Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When you have no idea what you are trying to say and then you try to defend yourself with name calling, it only demonstrates
your childish and ignorant ways.
Defending someone that fights to preserve an injustice, advocates ones belief in the injustice.
Defending those that believed and fought to retain slavery, means you are defending slavery.
Declaring yourself the winner doesn't make you the winner. Most people learned that lesson when they were children.
Again, the sleazy insinuations of racism. If your "victory" was so obvious you wouldn't need to resort to such tactics
"Declaring yourself the winner doesn't make you the winner. Most people learned that lesson when they were children. "
Notice how nasty they get when the know they have been beaten?
...
Don't you Lincoln worshipping numskulls get tired of having the same arguments kicked to pieces over and over again?
Ok, child.
It's not racist to say you are defending people whose stated intent was a desire to continue to enslave millions of black human beings to be bought as sold as cattle and horses.
It's fact.
I'm not defending slavery, jackass. In the end, when the ignominious lib poltroons can't win on the facts, they always get out the race card. That's the tell that indicates they know they've lost.
No it doesn't, you prehensile poltroon. That claim is the hail marry pass of the Lincoln cult members who are unable to defend the crimes of their patron saint.
When you have no idea what you are trying to say and then you try to defend yourself with name calling, it only demonstrates
your childish and ignorant ways.
Defending someone that fights to preserve an injustice, advocates ones belief in the injustice.
Defending those that believed and fought to retain slavery, means you are defending slavery.
"Declaring yourself the winner doesn't make you the winner. Most people learned that lesson when they were children. "
Ok, child.
It's not racist to say you are defending people whose stated intent was a desire to continue to enslave millions of black human beings to be bought as sold as cattle and horses.
It's fact.
I'm not defending slavery, jackass. In the end, when the ignominious lib poltroons can't win on the facts, they always get out the race card. That's the tell that indicates they know they've lost.
No it doesn't, you prehensile poltroon. That claim is the hail marry pass of the Lincoln cult members who are unable to defend the crimes of their patron saint.
ROLF! The list of names the Lincoln has called me in this thread would be quite long. What does that tell you about them?
I understand perfectly what I'm saying. That's what really bugs you.
See how your ignorance precedes you.
One more time. ....
Defending someone that fights to preserve an injustice, advocates ones belief in the injustice.
When you have no idea what you are trying to say and then you try to defend yourself with name calling, it only demonstrates
your childish and ignorant ways.
Defending someone that fights to preserve an injustice, advocates ones belief in the injustice.
Defending those that believed and fought to retain slavery, means you are defending slavery.
I'm not defending slavery, jackass. In the end, when the ignominious lib poltroons can't win on the facts, they always get out the race card. That's the tell that indicates they know they've lost.
No it doesn't, you prehensile poltroon. That claim is the hail marry pass of the Lincoln cult members who are unable to defend the crimes of their patron saint.
ROLF! The list of names the Lincoln has called me in this thread would be quite long. What does that tell you about them?
I understand perfectly what I'm saying. That's what really bugs you.
Wow. You're comparing yourself to a man hired to defend a murderer.See how your ignorance precedes you.
One more time. ....
Defending someone that fights to preserve an injustice, advocates ones belief in the injustice.
When you have no idea what you are trying to say and then you try to defend yourself with name calling, it only demonstrates
your childish and ignorant ways.
Defending someone that fights to preserve an injustice, advocates ones belief in the injustice.
Defending those that believed and fought to retain slavery, means you are defending slavery.
No it doesn't, you prehensile poltroon. That claim is the hail marry pass of the Lincoln cult members who are unable to defend the crimes of their patron saint.
ROLF! The list of names the Lincoln has called me in this thread would be quite long. What does that tell you about them?
I understand perfectly what I'm saying. That's what really bugs you.
No it doesn't, moron. If a lawyer defends a murderer, does that mean he approves of murder? How about if a child molester gets a DUI. Does a lawyer who defends him on the DUI charge approve of molesting children?
You and the rest of the Lincoln cult use this argument because all your other arguments have been shot down. Lincoln was a vicious blood-thirsty tyrant. You can't have the public becoming aware of that fact, so you slander anyone who mentions discusses it.
