Recording of trump pressuring Wayne County repubs not to certify 2020 election surfaces.

[Marener]

Did they say they were the electors selected via the ballot?

Is there any other way to be selected?

 

[martybegan]

Is there any other way to be selected?

Depends on the State, and the State's rules on Elector selection. Also on the independent legislature theory, which wasn't decided on until AFTER all this happened.

 

[Marener]

Depends on the State, and the State's rules on Elector selection. Also on the independent legislature theory, which wasn't decided on until AFTER all this happened.

Which state had rules indicating that electors could be chosen by anyone other than the votes.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Certifying them would be breaking the law, maybe.

Creating them or discussing creating them is not.

... it is when the intent to break the law, yes.

 

[martybegan]

Which state had rules indicating that electors could be chosen by anyone other than the votes.

One that say any ties or fraud can be handled by the legislature, or all under the independent legislature theory, which wasn't denied until decided by the SC.

 

[martybegan]

... it is when the intent to break the law, yes.

Their intent was to mitigate perceived fraud.

 

[Marener]

One that say any ties or fraud can be handled by the legislature, or all under the independent legislature theory, which wasn't denied until decided by the SC.

You think I can’t tell when you’re talking out your ass?

The fake electors claimed to be legitimate electors, which means they were claiming to have been selected by voters because that was the only way electors are chosen in those states.

 

[martybegan]

You think I can’t tell when you’re talking out your ass?

The fake electors claimed to be legitimate electors, which means they were claiming to have been selected by voters because that was the only way electors are chosen in those states.

No, they claimed to have the right to do so because of perceived fraud in the election.

 

[jbrownson0831]

trump is anti-democratic. He is sleazy. He is Scum.

And jimboliar is reeeaaallly desperate now but still doing a great job as Trump campaign manager.

 

[jbrownson0831]

Exactly.

Indeed, Trump is an enemy of democracy.

And Mrs. Jones hates America.

 

[jbrownson0831]

Gore took the challenge all the way to the USSC. He lost and accepted the defeat. He did not:
-decide to appoint fake electors in numerous states
-continue to lie about the results of the election
-incite his followers to come to DC and try to stop the certification of Bush

BUT trump DID!​

Even Gore was smart enosugh to know there was no cheating beyond normal in that election.
Just as Trump is smart enough to know what you commies did in 2020 and should never let it go until it is all exposed.

 

[jbrownson0831]

Garland drug his feet and orange SOB is probably gonna get away with his multiple crimes.

There is only one person getting away with multiple crimes....along with his bagman jimboliar.

 

[jbrownson0831]

When MAGA cheats, it is fine. They are chosen.

We didn't cheat, we actually placed our own votes. Your ilk on the other hand.....

 

[jbrownson0831]

trump tried to disenfranchise millions of votes. Now, some of those voters may be voting for the Lunatic.

That's silly jimboliar.....voting meanss the actual person fills out their own ballot.....that's not disenfanchisement.
But filling out someone elses ballot for them is......

 

[Lesh]

Gore took the challenge all the way to the USSC. He lost and accepted the defeat. He did not:
-decide to appoint fake electors in numerous states
-continue to lie about the results of the election
-incite his followers to come to DC and try to stop the certification of Bush

BUT trump DID!​

And he forcefully told his fellow Dems not to challenge the results. I believe one or two did and they were voted down.

Trump dId the opposite. He encouraged it on the hopes of throwing the election to what he assumed (because he appointed three members) would be a “friendly” SCOTUS

 

[Lesh]

No, they claimed to have the right to do so because of perceived fraud in the election.

Which they had no right or authority to do.

Do you have the authority to send your name in as an elector because… whatever?

No?

Neither did they

 

[Marener]

No, they claimed to have the right to do so because of perceived fraud in the election.

What law gives them the right to claim such?

 

[martybegan]

Which they had no right or authority to do.

Do you have the authority to send your name in as an elector because… whatever?

No?

Neither did they

They thought they did under the independent legislature theory, or any other provision in a State Constitution.

 

[martybegan]

What law gives them the right to claim such?

What law says you can't question electors if you think they are fraudulent?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Their intent was to mitigate perceived fraud.

They were acting illegally, whatever was their intent.

That is not how you question electors. Sheesh.