Republicans try to act like they AREN'T the party of War Mongers.

[the other mike]

Why are we in Syria, again?
Who invaded Syria and left US troops to fight his was as he left the WH?
WHO is the President who just escalated Barry's war?

It wasn't a Republican either time.

Well, they buried some 'dark memories' with John McCain, but that's another story.

 

[jc456]

La ram said we are as much war mongers. Equal. No different. Same. Not worse. If I’m wrong I’m sure he will let us know.

LA RAm said: You sure get angry when taken to school the dems are as evil at starting wars as the GOP is,sure you have facts to back up the gop starts wars but countless others have facts and evidence to back up what they say that the dems are as much warmongers as the GOP is and you run off and evade those facts everytime.

He didn't say the GOP was as evil as the demofks. nope, never said it. So equal wasn't his terminology, yet you altered his statement to fit your story. too fking funny. see, demofks are much more evil. You have no facts, you sheeple. you're welcome.

Hey idiot! I’m trying to get him to admit he likes the gop more. You right wingers consistently miss the point.

His wchtick is the dems are no better. I’ve yet to hear him say they are worse.

but he didn't say what you claimed. There you have a problem. get it? he never said they were equal.

 

[jc456]

La ram said we are as much war mongers. Equal. No different. Same. Not worse. If I’m wrong I’m sure he will let us know.

LA RAm said: You sure get angry when taken to school the dems are as evil at starting wars as the GOP is,sure you have facts to back up the gop starts wars but countless others have facts and evidence to back up what they say that the dems are as much warmongers as the GOP is and you run off and evade those facts everytime.

He didn't say the GOP was as evil as the demofks. nope, never said it. So equal wasn't his terminology, yet you altered his statement to fit your story. too fking funny. see, demofks are much more evil. You have no facts, you sheeple. you're welcome.

Hey idiot! I’m trying to get him to admit he likes the gop more. You right wingers consistently miss the point.

His wchtick is the dems are no better. I’ve yet to hear him say they are worse.

This hypocrite baby would obviously have loved trump if he ran under the democrat party,same as smellybozo he votes for party over indiivual,only morons do that.

I was a sucker for oBozo's lies in 2008 - a lot of people
voted for him who weren't Dems. John McCain was propped up to lose
especially after choosing Sarah View attachment 471319 Palin for running mate. Bozo was vetted just like Willy and
Dubya...and they did all the things good puppets do - and let the deep state take over. CIA, NSA
are out of control now basically. It's why guys like Comey , Clapper and Brennan can get away with lying UNDER OATH in Congressional hearings.

Same here,until trump I had never voted for a president before because of the fact both parties are corrupt and one in the same.I did so with trump though because unlike other candidates in the past he was not a career politician.so I did not vote for Obama but I was cheering him on because I knew with McCain,things would be the same and nothing would change and I as well was a sucker for his lies and felt relieved once he became potus.

I never would have been optimistic though on him had I know he was not a us citizen and connected to the cia same as Clinton and bush. When he became potus I thought well he at least cannot be any worse than bush.boy was I wrong,he expanded eveything bush got started so he indeed was even worse which I never thought would be possible.

same with me. I couldn't do the same old same old. Seems neither could the two parties.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

La ram said we are as much war mongers. Equal. No different. Same. Not worse. If I’m wrong I’m sure he will let us know.

LA RAm said: You sure get angry when taken to school the dems are as evil at starting wars as the GOP is,sure you have facts to back up the gop starts wars but countless others have facts and evidence to back up what they say that the dems are as much warmongers as the GOP is and you run off and evade those facts everytime.

He didn't say the GOP was as evil as the demofks. nope, never said it. So equal wasn't his terminology, yet you altered his statement to fit your story. too fking funny. see, demofks are much more evil. You have no facts, you sheeple. you're welcome.

Hey idiot! I’m trying to get him to admit he likes the gop more. You right wingers consistently miss the point.

His wchtick is the dems are no better. I’ve yet to hear him say they are worse.

That is true you haven’t heard me say that,for once in your
Life you are not lying as you always do when I take you to school Obama was evil and a traiter same as bush.

