Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know what? I don't give a damn what Scott says or the motive Obama had behind it. I am glad he got rid of that" pre existing conditions' bull shit and I am not alone by far. Trump sealed HIS fate when he announced he would appeal Obamacare.... that probably lost him the national election.Obama's mother was denied SOMETHING and died under the old system, thus was born his determination to reform it; which he did.I don't think you can quantify that! The private sector has done quite well under Obama. His PPACA has given millions of White people health care who could not afford it before. Look around at who dislikes Obama. It is mostly RW WHITE MALES and the women who love them. Rebel flag wavers, White CC members, and other supremacists are right at home in your party.Probably not.Those waters have yet to be tested since no woman has ever been elected president. Now , however, Obama is president and we know how the RW white male Taliban has expressed their seething hatred of him.
Obama is NOT black, he is half white. No one dislikes him for his bi racial parentage, he is disliked for his far left, socialist, hate-America ideology.
Not one person in the USA was denied medical care before ACA. NOT ONE, even those here illegally. There was no healthcare crisis. ACA was nothing but a way for the govt to take over 1/6 of the economy.
That's Obama bullshit.
Obama’s Untrue Anecdote
President Obama's much-told story about his mother's fight to get cancer coverage was untrue, according to a recently published book. And the White House isn't disputing the author's account.
The New York Times reports that Janny Scott, in her biography, “A Singular Woman: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mother,” writes that Stanley Ann Dunham's health insurance provider did, in fact, cover most of the medical expenses related to her uterine and ovarian cancer.
Obama, during the 2008 presidential campaign and the many months before he signed the health care law last year, often spoke of his mother's complications as a reason to overhaul the nation's health care system, saying that she nearly was denied health insurance coverage due to the fact that her illness was considered a preexisting condition. For example, when Obama was asked at an AARP tele-town hall two years ago if insurers would be required to cover people with preexisting conditions under his health care proposal, he replied:
New York Times, July 13: In her book, published in May by Riverhead Books, Ms. Scott writes that Mr. Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, had an employer-provided health insurance policy that paid her hospital bills directly, leaving her "to pay only the deductible and any uncovered expenses, which, she said, came to several hundred dollars a month."
Obama, July 28, 2009: The answer is yes. And so let me talk just a little bit about the kind of insurance reform that we're proposing as part of the broader reform package.But according to the Times, Scott writes that Dunham's dispute wasn't over health insurance coverage at all, but rather over a disability insurance policy. Such disability policies aren't covered by the new health care law for which Obama was arguing.
Number one, if you've got a preexisting condition, insurance companies will still have to insure you. This is something very personal for me. My mother, when she contracted cancer, the insurance companies started suggesting that, well, maybe this was a preexisting condition; maybe you could have diagnosed it before you actually purchased your insurance. Ultimately, they gave in, but she had to spend weeks fighting with insurance companies while she's in the hospital bed, writing letters back and forth just to get coverage for insurance that she had already paid premiums on. And that happens all across the country. We are going to put a stop to that. That's point number one.
New York Times, July 13: The Cigna disability policy, according to Ms. Scott, allowed the company to deny a claim if a patient had seen a doctor about the condition that caused the disability in the three months before employment. During that period, Ms. Dunham visited a New York gynecologist. When Cigna obtained the doctor’s notes, it learned that she had formed a working hypothesis that Ms. Dunham might have uterine cancer, Ms. Scott wrote.Scott, who calls Obama's version of what happened "abbreviated" in her book, told the paper that she found no evidence that Dunham encountered similar challenges from Dunham's actual health insurance provider.
The doctor ordered up a series of tests, and Ms. Dunham submitted to most of them. “None of these tests indicated that I had cancer,” Ms. Dunham wrote to Cigna, according to the book.
After several months, Cigna denied the claim.
Nicholas Papas, a White House spokesman, did not challenge Scott's account, which was based on actual letters Dunham had written to CIGNA, according to the Times. “We have not reviewed the letters or other material on which the author bases her account,” he told the paper. “The president has told this story based on his recollection of events that took place more than 15 years ago.”
