Question For Liberals #3

[jon_berzerk]

Continuing the QFLS:

Liberals: What is more egregious to you: Hillary Clinton granting the Russians twenty percent of USA uranium (regardless of whether you even concede a bribe occurred) or The Trump campaign briefly entertaining a legally admitted Russian lawyer lobbying for a law change?

Question For Liberals Series

Question For Liberals #1
Question For Liberals #2

Hillary Clinton didn't grant the Russians 20% of US uranium. Your question is based on a lie, as usual.

She signed off on the deal quite literally as secretary of state. I'm sure you have some cooked-up denial that gets her off the hook for that.

I see you a falling for another of Trump's lies. He is the POTUS, and the real information is available to him 24/7. It's a shame he is too stupid to even find out the truth.
Was she the only, or even the main one to sign off on it, or was she only one of 9 different members on the committee that approved the deal? Did she have veto power to stop the deal if she wanted to? Do you really think that uranium can or will ever be exported from the US? Find the answer to these questions, and then get back with me. Here is a good place to start.

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

Despite transfer of ownership, the uranium remained in the U.S.

A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statement by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

NRC’s review of the transfer of control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will
remain the licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize danger to life or property. The review also determined that the licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.

Despite the uranium remaining in the US, the Russians still own it, thanks to Hillary and the Hussein. That means they make profit selling it to the US. That means they could withhold it if they wanted to. That means they control it and could smuggle it out of the country if they want. The point is she put Russian interests ahead of US national security.

But hey, Jr. meeting a Russian to attempt to find out Hillary's illegal activities is more "treasonous" in your head.

all the while Russian cash flowed to the Clinton foundation

imagine that

 

[nat4900]

What threads like this stupid one confirm is this for right wing morons......

If Clinton did something that resembles better relations with Russia....BAD !!!

If Trump does something that resembles better relations with Russia....GOOD!!

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Continuing the QFLS:

Liberals: What is more egregious to you: Hillary Clinton granting the Russians twenty percent of USA uranium (regardless of whether you even concede a bribe occurred) or The Trump campaign briefly entertaining a legally admitted Russian lawyer lobbying for a law change?

Question For Liberals Series

Question For Liberals #1
Question For Liberals #2

Hillary Clinton didn't grant the Russians 20% of US uranium. Your question is based on a lie, as usual.

She signed off on the deal quite literally as secretary of state. I'm sure you have some cooked-up denial that gets her off the hook for that.

I see you a falling for another of Trump's lies. He is the POTUS, and the real information is available to him 24/7. It's a shame he is too stupid to even find out the truth.
Was she the only, or even the main one to sign off on it, or was she only one of 9 different members on the committee that approved the deal? Did she have veto power to stop the deal if she wanted to? Do you really think that uranium can or will ever be exported from the US? Find the answer to these questions, and then get back with me. Here is a good place to start.

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

Despite transfer of ownership, the uranium remained in the U.S.

A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statement by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

NRC’s review of the transfer of control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will
remain the licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize danger to life or property. The review also determined that the licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.

Despite the uranium remaining in the US, the Russians still own it, thanks to Hillary and the Hussein. That means they make profit selling it to the US. That means they could withhold it if they wanted to. That means they control it and could smuggle it out of the country if they want. The point is she put Russian interests ahead of US national security.

But hey, Jr. meeting a Russian to attempt to find out Hillary's illegal activities is more "treasonous" in your head.

Yup; and this is to say nothing of the OBVIOUS bribes that BULLDOG (probably a paid poster) is trying to write off.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

What threads like this stupid one confirm is this for right wing morons......

If Clinton did something that resembles better relations with Russia....BAD !!!

If Trump does something that resembles better relations with Russia,,,GOOD!!

It confirms that all the liberals on USMB are scared twits. If you're so sure of yourself, then vote for option 2 over option 1.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

lol, if Hillary Clinton got away with murdering Vince Foster, does that earn Donald Trump one free pass to murder someone without penalty?

Goddam you people are stupid.

Are you just throwing out random strawmans? Geez, you're a fucking idiot.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Liberals: What is more egregious to you: Hillary Clinton granting the Russians twenty percent of USA uranium (regardless of whether you even concede a bribe occurred) or The Trump campaign briefly entertaining a legally admitted Russian lawyer lobbying for a law change?

again, not what happened. The Russians didn't get that Uranium, which can't be exported outside the US>

Look, man, i know that you guys are doing flop sweat now that Junior is breaking bad on his dad.

Actually, I've seen nothing that says it can't be transported out of the USA. One report I saw suggested that it would not be transported out of the USA. As it is, Hillary being bribed to give Putin twenty percent control of OUR uranium? That's pretty fucking sad regardless of whether that's going to Russia or not.