Based on PRESIDENTS alone I will never waver from saying both parties are corrupt and one in the same,clowns like you and banker cannot accept reality that it is a one party system disguised as two so the sheep think they have a choice in who gets elected.the actions of slick willow,dubya and Obama have proven that to be true. Trolls like you and banker won’t accept facts that the establishment always makes sure the independent never gets in office cause they are not part of their agenda to destroy America.

you need to look in the mirror when calling someone an idiot.just like Harry Dresden you are being an idiot same as him putting words in my mouth.he has been hanging around you far too long because he has the same fucked up logic you do that just because I liked trump that I like the gop party better than the dems. What kind of fucked up logic have you been teaching that idiot?

until trump got elected,the last president thst was worth a shit who actually did not take a shit on the constitution was carter.the last president before trump came along that was not a warmonger.

how is it that I like the gop more than the dems ONLY cause I liked trump

Sense 1976 carter and trump are the only presidents we have had that were not evil war mongering mass murderers.I liked them BOTH.yet you are trying to tell everyone I think the gop party is better? I have asked you a hundred times before,how much crack do you smoke everyday?

also if anything,according to your warped logic you have, I like the dem party better because not only did I like carter,I LOVED kennedy and wish he had served a second term cause he was the greatest president of the 20th century,that was why the CIA killed him moron.so going back to 1960 there is a total of ONE gop president I liked,Trump.for the democrats? Two,carter and Kennedy. So I guess if we go by your bizarre logic,if anything I like the democrats better moron.

you are too stupid to understand the establishment did the same thing to trump they did to carter,carter same as kennedy also tried to get rid of the cia,the elite only did not kill carter cause they knew he was on his way out.they had the elections rigged for their boy Reagan to get in cause they knew he would get the war machine going again,same thing with trump idiot.Trump pissed of the elite when he said wars are always started so the defense contracters can profit and calling th cia controlled news,fake news.

good presidents like carter and trump never get to serve more than one term anymore,if you are good like they are,they make sure and rig the elections as theydid against both of them you fuckimg moron.

 

[jc456]

La ram said we are as much war mongers. Equal. No different. Same. Not worse. If I’m wrong I’m sure he will let us know.

LA RAm said: You sure get angry when taken to school the dems are as evil at starting wars as the GOP is,sure you have facts to back up the gop starts wars but countless others have facts and evidence to back up what they say that the dems are as much warmongers as the GOP is and you run off and evade those facts everytime.

He didn't say the GOP was as evil as the demofks. nope, never said it. So equal wasn't his terminology, yet you altered his statement to fit your story. too fking funny. see, demofks are much more evil. You have no facts, you sheeple. you're welcome.

Hey idiot! I’m trying to get him to admit he likes the gop more. You right wingers consistently miss the point.

His wchtick is the dems are no better. I’ve yet to hear him say they are worse.

That is true you haven’t heard me say that,for once in your
Life you are not lying as you always do when I take you to school Obama was evil and a traiter same as bush.

Based on PRESIDENTS alone I will never waver from saying both parties are corrupt and one in the same,clowns like you and banker cannot accept reality that it is a one party system disguised as two so the sheep think they have a choice in who gets elected.the actions of slick willow,dubya and Obama have proven that to be true. Trolls like you and banker won’t accept facts that the establishment always makes sure the independent never gets in office cause they are not part of their agenda to destroy America.

you need to look in the mirror when calling someone an idiot.just like Harry Dresden you are being an idiot same as him putting words in my mouth.he has been hanging around you far too long because he has the same fucked up logic you do that just because I liked trump that I like the gop party better than the dems. What kind of fucked up logic have you been teaching that idiot?

until trump got elected,the last president thst was worth a shit who actually did not take a shit on the constitution was carter.the last president before trump came along that was not a warmonger.

how is it that I like the gop more than the dems ONLY cause I liked trump

Sense 1976 carter and trump are the only presidents we have had that were not evil war mongering mass murderers.I liked them BOTH.yet you are trying to tell everyone I think the gop party is better? I have asked you a hundred times before,how much crack do you smoke everyday?

also if anything,according to your warped logic you have, I like the dem party better because not only did I like carter,I LOVED kennedy and wish he had served a second term cause he was the greatest president of the 20th century,that was why the CIA killed him moron.so going back to 1960 there is a total of ONE gop president I liked,Trump.for the democrats? Two,carter and Kennedy. So I guess if we go by your bizarre logic,if anything I like the democrats better moron.

well we did get trump into the WH and we saw how both parties reacted. Too fking funny how connected they are and try and hide.

The establishment pukes will never understand independent voting.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

La ram said we are as much war mongers. Equal. No different. Same. Not worse. If I’m wrong I’m sure he will let us know.