It's hilarious to watch a jackass like you complain about insults when you're accusing me of supporting slavery.
Wow. You're comparing yourself to a man hired to defend a murderer.See how your ignorance precedes you.
One more time. ....
Defending someone that fights to preserve an injustice, advocates ones belief in the injustice.
When you have no idea what you are trying to say and then you try to defend yourself with name calling, it only demonstrates
your childish and ignorant ways.
Defending someone that fights to preserve an injustice, advocates ones belief in the injustice.
No it doesn't, you prehensile poltroon. That claim is the hail marry pass of the Lincoln cult members who are unable to defend the crimes of their patron saint.
ROLF! The list of names the Lincoln has called me in this thread would be quite long. What does that tell you about them?
I understand perfectly what I'm saying. That's what really bugs you.
No it doesn't, moron. If a lawyer defends a murderer, does that mean he approves of murder? How about if a child molester gets a DUI. Does a lawyer who defends him on the DUI charge approve of molesting children?
You and the rest of the Lincoln cult use this argument because all your other arguments have been shot down. Lincoln was a vicious blood-thirsty tyrant. You can't have the public becoming aware of that fact, so you slander anyone who mentions discusses it.
It's hilarious to watch a jackass like you complain about insults when you're accusing me of supporting slavery.
That's so precious.
How much are the traitorous secessionists paying you?
Or is all pro-bonobo? (sic)
Oh look at the angry little boy flipping the bird - lashing out because he knows there is no defense for slavery enablers.Wow. You're comparing yourself to a man hired to defend a murderer.See how your ignorance precedes you.
One more time. ....
Defending someone that fights to preserve an injustice, advocates ones belief in the injustice.
When you have no idea what you are trying to say and then you try to defend yourself with name calling, it only demonstrates
your childish and ignorant ways.
Defending someone that fights to preserve an injustice, advocates ones belief in the injustice.
ROLF! The list of names the Lincoln has called me in this thread would be quite long. What does that tell you about them?
I understand perfectly what I'm saying. That's what really bugs you.
No it doesn't, moron. If a lawyer defends a murderer, does that mean he approves of murder? How about if a child molester gets a DUI. Does a lawyer who defends him on the DUI charge approve of molesting children?
You and the rest of the Lincoln cult use this argument because all your other arguments have been shot down. Lincoln was a vicious blood-thirsty tyrant. You can't have the public becoming aware of that fact, so you slander anyone who mentions discusses it.
It's hilarious to watch a jackass like you complain about insults when you're accusing me of supporting slavery.
That's so precious.
How much are the traitorous secessionists paying you?
Or is all pro-bonobo? (sic)
You are obviously just a sleazy ignominious piece of shit. There is no bar so low that you aren't willing to go under it.
Oh look at the angry little boy flipping the bird - lashing out because he knows there is no defense for slavery enablers.Wow. You're comparing yourself to a man hired to defend a murderer.See how your ignorance precedes you.
One more time. ....
Defending someone that fights to preserve an injustice, advocates ones belief in the injustice.
ROLF! The list of names the Lincoln has called me in this thread would be quite long. What does that tell you about them?
I understand perfectly what I'm saying. That's what really bugs you.
No it doesn't, moron. If a lawyer defends a murderer, does that mean he approves of murder? How about if a child molester gets a DUI. Does a lawyer who defends him on the DUI charge approve of molesting children?
You and the rest of the Lincoln cult use this argument because all your other arguments have been shot down. Lincoln was a vicious blood-thirsty tyrant. You can't have the public becoming aware of that fact, so you slander anyone who mentions discusses it.
It's hilarious to watch a jackass like you complain about insults when you're accusing me of supporting slavery.
That's so precious.
How much are the traitorous secessionists paying you?
Or is all pro-bonobo? (sic)
You are obviously just a sleazy ignominious piece of shit. There is no bar so low that you aren't willing to go under it.
Citing the White Nationalist DiLorenzo doesn't help your cause much, birdbrain.
