DriftingSand
Cast Iron Member
You said "No ... money was the issue. Slavery was a secondary issue..."What's that have to do with the price of tea in China? Alexander Stephens and Robert E. Lee are two, completely different individuals. You are aware of that -- aren't you?No ... money was the issue. Slavery was a secondary issue because most folks weren't effected by it. Most southerners didn't have slaves nor did they see what it was like on the various plantations. Not only that ... some wealthy northerners had slaves. War always boils down to money, power, and control.Most Southerners did not have a vote in secession. Slavery was THE issue. Stop lying and accept historical fact
I realize that you, like so many other Americans, have been thoroughly brainwashed and programmed. It's the norm.
Slavery was the primary issue. The money tied up in slaves, and that they were in danger of losing the literal lifeblood of their economy ---> Because if slavery was threatened, so were they.
Slavery was the Cornerstone of the Southern Confederacy.
My point.
The idiocy about tariffs you hear Lost Causers go on about is a null one. If you want to say it was about money, you can, but you can't do it without saying it was about the money invested
In Slavery.
That isn't the reason Lincoln instigated the Ft Sumter event and then invaded VIrginia. He wanted to the idea of secession and convert the United States from a voluntary union of sovereign states to an empire of subjects. That's what the euphemism he coined "preserving the union" means. It meant eliminating states rights and the original principles the nation was founded on.
Giant power grab!!