LA RAm said: You sure get angry when taken to school the dems are as evil at starting wars as the GOP is,sure you have facts to back up the gop starts wars but countless others have facts and evidence to back up what they say that the dems are as much warmongers as the GOP is and you run off and evade those facts everytime.

He didn't say the GOP was as evil as the demofks. nope, never said it. So equal wasn't his terminology, yet you altered his statement to fit your story. too fking funny. see, demofks are much more evil. You have no facts, you sheeple. you're welcome.

Hey idiot! I’m trying to get him to admit he likes the gop more. You right wingers consistently miss the point.

His wchtick is the dems are no better. I’ve yet to hear him say they are worse.

That is true you haven’t heard me say that,for once in your
Life you are not lying as you always do when I take you to school Obama was evil and a traiter same as bush.

Based on PRESIDENTS alone I will never waver from saying both parties are corrupt and one in the same,clowns like you and banker cannot accept reality that it is a one party system disguised as two so the sheep think they have a choice in who gets elected.the actions of slick willow,dubya and Obama have proven that to be true. Trolls like you and banker won’t accept facts that the establishment always makes sure the independent never gets in office cause they are not part of their agenda to destroy America.

you need to look in the mirror when calling someone an idiot.just like Harry Dresden you are being an idiot same as him putting words in my mouth.he has been hanging around you far too long because he has the same fucked up logic you do that just because I liked trump that I like the gop party better than the dems. What kind of fucked up logic have you been teaching that idiot?

until trump got elected,the last president thst was worth a shit who actually did not take a shit on the constitution was carter.the last president before trump came along that was not a warmonger.

how is it that I like the gop more than the dems ONLY cause I liked trump

Sense 1976 carter and trump are the only presidents we have had that were not evil war mongering mass murderers.I liked them BOTH.yet you are trying to tell everyone I think the gop party is better? I have asked you a hundred times before,how much crack do you smoke everyday?

also if anything,according to your warped logic you have, I like the dem party better because not only did I like carter,I LOVED kennedy and wish he had served a second term cause he was the greatest president of the 20th century,that was why the CIA killed him moron.so going back to 1960 there is a total of ONE gop president I liked,Trump.for the democrats? Two,carter and Kennedy. So I guess if we go by your bizarre logic,if anything I like the democrats better moron.

well we did get trump into the WH and we saw how both parties reacted. Too fking funny how connected they are and try and hide.

The establishment pukes will never understand independent voting.

I wonder where smellybozo comes up with his fucked up logic just cause I liked trump I think the gop is less corrupt than the dems.

by his crazy reasoning he would have me liking the dem party as well because I liked carter as well

also by his logic, I would have to like the dem party more sense that sense 1960 of all the presidents sense then trump is the only one from the gop party I liked where kennedy and carter make two.last time I checked 2 was a greater number than one. Plus the dude has Alzheimer’s because I have only told him a million times that kennedy was our last great president we had and the best of the 20th century. I’m sure you will Remember all this a year from now,he won’t though,he will forget by tomorrow.

 

[jc456]

La ram said we are as much war mongers. Equal. No different. Same. Not worse. If I’m wrong I’m sure he will let us know.

LA RAm said: You sure get angry when taken to school the dems are as evil at starting wars as the GOP is,sure you have facts to back up the gop starts wars but countless others have facts and evidence to back up what they say that the dems are as much warmongers as the GOP is and you run off and evade those facts everytime.

He didn't say the GOP was as evil as the demofks. nope, never said it. So equal wasn't his terminology, yet you altered his statement to fit your story. too fking funny. see, demofks are much more evil. You have no facts, you sheeple. you're welcome.

Hey idiot! I’m trying to get him to admit he likes the gop more. You right wingers consistently miss the point.

His wchtick is the dems are no better. I’ve yet to hear him say they are worse.

That is true you haven’t heard me say that,for once in your
Life you are not lying as you always do when I take you to school Obama was evil and a traiter same as bush.