 

[theHawk]

What threads like this stupid one confirm is this for right wing morons......

If Clinton did something that resembles better relations with Russia....BAD !!!

If Trump does something that resembles better relations with Russia,,,GOOD!!

Delusional libs:
Letting Russia take over national security assets like uranium = GOOD.
Teaming up with Russia to bomb the shit out of ISIS = BAD.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

All these liberals here BULL SHITTING me about Hillary's innocence and yet they're still to scared to vote for the meeting with the Russian lawyer. Because they know they're full of BULL SHIT and will only look bad voting for Hillary. Yea, I wouldn't want to stick my neck out for that bitch either.

 

[nat4900]

Teaming up with Russia to bomb the shit out of ISIS = BAD.

You mean "bombing" the shit out of empty fields AROUND a runway after giving 20 hour notice of the strike, so that only the cockroaches were left behind??? LOL

 

[theHawk]

Teaming up with Russia to bomb the shit out of ISIS = BAD.

You mean "bombing" the shit out of empty fields AROUND a runway after giving 20 hour notice of the strike, so that only the cockroaches were left behind??? LOL

Was that even ISIS? No. Get your fake news stories straight.

 

[BULLDOG]

Continuing the QFLS:

Liberals: What is more egregious to you: Hillary Clinton granting the Russians twenty percent of USA uranium (regardless of whether you even concede a bribe occurred) or The Trump campaign briefly entertaining a legally admitted Russian lawyer lobbying for a law change?

Question For Liberals Series

Question For Liberals #1
Question For Liberals #2

Hillary Clinton didn't grant the Russians 20% of US uranium. Your question is based on a lie, as usual.

Here's your NYT times saying otherwise.

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

snip
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s founder. But Giustra sold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.

 

[BULLDOG]

BULLDOG

VOTE OR DIE.

Hillary Clinton didn't grant the Russians 20% of US uranium. Your question is based on a lie, as usual.

Actually, she did. That is black and white reality. And you're a hack for calling me a liar. She literally had to fucking sign off on it, jackass.

Yes, like I said, she and 8 other CFIUS members signed off on the sale. Each CFIUS member had no more, or no less power than any of the others, and none of them had the power to veto the sale. Why are you trying to single her out above the other members?

 

[BULLDOG]

Continuing the QFLS:

Liberals: What is more egregious to you: Hillary Clinton granting the Russians twenty percent of USA uranium (regardless of whether you even concede a bribe occurred) or The Trump campaign briefly entertaining a legally admitted Russian lawyer lobbying for a law change?

Question For Liberals Series

Question For Liberals #1
Question For Liberals #2

Hillary Clinton didn't grant the Russians 20% of US uranium. Your question is based on a lie, as usual.

She signed off on the deal quite literally as secretary of state. I'm sure you have some cooked-up denial that gets her off the hook for that.

I see you a falling for another of Trump's lies. He is the POTUS, and the real information is available to him 24/7. It's a shame he is too stupid to even find out the truth.
Was she the only, or even the main one to sign off on it, or was she only one of 9 different members on the committee that approved the deal? Did she have veto power to stop the deal if she wanted to? Do you really think that uranium can or will ever be exported from the US? Find the answer to these questions, and then get back with me. Here is a good place to start.

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

Despite transfer of ownership, the uranium remained in the U.S.

A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statement by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

NRC’s review of the transfer of control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will
remain the licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize danger to life or property. The review also determined that the licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.

Despite the uranium remaining in the US, the Russians still own it, thanks to Hillary and the Hussein. That means they make profit selling it to the US. That means they could withhold it if they wanted to. That means they control it and could smuggle it out of the country if they want. The point is she put Russian interests ahead of US national security.

But hey, Jr. meeting a Russian to attempt to find out Hillary's illegal activities is more "treasonous" in your head.

all the while Russian cash flowed to the Clinton foundation

imagine that

Tell me about all that russian cash. Where did it come from, and how did it get to her?

 

[miketx]

Hillary Clinton didn't grant the Russians 20% of US uranium. Your question is based on a lie, as usual.

She signed off on the deal quite literally as secretary of state. I'm sure you have some cooked-up denial that gets her off the hook for that.

I see you a falling for another of Trump's lies. He is the POTUS, and the real information is available to him 24/7. It's a shame he is too stupid to even find out the truth.
Was she the only, or even the main one to sign off on it, or was she only one of 9 different members on the committee that approved the deal? Did she have veto power to stop the deal if she wanted to? Do you really think that uranium can or will ever be exported from the US? Find the answer to these questions, and then get back with me. Here is a good place to start.

