🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Reciting Other's Lies Makes One Weary

You've slipped into the trance, bw. You haven't made sense in some time.
Odd, isn't it, that I've had the same thoughts about you. Other than edu and personal responsibility, there is little, if anything we agree upon. But billy, I never thought I'd see the day when you would support unqualified judges

Why should I not question those who term them so?

I never thought I'd see the day when you'd support any President who ordered his staff to ignore subpoenas or testimony required by Congress

These are separate, co-equal branches of government. Each has the right to question the demands of one upon the other in court. The Democrats declined to pursue the matter in court. One does not wonder why.

or support any President who made money due to the office, ala resorts. I think if Bush or even Reagan did that, you'd protest. Heck, even 41 and Cheney put Carlisle in trust while they were in office.

You may not agree with the current arrangements, but I notice the claims based upon the emoluments clause have gone nowhere.

So I guess we, you and me, let this inarticulate babbling bloviating fool make fools of us too, huh?

I look at the results, and I am satisfied. As to the Democrats, there is nothing attractive about them.
 
Surely (Shirley?) listening to recited lies does not bother you. Seems like Republicans just can't get enough of them. And it appears that Barr is overtaking Trump lately, but we haven't heard from Rudy yet, so the jury is still out on the Blue Ribbon winner.





Don't know about. Schittferbrains has been lying for three years now. You seem to thrive on them.
Lies? The guy has oath-backed testimony, which is something you can read about in a dictionary maybe, because you sure wont find any in Republican whining about process or Presidential tweets.

Oath-backed testimony based upon hearsay is of little value. Where's the evidence?
 

Let's face facts, Billy:
  • No little kid like that rises to national fame without a lot of help.
  • I can throw a snowball in any schoolyard and hit 50 cute kids just like her who have outspoken views on climate change, the environment and 50 other social topics drilled into them by the school. She's no "gift" to the world, just a well-exploited one.
  • It takes a lot of backing, support and money, not to mention, rehearsal and training, to get around all over, be made guest speaker at all kinds of functions and answer 500 questions before hot lights and cameras.
They've played the kid out. She wants to go back to just being a kid again.

In 6 months, no one will remember her. And with thousands of people the world over fighting to cure disease, advance science and reach better world peace having all been dissed, Time Magazine will be left picking some fresh-faced child as "Person Of The Year."

But she's just so darned adorable...

maxresdefault.jpg


Just keep your fingers away from her mouth when she's feeding.

 
Then I am surprised you found the energy to start this thread.

By the way, insane conspiracy theories go in the conspiracy theory section.

What conspiracy theory?
That all the climate scientists are lying, of course. Duh. Come on man, you have to be able to puzzle this simple shit out for yourself.
 
Interesting bit of soft propaganda -

The headline states "Greta Thunberg won't meet with Trump" as if she is rejecting an invitation which in reality has not been offered. Trump would have no reason whatsoever to meet with her.

Greta Thunberg on meeting with Trump: 'I don't understand why I would do that'
Interesting that Thunberg thinks global warming is an existential crisis with the fate of earth hanging in the balance yet she has unilaterally ruled out the prospect of meeting with the most powerful leader in the world to see if she can't gain some
advantage for her cause.

I guess she's not that serious about peril to the earth after all.
She needs to meet with President Xi and tell him how she's going to put him up against the wall if China doesn't stop polluting.

No would leader should meet with this poor deluded child.
 
Then I am surprised you found the energy to start this thread.

By the way, insane conspiracy theories go in the conspiracy theory section.

What conspiracy theory?
That all the climate scientists are lying, of course. Duh. Come on man, you have to be able to puzzle this simple shit out for yourself.

Some climate scientists. Other climate scientists disagree with them. They simply don't get all the free press from Democrat media.
 
Some climate scientists.
Hmm, no, it is pretty much all. I'm not sure who has been feeding you these lies.

These climate scientists you say dont agree...how is it that they have not managed to publish ONE single research paper in over 25 years that concludes mankind's actions are likely not the primary driver of the observed, rapid warming? Were they just too busy?

By the way, you have just agreed that you think there is a grand conspiracy of scientists to lie to us about the climate. Strange that you couldn't seem to puzzle this out just a short time ago...
 
Some climate scientists.
Hmm, no, it is pretty much all. I'm not sure who has been feeding you these lies.

These climate scientists you say dont agree...how is it that they have not managed to publish ONE single research paper in over 25 years that concludes mankind's actions are likely not the primary driver of the observed, rapid warming? Were they just too busy?

By the way, you have just agreed that you think there is a grand conspiracy of scientists to lie to us about the climate. Strange that you couldn't seem to puzzle this out just a short time ago...

:auiqs.jpg:

Most of your "climate scientists" are not even climate scientists, but they do love those Leftist government grants.

 
Most of your "climate scientists" are not even climate scientists.
Of course that is idiotic, as the climate scientists to which I refer are actual scientists publishing scientific research. Oh, and their research is bolstered by scientists also publishing scientific research across nearly every other field of physical science.

So, go ahead, keep embarrassing yourself. Please, continue.
 
Oath-backed testimony based upon hearsay is of little value. Where's the evidence?
The evidence is hiding behind Trump's edict that no staffer shall respond to subpoenas in any form...no Emails, documents or factual testimony. Don't play dumb, billy.
 
The evidence is hiding behind Trump's edict that no staffer shall respond to subpoenas in any form...no Emails, documents or factual testimony.
Which, itself, composes.one of the articles of impeachment. It's like these guys know less than nothing about any of this.
 
As I post this, 4 out of the top 10 threads are about her. Pretty impressive for a 16 year old girl.
 
Oath-backed testimony based upon hearsay is of little value. Where's the evidence?
The evidence is hiding behind Trump's edict that no staffer shall respond to subpoenas in any form...no Emails, documents or factual testimony. Don't play dumb, billy.

Well if so, why didn't the Democrats pursue a court challenge over their subpoenas?

They folded, because they knew they had nothing.
 
As I post this, 4 out of the top 10 threads are about her. Pretty impressive for a 16 year old girl.

It's not Greta, but the puppetization of Greta that is so interesting. She's a made symbol, through no fault of her own.
 
Well if so, why didn't the Democrats pursue a court challenge over their subpoenas?
Because of time, and because this obstruction of Congress was its own high crime. Note that the one court ruling on this was an aimed kick right at Trump's nuts. "Presidents are not kings...".
 

Forum List

Back
Top