Based on PRESIDENTS alone I will never waver from saying both parties are corrupt and one in the same,clowns like you and banker cannot accept reality that it is a one party system disguised as two so the sheep think they have a choice in who gets elected.the actions of slick willow,dubya and Obama have proven that to be true. Trolls like you and banker won’t accept facts that the establishment always makes sure the independent never gets in office cause they are not part of their agenda to destroy America.

you need to look in the mirror when calling someone an idiot.just like Harry Dresden you are being an idiot same as him putting words in my mouth.he has been hanging around you far too long because he has the same fucked up logic you do that just because I liked trump that I like the gop party better than the dems. What kind of fucked up logic have you been teaching that idiot?

until trump got elected,the last president thst was worth a shit who actually did not take a shit on the constitution was carter.the last president before trump came along that was not a warmonger.

how is it that I like the gop more than the dems ONLY cause I liked trump

Sense 1976 carter and trump are the only presidents we have had that were not evil war mongering mass murderers.I liked them BOTH.yet you are trying to tell everyone I think the gop party is better? I have asked you a hundred times before,how much crack do you smoke everyday?

also if anything,according to your warped logic you have, I like the dem party better because not only did I like carter,I LOVED kennedy and wish he had served a second term cause he was the greatest president of the 20th century,that was why the CIA killed him moron.so going back to 1960 there is a total of ONE gop president I liked,Trump.for the democrats? Two,carter and Kennedy. So I guess if we go by your bizarre logic,if anything I like the democrats better moron.

well we did get trump into the WH and we saw how both parties reacted. Too fking funny how connected they are and try and hide.

The establishment pukes will never understand independent voting.

I wonder where smellybozo comes up with his fucked up logic just cause I liked trump I think the gop is less corrupt than the dems.

by his crazy reasoning he would have me liking the dem party as well because I liked carter as well

also by his logic, I would have to like the dem party more sense that sense 1960 of all the presidents sense then trump is the only one from the gop party I liked where kennedy and carter make two.last time I checked 2 was a greater number than one. Plus the dude has Alzheimer’s because I have only told him a million times that kennedy was our last great president we had and the best of the 20th century. I’m sure you will Remember all this a year from now,he won’t though,he will forget by tomorrow.

JFK was taken out by the establishment, Trump was handled differently, but the intent was the same

 

[LA RAM FAN]

La ram said we are as much war mongers. Equal. No different. Same. Not worse. If I’m wrong I’m sure he will let us know.

LA RAm said: You sure get angry when taken to school the dems are as evil at starting wars as the GOP is,sure you have facts to back up the gop starts wars but countless others have facts and evidence to back up what they say that the dems are as much warmongers as the GOP is and you run off and evade those facts everytime.

He didn't say the GOP was as evil as the demofks. nope, never said it. So equal wasn't his terminology, yet you altered his statement to fit your story. too fking funny. see, demofks are much more evil. You have no facts, you sheeple. you're welcome.

Hey idiot! I’m trying to get him to admit he likes the gop more. You right wingers consistently miss the point.

His wchtick is the dems are no better. I’ve yet to hear him say they are worse.

That is true you haven’t heard me say that,for once in your
Life you are not lying as you always do when I take you to school Obama was evil and a traiter same as bush.

Based on PRESIDENTS alone I will never waver from saying both parties are corrupt and one in the same,clowns like you and banker cannot accept reality that it is a one party system disguised as two so the sheep think they have a choice in who gets elected.the actions of slick willow,dubya and Obama have proven that to be true. Trolls like you and banker won’t accept facts that the establishment always makes sure the independent never gets in office cause they are not part of their agenda to destroy America.

you need to look in the mirror when calling someone an idiot.just like Harry Dresden you are being an idiot same as him putting words in my mouth.he has been hanging around you far too long because he has the same fucked up logic you do that just because I liked trump that I like the gop party better than the dems. What kind of fucked up logic have you been teaching that idiot?

until trump got elected,the last president thst was worth a shit who actually did not take a shit on the constitution was carter.the last president before trump came along that was not a warmonger.

how is it that I like the gop more than the dems ONLY cause I liked trump

Sense 1976 carter and trump are the only presidents we have had that were not evil war mongering mass murderers.I liked them BOTH.yet you are trying to tell everyone I think the gop party is better? I have asked you a hundred times before,how much crack do you smoke everyday?

also if anything,according to your warped logic you have, I like the dem party better because not only did I like carter,I LOVED kennedy and wish he had served a second term cause he was the greatest president of the 20th century,that was why the CIA killed him moron.so going back to 1960 there is a total of ONE gop president I liked,Trump.for the democrats? Two,carter and Kennedy. So I guess if we go by your bizarre logic,if anything I like the democrats better moron.

well we did get trump into the WH and we saw how both parties reacted. Too fking funny how connected they are and try and hide.

The establishment pukes will never understand independent voting.

