Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
VI 9995827 regarding NF 9995788, VI 9994725, NF 9994683, VI 9994488Why did the Slimes do an article then?...They HATED BUSH, and now they acquit him of all these false charges!
ISIS Likely Captured Iraqi Chemical Weapons New York Times Confirms
The New York Times in 2002 2003 was a steno pad for the Bush Cheney drive for war. You are nuts if you truly believe what you wrote. Judith Miller ring a bell?
VI 9995827 regarding NF 9995788, VI 9994725, NF 9994683, VI 9994488...England, France and Germany ALL HAD their intelligence networks saying there was WMD...
Germany and France did not say that after the 1441 UN inspections were resumed. The French were adamant about continuing the inspection process which had found no evidence of any active WMD programs and or stockpiles of weapons. Bush lied on March 17 2003 that he had intelligence knowing where these stockpiles were.
It is obvious that old 1970's shells buried 20 years earlier after the war with Iran are not what Bush was eluding to. Rove knows that but Limbaugh doesn't.
VI 9995827 regarding NF 9995788, VI 9994725, NF 9994683, VI 9994488.They are STILL finding the WMD in Iraq to this day, you FOOL!
No they aren't. The NYTimes explains exactly why they have not.
Read what you cite *Vigilante. That would be the first step in your recovery from being a Bush-Duped-Fool.
This is the lie by Bush when he announced he was starting a ground invasion into Iraq:
Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised
commies/socialists just NEVER give up, and NOW you are really laughed at after the SOCIALIST N.Y.Slimes says there were plenty of WMD... The entertainment is starting to turn into guffaws
!!!
Here's a peon that never got over his BDS....BUSH DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, .....Want me to post Bill Clitoris's Youtube about Saddam and WMD?... You
VI 9998645 regarding NF 9996220, VI 9995827, NF 9995788, VI 9994725, NF 9994683, VI 9994488Here's a peon that never got over his BDS....BUSH DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, .....Want me to post Bill Clitoris's Youtube about Saddam and WMD?... You
Excellent display of just another foulmouthed ditto head who cannot put up a coherent defense of the Limbaugh mindless rant that he posted.
Go ahead post President Clinton's words on Saddam Hussein. Nothing you post can explain why Bush 43 wrote in late 2010 his admission that the WMD he claimed was hidden there was not ever found. Bush sent 4484 Americans to their deaths to find and secure WMD that was not there. At least Bush says he is sickened by that reality. That is morally preferable to those who falsely contend that Bush is wrong and they know better. But why is *Vigilante running away from Bush's admission on the WMD matter before us? Why? Why? Why?
YOU ARE 100% right re Rove!VI 9998645 regarding NF 9996220, VI 9995827, NF 9995788, VI 9994725, NF 9994683, VI 9994488Here's a peon that never got over his BDS....BUSH DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, .....Want me to post Bill Clitoris's Youtube about Saddam and WMD?... You
Excellent display of just another foulmouthed ditto head who cannot put up a coherent defense of the Limbaugh mindless rant that he posted.
Go ahead post President Clinton's words on Saddam Hussein. Nothing you post can explain why Bush 43 wrote in late 2010 his admission that the WMD he claimed was hidden there was not ever found. Bush sent 4484 Americans to their deaths to find and secure WMD that was not there. At least Bush says he is sickened by that reality. That is morally preferable to those who falsely contend that Bush is wrong and they know better. But why is *Vigilante running away from Bush's admission on the WMD matter before us? Why? Why? Why?
Of course it's been explained that the STUPID BUSH ADMINISTRATION had a policy NOT to answer any allegations made against it.... It was idiots like Karl Rove that thought it was better to just let those allegations go unanswered and soon something else would happen and those would be forgotten, such as with the current CORRUPT president with Fast and Furious, Benghazi, our Marine in Mexico, and the THOUSANDS of little Central American invaders that are STILL coming in.
I know that BDS has got you by the throat, but sonny, let it go and you'll start to feel better about yourself, and NOT look like the fool you are!