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

Despite transfer of ownership, the uranium remained in the U.S.

A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statement by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

NRC’s review of the transfer of control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will
remain the licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize danger to life or property. The review also determined that the licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.

Despite the uranium remaining in the US, the Russians still own it, thanks to Hillary and the Hussein. That means they make profit selling it to the US. That means they could withhold it if they wanted to. That means they control it and could smuggle it out of the country if they want. The point is she put Russian interests ahead of US national security.

But hey, Jr. meeting a Russian to attempt to find out Hillary's illegal activities is more "treasonous" in your head.

all the while Russian cash flowed to the Clinton foundation

imagine that

Tell me about all that russian cash. Where did it come from, and how did it get to her?

Why? You haven't denied enough already?

 

[BULLDOG]

Continuing the QFLS:

Liberals: What is more egregious to you: Hillary Clinton granting the Russians twenty percent of USA uranium (regardless of whether you even concede a bribe occurred) or The Trump campaign briefly entertaining a legally admitted Russian lawyer lobbying for a law change?

Question For Liberals Series

Question For Liberals #1
Question For Liberals #2

Hillary Clinton didn't grant the Russians 20% of US uranium. Your question is based on a lie, as usual.

She signed off on the deal quite literally as secretary of state. I'm sure you have some cooked-up denial that gets her off the hook for that.

I see you a falling for another of Trump's lies. He is the POTUS, and the real information is available to him 24/7. It's a shame he is too stupid to even find out the truth.
Was she the only, or even the main one to sign off on it, or was she only one of 9 different members on the committee that approved the deal? Did she have veto power to stop the deal if she wanted to? Do you really think that uranium can or will ever be exported from the US? Find the answer to these questions, and then get back with me. Here is a good place to start.

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

Despite transfer of ownership, the uranium remained in the U.S.

A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statement by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

NRC’s review of the transfer of control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will
remain the licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize danger to life or property. The review also determined that the licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.

Despite the uranium remaining in the US, the Russians still own it, thanks to Hillary and the Hussein. That means they make profit selling it to the US. That means they could withhold it if they wanted to. That means they control it and could smuggle it out of the country if they want. The point is she put Russian interests ahead of US national security.

But hey, Jr. meeting a Russian to attempt to find out Hillary's illegal activities is more "treasonous" in your head.

Yup; and this is to say nothing of the OBVIOUS bribes that BULLDOG (probably a paid poster) is trying to write off.

Credible link?

 

[BULLDOG]

She signed off on the deal quite literally as secretary of state. I'm sure you have some cooked-up denial that gets her off the hook for that.

I see you a falling for another of Trump's lies. He is the POTUS, and the real information is available to him 24/7. It's a shame he is too stupid to even find out the truth.
Was she the only, or even the main one to sign off on it, or was she only one of 9 different members on the committee that approved the deal? Did she have veto power to stop the deal if she wanted to? Do you really think that uranium can or will ever be exported from the US? Find the answer to these questions, and then get back with me. Here is a good place to start.

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

Despite transfer of ownership, the uranium remained in the U.S.

A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statement by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

NRC’s review of the transfer of control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will
remain the licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize danger to life or property. The review also determined that the licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.

Despite the uranium remaining in the US, the Russians still own it, thanks to Hillary and the Hussein. That means they make profit selling it to the US. That means they could withhold it if they wanted to. That means they control it and could smuggle it out of the country if they want. The point is she put Russian interests ahead of US national security.

But hey, Jr. meeting a Russian to attempt to find out Hillary's illegal activities is more "treasonous" in your head.

all the while Russian cash flowed to the Clinton foundation

imagine that

Tell me about all that russian cash. Where did it come from, and how did it get to her?

Why? You haven't denied enough already?

I've given credible proof to discredit the lies presented by idiots making silly accusations.

 

[miketx]

I see you a falling for another of Trump's lies. He is the POTUS, and the real information is available to him 24/7. It's a shame he is too stupid to even find out the truth.
Was she the only, or even the main one to sign off on it, or was she only one of 9 different members on the committee that approved the deal? Did she have veto power to stop the deal if she wanted to? Do you really think that uranium can or will ever be exported from the US? Find the answer to these questions, and then get back with me. Here is a good place to start.

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

Despite transfer of ownership, the uranium remained in the U.S.

A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statement by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

NRC’s review of the transfer of control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will
remain the licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize danger to life or property. The review also determined that the licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.

Despite the uranium remaining in the US, the Russians still own it, thanks to Hillary and the Hussein. That means they make profit selling it to the US. That means they could withhold it if they wanted to. That means they control it and could smuggle it out of the country if they want. The point is she put Russian interests ahead of US national security.

