Remembering Robert E. Lee: American Patriot and Southern Hero

[bripat9643]

1) The South started a war over slavery. FACT.

2) Yes, Lee owned slaves, and even had slaves waiting on him as he fought the war to preserve, protect, defend, and expand Slavery.

1) Not a fact. The South didn't start the war. Lincoln did.

Those dodging cannonballs at Ft Sumter would beg to differ

Only traitors fire on their own flag

You can believe in secession, or you can believe in a United States of America. You can't believe in both.

This is a map of what the US would look like if all secessions had been successful:

And to think it's the RWnuts who like to accuse Liberals of Balkanization...

What does it even mean to "believe in the United States of America?" No one attacks America more than you and your fellow liberal turds.

 

[bripat9643]

1) The South started a war over slavery. FACT.

2) Yes, Lee owned slaves, and even had slaves waiting on him as he fought the war to preserve, protect, defend, and expand Slavery.

1) Not a fact. The South didn't start the war. Lincoln did.

Those dodging cannonballs at Ft Sumter would beg to differ

Only traitors fire on their own flag

It wasn't their flag, you dumb asshole.

Most traitors say that

I can't believe what a dumb useless asshole you are.

 

[eagle7_31]

You can believe in secession, or you can believe in a United States of America. You can't believe in both.

This is a map of what the US would look like if all secessions had been successful:

And to think it's the RWnuts who like to accuse Liberals of Balkanization...

If you are referring to me, I am not a confederate sympathizer.

 

[RKMBrown]

1) The South started a war over slavery. FACT.

2) Yes, Lee owned slaves, and even had slaves waiting on him as he fought the war to preserve, protect, defend, and expand Slavery.

1) Not a fact. The South didn't start the war. Lincoln did.

Those dodging cannonballs at Ft Sumter would beg to differ

Only traitors fire on their own flag

You can believe in secession, or you can believe in a United States of America. You can't believe in both.

This is a map of what the US would look like if all secessions had been successful:

And to think it's the RWnuts who like to accuse Liberals of Balkanization...

What does it even mean to "believe in the United States of America?" No one attacks America more than you and your fellow liberal turds.

Hate these scum bag liberal traitorous pieces of crap.

 

[JimH52]

Grant was a whole lot better. His casually rate was for his worst battles was 28%. He also didn't through live away like Lee did. His battles were logical. Viksburg was fight the same day. The campain was fought at the same time.... mid may to July. That alone should put paid to the discussion of who was a better general

Grant was a drunk....

 

[paperview]

Grant was a whole lot better. His casually rate was for his worst battles was 28%. He also didn't through live away like Lee did. His battles were logical. Viksburg was fight the same day. The campain was fought at the same time.... mid may to July. That alone should put paid to the discussion of who was a better general

Grant was a drunk....

Lincoln: Send him another case of Whiskey!

 

[toxicmedia]

Grant was a whole lot better. His casually rate was for his worst battles was 28%. He also didn't through live away like Lee did. His battles were logical. Viksburg was fight the same day. The campain was fought at the same time.... mid may to July. That alone should put paid to the discussion of who was a better general

Grant was a drunk....

And Sherman was crazy...but they put those filthy secessionists in their rightful places. Poor and toothless.

Their descendants remain filthy, at least intellectually...if they buy into the crap Bripat has embraced

 

[RKMBrown]

Grant was a whole lot better. His casually rate was for his worst battles was 28%. He also didn't through live away like Lee did. His battles were logical. Viksburg was fight the same day. The campain was fought at the same time.... mid may to July. That alone should put paid to the discussion of who was a better general

Grant was a drunk....

Lincoln: Send him another case of Whiskey!

Lincoln: murderous mad man.

 

[Camp]

1) The South started a war over slavery. FACT.

2) Yes, Lee owned slaves, and even had slaves waiting on him as he fought the war to preserve, protect, defend, and expand Slavery.

1) Not a fact. The South didn't start the war. Lincoln did.

Here are some facts. Real ones.

The first shot fired was fired by Citadel Cadets manning an artillery battery. It was specifically fired by Cadet Gunner George E. Haynsworth on Jan. 9, 1861. The target of the fire mission was the steamer Star of the West bringing supplies to Fort Sumter.

The authorities governing actions towards attacks on Fort Sumter were Governor Francis W. Pickens and Brig. Gen. P.G. T. Beauregard.

These are the guys who factually started the American Civil War.

In other words, he fired on a union boat violating the territorial waters of South Caroline. The federal government was warned not to attempt any resupply of Fort Sumter. Any attempt to do so was an act of war.

It was an unarmed merchant vessel. Even if your stupid opinions were valid, it was against international law to fire on a merchant vessel.

