🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Rand Paul says the quiet part out loud regarding elections

Why should paying taxes be a requirement? If laws and issues are going to effect you, you have the right to have a say. Income, which is what this amounts to, disenfranchised all those who's income falls below a taxable rate and essentially creates two distinct classes of citizens. The elite, who are allowed to vote and the rest, who are not yet sustained pay taxes on purchases, have children in schools, and must what the elite decides. They have skin in the game, you've just removed their voice.
Are you still telling blacks they’re inferior and too ignorant to vote? Wow racist
 
The biggest players are the military industrial complex and private contract profiteering. Privatizing the prison industrial complex is another player.
Yes. Both of these are a blight on freedom.
Sports Socialism is another. Are you ready to stop all financing of sports stadiums, managers, and players worth billions?
I am, yes. There's plenty of money in sports. No need to bilk taxpayers.
How about the farm bill that pays farmers socialism profits for losses do to failed farming practices?
Yep. We should ditch that too.
All these folks are part of the voting block, and they receive socialism in the private sector.
Exactly. That's why it's so insidious. Everybody wants free shit.
 
If you say so. But my statement holds. Without Jobs, Apple would have been a footnote. Your conception of "actual work" doesn't seem to take into account everything that goes into producing useful products. It's more than just manual labor or product design.

Those designs and products that he had nothing to do with creating are the reason the company was successful.

Without Wozniak, Job has nothing Wozniak on the other hand had a product that could be sold with or without Jobs.
 
Without Wozniak, Job has nothing Wozniak on the other hand had a product that could be sold with or without Jobs.
But Wozniak didn't sell them. Jobs did.

It's certainly possible that someone else could have done a better job, but he did run the company. You seem committed to the idea that running a company is "leeching" and that profit is "money for nothing". I don't get that.

Have you ever tried to run a successful business? It doesn't "just happen".
 
In other words, people born into privilege. So, to hell with what you know, but who you are, and what you have. Which comes from privilege and inheritance. Sounds like a plantation owner who gets all the rights. LOL! You want to go back to the old confederacy with control, slave labor, and the say so about those less fortunate. Folks like you are extremely shallow.
No
 
But Wozniak didn't sell them. Jobs did.

It's certainly possible that someone else could have done a better job, but he did run the company. You seem committed to the idea that running a company is "leeching" and that profit is "money for nothing". I don't get that.

Have you ever tried to run a successful business? It doesn't "just happen".
He didnt run the cmpany by himself . Wozniak and othered worked as designers in addition to handling corporate matters. Jobs was more of a public relations guy than a ceo. He was more like a mascot.


And without Wozniaks designs he literally had nothing.

There is a reason why he resorted to corporate espionage when the design team walked out in the 90's.. Because he had NOTHING.
 
But Wozniak didn't sell them. Jobs did.

It's certainly possible that someone else could have done a better job, but he did run the company. You seem committed to the idea that running a company is "leeching" and that profit is "money for nothing". I don't get that.

Have you ever tried to run a successful business? It doesn't "just happen".
If you create a product, and someone else markets it for you, do you beleive that they are entitled to be credited as a creator and take most of the profits? Cause thats what Jobs did. And once Wozniak was gone, the company was never as profitable because his designs were the backbone of the company. The onl reason the company made a comeback was job stealing the designs for mp3 players and getting a version out first.
 
If you create a product, and someone else markets it for you, do you beleive that they are entitled to be credited as a creator and take most of the profits? Cause thats what Jobs did. And once Wozniak was gone, the company was never as profitable because his designs were the backbone of the company. The onl reason the company made a comeback was job stealing the designs for mp3 players and getting a version out first.
Sure man. :rolleyes:

Jobs was a just a shiftless bum who took credit for the work of others. Everyone just gave him their money because - I dunno. Something. He sure tricked us.
 

Forum List

Back
Top