Remember When McConnell Was Fine With Pelosi Witholding Impeachment Articles

[Nostra]

If Obama had bombed this guy, the right wingers would have reacted in the same way they did when Obama took out OBL. Do you remember?

They poured shit on the whole thing, some of them said there's no proof it ever happened, and other BS.

You right wingers behaved like a bunch of whiny bitches for 8 years, you're not going to get praise in return, especially with this bastard that has been talking smack for 4+ years.

well first you would have to have some evidence that we did that on the other 571 targets he hit. you got that? BTW, we aren't traitors to our country, and don't stand behind Iran. Did we do it for Bin Laden? come on mate, give us all that evidence to back your sad ass statement.

The bottom line is your party is chock full of lying hypocrites Obama would be hanging from a lamp post if he pulled half the bull shit your party is responsible INCLUDING breaking the fn treaty

Your unhinged rants have no basis in reality.

 

[Nostra]

Remember when nancy said this donkey show was urgent.

Why would Pelosi be in a big hurry for McConnell to not have a trial with witnesses so the whole thing could be completely swept under the carpet? That doesn't make sense, instead she's holding back and using her political influence over the process. Apparently Mitch feels it too.

She has no political influence over the process in the Senate. None. Zero. Zip.

She is making a fool of herself.

 

[HappyJoy]

Remember when nancy said this donkey show was urgent.

Why would Pelosi be in a big hurry for McConnell to not have a trial with witnesses so the whole thing could be completely swept under the carpet? That doesn't make sense, instead she's holding back and using her political influence over the process. Apparently Mitch feels it too.

What influence?

Holding back the impeachment articles. Where as Mitch just wants to get it over with and now he's frustrated as at least a couple of moderate Republicans make up their minds on how honest of a trial we are going to have.

Most Americans polled want there to be witnesses, Pelosi's position is in agreement.

 

[HappyJoy]

Remember when nancy said this donkey show was urgent.

Why would Pelosi be in a big hurry for McConnell to not have a trial with witnesses so the whole thing could be completely swept under the carpet? That doesn't make sense, instead she's holding back and using her political influence over the process. Apparently Mitch feels it too.

She has no political influence over the process in the Senate. None. Zero. Zip.

She is making a fool of herself.

She's not, most Americans want witnesses to testify in the trial, that's what she is holding out for.

 

[toobfreak]

Remember when nancy said this donkey show was urgent.

Why would Pelosi be in a big hurry for McConnell to not have a trial with witnesses so the whole thing could be completely swept under the carpet? That doesn't make sense, instead she's holding back and using her political influence over the process. Apparently Mitch feels it too.

Sorry, wrong, Joyless. McConnell has already said that he needs to read the case in order to determine the trial parameters. Nancy wants him to do it ass backwards and set the parameters before he even sees what's in the filing!

IT DON'T WORK THAT WAY.

 

[HappyJoy]

Remember when nancy said this donkey show was urgent.

Why would Pelosi be in a big hurry for McConnell to not have a trial with witnesses so the whole thing could be completely swept under the carpet? That doesn't make sense, instead she's holding back and using her political influence over the process. Apparently Mitch feels it too.

Sorry, wrong, Joyless. McConnell has already said that he needs to read the case in order to determine the trial parameters. Nancy wants him to do it ass backwards and set the parameters before he even sees what's in the filing!

IT DON'T WORK THAT WAY.

Ahh, Pelosi wants witnesses, Mitch doesn't. Let's see who gets their way. Personally I'm not sure how it's going to end up, curious to see.

 

[The Purge]

Have you seen todays demonRAT PRIMARY POLL? GUESS WHO IS IN 4TH PLACE AND MOVING FASTER THEN LIVE CANDIDATES!

 

[Thinker101]

Remember when nancy said this donkey show was urgent.

Why would Pelosi be in a big hurry for McConnell to not have a trial with witnesses so the whole thing could be completely swept under the carpet? That doesn't make sense, instead she's holding back and using her political influence over the process. Apparently Mitch feels it too.

She has no political influence over the process in the Senate. None. Zero. Zip.

She is making a fool of herself.

She's not, most Americans want witnesses to testify in the trial, that's what she is holding out for.

You mean like quid pro quo...idiot.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

How do you know when you have Senate Majority Leader over a barrel? When he starts accusing you of "shameless game-playing," as he did of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on the Senate floor Wednesday afternoon. Wow, seems like McConnell's pretty desperate to get those articles now. Remember in December when he rather smugly declared "fine with me" after Pelosi announced she wouldn't immediately transmit the articles? Gee, Mitch, what's the hurry? Thought everything was just "fine."

Remember when McConnell was 'fine' with Pelosi withholding impeachment articles? Not anymore

He doesn't give a rat's ass whether she sends them or not, since the matter is DOA, and should simply say so. TV tit-for-tat is unnecessary.

 

[HappyJoy]

Have you seen todays demonRAT PRIMARY POLL? GUESS WHO IS IN 4TH PLACE AND MOVING FASTER THEN LIVE CANDIDATES!

Sad thing is you probably believe it.