Of course it's been explained that the STUPID BUSH ADMINISTRATION had a policy NOT to answer any allegations made against it.... It was idiots like Karl Rove that thought it was better to just let those allegations go unanswered and soon something else would happen and those would be forgotten, such as with the current CORRUPT president with Fast and Furious, Benghazi, our Marine in Mexico, and the THOUSANDS of little Central American invaders that are STILL coming in.
I know that BDS has got you by the throat, but sonny, let it go and you'll start to feel better about yourself, and NOT look like the fool you are!
The Secret Casualties of Iraq’s Abandoned Chemical Weapons
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html?_r=0
- MAY 2004 Two soldiers exposed to sarin from a shell near Baghdad’s Yarmouk neighborhood.
- SUMMER 2006 Over 2,400 nerve-agent rockets found at this former Republican Guard compound.
- JULY 2008 Six Marines exposed to mustard agent from an artillery shell at an abandoned bunker.
- AUGUST 2008 Five American soldiers exposed to mustard agent while destroying a weapons cache.
- 2010 OR EARLY 2011 Hundreds of mustard rounds discovered in a container at this Iraqi security compound.
That makes two threads on this topic....both misrepresenting the matter. Congrats.
4,000+ young American lives, tens of thousands of lost limbs and minds, thousands of destroyed families over one trillion dollars that we didn't have, and an even more destabilized Middle East. For that? No thanks.
1.2 million children ALIVE today because they weren't starved by Saddam's refusal to admit he DIDN"T have WMDs! And now we know he DID!
OR 9976677NY 9976873Bush's own team stated that Iraq had no WMD. So what are you silly asses trying to prove stating otherwise?Yo 9976945Rightwingers can never admit they were wrong. If they do, they get kicked out of the cult.NY 9976959Nimrod., Please cite examples. Otherwise you are simply full of emotional TV bull stein. ADVANCE THE DEBATE.Yo 9977493 regarding NY 9976959, Yo 9976945, NY 9976873, OR 997667790% of the rightwingers on this board won't admit that Saddam didn't have any WMD's, even though Bush himself admitted it. Read the forum.Nimrod, The consensus of the forum is irrelevant. Saddam is documented to have used WMD against the Kurds, and likely some Iranians. I know, I was there, This is basic stuff. You cannot refute this. I disagree with your simpleton descriptions of "right-wingers" as it is inaccurate by all measures. Do some idiots on both sides fail to understand? Of course, because emotion is more powerful than knowledge. Sad.
[/QUOTE]VI 9999277 regarding NF 9999248, VI 9998645, NF 9996220, VI 9995827, NF 9995788, VI 9994725, NF 9994683, VI 9994488Of course it's been explained that the STUPID BUSH ADMINISTRATION had a policy NOT to answer any allegations made against it.... It was idiots like Karl Rove that thought it was better to just let those allegations go unanswered and soon something else would happen and those would be forgotten, such as with the current CORRUPT president with Fast and Furious, Benghazi, our Marine in Mexico, and the THOUSANDS of little Central American invaders that are STILL coming in.
I know that BDS has got you by the throat, but sonny, let it go and you'll start to feel better about yourself, and NOT look like the fool you are!
In my post 9999248 I wrote, "Nothing you post can explain why Bush 43 wrote in late 2010 his admission that the WMD he claimed was hidden there was not ever found." And then you respond in post 9999277 with nothing but what your thoughtless repetition of what you originally cited from your buffoon (Rush Limbaugh), "Of course it's been explained that the STUPID BUSH ADMINISTRATION had a policy NOT to answer any allegations made against it.... It was idiots like Karl Rove that thought it was better to just let those allegations go unanswered and soon something else would happen and those would be forgotten... " So what continues to NOT be 'explained' by you is, "why Bush 43 wrote in late 2010 his admission that the WMD he claimed was hidden there was not ever found." So why not the next time attempt to try to actually respond to what I have written in fairly plain English? I saw what Limbaugh says about Rove and the Bush Administration, but the Bush Administration thank god came to an end in 2009. I pointed out Bush's admission came in late 2010. Why would Bush continue to deny that WMD were found in Iraq all the way to the present day? What Bush 43 wrote in his memoir turns Limbaugh's screed that you are so addicted to into nothing but mental rubbish.
