martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 83,046
- 34,363
Creating fake electors is breaking the lawy, marty.
Certifying them would be breaking the law, maybe.
Creating them or discussing creating them is not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Creating fake electors is breaking the lawy, marty.
Just say it was corrupt and let Republicans handle the rest.I am fixing on the cheating Dems are suspected of doing in 2020.
Other than fraud.There's no laws broken in what they did.
Just say it was corrupt and let Republicans handle the rest.
You assholes should hear yourselves.
Other than fraud.
That’s what we call it when someone attempts to vote without have the legal authority to do so.
Their fraudulent certificate says they did.Did any of the so called "false electors" actually place a vote?
Ignorant dope.No, it wasn't corrupt. You keep using that word because you like the sound of it, without applying any meaning other than "I don't like what X did"
Their fraudulent certificate says they did.
Are you under the impression that it’s only voter fraud if the vote is counted?What certificates?
What vote did they fraudulently place that was a registered or approved of vote?
Are you under the impression that it’s only voter fraud if the vote is counted?
Nope. There has to be an act in furtherance of the fraud.Isn't that the line crossed in any form of fraud? There has to be a fraudulent act
Waving around a fake ballot and not casting it doesn't cross the line.
Nope. There has to be an act in furtherance of the fraud.
Submitting a fake ballot is fraud even if the election workers catch the fake ballot and discard it.
The fake electors submitted their fraudulent votes.
They submitted the fake certificate to Congress and to the Archives in December. They tried to get Pence to bring them up in the certification.When did they do that, and if it was part of the legislative process, are you saying anyone who votes no on a bill that passes is now guilty of fraud?
How were they allowed to vote in the first place?
They submitted the fake certificate to Congress and to the Archives in December. They tried to get Pence to bring them up in the certification.
That’s an act in furtherance of fraud.
Submitting fake electoral votes is not part of the process. You don’t get to pretend to be elected to office and exercise the authority of that office because you think you won the election.Except if they though the official electors were selected via fraud. Part of the process.
Submitting fake electoral votes is not part of the process. You don’t get to pretend to be elected to office and exercise the authority of that office because you think you won the election.
Being delusional is not permission to engage in fraud.
They don’t have the legal authority to say they’re the correct electors.You say fake, they say correct due to potential fraud.
Which is why this is a political matter, and not a criminal one despite Dem lawfare attempts.
They don’t have the legal authority to say they’re the correct electors.
Again, being delusional is not a legal defense.
No one certified the fake electors. They lied when they said they were the electors.That's up to the certifying board. Unless the so called false electors lied about what they were trying to do, no fraud occurred.
No one certified the fake electors. They lied when they said they were the electors.
That’s fraud.