— D'Angelo Gore
God what a dick he is...Is this whiny-bitch little Leftist rant-thread still going, about how the mean ol' Right folk aren't worshiping the Failed Messiah the way he deserves? Puh-leeeze!
....and yet, like a fly to a dog turd....here you are.......LOL
No I a NOT lying, idiot. I've said this before and I will say it again. You must be a shitbird because you certainly have a FOWL mouth.Yeah, you are lying. You piece of socialist shit.No, I am not lying. You don't even know what kind of Insurance I have. One size does not fit all. You extremists love to project your known predilections onto others. That is straight outta Limbaugh 101.Because he is an American patriot who WANTS businesses to succeed. When more people were required to pay into the system that is where most of the extra money was produced. I am not using Obamacare and my premiums were not affected.Moron.......You know who made out like bandits from the ACA??? The private sector insurers, the AMA, the big pharamas and the hospital owners.
So then why do you support it?
you are lying about your premiums. but we understand its what you libs do best.
You know what? I don't give a damn what Scott says or the motive Obama had behind it. I am glad he got rid of that" pre existing conditions' bull shit and I am not alone by far. Trump sealed HIS fate when he announced he would appeal Obamacare.... that probably lost him the national election.Obama's mother was denied SOMETHING and died under the old system, thus was born his determination to reform it; which he did.I don't think you can quantify that! The private sector has done quite well under Obama. His PPACA has given millions of White people health care who could not afford it before. Look around at who dislikes Obama. It is mostly RW WHITE MALES and the women who love them. Rebel flag wavers, White CC members, and other supremacists are right at home in your party.Obama is NOT black, he is half white. No one dislikes him for his bi racial parentage, he is disliked for his far left, socialist, hate-America ideology.
Not one person in the USA was denied medical care before ACA. NOT ONE, even those here illegally. There was no healthcare crisis. ACA was nothing but a way for the govt to take over 1/6 of the economy.
That's Obama bullshit.
Obama’s Untrue Anecdote
President Obama's much-told story about his mother's fight to get cancer coverage was untrue, according to a recently published book. And the White House isn't disputing the author's account.
The New York Times reports that Janny Scott, in her biography, “A Singular Woman: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mother,” writes that Stanley Ann Dunham's health insurance provider did, in fact, cover most of the medical expenses related to her uterine and ovarian cancer.
Obama, during the 2008 presidential campaign and the many months before he signed the health care law last year, often spoke of his mother's complications as a reason to overhaul the nation's health care system, saying that she nearly was denied health insurance coverage due to the fact that her illness was considered a preexisting condition. For example, when Obama was asked at an AARP tele-town hall two years ago if insurers would be required to cover people with preexisting conditions under his health care proposal, he replied:
New York Times, July 13: In her book, published in May by Riverhead Books, Ms. Scott writes that Mr. Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, had an employer-provided health insurance policy that paid her hospital bills directly, leaving her "to pay only the deductible and any uncovered expenses, which, she said, came to several hundred dollars a month."
Obama, July 28, 2009: The answer is yes. And so let me talk just a little bit about the kind of insurance reform that we're proposing as part of the broader reform package.But according to the Times, Scott writes that Dunham's dispute wasn't over health insurance coverage at all, but rather over a disability insurance policy. Such disability policies aren't covered by the new health care law for which Obama was arguing.
Number one, if you've got a preexisting condition, insurance companies will still have to insure you. This is something very personal for me. My mother, when she contracted cancer, the insurance companies started suggesting that, well, maybe this was a preexisting condition; maybe you could have diagnosed it before you actually purchased your insurance. Ultimately, they gave in, but she had to spend weeks fighting with insurance companies while she's in the hospital bed, writing letters back and forth just to get coverage for insurance that she had already paid premiums on. And that happens all across the country. We are going to put a stop to that. That's point number one.
New York Times, July 13: The Cigna disability policy, according to Ms. Scott, allowed the company to deny a claim if a patient had seen a doctor about the condition that caused the disability in the three months before employment. During that period, Ms. Dunham visited a New York gynecologist. When Cigna obtained the doctor’s notes, it learned that she had formed a working hypothesis that Ms. Dunham might have uterine cancer, Ms. Scott wrote.Scott, who calls Obama's version of what happened "abbreviated" in her book, told the paper that she found no evidence that Dunham encountered similar challenges from Dunham's actual health insurance provider.
