Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
Why is it ridiculous?
Don't expect and answer from C_Coward.
He has literally NEVER supported any of his idiotic statements.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why is it ridiculous?
"Rep. Mia Love wants to limit congressional bills to one subject at a time"
How typical of the naive TPM right - a truly childish, ridiculous, and inane proposal.
Why is it ridiculous?
Good bye budgets and keeping America running.
Good bye budgets and keeping America running.
..?"Rep. Mia Love wants to limit congressional bills to one subject at a time"
How typical of the naive TPM right - a truly childish, ridiculous, and inane proposal.
It's not a "ridiculous" proposal by any means.
Many state legislatures have single subject rules like this.
No it's just that money saved would be there to keep America going in the right direction instead of the status qoue keeping it going in the wrong direction.Good bye budgets and keeping America running.
Of course it's ridiculous – in theory and in practice...?"Rep. Mia Love wants to limit congressional bills to one subject at a time"
How typical of the naive TPM right - a truly childish, ridiculous, and inane proposal.
It's not a "ridiculous" proposal by any means.
Many state legislatures have single subject rules like this.
No in theory it's not ridiculous.
Of course it's ridiculous – in theory and in practice...?"Rep. Mia Love wants to limit congressional bills to one subject at a time"
How typical of the naive TPM right - a truly childish, ridiculous, and inane proposal.
It's not a "ridiculous" proposal by any means.
Many state legislatures have single subject rules like this.
No in theory it's not ridiculous.
The 'proposal' is just more whining from the childish, sophomoric, reactionary right upset about omnibus legislation; it would be impossible, for example, to pass spending measures funding all the required departments and agencies 'one subject at at time.'
It's just another example of the ridiculous right's contempt for sound, responsible governance.
"Rep. Mia Love wants to limit congressional bills to one subject at a time"
How typical of the naive TPM right - a truly childish, ridiculous, and inane proposal.
..?"Rep. Mia Love wants to limit congressional bills to one subject at a time"
How typical of the naive TPM right - a truly childish, ridiculous, and inane proposal.
It's not a "ridiculous" proposal by any means.
Many state legislatures have single subject rules like this.
Progressives fuck everything up...Someone will kill her bill by attaching a poison pill to it, lol.
Have you ever thought about why they don't?I can see this getting bi-partisan support. I want this to happen, for obvious reasons.
Rep. Mia Love wants to limit congressional bills to one subject at a time
Rep. Mia Love wants to crack down on Congress dumping controversial legislation into unrelated, must-pass bills in the middle of the night.
The Utah Republican has introduced a measure to limit bills in Congress to one subject at a time. It would prevent lawmakers from bundling things together or folding legislation into large appropriations bills. Each bill would rise and fall on its own merits.
"Members of both parties have made a habit of passing complex, thousand-page bills without hearings, amendments or debate," Love said. "That process and the collusion that goes with it are why we are $18 trillion in debt and why the American people have lost trust in elected officials."
Love's proposal takes a page out of the Utah Constitution, which requires the Legislature pass bills containing only one subject and that is clearly expressed in the title.
I love a man that calls his toast and jam progressive...Progressives fuck everything up...Someone will kill her bill by attaching a poison pill to it, lol.
This coming from a man that could fuck up a wet dream...Progressives fuck everything up...Someone will kill her bill by attaching a poison pill to it, lol.
![]()