Remember when Trump was attacking NATO? Thank your lucky stars he was fired.

[366h34d]

If true, why should we be the top dog in NATO. European nations are more threatened by a Russian invasion than we are. I don’t see Russian tanks rolling across our Mexican border anytime in the near future but they might in Poland.

ya, that is Trump's pt too. Trump said we should pay less. I believe Biden admin still pays the most but is being a follower.

 

[Flash]

 

[Flash]

 

[366h34d]

The UK alpha dog....
View attachment 609774

That is the problem. A Chihuahua can be an alpha dog when Biden is in the WH.

 

[jc456]

Poor Pooty.

I know you meant xiden. thanks,

 

[jc456]

View attachment 609794

Outstanding.

 

[jc456]

I place that next to the Russian collusion file.

again, never once has one demofk stated the collusion.

 

[jc456]

I asked for a link to your claim and you didn't provide one.

sure I did, you just haven't figured it out.

 

[whitehall]

Remember when Bill Clinton bypassed congress and used his socialist friend in NATO to get permission to bomb a defenseless country in Europe when he was caught with his pants down? Remember when people in suits carrying briefcases had to run for their lives in Belgrade when the sirens told them that U.S. planes were on a bombing run? Remember when indiscriminate daisy cutter bombs were used against unidentified groups of people alleged to be the enemy? The media loved it because they needed to protect Clinton. Thank God Trump beat Hillary.

 

[HappyJoy]

I know you meant xiden. thanks,

Nope. I'm referring to the guys some of you wingnuts are whining over that you think isn't being treated fair.

 

[HappyJoy]

sure I did, you just haven't figured it out.

You provided a video of some rando and it didn't back up your claim.

 

[odanny]

So many Russian apologists on this forum, I honestly don't know if they started worshipping Putin when Trump was in office, or if they are actually Russian, but it would appear that Republicans who are not, indeed, Russian trolls, are supporting Russia and their invasion of Ukraine

Unreal.

 

[Auld Phart]

So many Russian apologists on this forum, I honestly don't know if they started worshipping Putin when Trump was in office, or if they are actually Russian, but it would appear that Republicans who are not, indeed, Russian trolls, are supporting Russia and their invasion of Ukraine

Unreal.

^^^^^

 

[jc456]

We do have too many; they are known as the Trump Cult. Bigly!!!

you still haven't figured out what a cult is. You are the one bigly in one. It's ok, just pass it off as you're too stupid to understand. you ought to get by on that.

 

[jc456]

Nope. I'm referring to the guys some of you wingnuts are whining over that you think isn't being treated fair.

I know, I know, it's tough. suck it up though.

 

[jc456]

You provided a video of some rando and it didn't back up your claim.

sure it did, you are far too ignorant to understand it. So, please, stop with I didn't do what I said. I did. you just admitted so. So you lied the other two posts. It's what you all do.

 

[Leo123]

What a clusterfuck our response to this invasion would be if Putin's BFF was still in Washington. The world breathes a sigh of relief, along with educated and sensible Americans.



BRUSSELS — The Dutch are sending rocket launchers for air defense. The Estonians are sending Javelin antitank missiles. The Poles and the Latvians are sending Stinger surface-to-air missiles. The Czechs are sending machine guns, sniper rifles, pistols and ammunition.

Even formerly neutral countries like Sweden and Finland are sending weapons. And Germany, long allergic to sending weapons into conflict zones, is sending Stingers as well as other shoulder-launched rockets.

In all, about 20 countries — most members of NATO and the European Union, but not all — are funneling arms into Ukraine to fight off Russian invaders and arm an insurgency, if the war comes to that.

At the same time, NATO is moving military equipment and as many as 22,000 more troops into member states bordering Russia and Belarus, to reassure them and enhance deterrence.


The Russian invasion of Ukraine has brought European countries together as never before, minds concentrated by the larger threat to European security presented by the Russia of President Vladimir V. Putin.

“European security and defense has evolved more in the last six days than in the last two decades,” Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Union’s executive arm, asserted in a speech to the European Parliament on Tuesday. Brussels has moved to “Europeanize” the efforts of member states to aid Ukraine with weapons and money and put down a marker for the bloc as a significant military actor.


But whether European weaponry will continue to reach the Ukrainian battlefield in time to make a difference is far from certain. However proud Brussels is of its effort, it is a strategy that risks encouraging a wider war and possible retaliation from Mr. Putin. The rush of lethal military aid into Ukraine from Poland, a member of NATO, aims, after all, to kill Russian soldiers.

Mr. Putin already sees NATO as committed to threaten or even destroy Russia through its support for Ukraine, as he has repeated in his recent speeches, even as he has raised the nuclear alert of his own forces to warn Europe and the United States of the risks of interference.

NATO Countries Pour Weapons Into Ukraine, Risking Conflict With Russia (Published 2022)

Brussels is proud to be providing military aid, but Moscow may see it as a dangerous intervention.

www.nytimes.com

Trump made NATO stronger by insisting they pay their fair share.

 

[bripat9643]

Obama and Trump both pushed for spending increases by NATO allies. In the end it was the Crimea invasion that had the most influence.

Europeans were already increasing their defense spending before the Ukraine thing, so you're wrong.

 

[HappyJoy]

sure it did, you are far too ignorant to understand it. So, please, stop with I didn't do what I said. I did. you just admitted so. So you lied the other two posts. It's what you all do.

What was the point your video made? I'm more than willing to talk about it. You claimed there was no way for supplies to make it into Ukraine. That was your claim, what in that video backed up what you said? And why would anyone use that guy as a source?

 

[jc456]

What was the point your video made? I'm more than willing to talk about it. You claimed there was no way for supplies to make it into Ukraine. That was your claim, what in that video backed up what you said? And why would anyone use that guy as a source?

misinformation by everyone. both sides, you didn't even listen. too fking funny.