bendog
Diamond Member
JMO, but I can't see removing a potus for a one time attempt at illegally trying to gain a political favor in exchange for military aid.So what is the quid pro quo we do know about now?
a) According to the President's own released 'transcripts' we know that he specifically asked Ukraine to investigate the mythical DNC server and Joe Biden.
b) According to the text messages from Trump's diplomats we know that aid was being held up pending Ukraine's agreement to make a public announcement regarding starting an investigation into the DNC server
c) Also we know that a very desired meeting at the White House with the new Ukrainian President and Trump was being held up pending that public announcement of an investigation.
d) We also know that at least one U.S. diplomat expressed concern that aid was being held up because of a demand for a political favor.
e) And finally we have Trump's own Chief of Staff admitting that there was a quid pro quo when it came to aid and the DNC server investigation. And that it happens all the time.
But the Trumpettes are cool with a quid pro quo by a sitting U.S. President- just so long as that President is Trump.
I'm a little surprised the walls haven't fallen in on Trump with other transgressions. But so far the dems seem content to show Trump is pretty much in contempt of Ukrainian corruption.
I mean, I'd think there are rotten timbers in Saudi Arabia and the boychinkin with 666 real estate.