Don't you understand "white nationalism" and the assorted lunacy is the basis of their entire argument???
There's no such thing as "white nationalism," shit-for-brains.Citing the White Nationalist DiLorenzo doesn't help your cause much, birdbrain.
Don't you understand "white nationalism" and the assorted lunacy is the basis of their entire argument???
There's no such thing as "white nationalism," shit-for-brains.
Wow...Look!!!!!...a definition for a non-existant word...
What is White Nationalism?
1. Q. What is White Nationalism?
A. The idea that Whites may need to create a separate nation as a means of defending themselves.
What is White Nationalism
You were saying...shit for brains.
In other words, it's a smear conceived by liberals. No one has ever expressed such an opinion.
Citing the White Nationalist DiLorenzo doesn't help your cause much, birdbrain.
Don't you understand "white nationalism" and the assorted lunacy is the basis of their entire argument???
There's no such thing as "white nationalism," shit-for-brains.Citing the White Nationalist DiLorenzo doesn't help your cause much, birdbrain.
Don't you understand "white nationalism" and the assorted lunacy is the basis of their entire argument???
There's no such thing as "white nationalism," shit-for-brains.
Wow...Look!!!!!...a definition for a non-existant word...
What is White Nationalism?
1. Q. What is White Nationalism?
A. The idea that Whites may need to create a separate nation as a means of defending themselves.
What is White Nationalism
You were saying...shit for brains.
In other words, it's a smear conceived by liberals. No one has ever expressed such an opinion.
There's no getting through the thick skulls of these tiny-brained, well-trained autobots. Their progressive teachers; CNN; and the New Youk Times toot their collective pipes and the mice scurry after them in politically correct fashion. It's sorta pathetic!
So brit has been reduced to the "nah...nah...nah" club for his last four or five posts.
It was inevitable...
So you still want to claim there's no such word as "white nationalism", you ignorant phlegm bucket???So brit has been reduced to the "nah...nah...nah" club for his last four or five posts.
It was inevitable...
That's what you've been doing for the last 500 posts, moron.
If Hitler fought a bloody war stating clearly and loudly in documents and in speeches he was going to war primarily because he "loved animals," then you might have a point,Don't you understand "white nationalism" and the assorted lunacy is the basis of their entire argument???
There's no such thing as "white nationalism," shit-for-brains.Don't you understand "white nationalism" and the assorted lunacy is the basis of their entire argument???
There's no such thing as "white nationalism," shit-for-brains.
Wow...Look!!!!!...a definition for a non-existant word...
What is White Nationalism?
1. Q. What is White Nationalism?
A. The idea that Whites may need to create a separate nation as a means of defending themselves.
What is White Nationalism
You were saying...shit for brains.
In other words, it's a smear conceived by liberals. No one has ever expressed such an opinion.
There's no getting through the thick skulls of these tiny-brained, well-trained autobots. Their progressive teachers; CNN; and the New Youk Times toot their collective pipes and the mice scurry after them in politically correct fashion. It's sorta pathetic!
Yes, I know. They are trying to smear me because their idiotic defence of Lincoln has been shot full of holes. Their current attack is like saying that if you say Hitler loved animals then you must approve of death camps. That's their conception of "logic."
So you still want to claim there's no such word as "white nationalism", you ignorant phlegm bucket???So brit has been reduced to the "nah...nah...nah" club for his last four or five posts.
It was inevitable...
That's what you've been doing for the last 500 posts, moron.
Said the White Nationalist.So you still want to claim there's no such word as "white nationalism", you ignorant phlegm bucket???So brit has been reduced to the "nah...nah...nah" club for his last four or five posts.
It was inevitable...
That's what you've been doing for the last 500 posts, moron.
Learn to read. I said there's no such THING as white nationalism. Anyone can make of bullshit jargon for propaganda purposes, and that's all the term "white nationalism" is.
It's his best attempt at higher level logic...lol.Said the White Nationalist.So you still want to claim there's no such word as "white nationalism", you ignorant phlegm bucket???So brit has been reduced to the "nah...nah...nah" club for his last four or five posts.
It was inevitable...
