Republicans Are Now Vowing Total War And The Consequences Could Be Immense

Civil Rights passed due to the Republican Party. It's passage scared racist Liberals shitless, causing LBJ to come up with his plan of 'economic slavery' the Libs still use today.

"These uppity negroes now have something they have never had before - power to back their movement. We have to give them something, but not enough to make a difference. I'll have those ni@@ers voting Democrat for the next 200 years.'
:clap: Well said, sir - spoken like a true liberal.

It should be noted that at the opening of the LBJ library Obama declared that Blacks owed a debt of gratitude to LBJ, who he called 'no better friend to blacks'.

:wtf:


Some things NEVER change:

DNC Emails Chock-Full of “Racism, Sexism, Homophobia & Anti-Semitism”
Civil rights passed because of the Liberal north where most of the Republican Congressmen/women were at the time.

More Democrats voted for it than Republicans in the Union north. No Republicans voted for it in the conservative confederate south.

2je8zur.jpg


Liberalism is what got civil rights passed. The conservative south, mostly Democrat in those days, has since become predominantly Republican. That's the reason most blacks vote Democrat these days. They're much smarter than rubes like you.
Neither the Union nor the Confederacy existed anymore in 1964....
Moron .... that's identifying the states, not claiming the union or confederacy still existed. You have some nerve self-proclaiming yourself smarter than any other millennials when you can't even comprehend something as simple as that.
 
Civil Rights passed due to the Republican Party. It's passage scared racist Liberals shitless, causing LBJ to come up with his plan of 'economic slavery' the Libs still use today.

"These uppity negroes now have something they have never had before - power to back their movement. We have to give them something, but not enough to make a difference. I'll have those ni@@ers voting Democrat for the next 200 years.'
:clap: Well said, sir - spoken like a true liberal.

It should be noted that at the opening of the LBJ library Obama declared that Blacks owed a debt of gratitude to LBJ, who he called 'no better friend to blacks'.

:wtf:


Some things NEVER change:

DNC Emails Chock-Full of “Racism, Sexism, Homophobia & Anti-Semitism”
Civil rights passed because of the Liberal north where most of the Republican Congressmen/women were at the time.

More Democrats voted for it than Republicans in the Union north. No Republicans voted for it in the conservative confederate south.

2je8zur.jpg


Liberalism is what got civil rights passed. The conservative south, mostly Democrat in those days, has since become predominantly Republican. That's the reason most blacks vote Democrat these days. They're much smarter than rubes like you.

These Repugs truly live in an alternate reality, it's unbelievable how they just make shit up.

It's historical fact that Democrats such as Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey were the champions of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. As a result of the 1964 Civil Right Act, southern Democrats such as Strom Thurmond from South Carolina became Republicans.

You mean Republicans like Al Gore Sr. and Robert Byrd? What about Sam Ervin? Then there is JFK who voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act, the guy who had MLK wire tapped and investigated over and over.

Then you have Clinton's favorite Senator William Fulbright who filibustered against the Civil Rights Act. All strong Democrats. Lol!

And nothing you just wrote changes the fact that LBJ and Northern Democrats made the Civil Rights Act possible. Which is why blacks and minorities still overwhelmingly support the Democratic Party to this day and why there will never be another Republican President.

Dems bought them off. Thanks! And nothing you posted that the Democrats were a racist group.
Again, the divide was by north/south as more northern Democrats voted for it than northern Republicans. Almost no one in the south voted for it and not a single southern Republican voted for it.

2je8zur.jpg
 
Civil Rights passed due to the Republican Party. It's passage scared racist Liberals shitless, causing LBJ to come up with his plan of 'economic slavery' the Libs still use today.

"These uppity negroes now have something they have never had before - power to back their movement. We have to give them something, but not enough to make a difference. I'll have those ni@@ers voting Democrat for the next 200 years.'
:clap: Well said, sir - spoken like a true liberal.

It should be noted that at the opening of the LBJ library Obama declared that Blacks owed a debt of gratitude to LBJ, who he called 'no better friend to blacks'.

:wtf:


Some things NEVER change:

DNC Emails Chock-Full of “Racism, Sexism, Homophobia & Anti-Semitism”
Civil rights passed because of the Liberal north where most of the Republican Congressmen/women were at the time.

More Democrats voted for it than Republicans in the Union north. No Republicans voted for it in the conservative confederate south.

2je8zur.jpg


Liberalism is what got civil rights passed. The conservative south, mostly Democrat in those days, has since become predominantly Republican. That's the reason most blacks vote Democrat these days. They're much smarter than rubes like you.

These Repugs truly live in an alternate reality, it's unbelievable how they just make shit up.

It's historical fact that Democrats such as Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey were the champions of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. As a result of the 1964 Civil Right Act, southern Democrats such as Strom Thurmond from South Carolina became Republicans.