 

[L.K.Eder]

How do you know when you have Senate Majority Leader over a barrel? When he starts accusing you of "shameless game-playing," as he did of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on the Senate floor Wednesday afternoon. Wow, seems like McConnell's pretty desperate to get those articles now. Remember in December when he rather smugly declared "fine with me" after Pelosi announced she wouldn't immediately transmit the articles? Gee, Mitch, what's the hurry? Thought everything was just "fine."

Remember when McConnell was 'fine' with Pelosi withholding impeachment articles? Not anymore

shameless game-playing, he queefs. lol.

merrick garland says hello.

 

[The Purge]

Have you seen todays demonRAT PRIMARY POLL? GUESS WHO IS IN 4TH PLACE AND MOVING FASTER THEN LIVE CANDIDATES!

Sad thing is you probably believe it.

I think he is #2 on YOUR LIST!

 

[HappyJoy]

Remember when nancy said this donkey show was urgent.

Why would Pelosi be in a big hurry for McConnell to not have a trial with witnesses so the whole thing could be completely swept under the carpet? That doesn't make sense, instead she's holding back and using her political influence over the process. Apparently Mitch feels it too.

She has no political influence over the process in the Senate. None. Zero. Zip.

She is making a fool of herself.

She's not, most Americans want witnesses to testify in the trial, that's what she is holding out for.

You mean like quid pro quo...idiot.

Are you really comparing compromise in Washington with a president pressuring another country for political dirt?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Remember when Schiff had evidence?

Schiff doesn't remember, 'cause he didn't.

 

[The Purge]

How do you know when you have Senate Majority Leader over a barrel? When he starts accusing you of "shameless game-playing," as he did of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on the Senate floor Wednesday afternoon. Wow, seems like McConnell's pretty desperate to get those articles now. Remember in December when he rather smugly declared "fine with me" after Pelosi announced she wouldn't immediately transmit the articles? Gee, Mitch, what's the hurry? Thought everything was just "fine."

Remember when McConnell was 'fine' with Pelosi withholding impeachment articles? Not anymore

shameless game-playing, he queefs. lol.

merrick garland says hello.

Explained a dozen times why he was shitcanned!...Need me to inform you again, about last term of presidency?

 

[toobfreak]

Have you seen todays demonRAT PRIMARY POLL? GUESS WHO IS IN 4TH PLACE AND MOVING FASTER THEN LIVE CANDIDATES!

Think I'd have to pull the lever for Qasem over any of the others. Looks like a sweetheart of a guy to me. I'd trust him more than Barack or Hillary.

 

[HappyJoy]

Have you seen todays demonRAT PRIMARY POLL? GUESS WHO IS IN 4TH PLACE AND MOVING FASTER THEN LIVE CANDIDATES!

Sad thing is you probably believe it.

I think he is #2 on YOUR LIST!

Why are you derailing the thread? This is out of nowhere.

 

[edward37]

How do you know when you have Senate Majority Leader over a barrel? When he starts accusing you of "shameless game-playing," as he did of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on the Senate floor Wednesday afternoon. Wow, seems like McConnell's pretty desperate to get those articles now. Remember in December when he rather smugly declared "fine with me" after Pelosi announced she wouldn't immediately transmit the articles? Gee, Mitch, what's the hurry? Thought everything was just "fine."

Remember when McConnell was 'fine' with Pelosi withholding impeachment articles? Not anymore

View attachment 299326

SOOOOO . . . your problem is that the Senate wants to finish trying the case that Pelosi spent millions of dollars and 12 weeks before the holidays rushing to prosecute in a mad pall saying that Trump was a matter of national crisis and imminent danger?

Why are you so afraid to let the Senate adjudicate the case?

Because they're crooks who don't want a real trial that has witnesses that will expose the piece of excrement we have in our WH

 

[The Purge]

Remember when nancy said this donkey show was urgent.

Why would Pelosi be in a big hurry for McConnell to not have a trial with witnesses so the whole thing could be completely swept under the carpet? That doesn't make sense, instead she's holding back and using her political influence over the process. Apparently Mitch feels it too.

She has no political influence over the process in the Senate. None. Zero. Zip.

She is making a fool of herself.

She's not, most Americans want witnesses to testify in the trial, that's what she is holding out for.

You mean like quid pro quo...idiot.

Are you really comparing compromise in Washington with a president pressuring another country for political dirt?

Remind us again who pressured who...

 

[toobfreak]

How do you know when you have Senate Majority Leader over a barrel? When he starts accusing you of "shameless game-playing," as he did of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on the Senate floor Wednesday afternoon. Wow, seems like McConnell's pretty desperate to get those articles now. Remember in December when he rather smugly declared "fine with me" after Pelosi announced she wouldn't immediately transmit the articles? Gee, Mitch, what's the hurry? Thought everything was just "fine."

Remember when McConnell was 'fine' with Pelosi withholding impeachment articles? Not anymore

View attachment 299326

SOOOOO . . . your problem is that the Senate wants to finish trying the case that Pelosi spent millions of dollars and 12 weeks before the holidays rushing to prosecute in a mad pall saying that Trump was a matter of national crisis and imminent danger?

Why are you so afraid to let the Senate adjudicate the case?

Because they're crooks who don't want a real trial that has witnesses that will expose the piece of excrement we have in our WH

Need I remind you again?

Hillary LOST the race!
Obama's been out of office for YEARS!​