I wonder where smellybozo comes up with his fucked up logic just cause I liked trump I think the gop is less corrupt than the dems.

by his crazy reasoning he would have me liking the dem party as well because I liked carter as well

also by his logic, I would have to like the dem party more sense that sense 1960 of all the presidents sense then trump is the only one from the gop party I liked where kennedy and carter make two.last time I checked 2 was a greater number than one. Plus the dude has Alzheimer’s because I have only told him a million times that kennedy was our last great president we had and the best of the 20th century. I’m sure you will Remember all this a year from now,he won’t though,he will forget by tomorrow.

JFK was taken out by the establishment, Trump was handled differently, but the intent was the same

That’s what I was saying,wouldn’t you agree that the intent was the same with carter identical to trump? Carter reformed the CIA when he got in office hiring stansfield turner who cleaned house getting rid of cia dirty tricks covert operations and once they rigged it for Reagan,he got the war machine going again and got the CIA back to its covert wars as well.

 

[kaz]

And that is why the ruse that Pakistan didn't know was created.

They still got their share of the millions we send Pakistan to appease them.

If that is how we kept our soldiers safe during the mission, I'm okay with it. I'm also okay with the west propping up a nuclear power and helping them defend against religious extremist.

You're OK with a Democrat war, of course you are. That was supposed to be an admission?

Al Qaeda attacked us under a Republican president. So yeah me, republican and democrat Americans, fully support greasing that fucking piece of shit regardless of whose toes we stepped on. If you don't like it, too bad. It was a win for the home team.

I guess Trumpybears Banana Republican's no longer play for, or ever root for, the home team anymore, if they're not in the starting line up.

And so the goalposts move.

The subject was foreign wars.

If Obama had only done Pakistan for that reason, it would be defensible. But in your typical lying hack partisan bitch style you just keep changing the standard.

Of course you lost all credibility when you said bombing Libya and changing the government wasn't an act of war, it wasn't anything at all

The only folk moving the goal posts are the ones that think anything changed in the last 4 years.

"On March 10, a U.S. drone fired a missile, turning a passenger vehicle outside Janaale, Somalia, into a heap of burnt and broken metal with fresh corpses inside. Whether the people killed that day were “terrorists” or ordinary Somalis is actively disputed. It is also a reminder that the United States’ targeted killing program persists to this day, another legacy of the forever war that has now lasted for three presidential administrations and shows no signs of stopping in the next one. Under U.S. President Donald Trump, however, an already opaque and murderous set of rules has become even more widely applied, and ever less accountable.

The elastic nature of the September 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) has stretched so far as to cover strikes in Yemen, Libya, and Somalia. The first modern drone attack, a Hellfire missile fired from a CIA-piloted Predator drone in October 2001, was covered by the AUMF, as was the airstrike in Janaale, conducted by U.S. Africa Command (Africom), itself born in the dying years of President George W. Bush ‘s administration as part of the “war on terror.”

Trump Inherited the Drone War but Ditched Accountability

Only a single formal check remains on U.S. killings worldwide.

foreignpolicy.com

How would you know when you're so bitterly partisan that you don't consider airstrikes that bring down a government in Libya to be an act of war ... when it's a Democrat ... You don't know what a standard is. Literally, fascist

 

[sealybobo]

La ram said we are as much war mongers. Equal. No different. Same. Not worse. If I’m wrong I’m sure he will let us know.

LA RAm said: You sure get angry when taken to school the dems are as evil at starting wars as the GOP is,sure you have facts to back up the gop starts wars but countless others have facts and evidence to back up what they say that the dems are as much warmongers as the GOP is and you run off and evade those facts everytime.

He didn't say the GOP was as evil as the demofks. nope, never said it. So equal wasn't his terminology, yet you altered his statement to fit your story. too fking funny. see, demofks are much more evil. You have no facts, you sheeple. you're welcome.

Hey idiot! I’m trying to get him to admit he likes the gop more. You right wingers consistently miss the point.

His wchtick is the dems are no better. I’ve yet to hear him say they are worse.

This hypocrite baby would obviously have loved trump if he ran under the democrat party,same as smellybozo he votes for party over indiivual,only morons do that.

I was a sucker for oBozo's lies in 2008 - a lot of people
voted for him who weren't Dems. John McCain was propped up to lose
especially after choosing Sarah View attachment 471319 Palin for running mate. Bozo was vetted just like Willy and
Dubya...and they did all the things good puppets do - and let the deep state take over. CIA, NSA
are out of control now basically. It's why guys like Comey , Clapper and Brennan can get away with lying UNDER OATH in Congressional hearings.