1) The South started a war over slavery. FACT.

2) Yes, Lee owned slaves, and even had slaves waiting on him as he fought the war to preserve, protect, defend, and expand Slavery.

1) Not a fact. The South didn't start the war. Lincoln did.

Here are some facts. Real ones.

The first shot fired was fired by Citadel Cadets manning an artillery battery. It was specifically fired by Cadet Gunner George E. Haynsworth on Jan. 9, 1861. The target of the fire mission was the steamer Star of the West bringing supplies to Fort Sumter.

The authorities governing actions towards attacks on Fort Sumter were Governor Francis W. Pickens and Brig. Gen. P.G. T. Beauregard.

These are the guys who factually started the American Civil War.

I've only posted this about 20 times by now.

Buchanan was President and he was trying to resupply Sumter.


Click to enlarge

The South fired upon the Union Steamship Star of the West

They took another ship and seized it: "The Marion."

Then converted her to a Man of War ship.
THE STEAMSHIP "MARION." ; SEIZED BY THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA TO BE CONVERTED INTO A MAN-OF-WAR.

Star of the West

Date on the Harpers Weekly newspaper: January, 1861, linked above.

Neoconfederates refuse to accept it.

At West Point, January 1861 is considered the actual start of the Civil War.

Well before Abraham Lincoln even stepped into office.

1) The South started a war over slavery. FACT.

2) Yes, Lee owned slaves, and even had slaves waiting on him as he fought the war to preserve, protect, defend, and expand Slavery.

1) Not a fact. The South didn't start the war. Lincoln did.

Here are some facts. Real ones.

The first shot fired was fired by Citadel Cadets manning an artillery battery. It was specifically fired by Cadet Gunner George E. Haynsworth on Jan. 9, 1861. The target of the fire mission was the steamer Star of the West bringing supplies to Fort Sumter.

The authorities governing actions towards attacks on Fort Sumter were Governor Francis W. Pickens and Brig. Gen. P.G. T. Beauregard.

These are the guys who factually started the American Civil War.

I've only posted this about 20 times by now.

Buchanan was President and he was trying to resupply Sumter.


Click to enlarge

The South fired upon the Union Steamship Star of the West

They took another ship and seized it: "The Marion."

Then converted her to a Man of War ship.
THE STEAMSHIP "MARION." ; SEIZED BY THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA TO BE CONVERTED INTO A MAN-OF-WAR.

Star of the West

Date on the Harpers Weekly newspaper: January, 1861, linked above.

Neoconfederates refuse to accept it.

At West Point, January 1861 is considered the actual start of the Civil War.

Well before Abraham Lincoln even stepped into office.

Do you know who was in charge of the battery that fired on the Star of the West?

 

[bripat9643]

Grant was a whole lot better. His casually rate was for his worst battles was 28%. He also didn't through live away like Lee did. His battles were logical. Viksburg was fight the same day. The campain was fought at the same time.... mid may to July. That alone should put paid to the discussion of who was a better general

Grant was a drunk....

And Sherman was crazy...but they put those filthy secessionists in their rightful places. Poor and toothless

You worship a dictator and a mass murderer. That's just the kind of scum you are.

 

[NYcarbineer]

1) The South started a war over slavery. FACT.

2) Yes, Lee owned slaves, and even had slaves waiting on him as he fought the war to preserve, protect, defend, and expand Slavery.

1) Not a fact. The South didn't start the war. Lincoln did.

Those dodging cannonballs at Ft Sumter would beg to differ

Only traitors fire on their own flag

You can believe in secession, or you can believe in a United States of America. You can't believe in both.

This is a map of what the US would look like if all secessions had been successful:

And to think it's the RWnuts who like to accuse Liberals of Balkanization...

What does it even mean to "believe in the United States of America?" No one attacks America more than you and your fellow liberal turds.

Is the irony of the above post, in this context, not truly breathtaking?

 

[rightwinger]

1) The South started a war over slavery. FACT.

2) Yes, Lee owned slaves, and even had slaves waiting on him as he fought the war to preserve, protect, defend, and expand Slavery.

1) Not a fact. The South didn't start the war. Lincoln did.

Those dodging cannonballs at Ft Sumter would beg to differ

Only traitors fire on their own flag

You can believe in secession, or you can believe in a United States of America. You can't believe in both.

This is a map of what the US would look like if all secessions had been successful:

And to think it's the RWnuts who like to accuse Liberals of Balkanization...

What does it even mean to "believe in the United States of America?" No one attacks America more than you and your fellow liberal turds.

Liberals founded this great country.....don't you forget it

 

[JakeStarkey]

The pro-CSA folks clearly demonstrate that Lincoln was right.

