Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doesn't that line of thinking imply that the President can essentially do anything?
I would say the President could kill a US citizen on US soil, if they needed to do it.
Even if they weren't an immediate threat?
I would say the President could kill a US citizen on US soil, if they needed to do it.
Even if they weren't an immediate threat?
Someone who wasn't an immediate threat would be captured, unless they were an immediate threat of escaping.
The bottom line is, a rookie cop can kill a US citizen on US soil and the COC can and would under the right circumstances.
Even if they weren't an immediate threat?
Someone who wasn't an immediate threat would be captured, unless they were an immediate threat of escaping.
The bottom line is, a rookie cop can kill a US citizen on US soil and the COC can and would under the right circumstances.
Ok, so that's your opinion. Now we'd like the administration's opinion.
Someone who wasn't an immediate threat would be captured, unless they were an immediate threat of escaping.
The bottom line is, a rookie cop can kill a US citizen on US soil and the COC can and would under the right circumstances.
Ok, so that's your opinion. Now we'd like the administration's opinion.
I think that's every administration's opinion and people like Rand Paul know it. RP is just showing off.
Ok, so that's your opinion. Now we'd like the administration's opinion.
I think that's every administration's opinion and people like Rand Paul know it. RP is just showing off.
This discussion is going in circles now. I've demonstrated why we don't feel the administration has adequately answered the question. You can either accept that we at the very least have some ground to stand on, or that we're just showing off.
I think that's every administration's opinion and people like Rand Paul know it. RP is just showing off.
This discussion is going in circles now. I've demonstrated why we don't feel the administration has adequately answered the question. You can either accept that we at the very least have some ground to stand on, or that we're just showing off.
So you don't believe all the past Presidents have the same policy on such issues of being COC? If the British attacked after the government was formed, do you think they would be using due process for loyalist citizens?
This discussion is going in circles now. I've demonstrated why we don't feel the administration has adequately answered the question. You can either accept that we at the very least have some ground to stand on, or that we're just showing off.
So you don't believe all the past Presidents have the same policy on such issues of being COC? If the British attacked after the government was formed, do you think they would be using due process for loyalist citizens?
Irrelevant. I want to know what this administration believes the limits of its powers are on this issue. That other administrations may or may not have had differing notions of the limits of their power has no bearing on this.
So you don't believe all the past Presidents have the same policy on such issues of being COC? If the British attacked after the government was formed, do you think they would be using due process for loyalist citizens?
Irrelevant. I want to know what this administration believes the limits of its powers are on this issue. That other administrations may or may not have had differing notions of the limits of their power has no bearing on this.
Send them an email and see what answer you get!
Irrelevant. I want to know what this administration believes the limits of its powers are on this issue. That other administrations may or may not have had differing notions of the limits of their power has no bearing on this.
Send them an email and see what answer you get!
That's what I need, a form email sent from some low level staffer at the White House that still doesn't answer the question.
Send them an email and see what answer you get!
That's what I need, a form email sent from some low level staffer at the White House that still doesn't answer the question.
Rand Paul didn't get much, did he?
Ok, so that's your opinion. Now we'd like the administration's opinion.
I think that's every administration's opinion and people like Rand Paul know it. RP is just showing off.
This discussion is going in circles now. I've demonstrated why we don't feel the administration has adequately answered the question. You can either accept that we at the very least have some ground to stand on, or that we're just showing off.
That's what I need, a form email sent from some low level staffer at the White House that still doesn't answer the question.
Rand Paul didn't get much, did he?
Document: Attorney General Eric Holder drone letter to Sen. Rand Paul - Josh Gerstein - POLITICO.com
He got an answer. At last.
Well, of COURSE Holder was going to say that...the Administration would be pretty stupid to say anything to the contrary.Rand Paul didn't get much, did he?
Document: Attorney General Eric Holder drone letter to Sen. Rand Paul - Josh Gerstein - POLITICO.com
He got an answer. At last.
And the answer was exactly what you knew it would be. Grandstanding by the reactionaries and libertarians, nothing else.
Rand Paul didn't get much, did he?
Document: Attorney General Eric Holder drone letter to Sen. Rand Paul - Josh Gerstein - POLITICO.com
He got an answer. At last.
And the answer was exactly what you knew it would be. Grandstanding by the reactionaries and libertarians, nothing else.
Well, of COURSE Holder was going to say that...the Administration would be pretty stupid to say anything to the contrary.
And the answer was exactly what you knew it would be. Grandstanding by the reactionaries and libertarians, nothing else.
Send them an email and see what answer you get!
That's what I need, a form email sent from some low level staffer at the White House that still doesn't answer the question.
Rand Paul didn't get much, did he?
And the answer was exactly what you knew it would be. Grandstanding by the reactionaries and libertarians, nothing else.
Weren't you one of the ones arguing that the answer was obviously "yes" earlier?
That's what I need, a form email sent from some low level staffer at the White House that still doesn't answer the question.
Rand Paul didn't get much, did he?
He finally got his answer. You mad?
You people are so gullible. Do you really think this little wuss is trying to do something good for his country?? He's not. He is motivated by his hate for the president and nothing else.