Again... YOU keep forgetting the 1991 Cease Fire as obviously Saddam forgot with the ensuing consequences, i.e. he was deposed!Ma 99752834,000+ young American lives, tens of thousands of lost limbs and minds, thousands of destroyed families over one trillion dollars that we didn't have, and an even more destabilized Middle East. For that? No thanks.
HM 9975319 regarding Ma 99752831.2 million children ALIVE today because they weren't starved by Saddam's refusal to admit he DIDN"T have WMDs! And now we know he DID!
If the US invasion of Iraq were purely a humanitarian effort and the matter of securing the WMD stockpiles was not the justification for launching the invasion, then an invasion would never have taken place. Bush would not have decided on war over starved children or drained swamps. What Mac1958 wrote is more astute when there is no actual potential national security threat to the US being involved. Starving children are not a threat. Neither is drained Iraqi swamps. Healthmyth's is reaching for anything thing here because his OP has has been ripped to shreds by facts and truth.
Of course it's been explained that the STUPID BUSH ADMINISTRATION had a policy NOT to answer any allegations made against it.... It was idiots like Karl Rove that thought it was better to just let those allegations go unanswered ...
Fucking Fool, apparently you did NOT understand #403, but more likely, it just doesn't FIT YOU AGENDA....which is it FOOL?....
Either Saddam KNEW he had WMDs and would NOT certify the destruction so has to keep Iran at bay...
HM 10001227Either Saddam KNEW he had WMDs and would NOT certify the destruction so has to keep Iran at bay...
What do you mean by "certify the destruction"? UN Resolution did not require that. Iraq needed to let inspectors in and cooperate. Which he did.
VI403 9999277 NF 9999248, VI 9998645, NF 9996220, VI 9995827, NF 9995788, VI 9994725, NF 9994683, VI 9994488Of course it's been explained that the STUPID BUSH ADMINISTRATION had a policy NOT to answer any allegations made against it.... It was idiots like Karl Rove that thought it was better to just let those allegations go unanswered ...
Let's see...*Vigilante's post 403 does not address why Bush in late 2010 was still maintaining that none of the WMD he expected to find in Iraq were found. What on earth does *Vigilante think I don't understand about that.
VI410 10000815 regarding NF 9999943, VI 9999277, NF 9999248, VI 9998645, NF 9996220, VI 9995827, NF 9995788, VI 9994725, NF 9994683, VI 9994488Fucking Fool, apparently you did NOT understand #403, but more likely, it just doesn't FIT YOU AGENDA....which is it FOOL?....
Foulmouth cannot respond to the question. Why in late 2010 it is a fact that Bush was still maintaining that none of the WMD he expected to find in Iraq were found. Why? Why? Why? The Bush Administration was done. There is no political need to perpetuate something that is not true unless it is true. Face it losers, Bush knows there were no chemical weapons found that could be defined as the reason he gave us for deciding to invade Iraq in March 2003. Your Limbaugh hero is all wrong. Bush is right. How's that.
AGAIN read what Saddam SAID...still wouldn't admit he had no WMDs...
Interview with FBI agent who interrogated Saddam Archive - AnandTech Forums
I am pleased to inform you of the decision of the Government of the Republic of Iraq to allow the return of the United Nations weapons inspectors to Iraq without conditions. ... The Government of the Republic of Iraq has based its decision concerning the return of inspectors on its desire to complete the implementation of the relevant Security Council resolutions and to remove any doubts that Iraq still possesses weapons of mass
destruction . This decision is also based on your statement to the General Assembly on 12 September 2002 that the decision by the Government of the Republic of Iraq is the indispensable first step towards an assurance that Iraq no longer possesses weapons of mass destruction and, equally importantly, towards a comprehensive solution that
includes the lifting of the sanctions imposed on Iraq and the timely implementation of other provisions of the relevant Security Council resolutions, including resolution 687(1991). ... To this end, the Government of the Republic of Iraq is ready to discuss the practical arrangements necessary for the immediate resumption of inspections.
US Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Baghdad Operations Center June 11, 2004
Para 1: While engaging SSA George L. Piro in casual conversation, Saddam Hussein providing the following information regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD):
Para 2: [conversation about Saddam’s Speeches]
Para 3: SSA Piro then asked Hussein if he wrote his own speeches and they come from the heart, then what was the meaning of his June 2000 speech. Hussein replied this speech was meant to serve a regional and an operational purpose. Regionally, the speech was meant to respond to Iraq's regional threat. Hussein believed that Iraq could not appear weak to his enemies, especially Iran. Iraq was being threatened by others in the region and must be able to defend himself. Operationally, Hussein was demonstrating Iraq's compliance with the United Nations (UN) in its destruction of its Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD).
Para 4: [Hussein discusses Iran’s threat to Iraq & other nations in the region are too weak in the face of Iran.]
Para 5: Hussein continued his dialogue on the issues relating to the significant threat to Iraq from Iran. Even though Hussein claimed Iraq didn’t have WMD, the threat from Iran was the major factor as to why he did not allow the return of the UN inspectors. Hussein stated he was more concerned about Iran discovering Iraq’s weaknesses and vulnerabilities than the repercussions of the United States for his refusal to allow UN inspectors back into Iraq. In his opinion, the UN inspectors would have directly identified to the Iranians where to inflict maximum damage to Iraq. [Hussein gives an analogy about the forearm and wrist] Hussein indicated he was angered when the United States struck Iraq in 1998. Hussein stated Iraq could have absorbed another United States strike for he viewed this as less of a threat than exposing themselves to Iran.
Para 6: [discussion about Iran’s weapons capabilities and the war of the cities between Iraq and Iran.]
Para 7: Hussein recognized that Iran continued to develop its weapons capabilities, to include its WMD, while Iraq had lost its weapons capabilities due to the UN inspections and sanctions. Hussein was asked how Iraq would have dealt with the threat from Iran once the UN sanction were lifted. Hussein replied Iraq would have been extremely vulnerable to an attack from Iran, and would have sought a security agreement with the United States to protect it from threats in the region. Hussein felt such an agreement would not only have benefitted Iraq, but its neighbors, such as Saudi Arabia.
SSA Piro agrees that such an agreement would have assisted Iraq immensely. SSA Piro noted due to the history between the two countries, it would have taken some time before the United States would have entered into such an agreement with Iraq.
Para 8: Further, SSA Piro advised Hussein that paragraph 14 of UN Resolution 687 states that the disarming of Iraq was part of a total disarmament of the entire region, however , that portion of resolution was not enforceable. The threat from Iran would have loomed over Iraq, especially as Iran had continued to advance its weapons capabilities. SSA Piro commented that under those circumstances, it would appear that Iraq would have needed to reconstitute its own weapons program in response. Hussein replied that Iraq would have done what was necessary and agree that Iraq’s technical and scientific abilities exceeded others in the region.
Para 9: Hussein commented he allowed the UN inspectors back into Iraq to counter allegations by the British Government. Hussein stated this was a very difficult decision to make, but the British Government had prepared a report containing inaccurate intelligence. It was this inaccurate intelligence on which the United States was making their decisions. However, Hussein admitted that when it was clear that a war with the United States was imminent, he allowed the inspectors back into Iraq in hopes of averting war. Yet, it became clear to him four months before the war that the war was inevitable.
Para 10: Hussein reiterated he had wanted to have a relationship with the United States but was not given the chance, as the United States was not listening to anything Iraq had to say. Further he was concerned about the United States advanced technological capabilities and resources.
Para 11: [talk about evasive actions when Hussein was President]
Para 12: [not WMD related]
Para 13: [not WMD related]
Why, you idiot? I explained that it was Bush policy, formed by Rove, to NOT ANSWER any accusations made against him or his administration, as the think at that time, and if you follow the current crop of FECKLESS Republican's in Congress, still follow the policy, that FIGHTING these accusations only makes them last longer, and the longer IN THE HEADLINES, the MORE the SHEEPLE (that's citizens, because I KNOW you have no idea what that meant) TEND to remember a LONG RUNNING story! THAT is why he said there were no WMD in 2010, simply to take pressure off himself, and undoubtedly the stigma that has been placed on Republican's by fools like you with a conspiratorial press, to do the subversives dirty work! Now please tell me you haven't the foggiest clue what this means...PLEASE!