Same here,until trump I had never voted for a president before because of the fact both parties are corrupt and one in the same.I did so with trump though because unlike other candidates in the past he was not a career politician.so I did not vote for Obama but I was cheering him on because I knew with McCain,things would be the same and nothing would change and I as well was a sucker for his lies and felt relieved once he became potus.

I never would have been optimistic though on him had I know he was not a us citizen and connected to the cia same as Clinton and bush. When he became potus I thought well he at least cannot be any worse than bush.boy was I wrong,he expanded eveything bush got started so he indeed was even worse which I never thought would be possible.

You’re the typical new voter who never voted before but fell for trumps bullshit. You suck his balls more than I suck hillarys

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

GWB lied to the world and exaggerated the threat of Iraq and convinced idiot republicans we needed to go to war in Iraq

 

[BlindBoo]

And that is why the ruse that Pakistan didn't know was created.

They still got their share of the millions we send Pakistan to appease them.

If that is how we kept our soldiers safe during the mission, I'm okay with it. I'm also okay with the west propping up a nuclear power and helping them defend against religious extremist.

You're OK with a Democrat war, of course you are. That was supposed to be an admission?

Al Qaeda attacked us under a Republican president. So yeah me, republican and democrat Americans, fully support greasing that fucking piece of shit regardless of whose toes we stepped on. If you don't like it, too bad. It was a win for the home team.

I guess Trumpybears Banana Republican's no longer play for, or ever root for, the home team anymore, if they're not in the starting line up.

And so the goalposts move.

The subject was foreign wars.

If Obama had only done Pakistan for that reason, it would be defensible. But in your typical lying hack partisan bitch style you just keep changing the standard.

Of course you lost all credibility when you said bombing Libya and changing the government wasn't an act of war, it wasn't anything at all

The only folk moving the goal posts are the ones that think anything changed in the last 4 years.

"On March 10, a U.S. drone fired a missile, turning a passenger vehicle outside Janaale, Somalia, into a heap of burnt and broken metal with fresh corpses inside. Whether the people killed that day were “terrorists” or ordinary Somalis is actively disputed. It is also a reminder that the United States’ targeted killing program persists to this day, another legacy of the forever war that has now lasted for three presidential administrations and shows no signs of stopping in the next one. Under U.S. President Donald Trump, however, an already opaque and murderous set of rules has become even more widely applied, and ever less accountable.

The elastic nature of the September 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) has stretched so far as to cover strikes in Yemen, Libya, and Somalia. The first modern drone attack, a Hellfire missile fired from a CIA-piloted Predator drone in October 2001, was covered by the AUMF, as was the airstrike in Janaale, conducted by U.S. Africa Command (Africom), itself born in the dying years of President George W. Bush ‘s administration as part of the “war on terror.”

Trump Inherited the Drone War but Ditched Accountability

Only a single formal check remains on U.S. killings worldwide.

foreignpolicy.com

How would you know when you're so bitterly partisan that you don't consider airstrikes that bring down a government in Libya to be an act of war ... when it's a Democrat ... You don't know what a standard is. Literally, fascist

Your claim was that our involvement in Libya was a "Democrat War"

 

[jc456]

La ram said we are as much war mongers. Equal. No different. Same. Not worse. If I’m wrong I’m sure he will let us know.

LA RAm said: You sure get angry when taken to school the dems are as evil at starting wars as the GOP is,sure you have facts to back up the gop starts wars but countless others have facts and evidence to back up what they say that the dems are as much warmongers as the GOP is and you run off and evade those facts everytime.

He didn't say the GOP was as evil as the demofks. nope, never said it. So equal wasn't his terminology, yet you altered his statement to fit your story. too fking funny. see, demofks are much more evil. You have no facts, you sheeple. you're welcome.

Hey idiot! I’m trying to get him to admit he likes the gop more. You right wingers consistently miss the point.

His wchtick is the dems are no better. I’ve yet to hear him say they are worse.

This hypocrite baby would obviously have loved trump if he ran under the democrat party,same as smellybozo he votes for party over indiivual,only morons do that.

I was a sucker for oBozo's lies in 2008 - a lot of people
voted for him who weren't Dems. John McCain was propped up to lose
especially after choosing Sarah View attachment 471319 Palin for running mate. Bozo was vetted just like Willy and
Dubya...and they did all the things good puppets do - and let the deep state take over. CIA, NSA
are out of control now basically. It's why guys like Comey , Clapper and Brennan can get away with lying UNDER OATH in Congressional hearings.