That's what you've been doing for the last 500 posts, moron.
Learn to read. I said there's no such THING as white nationalism. Anyone can make of bullshit jargon for propaganda purposes, and that's all the term "white nationalism" is.
Wait...it's a discussion of the Civil War and you complain about a "race card"?No, no, & no.Recounting the same events over and over again doesn't strengthen your case. Sovereign nations have a right to evict trespassers, and all union troops in the South became trespassers the minute the Southern states seceded. Wasn't it you who admitted that no military base in a foreign country can ever be permanent?
You lost, long ago.
Give up your crusade to defend people whose stated intent was a desire to continue to enslave millions of black human beings to be bought as sold as cattle and horses.
Declaring yourself the winner doesn't make you the winner. Most people learned that lesson when they were children.
Again, the sleazy insinuations of racism. If your "victory" was so obvious you wouldn't need to resort to such tactics
"Declaring yourself the winner doesn't make you the winner. Most people learned that lesson when they were children. "
Notice how nasty they get when the know they have been beaten?
...
Don't you Lincoln worshipping numskulls get tired of having the same arguments kicked to pieces over and over again?
Ok, child.
It's not racist to say you are defending people whose stated intent was a desire to continue to enslave millions of black human beings to be bought as sold as cattle and horses.
It's fact.
I'm not defending slavery, jackass. In the end, when the ignominious lib poltroons can't win on the facts, they always get out the race card. That's the tell that indicates they know they've lost.Sorry, child. You cannot separate the topic of Robert E. Lee and the Civil War from the issue of Race and Slavery. You just can't.
no obscenity boy, I just pointed out the reality that the North would have accepted slavery in the theretofore identified slave states.
See how your ignorance precedes you.
One more time. ....
Defending someone that fights to preserve an injustice, advocates ones belief in the injustice.
When you have no idea what you are trying to say and then you try to defend yourself with name calling, it only demonstrates
your childish and ignorant ways.
Defending someone that fights to preserve an injustice, advocates ones belief in the injustice.
Defending those that believed and fought to retain slavery, means you are defending slavery.
No it doesn't, you prehensile poltroon. That claim is the hail marry pass of the Lincoln cult members who are unable to defend the crimes of their patron saint.
ROLF! The list of names the Lincoln has called me in this thread would be quite long. What does that tell you about them?
I understand perfectly what I'm saying. That's what really bugs you.
No it doesn't, moron. If a lawyer defends a murderer, does that mean he approves of murder? How about if a child molester gets a DUI. Does a lawyer who defends him on the DUI charge approve of molesting children?
You and the rest of the Lincoln cult use this argument because all your other arguments have been shot down. Lincoln was a vicious blood-thirsty tyrant. You can't have the public becoming aware of that fact, so you slander anyone who dares to mention it.
It's hilarious to watch a jackass like you complain about insults when you're accusing me of supporting slavery.
Wow. You're comparing yourself to a man hired to defend a murderer.See how your ignorance precedes you.
One more time. ....
Defending someone that fights to preserve an injustice, advocates ones belief in the injustice.
When you have no idea what you are trying to say and then you try to defend yourself with name calling, it only demonstrates
your childish and ignorant ways.
Defending someone that fights to preserve an injustice, advocates ones belief in the injustice.
ROLF! The list of names the Lincoln has called me in this thread would be quite long. What does that tell you about them?
I understand perfectly what I'm saying. That's what really bugs you.
No it doesn't, moron. If a lawyer defends a murderer, does that mean he approves of murder? How about if a child molester gets a DUI. Does a lawyer who defends him on the DUI charge approve of molesting children?
You and the rest of the Lincoln cult use this argument because all your other arguments have been shot down. Lincoln was a vicious blood-thirsty tyrant. You can't have the public becoming aware of that fact, so you slander anyone who mentions discusses it.
It's hilarious to watch a jackass like you complain about insults when you're accusing me of supporting slavery.
That's so precious.
How much are the traitorous secessionists paying you?
Or is all pro-bonobo? (sic)
You are obviously just a sleazy ignominious piece of shit. There is no bar so low that you aren't willing to go under it.
