whitehall
Diamond Member
Didn't fat Jerry fall asleep during his own committee hearings?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Odd, isn't it, that I've had the same thoughts about you. Other than edu and personal responsibility, there is little, if anything we agree upon. But billy, I never thought I'd see the day when you would support unqualified judgesYou've slipped into the trance, bw. You haven't made sense in some time.
I never thought I'd see the day when you'd support any President who ordered his staff to ignore subpoenas or testimony required by Congress
or support any President who made money due to the office, ala resorts. I think if Bush or even Reagan did that, you'd protest. Heck, even 41 and Cheney put Carlisle in trust while they were in office.
So I guess we, you and me, let this inarticulate babbling bloviating fool make fools of us too, huh?
Lies? The guy has oath-backed testimony, which is something you can read about in a dictionary maybe, because you sure wont find any in Republican whining about process or Presidential tweets.Surely (Shirley?) listening to recited lies does not bother you. Seems like Republicans just can't get enough of them. And it appears that Barr is overtaking Trump lately, but we haven't heard from Rudy yet, so the jury is still out on the Blue Ribbon winner.
Don't know about. Schittferbrains has been lying for three years now. You seem to thrive on them.
Then I am surprised you found the energy to start this thread.
Let's face facts, Billy:
They've played the kid out. She wants to go back to just being a kid again.
- No little kid like that rises to national fame without a lot of help.
- I can throw a snowball in any schoolyard and hit 50 cute kids just like her who have outspoken views on climate change, the environment and 50 other social topics drilled into them by the school. She's no "gift" to the world, just a well-exploited one.
- It takes a lot of backing, support and money, not to mention, rehearsal and training, to get around all over, be made guest speaker at all kinds of functions and answer 500 questions before hot lights and cameras.
In 6 months, no one will remember her. And with thousands of people the world over fighting to cure disease, advance science and reach better world peace having all been dissed, Time Magazine will be left picking some fresh-faced child as "Person Of The Year."
But she's just so darned adorable...
![]()
Just keep your fingers away from her mouth when she's feeding.
Then I am surprised you found the energy to start this thread.
By the way, insane conspiracy theories go in the conspiracy theory section.
That all the climate scientists are lying, of course. Duh. Come on man, you have to be able to puzzle this simple shit out for yourself.Then I am surprised you found the energy to start this thread.
By the way, insane conspiracy theories go in the conspiracy theory section.
What conspiracy theory?
She needs to meet with President Xi and tell him how she's going to put him up against the wall if China doesn't stop polluting.Interesting that Thunberg thinks global warming is an existential crisis with the fate of earth hanging in the balance yet she has unilaterally ruled out the prospect of meeting with the most powerful leader in the world to see if she can't gain someInteresting bit of soft propaganda -
The headline states "Greta Thunberg won't meet with Trump" as if she is rejecting an invitation which in reality has not been offered. Trump would have no reason whatsoever to meet with her.
Greta Thunberg on meeting with Trump: 'I don't understand why I would do that'
advantage for her cause.
I guess she's not that serious about peril to the earth after all.
Reciting Other's Lies Makes One Weary
That all the climate scientists are lying, of course. Duh. Come on man, you have to be able to puzzle this simple shit out for yourself.Then I am surprised you found the energy to start this thread.
By the way, insane conspiracy theories go in the conspiracy theory section.
What conspiracy theory?
Hmm, no, it is pretty much all. I'm not sure who has been feeding you these lies.Some climate scientists.
Hmm, no, it is pretty much all. I'm not sure who has been feeding you these lies.Some climate scientists.
These climate scientists you say dont agree...how is it that they have not managed to publish ONE single research paper in over 25 years that concludes mankind's actions are likely not the primary driver of the observed, rapid warming? Were they just too busy?
By the way, you have just agreed that you think there is a grand conspiracy of scientists to lie to us about the climate. Strange that you couldn't seem to puzzle this out just a short time ago...
Of course that is idiotic, as the climate scientists to which I refer are actual scientists publishing scientific research. Oh, and their research is bolstered by scientists also publishing scientific research across nearly every other field of physical science.Most of your "climate scientists" are not even climate scientists.
I didn't know that. When, in what venue did Schiff claim he had first hand knowledge of Trump's collusion with Russia?Oh? He claimed to have first hand knowledge of trump's collusion with russia.
The evidence is hiding behind Trump's edict that no staffer shall respond to subpoenas in any form...no Emails, documents or factual testimony. Don't play dumb, billy.Oath-backed testimony based upon hearsay is of little value. Where's the evidence?
Which, itself, composes.one of the articles of impeachment. It's like these guys know less than nothing about any of this.The evidence is hiding behind Trump's edict that no staffer shall respond to subpoenas in any form...no Emails, documents or factual testimony.
The evidence is hiding behind Trump's edict that no staffer shall respond to subpoenas in any form...no Emails, documents or factual testimony. Don't play dumb, billy.Oath-backed testimony based upon hearsay is of little value. Where's the evidence?
As I post this, 4 out of the top 10 threads are about her. Pretty impressive for a 16 year old girl.
Because of time, and because this obstruction of Congress was its own high crime. Note that the one court ruling on this was an aimed kick right at Trump's nuts. "Presidents are not kings...".Well if so, why didn't the Democrats pursue a court challenge over their subpoenas?