MarathonMike
Diamond Member
Extremely low rate of occurrence and the risks to people with heart conditions is well understood since it has a 40 year usage history. Do you want to abandon it, and let people die waiting for this new unproven drug to be "proved safe"? And we all know that proved safe means understanding the side effects which will of course be there.It's way too early to proclaim this new drug has "far fewer complications" than hydroxychloroquine which has about a 40 year history of use with extremely low risk. You and other Trump haters just want to dismiss this highly effective treatment because it is associated with Trump. Why would anyone want to dismiss ANY treatment that is proving very effective with very little in the way of negative side effects?Let's see what happens.
I know that a lot of doctors swear by Hydrochloroquine and a Z-pack and have shown great results. But because Trump recommended it the deranged left are determined to poo-poo its success. Crazy......
Personally, I am getting plenty of exercise, fresh air, and as much sunshine vitamin D as I can.
There are some doctors that are using hydrocholorquine and z packs to treat the disease, but they are having troubles getting the dosage to where it fights the virus, but doesn't stop your heart.
This new drug has far fewer complications to go along with it, and they aren't planning on using it unless a person is admitted to the hospital.
Fewer side effects means it's a better drug by the way.
You don't consider people's heart stopping as a negative? That's really not the way to increase your voting base.
Study of Trump-touted chloroquine for coronavirus stopped due to heart problems, deaths