The doctor ordered up a series of tests, and Ms. Dunham submitted to most of them. “None of these tests indicated that I had cancer,” Ms. Dunham wrote to Cigna, according to the book.
After several months, Cigna denied the claim.
Nicholas Papas, a White House spokesman, did not challenge Scott's account, which was based on actual letters Dunham had written to CIGNA, according to the Times. “We have not reviewed the letters or other material on which the author bases her account,” he told the paper. “The president has told this story based on his recollection of events that took place more than 15 years ago.”
— D'Angelo Gore
No I a NOT lying, idiot. I've said this before and I will say it again. You must be a shitbird because you certainly have a FOWL mouth.Yeah, you are lying. You piece of socialist shit.No, I am not lying. You don't even know what kind of Insurance I have. One size does not fit all. You extremists love to project your known predilections onto others. That is straight outta Limbaugh 101.Because he is an American patriot who WANTS businesses to succeed. When more people were required to pay into the system that is where most of the extra money was produced. I am not using Obamacare and my premiums were not affected.So then why do you support it?
you are lying about your premiums. but we understand its what you libs do best.
No I a NOT lying, idiot. I've said this before and I will say it again. You must be a shitbird because you certainly have a FOWL mouth.Yeah, you are lying. You piece of socialist shit.No, I am not lying. You don't even know what kind of Insurance I have. One size does not fit all. You extremists love to project your known predilections onto others. That is straight outta Limbaugh 101.Because he is an American patriot who WANTS businesses to succeed. When more people were required to pay into the system that is where most of the extra money was produced. I am not using Obamacare and my premiums were not affected.So then why do you support it?
you are lying about your premiums. but we understand its what you libs do best.
Trump sealed HIS fate when he announced he would appeal Obamacare.... that probably lost him the national election.
Did you go to the same school for gifted dyslectic geniuses as DarkFuzzy?The right hate that the helped regular folk
You know what? I don't give a damn what Scott says or the motive Obama had behind it. I am glad he got rid of that" pre existing conditions' bull shit and I am not alone by far. Trump sealed HIS fate when he announced he would appeal Obamacare.... that probably lost him the national election.Obama's mother was denied SOMETHING and died under the old system, thus was born his determination to reform it; which he did.I don't think you can quantify that! The private sector has done quite well under Obama. His PPACA has given millions of White people health care who could not afford it before. Look around at who dislikes Obama. It is mostly RW WHITE MALES and the women who love them. Rebel flag wavers, White CC members, and other supremacists are right at home in your party.Obama is NOT black, he is half white. No one dislikes him for his bi racial parentage, he is disliked for his far left, socialist, hate-America ideology.
Not one person in the USA was denied medical care before ACA. NOT ONE, even those here illegally. There was no healthcare crisis. ACA was nothing but a way for the govt to take over 1/6 of the economy.
That's Obama bullshit.
Obama’s Untrue Anecdote
President Obama's much-told story about his mother's fight to get cancer coverage was untrue, according to a recently published book. And the White House isn't disputing the author's account.
The New York Times reports that Janny Scott, in her biography, “A Singular Woman: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mother,” writes that Stanley Ann Dunham's health insurance provider did, in fact, cover most of the medical expenses related to her uterine and ovarian cancer.
Obama, during the 2008 presidential campaign and the many months before he signed the health care law last year, often spoke of his mother's complications as a reason to overhaul the nation's health care system, saying that she nearly was denied health insurance coverage due to the fact that her illness was considered a preexisting condition. For example, when Obama was asked at an AARP tele-town hall two years ago if insurers would be required to cover people with preexisting conditions under his health care proposal, he replied:
New York Times, July 13: In her book, published in May by Riverhead Books, Ms. Scott writes that Mr. Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, had an employer-provided health insurance policy that paid her hospital bills directly, leaving her "to pay only the deductible and any uncovered expenses, which, she said, came to several hundred dollars a month."