You mean Republicans like Al Gore Sr. and Robert Byrd? What about Sam Ervin? Then there is JFK who voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act, the guy who had MLK wire tapped and investigated over and over.

Then you have Clinton's favorite Senator William Fulbright who filibustered against the Civil Rights Act. All strong Democrats. Lol!

And nothing you just wrote changes the fact that LBJ and Northern Democrats made the Civil Rights Act possible. Which is why blacks and minorities still overwhelmingly support the Democratic Party to this day and why there will never be another Republican President.

Dems bought them off. Thanks! And nothing you posted that the Democrats were a racist group.

Whatever...."were" is the key word.

Unfortunately for you and your ilk, the modern Repug Party is CURRENTLY an unabashed racist party. For the good of the country, I hope a Republican leader emerges and flushes all of the racist turds out of the party. If this happens, maybe the Republican Party can compete for the White House again 20 - 30 years from now.

We need a two party system, but not when one party (the Repugs) is completely out of their fucking minds.
 
Looks like Republicans need to gear up for this war of their's. The highly accurate Sam Wang predicts Hillary's chance of winning is 99%.

:dance:
 
Civil rights passed because of the Liberal north where most of the Republican Congressmen/women were at the time.

More Democrats voted for it than Republicans in the Union north. No Republicans voted for it in the conservative confederate south.

2je8zur.jpg


Liberalism is what got civil rights passed. The conservative south, mostly Democrat in those days, has since become predominantly Republican. That's the reason most blacks vote Democrat these days. They're much smarter than rubes like you.

These Repugs truly live in an alternate reality, it's unbelievable how they just make shit up.

It's historical fact that Democrats such as Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey were the champions of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. As a result of the 1964 Civil Right Act, southern Democrats such as Strom Thurmond from South Carolina became Republicans.

You mean Republicans like Al Gore Sr. and Robert Byrd? What about Sam Ervin? Then there is JFK who voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act, the guy who had MLK wire tapped and investigated over and over.

Then you have Clinton's favorite Senator William Fulbright who filibustered against the Civil Rights Act. All strong Democrats. Lol!

And nothing you just wrote changes the fact that LBJ and Northern Democrats made the Civil Rights Act possible. Which is why blacks and minorities still overwhelmingly support the Democratic Party to this day and why there will never be another Republican President.

Dems bought them off. Thanks! And nothing you posted that the Democrats were a racist group.
Again, the divide was by north/south as more northern Democrats voted for it than northern Republicans. Almost no one in the south voted for it and not a single southern Republican voted for it.

2je8zur.jpg

None of the 12, LOL! How many southern democrats 90? Pretty funny.
 
These Repugs truly live in an alternate reality, it's unbelievable how they just make shit up.

It's historical fact that Democrats such as Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey were the champions of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. As a result of the 1964 Civil Right Act, southern Democrats such as Strom Thurmond from South Carolina became Republicans.

You mean Republicans like Al Gore Sr. and Robert Byrd? What about Sam Ervin? Then there is JFK who voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act, the guy who had MLK wire tapped and investigated over and over.

Then you have Clinton's favorite Senator William Fulbright who filibustered against the Civil Rights Act. All strong Democrats. Lol!

And nothing you just wrote changes the fact that LBJ and Northern Democrats made the Civil Rights Act possible. Which is why blacks and minorities still overwhelmingly support the Democratic Party to this day and why there will never be another Republican President.

Dems bought them off. Thanks! And nothing you posted that the Democrats were a racist group.
Again, the divide was by north/south as more northern Democrats voted for it than northern Republicans. Almost no one in the south voted for it and not a single southern Republican voted for it.

2je8zur.jpg

None of the 12, LOL! How many southern democrats 90? Pretty funny.
You're making my point -- the south voted against it, regardless of party. The north voted for it, also, regardless of party.

The south was, and is, far more racist than the north. Always has been. They were predominately Democrat in those days. They are predominately Republican these days.

Thanks for helpin' me make that point!
thumbsup.gif
 
Looks like Republicans need to gear up for this war of their's. The highly accurate Sam Wang predicts Hillary's chance of winning is 99%.

:dance:

Yeah, it's over. At this point, it's only a question of how badly does Clinton crush Trump.

She will get at least 300 delegates, could be more.
"Delegates??"

Delegates vote in primaries to nominate a presidential candidate. Electors vote for president in the general election, per the U.S. Constitution.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-a-delegate-and-an-electors-in-USA

Jeez. :eusa_doh: You really should, at the very least, know the basics. <smh>
 
Looks like Republicans need to gear up for this war of their's. The highly accurate Sam Wang predicts Hillary's chance of winning is 99%.

:dance:

Yeah, it's over. At this point, it's only a question of how badly does Clinton crush Trump.