 

[RKMBrown]

1) The South started a war over slavery. FACT.

2) Yes, Lee owned slaves, and even had slaves waiting on him as he fought the war to preserve, protect, defend, and expand Slavery.

1) Not a fact. The South didn't start the war. Lincoln did.

Those dodging cannonballs at Ft Sumter would beg to differ

Only traitors fire on their own flag

You can believe in secession, or you can believe in a United States of America. You can't believe in both.

This is a map of what the US would look like if all secessions had been successful:

And to think it's the RWnuts who like to accuse Liberals of Balkanization...

What does it even mean to "believe in the United States of America?" No one attacks America more than you and your fellow liberal turds.

Liberals founded this great country.....don't you forget it

Moron. Classical liberals are the political opposite of modern liberals.

 

[toxicmedia]

Grant was a whole lot better. His casually rate was for his worst battles was 28%. He also didn't through live away like Lee did. His battles were logical. Viksburg was fight the same day. The campain was fought at the same time.... mid may to July. That alone should put paid to the discussion of who was a better general

Grant was a drunk....

And Sherman was crazy...but they put those filthy secessionists in their rightful places. Poor and toothless

You worship a dictator and a mass murderer. That's just the kind of scum you are.

Lincoln preserved our Union, and in part, if not in whole, we owe our prosperity to him today.

Sherman broke the backs of civilian traitors and collaborators that would have continued their terrorist activities, and the costly war that was always a waste.

 

[RKMBrown]

1) The South started a war over slavery. FACT.

2) Yes, Lee owned slaves, and even had slaves waiting on him as he fought the war to preserve, protect, defend, and expand Slavery.

1) Not a fact. The South didn't start the war. Lincoln did.

Those dodging cannonballs at Ft Sumter would beg to differ

Only traitors fire on their own flag

You can believe in secession, or you can believe in a United States of America. You can't believe in both.

This is a map of what the US would look like if all secessions had been successful:

And to think it's the RWnuts who like to accuse Liberals of Balkanization...

What does it even mean to "believe in the United States of America?" No one attacks America more than you and your fellow liberal turds.

Is the irony of the above post, in this context, not truly breathtaking?

Maybe if you'd stop sucking on Obama's ___ you'd have more breath.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

1) The South started a war over slavery. FACT.

2) Yes, Lee owned slaves, and even had slaves waiting on him as he fought the war to preserve, protect, defend, and expand Slavery.

1) Not a fact. The South didn't start the war. Lincoln did.

Those dodging cannonballs at Ft Sumter would beg to differ

Only traitors fire on their own flag

You can believe in secession, or you can believe in a United States of America. You can't believe in both.

This is a map of what the US would look like if all secessions had been successful:

And to think it's the RWnuts who like to accuse Liberals of Balkanization...

What does it even mean to "believe in the United States of America?" No one attacks America more than you and your fellow liberal turds.

Is the irony of the above post, in this context, not truly breathtaking?

Maybe if you'd stop sucking on Obama's ___ you'd have more breath.

When all else fails go for the fellatio argument.

This whole thread is a joke. No one can prove empirically that information from this period in the mid-1800s is legitimate due to sabotage from both sides, or maybe the term "mutual masturbation" would work better with you, Mr. Wayne?

Going where Doris Kearns Goodwin fears to tread is at best, a crap shoot.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

1) The South started a war over slavery. FACT.

2) Yes, Lee owned slaves, and even had slaves waiting on him as he fought the war to preserve, protect, defend, and expand Slavery.

1) Not a fact. The South didn't start the war. Lincoln did.

Those dodging cannonballs at Ft Sumter would beg to differ

Only traitors fire on their own flag

You can believe in secession, or you can believe in a United States of America. You can't believe in both.

This is a map of what the US would look like if all secessions had been successful:

And to think it's the RWnuts who like to accuse Liberals of Balkanization...

What does it even mean to "believe in the United States of America?" No one attacks America more than you and your fellow liberal turds.

Liberals founded this great country.....don't you forget it

Now this is do-able. Without going into minutia the people who revolted were definitely not sucking the King's ----, as RKMBrown would probably say.

 

[paperview]

The pro-CSA folks clearly demonstrate that Lincoln was right.

Some of these people go to bed at night, smiling, happy they are defending slavers.

People who raped, beat, tore families apart, and fought to the death to defend it.


Karma may set them straight -- at some point.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

Why the phuck would anyone in 21st century America give a phlying phuck about Robert E. Lee now? You've got so many other gasbags worship. Go suck Kruz Kock. Pop in a Paul. Rub on Rubio. Ram your Romney. Crunch on Christie. Go get your Gettysburg hard on if you have to, but who the phuck cares?
This thread should be in the basement of the USMB.