Same here,until trump I had never voted for a president before because of the fact both parties are corrupt and one in the same.I did so with trump though because unlike other candidates in the past he was not a career politician.so I did not vote for Obama but I was cheering him on because I knew with McCain,things would be the same and nothing would change and I as well was a sucker for his lies and felt relieved once he became potus.

I never would have been optimistic though on him had I know he was not a us citizen and connected to the cia same as Clinton and bush. When he became potus I thought well he at least cannot be any worse than bush.boy was I wrong,he expanded eveything bush got started so he indeed was even worse which I never thought would be possible.

You’re the typical new voter who never voted before but fell for trumps bullshit. You suck his balls more than I suck hillarys

Says the guy sucking demofk Kok’s. Doing their work for them, sheeple

 

[jc456]

La ram said we are as much war mongers. Equal. No different. Same. Not worse. If I’m wrong I’m sure he will let us know.

LA RAm said: You sure get angry when taken to school the dems are as evil at starting wars as the GOP is,sure you have facts to back up the gop starts wars but countless others have facts and evidence to back up what they say that the dems are as much warmongers as the GOP is and you run off and evade those facts everytime.

He didn't say the GOP was as evil as the demofks. nope, never said it. So equal wasn't his terminology, yet you altered his statement to fit your story. too fking funny. see, demofks are much more evil. You have no facts, you sheeple. you're welcome.

Hey idiot! I’m trying to get him to admit he likes the gop more. You right wingers consistently miss the point.

His wchtick is the dems are no better. I’ve yet to hear him say they are worse.

That is true you haven’t heard me say that,for once in your
Life you are not lying as you always do when I take you to school Obama was evil and a traiter same as bush.

Based on PRESIDENTS alone I will never waver from saying both parties are corrupt and one in the same,clowns like you and banker cannot accept reality that it is a one party system disguised as two so the sheep think they have a choice in who gets elected.the actions of slick willow,dubya and Obama have proven that to be true. Trolls like you and banker won’t accept facts that the establishment always makes sure the independent never gets in office cause they are not part of their agenda to destroy America.

you need to look in the mirror when calling someone an idiot.just like Harry Dresden you are being an idiot same as him putting words in my mouth.he has been hanging around you far too long because he has the same fucked up logic you do that just because I liked trump that I like the gop party better than the dems. What kind of fucked up logic have you been teaching that idiot?

until trump got elected,the last president thst was worth a shit who actually did not take a shit on the constitution was carter.the last president before trump came along that was not a warmonger.

how is it that I like the gop more than the dems ONLY cause I liked trump

Sense 1976 carter and trump are the only presidents we have had that were not evil war mongering mass murderers.I liked them BOTH.yet you are trying to tell everyone I think the gop party is better? I have asked you a hundred times before,how much crack do you smoke everyday?

also if anything,according to your warped logic you have, I like the dem party better because not only did I like carter,I LOVED kennedy and wish he had served a second term cause he was the greatest president of the 20th century,that was why the CIA killed him moron.so going back to 1960 there is a total of ONE gop president I liked,Trump.for the democrats? Two,carter and Kennedy. So I guess if we go by your bizarre logic,if anything I like the democrats better moron.

well we did get trump into the WH and we saw how both parties reacted. Too fking funny how connected they are and try and hide.

The establishment pukes will never understand independent voting.

I wonder where smellybozo comes up with his fucked up logic just cause I liked trump I think the gop is less corrupt than the dems.

by his crazy reasoning he would have me liking the dem party as well because I liked carter as well

also by his logic, I would have to like the dem party more sense that sense 1960 of all the presidents sense then trump is the only one from the gop party I liked where kennedy and carter make two.last time I checked 2 was a greater number than one. Plus the dude has Alzheimer’s because I have only told him a million times that kennedy was our last great president we had and the best of the 20th century. I’m sure you will Remember all this a year from now,he won’t though,he will forget by tomorrow.

JFK was taken out by the establishment, Trump was handled differently, but the intent was the same

That’s what I was saying,wouldn’t you agree that the intent was the same with carter identical to trump? Carter reformed the CIA when he got in office hiring stansfield turner who cleaned house getting rid of cia dirty tricks covert operations and once they rigged it for Reagan,he got the war machine going again and got the CIA back to its covert wars as well.

Carter was a yes man. Nowhere near Trump or JFK

 

[Markle]

GWB lied to the world and exaggerated the threat of Iraq and convinced idiot republicans we needed to go to war in Iraq, when we clearly didn't.