Obama, July 28, 2009: The answer is yes. And so let me talk just a little bit about the kind of insurance reform that we're proposing as part of the broader reform package.But according to the Times, Scott writes that Dunham's dispute wasn't over health insurance coverage at all, but rather over a disability insurance policy. Such disability policies aren't covered by the new health care law for which Obama was arguing.
Number one, if you've got a preexisting condition, insurance companies will still have to insure you. This is something very personal for me. My mother, when she contracted cancer, the insurance companies started suggesting that, well, maybe this was a preexisting condition; maybe you could have diagnosed it before you actually purchased your insurance. Ultimately, they gave in, but she had to spend weeks fighting with insurance companies while she's in the hospital bed, writing letters back and forth just to get coverage for insurance that she had already paid premiums on. And that happens all across the country. We are going to put a stop to that. That's point number one.
New York Times, July 13: The Cigna disability policy, according to Ms. Scott, allowed the company to deny a claim if a patient had seen a doctor about the condition that caused the disability in the three months before employment. During that period, Ms. Dunham visited a New York gynecologist. When Cigna obtained the doctor’s notes, it learned that she had formed a working hypothesis that Ms. Dunham might have uterine cancer, Ms. Scott wrote.Scott, who calls Obama's version of what happened "abbreviated" in her book, told the paper that she found no evidence that Dunham encountered similar challenges from Dunham's actual health insurance provider.
The doctor ordered up a series of tests, and Ms. Dunham submitted to most of them. “None of these tests indicated that I had cancer,” Ms. Dunham wrote to Cigna, according to the book.
After several months, Cigna denied the claim.
Nicholas Papas, a White House spokesman, did not challenge Scott's account, which was based on actual letters Dunham had written to CIGNA, according to the Times. “We have not reviewed the letters or other material on which the author bases her account,” he told the paper. “The president has told this story based on his recollection of events that took place more than 15 years ago.”
— D'Angelo Gore
And they thought you were checkmated...HA!So then why do you support it?
Well, because unlike you and your ilk, I am a humanitarian who cares for the millions of fellow citizens who had NO health insurance or who were too sick for any insurer to provide care.
Good enough reason?
Are you saying you are full of shit?Ya'll let me know if we need to dump a truckload of elephant shit into this cesspool...
what is so obvious that make you believe that lie? I don't hate capitalism and neither does Obama. As noted earlier, the business sector has been blessed since by Obama took office with astounding success. Pay attention, please.And YOU don't get to define ME with your one dimensional interpretations of what you think you read in a dictionary.What Libs? I consider myself a REAL conservative who stands up for the president of the USA no matter what race he/she is? You haters have frequently shown more favoritism for the Russian leader, Putin! Why is that?
Libs or real conservatives don't do that!
You're a leftwinger, in other words.
That is what YOUR kind calls me but I see myself as an American who thinks for himself. I don't follow the ritual political fads that manifests as sheer propaganda on radio and television talkshows.
That is what anyone who can read a dictionary calls you. You don't get to make up your own definitions for the words you use.
I didn't define you. English is what defines you. When you hate capitalism, you're a leftist, and you obviously hate capitalism.
No, I get FEHP...just like congress...plus I have TrICARE and MEDICARE.No I a NOT lying, idiot. I've said this before and I will say it again. You must be a shitbird because you certainly have a FOWL mouth.Yeah, you are lying. You piece of socialist shit.No, I am not lying. You don't even know what kind of Insurance I have. One size does not fit all. You extremists love to project your known predilections onto others. That is straight outta Limbaugh 101.Because he is an American patriot who WANTS businesses to succeed. When more people were required to pay into the system that is where most of the extra money was produced. I am not using Obamacare and my premiums were not affected.
you are lying about your premiums. but we understand its what you libs do best.
Ok, you say your premiums have not gone up, lets assume you are telling the truth. How about deductibles and co-payments, are they up? please tell the truth.
