Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A no fly zone is bat shit crazy. That’s how you get into a shooting war with a nuclear power.
Dude. Peddle your idiotic nonsense somewhere else.Nor could the US maintain a no-fly-zone in that distant area.
A no-fly-zone would also be illegal since Russia is legally enforcing the World Court ruling against the Ukraine in 2012, for stealing over $20 billion in oil/gas.
NATO is providing for the mutual defense of its member states.Why????...we are the USA...We are NATO...what is NATO for?...nice blue helmets?....why are we backing down to a thug?....weakness fuels Putin....
None of your fantasies have anything to do with this thread. NATO stands strong, unlike when Trump was attacking it and praising Putin.
Oh wait, he is still praising Putin...
yep the TDS briaged can't hear what Trump says they are told what he says. They went ape shit stupid over the biggly thing when he actually said, BIG LEAGUESYou obviously have selective hearing. Trump has not praised Putin.
What a clusterfuck our response to this invasion would be if Putin's BFF was still in Washington.
If true, why should we be the top dog in NATO. European nations are more threatened by a Russian invasion than we are. I don’t see Russian tanks rolling across our Mexican border anytime in the near future but they might in Poland.I highly doubt that Putin would have bothered Ukraine if Trump had not left the WH, NATO was so busy sorting out the internal ranking. In fact, no one notices that the US is not the Alpha dog now. The UK is. You need to thx who is in the WH now.
do you know how much misinformation is out there on this? it's hysterical.Got a link to that?
Keep dancing, and keep posting.
Only a Russian would spend so much time supporting this invasion.
You know I'm right, your posts prove it.
NATO is providing for the mutual defense of its member states.
Blue helmets are a UN thing, by the way.
Keep dancing, and keep posting.
Only a Russian would spend so much time supporting this invasion.
You know I'm right, your posts prove it.
Trump’s coddling dictators and attacking our allies was reckless, irresponsible, and harmed America – one of scores of reasons why Trump was unfit to be president, and why he was thankfully voted out of office.Blah blah blah Mr Constitutional.
You can't defend a damn thing you squeak and everyone knows it
Dude - you are dumber than two rocks.None of your fantasies have anything to do with this thread. NATO stands strong, unlike when Trump was attacking it and praising Putin.
Oh wait, he is still praising Putin...
do you know how much misinformation is out there on this? it's hysterical.
Trump was attacking NATO, our most dependable allies, and coddling dictators, Putin in particular – thankfully Trump was voted out of office.
You mean there would BE no Putin invasion if Trump were still in office! But thanks for all those NATO guns from worthless NATO, likely most of them were bought and paid for anyway with US taxpayer dollars you stupid dumbfuck clueless imbecile!
Only stupid uneducated low information TDS afflicted Moon Bats would characterize getting other NATO members to pay their fair share as "attacking NATO". LOL!
If Trump was President now Putin wouldn't have the courage to invade the Ukraine. Too bad we have this weak and stupid shithead for President now.
What a clusterfuck our response to this invasion would be if Putin's BFF was still in Washington. The world breathes a sigh of relief, along with educated and sensible Americans.
BRUSSELS — The Dutch are sending rocket launchers for air defense. The Estonians are sending Javelin antitank missiles. The Poles and the Latvians are sending Stinger surface-to-air missiles. The Czechs are sending machine guns, sniper rifles, pistols and ammunition.
Even formerly neutral countries like Sweden and Finland are sending weapons. And Germany, long allergic to sending weapons into conflict zones, is sending Stingers as well as other shoulder-launched rockets.
In all, about 20 countries — most members of NATO and the European Union, but not all — are funneling arms into Ukraine to fight off Russian invaders and arm an insurgency, if the war comes to that.
At the same time, NATO is moving military equipment and as many as 22,000 more troops into member states bordering Russia and Belarus, to reassure them and enhance deterrence.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine has brought European countries together as never before, minds concentrated by the larger threat to European security presented by the Russia of President Vladimir V. Putin.
“European security and defense has evolved more in the last six days than in the last two decades,” Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Union’s executive arm, asserted in a speech to the European Parliament on Tuesday. Brussels has moved to “Europeanize” the efforts of member states to aid Ukraine with weapons and money and put down a marker for the bloc as a significant military actor.
But whether European weaponry will continue to reach the Ukrainian battlefield in time to make a difference is far from certain. However proud Brussels is of its effort, it is a strategy that risks encouraging a wider war and possible retaliation from Mr. Putin. The rush of lethal military aid into Ukraine from Poland, a member of NATO, aims, after all, to kill Russian soldiers.
Mr. Putin already sees NATO as committed to threaten or even destroy Russia through its support for Ukraine, as he has repeated in his recent speeches, even as he has raised the nuclear alert of his own forces to warn Europe and the United States of the risks of interference.
NATO Countries Pour Weapons Into Ukraine, Risking Conflict With Russia (Published 2022)
Brussels is proud to be providing military aid, but Moscow may see it as a dangerous intervention.www.nytimes.com
