation was loaded with pay for play deals
Judicial Watch: New Abedin Emails Reveal Additional Instances of Clinton Donors Receiving Special Treatment from Clinton Department of State
JULY 14, 2017
Judicial Watch: New Abedin Emails Reveal Additional Instances of Clinton Donors Receiving Special Treatment from Clinton Department of State - Judicial Watch
Here are just 3 of Judicial Watches fake stories. I have dozens more if you need them
DHS Quietly Moving, Releasing 'Vanloads' of 'Illegal Aliens' Away from Border
FALSE: 'Islamic Refugee' Arrested with Plans to Blow Up Gas Pipeline
FACT CHECK: Did the IRS 'Fast Track' Tax-Exempt Status for 'After School Satan' Clubs?
so say you retard
the information comes from huma -emails
if you think it is false
take it up with huma and the state department
there are 448 pages of em
Huma Production 18 Archives - Judicial Watch
Nope. Not me. Snopes said they lie, and it's documented that Judicial Watch lies quite often, just like most other RW sites.
Typically been linked? By who? More RWNJs like you?
oh now you are rambling on like the retard you are
the foundation was loaded with pay for play deals
Judicial Watch: New Abedin Emails Reveal Additional Instances of Clinton Donors Receiving Special Treatment from Clinton Department of State
JULY 14, 2017
Judicial Watch: New Abedin Emails Reveal Additional Instances of Clinton Donors Receiving Special Treatment from Clinton Department of State - Judicial Watch
Here are just 3 of Judicial Watches fake stories. I have dozens more if you need them
DHS Quietly Moving, Releasing 'Vanloads' of 'Illegal Aliens' Away from Border
FALSE: 'Islamic Refugee' Arrested with Plans to Blow Up Gas Pipeline
FACT CHECK: Did the IRS 'Fast Track' Tax-Exempt Status for 'After School Satan' Clubs?
so say you retard
the information comes from huma -emails
if you think it is false
take it up with huma and the state department
there are 448 pages of em
Huma Production 18 Archives - Judicial Watch
Nope. Not me. Snopes said they lie, and it's documented that Judicial Watch lies quite often, just like most other RW sites.
bullshit they are documented emails
oh now you are rambling on like the retard you are
the foundation was loaded with pay for play deals
Judicial Watch: New Abedin Emails Reveal Additional Instances of Clinton Donors Receiving Special Treatment from Clinton Department of State
JULY 14, 2017
Judicial Watch: New Abedin Emails Reveal Additional Instances of Clinton Donors Receiving Special Treatment from Clinton Department of State - Judicial Watch
Here are just 3 of Judicial Watches fake stories. I have dozens more if you need them
DHS Quietly Moving, Releasing 'Vanloads' of 'Illegal Aliens' Away from Border
FALSE: 'Islamic Refugee' Arrested with Plans to Blow Up Gas Pipeline
FACT CHECK: Did the IRS 'Fast Track' Tax-Exempt Status for 'After School Satan' Clubs?
so say you retard
the information comes from huma -emails
if you think it is false
take it up with huma and the state department
there are 448 pages of em
Huma Production 18 Archives - Judicial Watch
Nope. Not me. Snopes said they lie, and it's documented that Judicial Watch lies quite often, just like most other RW sites.
bullshit they are documented emails
I'm sure they are. Those were documented emails that the right claimed were talking about a child sex prisoner ring at a pizza place too.
Never said the State Department wasn't one of 9 different departments that had to sign off. Claims as specific as yours need a link.If Hillary did actually sign a piece of paper, her signature would be just one of nine, and no more or less important than the others.
The hell it isn't. The State Department is the president's right hand organization. And Hillary sure as shit had the power to approve or disapprove the deal regardless of the other agencies being signatories in whatever capacity. In fact, the whole eight agencies shit is just liberal spin. It definitely came down to one agency.
Where did you get that info? Link, or did you just pull it out of your ass?
You're a fucking moron if you think that major uranium decisions involving foreign entities don't have to be approved by the State Department. It's called common sense; I'm afraid you can't get that on a link, moron.
