Crixus
Gold Member
It all comes down to the opinion that gun owners can do no wrong when it comes to deciding to pull the trigger. It is solely their call on whether it is warranted or not.The bitch was stupid. She shot a dude who was sitting on his couch eating ice cream. She is guilty of murder period. She was not railroaded she screwed up and just like any of us, must now pay for that screw up. The system did its job.
No you are the stupid one. He was not sitting on his couch....just another lie that was circulated...he was advancing on the defendant.
It was definitely a miscarriage of justice that will be over-turned on appeal.
And what does eating ice cream have to do with anything oh my bad I forget ....trayvon was just eating skittles and walking innocently home....bwaaaaaaaaaaaa you idiots know nothing of the law...especially the law on self defense.
You are the dumb one. And just not honest. The stupid cow shot the guy IN HIS OWN HOUSE. She was In HIS house. By law, that could have cost her HER life. She was stupid, she killed a guy, now the dumb twat will do some time for being a retard. I know in the end it always has to be politics for you dumb shits, but the fact is, the law worked.
The jury disagreed
Here is my thing. A police officer isn't supposed to be held to the standard as we are when it comes to carrying firearms and the use of deadly force. They are supposed to be symbols of leadership and discipline. They are held (allegedly) to a higher standard then us. Walking into someone else's home and shooting them in the chest is a mistake cops aren't supposed to make. The jury was right on. The woman committed murder period. Even other cops say as much.
Police are under the same laws as all of us are.....look up the definition of murder...it has been posted on here...what she did was not murder by any stretch of the imagination....it was at most negligent homicide....though I do not think it even amounts to that.
The law of self defense is based on the perception of the defendant....was her life in reasonable danger...she obviously believed so...no other logical reason to shoot.
No they aren't. They have unions and all sorts of legal funds to protect them when they screw up like this. We don't. Even in a shooting that's justified, if we throw down our lives are over when the first round is fired. You are getting your facts from Foux news. Gieger was asked, "did you intend to kill Mr. Jean". The only answer is "yes". That being the case, she was convicted. She was tried and justly convicted. Hopefully she does some time, but I won't hold my breath.