She will get at least 300 delegates, could be more.
"Delegates??"

Delegates vote in primaries to nominate a presidential candidate. Electors vote for president in the general election, per the U.S. Constitution.

What is the difference between a delegate and an electors in USA? - Quora

Jeez. :eusa_doh: You really should, at the very least, know the basics. <smh>

I do, I'm just not perfect like you asshole! Lol!
 
Article from the Washington Post today. If this country goes down in flames due to Repug right-wing extremism, at least one newspaper tried to warn us:

Republicans are now vowing Total War. And the consequences could be immense.

The election is just five days away, and something truly frightening is happening, something with far-reaching implications for the immediate future of American politics. Republicans, led by Donald Trump but by no means limited to him, are engaging in kind of termite-level assault on American democracy, one that looks on the surface as though it’s just aimed at Hillary Clinton, but in fact is undermining our entire system.

...........Do not copy and paste this much from other sources. There's a reason links are required with outside sources.

Only one party is doing all of that. And we should all be very worried about what Republicans will do after November 8, whether they win or lose.


The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.

-- Thomas Jefferson
 
Looks like Republicans need to gear up for this war of their's. The highly accurate Sam Wang predicts Hillary's chance of winning is 99%.

:dance:

Yeah, it's over. At this point, it's only a question of how badly does Clinton crush Trump.

She will get at least 300 delegates, could be more.
"Delegates??"

Delegates vote in primaries to nominate a presidential candidate. Electors vote for president in the general election, per the U.S. Constitution.

What is the difference between a delegate and an electors in USA? - Quora

Jeez. :eusa_doh: You really should, at the very least, know the basics. <smh>

I do, I'm just not perfect like you asshole! Lol!

At least you admitted that Clinton is going to win. I'll give you credit for that.
 
Article from the Washington Post today. If this country goes down in flames due to Repug right-wing extremism, at least one newspaper tried to warn us:

Republicans are now vowing Total War. And the consequences could be immense.

The election is just five days away, and something truly frightening is happening, something with far-reaching implications for the immediate future of American politics. Republicans, led by Donald Trump but by no means limited to him, are engaging in kind of termite-level assault on American democracy, one that looks on the surface as though it’s just aimed at Hillary Clinton, but in fact is undermining our entire system.

...........Do not copy and paste this much from other sources. There's a reason links are required with outside sources.

Only one party is doing all of that. And we should all be very worried about what Republicans will do after November 8, whether they win or lose.


The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Repug voter suppression in states like N. Carolina and Wisconsin does nothing to promote liberty.
 
Looks like Republicans need to gear up for this war of their's. The highly accurate Sam Wang predicts Hillary's chance of winning is 99%.

:dance:

Yeah, it's over. At this point, it's only a question of how badly does Clinton crush Trump.

She will get at least 300 delegates, could be more.
"Delegates??"

Delegates vote in primaries to nominate a presidential candidate. Electors vote for president in the general election, per the U.S. Constitution.

What is the difference between a delegate and an electors in USA? - Quora

Jeez. :eusa_doh: You really should, at the very least, know the basics. <smh>

I do, I'm just not perfect like you asshole! Lol!
Try harder.
 
Looks like Republicans need to gear up for this war of their's. The highly accurate Sam Wang predicts Hillary's chance of winning is 99%.

:dance:

Yeah, it's over. At this point, it's only a question of how badly does Clinton crush Trump.

She will get at least 300 delegates, could be more.
"Delegates??"

Delegates vote in primaries to nominate a presidential candidate. Electors vote for president in the general election, per the U.S. Constitution.

What is the difference between a delegate and an electors in USA? - Quora

Jeez. :eusa_doh: You really should, at the very least, know the basics. <smh>

I do, I'm just not perfect like you asshole! Lol!

At least you admitted that Clinton is going to win. I'll give you credit for that.

Where did I say she was going to lose?
 
Yeah, it's over. At this point, it's only a question of how badly does Clinton crush Trump.

She will get at least 300 delegates, could be more.
"Delegates??"

Delegates vote in primaries to nominate a presidential candidate. Electors vote for president in the general election, per the U.S. Constitution.

What is the difference between a delegate and an electors in USA? - Quora

Jeez. :eusa_doh: You really should, at the very least, know the basics. <smh>

I do, I'm just not perfect like you asshole! Lol!

At least you admitted that Clinton is going to win. I'll give you credit for that.

Where did I say she was going to lose?

You didn't...but not many conservatives will admit the obvious about this election. Look at some of the other idiotic posts on this board.
 
Article from the Washington Post today. If this country goes down in flames due to Repug right-wing extremism, at least one newspaper tried to warn us:

Republicans are now vowing Total War. And the consequences could be immense.