You know what? I don't give a damn what Scott says or the motive Obama had behind it. I am glad he got rid of that" pre existing conditions' bull shit and I am not alone by far. Trump sealed HIS fate when he announced he would appeal Obamacare.... that probably lost him the national election.Obama's mother was denied SOMETHING and died under the old system, thus was born his determination to reform it; which he did.I don't think you can quantify that! The private sector has done quite well under Obama. His PPACA has given millions of White people health care who could not afford it before. Look around at who dislikes Obama. It is mostly RW WHITE MALES and the women who love them. Rebel flag wavers, White CC members, and other supremacists are right at home in your party.
Not one person in the USA was denied medical care before ACA. NOT ONE, even those here illegally. There was no healthcare crisis. ACA was nothing but a way for the govt to take over 1/6 of the economy.
That's Obama bullshit.
Obama’s Untrue Anecdote
President Obama's much-told story about his mother's fight to get cancer coverage was untrue, according to a recently published book. And the White House isn't disputing the author's account.
The New York Times reports that Janny Scott, in her biography, “A Singular Woman: The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mother,” writes that Stanley Ann Dunham's health insurance provider did, in fact, cover most of the medical expenses related to her uterine and ovarian cancer.
Obama, during the 2008 presidential campaign and the many months before he signed the health care law last year, often spoke of his mother's complications as a reason to overhaul the nation's health care system, saying that she nearly was denied health insurance coverage due to the fact that her illness was considered a preexisting condition. For example, when Obama was asked at an AARP tele-town hall two years ago if insurers would be required to cover people with preexisting conditions under his health care proposal, he replied:
New York Times, July 13: In her book, published in May by Riverhead Books, Ms. Scott writes that Mr. Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, had an employer-provided health insurance policy that paid her hospital bills directly, leaving her "to pay only the deductible and any uncovered expenses, which, she said, came to several hundred dollars a month."
Obama, July 28, 2009: The answer is yes. And so let me talk just a little bit about the kind of insurance reform that we're proposing as part of the broader reform package.But according to the Times, Scott writes that Dunham's dispute wasn't over health insurance coverage at all, but rather over a disability insurance policy. Such disability policies aren't covered by the new health care law for which Obama was arguing.
Number one, if you've got a preexisting condition, insurance companies will still have to insure you. This is something very personal for me. My mother, when she contracted cancer, the insurance companies started suggesting that, well, maybe this was a preexisting condition; maybe you could have diagnosed it before you actually purchased your insurance. Ultimately, they gave in, but she had to spend weeks fighting with insurance companies while she's in the hospital bed, writing letters back and forth just to get coverage for insurance that she had already paid premiums on. And that happens all across the country. We are going to put a stop to that. That's point number one.
New York Times, July 13: The Cigna disability policy, according to Ms. Scott, allowed the company to deny a claim if a patient had seen a doctor about the condition that caused the disability in the three months before employment. During that period, Ms. Dunham visited a New York gynecologist. When Cigna obtained the doctor’s notes, it learned that she had formed a working hypothesis that Ms. Dunham might have uterine cancer, Ms. Scott wrote.Scott, who calls Obama's version of what happened "abbreviated" in her book, told the paper that she found no evidence that Dunham encountered similar challenges from Dunham's actual health insurance provider.
The doctor ordered up a series of tests, and Ms. Dunham submitted to most of them. “None of these tests indicated that I had cancer,” Ms. Dunham wrote to Cigna, according to the book.
After several months, Cigna denied the claim.
Nicholas Papas, a White House spokesman, did not challenge Scott's account, which was based on actual letters Dunham had written to CIGNA, according to the Times. “We have not reviewed the letters or other material on which the author bases her account,” he told the paper. “The president has told this story based on his recollection of events that took place more than 15 years ago.”
— D'Angelo Gore
there were two problems with medical insurance before ACA
1. you could be denied coverage for pre-existing conditions
2. most policies had a lifetime maximum payment
those two things could have been fixed with a one page bill. not the 2000 page disaster that the dems passed in the most corrupt manner before anyone had a chance to read it.
those two provisions will be included in any plan put forth by Trump or any GOP candidate.
you are pissed off over nothing.
Now, how about the americans whose premiums have doubled, whose deductibles have doubled, and who are being forced to buy coverages that they don't want or need?
