- Thread starter
- Banned
- #261
"If you have any links that would show members of the log cabin republicans - who are gay, please show them."
http://online.logcabin.org/
Are you asking for specific members? Do you dispute that this organization is, in fact, a republican organization meant to serve gay conservatives? Do you think that no one of they're membership voted for bush in 04?
but here you go:
Pro-Gay, Pro-Values, Pro-Bush
Rich Tafel, former executive director of Log Cabin Republicans, writing in National Review Online:
The one statistic confounding pundits in this election is the number of gays who voted for George W. Bush. Polls show that the president received anywhere from 1.5 million to 2 million gay votes, up from 1 million votes in 2000 and double the number of gay votes for Bob Dole in 1996. This dramatic increase comes despite the fact that no gay organization endorsed him, no gay journalist editorialized on his behalf, and no gay leader supported him.
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/tafel200412150811.asp
served.
"I would suggest that log cabin republicans are republicans because of the priority they place on other republican values,"
and this guy CANT subsribe to the exact same political opinion? So, if a Log Cabin Republican gets elected should he be required to perform according to what you think gays should or face the retribution of being dragged out of the closet? See above article.
"not out of a desire to publicly affirm some sense of self loathing."
Can YOU speak for anyone besides yourself in regards to motive? You really think that a gay elected republican is voting his record because of self loathing RATHER THAN BECAUSE OF HIS CONSTITUANTS?
"If you have any record of an openly gay log cabin republican legislator who voted against gay issues, I would love to see it."
do you want to narrow your requirement down to only those with red hair, who are left handed and part their hair on the right side? See above article.
HA!
"It is possible to be a democrat and not agree with every stance of the democratic party. I find it ridiculous to assume that gay republicans agree with their party's stance on homosexuality."
Some do as noted above. Sit back and let the reality BLOW YOUR MIND.
"And I love it when republicans are getting their asses kicked on a current events issue, they bring up Clinton. He ain't a part of this discussion, unless Nixon and Harding and Grant are as well. Clinton was a hypocrite... he let his dick do the thinking whenever it stood up.... and he tainted his legacy because of it. I have no glowing praise for Bill Clinton.... and, as I said, we are not talking about they hypocrisy of Clinton, but the hypocrisy of Senator Craig."
Would you like to look back and see who broughtup clinton first?
"And again...I could give a fuck if he is gay, but I give a fuck that he IS a hypocrite."
Obviously your concern over hypocricy ends at a common political ideology. Likewise, your lack of uniform application and quickness to discount gay conservatives as the next loch ness monster or bigfoot conveys exactly what criteria sparked your interest. It's not mere hypocricy.
are you being intentionally obtuse?
Did you not read where I said that log cabin republicans can be republicans and still disagree with their party's stance on gay rights?
I do not agree with everything in the democratic platform but that doesn't send me running to the other side.
I understand that there are openly gay republicans. I understand that there are openly gay republicans elected to office. Do you have any record of any openly gay republican legislator voting against any bill that dealt with increasing or confirming homosexual rights?
I'll wait.