The election is just five days away, and something truly frightening is happening, something with far-reaching implications for the immediate future of American politics. Republicans, led by Donald Trump but by no means limited to him, are engaging in kind of termite-level assault on American democracy, one that looks on the surface as though it’s just aimed at Hillary Clinton, but in fact is undermining our entire system.

...........Do not copy and paste this much from other sources. There's a reason links are required with outside sources.

Only one party is doing all of that. And we should all be very worried about what Republicans will do after November 8, whether they win or lose.


The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Repug voter suppression in states like N. Carolina and Wisconsin does nothing to promote liberty.


... which, of course, you have no proof. All you have is propaganda from the left. And, of course, we'll never know, since Dems oppose voter ID laws, and won't allow surveys of their voting rolls.

And you wonder why???? Bang, bang.
 
Article from the Washington Post today. If this country goes down in flames due to Repug right-wing extremism, at least one newspaper tried to warn us:

Republicans are now vowing Total War. And the consequences could be immense.

The election is just five days away, and something truly frightening is happening, something with far-reaching implications for the immediate future of American politics. Republicans, led by Donald Trump but by no means limited to him, are engaging in kind of termite-level assault on American democracy, one that looks on the surface as though it’s just aimed at Hillary Clinton, but in fact is undermining our entire system.

...........Do not copy and paste this much from other sources. There's a reason links are required with outside sources.

Only one party is doing all of that. And we should all be very worried about what Republicans will do after November 8, whether they win or lose.


The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Repug voter suppression in states like N. Carolina and Wisconsin does nothing to promote liberty.


... which, of course, you have no proof. All you have is propaganda from the left. And, of course, we'll never know, since Dems oppose voter ID laws, and won't allow surveys of their voting rolls.

And you wonder why???? Bang, bang.
Grow a pair and learn to lose with dignity.
 
She will get at least 300 delegates, could be more.
"Delegates??"

Delegates vote in primaries to nominate a presidential candidate. Electors vote for president in the general election, per the U.S. Constitution.

What is the difference between a delegate and an electors in USA? - Quora

Jeez. :eusa_doh: You really should, at the very least, know the basics. <smh>

I do, I'm just not perfect like you asshole! Lol!

At least you admitted that Clinton is going to win. I'll give you credit for that.

Where did I say she was going to lose?

You didn't...but not many conservatives will admit the obvious about this election. Look at some of the other idiotic posts on this board.

So you stereotype.
 
The fact that you are an irrational, intellectually dishonest Repug partisan doesn't change the simple fact that Bush's Iraq disaster is far worse than all of Obama's and Hillary's "mistakes" combined.

Iraq was a disaster; however, Hillary Clinton was one of the Liberals who not only gave bush the Authority to go to war, she made the case for it. Bush did not ally himself with this nation's enemies - enemies who slaughtered 3,000 Americans - and help them take over their own nations in UN-Constitutional Private Wars that were not given Congressional approval.

I posted quite a few crimes, violations of the Constitution and Rule of law, of aiding our enemies, and in return you can only respond with 1 thing - 'Iraq'. It's 'Florida' all over against for you Liberals.

You have proven that Violating the Constitution means nothing to you.
You have proven that Breaking the law means nothing to you.
You have proven that committing TREASPON by helping terrorists / this nations enemies means nothing to you.
You have proven that the deaths of thousands upon thousands of innocent people around the WORLD means nothing to you...

...proving you are delusional, mentally ill, rabid partisans devoid of reality...as long as it is a Liberal doing it all.

I only respond with Iraq because Bush's disaster is far worse than anything that Hillary and Obama have done. The history books will agree with me, not you. Deep down, you know I'm right, but you are an irrational partisan and you simply can't control yourself.

Like I said, this is a very boring conversation to have with a Repug because you people simply have no credibility due to all of Bush's egregious foreign policy mistakes.

And your hate-filled posts are not evidence of any Obama "crimes". These posts only make yourself feel good, they are not evidence of any wrong-doing. Using drones to hunt American suspected terrorists hiding in the Middle East is the one foreign policy issue that I strongly disagree with Obama about.
Dims like you have no credibility. Hillary voted for Iraq and the Dims support her while complaining about Iraq.

It doesn't get any stupider.

Blah, blah, blah. I ain't listening to any of you dumb Repug mother fuckers who voted for Bush twice and then have the audacity to criticize Obama and Clinton. Clinton was not Commander in Chief during Iraq, she was not the one who completely mismanaged the war and got over 4,000 American soldiers killed and countless innocent Iraqis killed. Bush owns the Iraq War disaster and you little Repug pussies just have to accept that.
You aren't done puking on yourself? Not too smart, are you?

Hilly voted for Iraq, it wasn't up to one man and you can't make that go away. It just makes you look like an idiot that doesn't care about truth.
 

Forum List

Back
Top