Mertex
Cat Lady =^..^=
- Apr 27, 2013
- 26,532
- 13,987
- 1,445
Looks like you're the uneducated nitwit......in fact....it is a law that the President can make that can be overturned by a succeeding president. Now eat crow.
The one sure way of getting rid of an executive order is in the White House. If an administration doesn't like an order from a previous president, it can legally reverse it on its own.
Executive orders coming? Here's how they work
Playtex, you've always had an IQ of DD, but even for you this is a level of stupidity beyond the pale...
{Executive Orders (EOs) are legally binding orders given by the President, acting as the head of the Executive Branch, to Federal Administrative Agencies. Executive Orders are generally used to direct federal agencies and officials in their execution of congressionally established laws or policies.}
ThisNation.com--What is an Executive Order?
An EO is not law, you drooling moron. In fact, an EO by nature has no authority over any person who is not employed by a federal agency working for the Executive.
Moron.....an EO has the force of law. Talk about stupid....that's why I generally don't respond to your posts....you're an ignorant boob who thinks he knows lot and shows how stupid he really is challenging others.
From your very own link....you must be extra stupid if you post a link that contradicts your claims. Why don't you remain quiet, so as to not expose how really ignorant you are.
Now, don't bother me again.....I don't like to debate with a drooling mental pygmy.
From your link:
Executive Orders (EOs) are legally binding orders given by the President, acting as the head of the Executive Branch, to Federal Administrative Agencies. Executive Orders are generally used to direct federal agencies and officials in their execution of congressionally established laws or policies.
Wiki:
Executive orders have the full force of law when they take authority from a legislative power which grants its power directly to the Executive by the Constitution, or are made pursuant to Acts of Congress that explicitly delegate to the President some degree of discretionary power (delegated legislation).
Actually EO's aren't worth the paper they're written on unless they used to direct federal agencies and officials in the execution of congressionally established laws, policies or are to implement powers bestowed to the executive branch by the Constitution. A president can't just make shit up as they go along.
And where did I ever say that a President can?