But hey, Jr. meeting a Russian to attempt to find out Hillary's illegal activities is more "treasonous" in your head.

all the while Russian cash flowed to the Clinton foundation

imagine that

Tell me about all that russian cash. Where did it come from, and how did it get to her?

Why? You haven't denied enough already?

I've given credible proof to discredit the lies presented by idiots making silly accusations.

No you haven't and I haven't either. You see, your problem along with a lot of people, is you (and me) have no idea of the credibility of the so called "links". As we have seen time and time again, the media is biased, even going so far as to lie. ALL the media does this. So your "proof" is nothing more than you parroting what someone else has parroted from someone else who may or may not be accurate. Probably not. Which is why I rarely ever post links or provide "proof" because I can't say with certainty it really happened and you can't either unless you were involved directly which you were not. Then if you were directly involved and you tell, you might be committing treason.

 

[BULLDOG]

Despite the uranium remaining in the US, the Russians still own it, thanks to Hillary and the Hussein. That means they make profit selling it to the US. That means they could withhold it if they wanted to. That means they control it and could smuggle it out of the country if they want. The point is she put Russian interests ahead of US national security.

But hey, Jr. meeting a Russian to attempt to find out Hillary's illegal activities is more "treasonous" in your head.

all the while Russian cash flowed to the Clinton foundation

imagine that

Tell me about all that russian cash. Where did it come from, and how did it get to her?

Why? You haven't denied enough already?

I've given credible proof to discredit the lies presented by idiots making silly accusations.

No you haven't and I haven't either. You see, your problem along with a lot of people, is you (and me) have no idea of the credibility of the so called "links". As we have seen time and time again, the media is biased, even going so far as to lie. ALL the media does this. So your "proof" is nothing more than you parroting what someone else has parroted from someone else who may or may not be accurate. Probably not. Which is why I rarely ever post links or provide "proof" because I can't say with certainty it really happened and you can't either unless you were involved directly which you were not. Then if you were directly involved and you tell, you might be committing treason.

Credibility is not so arbitrary as you seem to think. All sources have been known to make mistakes, but willingness to make retractions and corrections go a long way toward earning credibility. The right wing meme of attacking the press is no more valid then their claims of FEMA prisons were.

 

[miketx]

all the while Russian cash flowed to the Clinton foundation

imagine that

Tell me about all that russian cash. Where did it come from, and how did it get to her?

Why? You haven't denied enough already?

I've given credible proof to discredit the lies presented by idiots making silly accusations.

No you haven't and I haven't either. You see, your problem along with a lot of people, is you (and me) have no idea of the credibility of the so called "links". As we have seen time and time again, the media is biased, even going so far as to lie. ALL the media does this. So your "proof" is nothing more than you parroting what someone else has parroted from someone else who may or may not be accurate. Probably not. Which is why I rarely ever post links or provide "proof" because I can't say with certainty it really happened and you can't either unless you were involved directly which you were not. Then if you were directly involved and you tell, you might be committing treason.

Credibility is not so arbitrary as you seem to think. All sources have been known to make mistakes, but willingness to make retractions and corrections go a long way toward earning credibility. The right wing meme of attacking the press is no more valid then their claims of FEMA prisons were.

Nonsense. All one need do is look at the MSM and see all the negative press on Trump, everyday, non stop.

 

[BULLDOG]

Tell me about all that russian cash. Where did it come from, and how did it get to her?

Why? You haven't denied enough already?

I've given credible proof to discredit the lies presented by idiots making silly accusations.

No you haven't and I haven't either. You see, your problem along with a lot of people, is you (and me) have no idea of the credibility of the so called "links". As we have seen time and time again, the media is biased, even going so far as to lie. ALL the media does this. So your "proof" is nothing more than you parroting what someone else has parroted from someone else who may or may not be accurate. Probably not. Which is why I rarely ever post links or provide "proof" because I can't say with certainty it really happened and you can't either unless you were involved directly which you were not. Then if you were directly involved and you tell, you might be committing treason.

Credibility is not so arbitrary as you seem to think. All sources have been known to make mistakes, but willingness to make retractions and corrections go a long way toward earning credibility. The right wing meme of attacking the press is no more valid then their claims of FEMA prisons were.

Nonsense. All one need do is look at the MSM and see all the negative press on Trump, everyday, non stop.

If Trump and his supporters are tired of his stupid behavior being reported, he should quit being so stupid. You should note that Trump has done what he is accused of. Obama faced just as much opposition, but he wasn't guilty of the countless fake accusations.