Clearly the FACTS prove you wrong but you firmly believe that if you keep on telling a lie, sooner or later it will be believed. You are wrong. Why do you persist? Are you that desperate to divert attention to the trainwreck now happening in the Oval Office?

The United Nations had issued dozens of resolutions condemning Saddam Hussein and finally issuing a Resolution to use force to take down Hussein as did the US Congress. So really, can your lies.

Here is what your fellow Democrats said about Saddam Hussein. You may have forgotten.

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow."
- President Clinton in 1998 “

[…], when I say to Saddam Hussein, "You cannot defy the will of the world", and when I say to him, "You have used weapons of mass destruction before; we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again.”
- President Clinton , Jan. 27, 1998 – State of the Union


"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 .

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

“Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraqis nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.”

“Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.”

“Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.”

- President Bill Clinton, Dec. 16, 1998


"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed."
- Madeline Albright, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "

Update: September 8, 2005 - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser was sentenced to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them..

[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 .

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 .

Former Vice President Joe Biden urged the U.S. government in 1998 to pursue a strategy to ‘dethrone’ Saddam Hussein over allegations the Iraqi strongman was hiding weapons of mass destruction.

Biden, the-then ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was one of President Bill Clinton’s most vocal allies in the battle to pressure Hussein to abide by terms established after the Gulf War requiring Iraq to destroy its stockpile of chemical weapons. - Former Vice President Joe Biden 1998 1998: Joe Biden Urged U.S. to 'Dethrone' Saddam Hussein Over WMDs

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 .


"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 .

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 .

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons but has not yet achieved nuclear capability."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 .

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 .

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003" (Currently President Barack Hussein Obama’s Secretary of State)

I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out."
- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

"Saddam is gone and good riddance," former President Bill Clinton said yesterday, but he urged President Bush to resist trying to get even with nations that opposed the war.

"There are German and French soldiers in Afghanistan today. Does the President want them to come home?" Clinton said at a Manhattan forum on corporate integrity.

Democrats on Iraq + WMD's (Weapons of Mass Destruction)



He [President Clinton] praised Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for their handling of the war, but said Bush should have waited longer before attacking for the "chance that either [Saddam Hussein] would have disarmed or . . . we would have had far more members of the Security Council with us."

Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.

"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.

- Former President Clinton Wednesday, April 16, 2003

"Could Be One of the Great Achievements of This Administration" The vice president said he’d been to Iraq 17 times and visits the country every three months or so. "I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society" he said. "It's impressed me. I've been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences."

- Vice President Joe Biden (D) Feb. 10, 2010

How has the war President Barack Hussein Obama said we SHOULD have been fighting going? How is the Middle East going now that President Obama is President? Oh, Afghanistan just crossed 2,330 American fatalities. Seventy percent of whom died since President Obama took office.




And then the Obama administration wanted to TAKE CREDIT for the Iraq war…whew….

ttp://articles.nydailynews.com/2003-04-16/news/18226075_1_saddam-hussein-president-bush-security-council

We Fought A Good Fight, Clinton Says
BY JOEL SIEGEL
Wednesday, April 16, 2003
"Saddam is gone and good riddance," former President Bill Clinton said yesterday, but he urged President Bush to resist trying to get even with nations that opposed the war.

"There are German and French soldiers in Afghanistan today. Does the President want them to come home?" Clinton said at a Manhattan forum on corporate integrity.

He praised Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for their handling of the war, but said Bush should have waited longer before attacking for the "chance that either [Saddam Hussein] would have disarmed or . . . we would have had far more members of the Security Council with us."

Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.

"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.

 

[Muhammed]

GWB lied to the world and exaggerated the threat of Iraq and convinced idiot republicans we needed to go to war in Iraq, when we clearly didn't. On top of that Bush and the idiot republicans totally fucked up and mismanaged the war and it turned into a mega disaster. The vast majority of the problems in the Mid east today, are the result of Bush and the GOP failure there

.

He didn't lie to the world on purpose, he was echoing the then prevailing intelligence of many countries about Iraq being a threat, Saddam requested that Bush 1 be assassinated, and he also posted $25,000 for any Muslim to kill Americans. You forget that Saddam invaded Kuwait and gassed his own people and flouted U.N. Inspection rules of his then known WMD in various places.

The democrats at the time overwhelmingly supported Bush in going to war with Iraq.

The Congress passed the 1998 Iraqi liberation act for Clinton to use as the basis for attacking and removing Saddam Hussein.

Your one sided ignorant partisan based post is an awesome epic fail!

LIES

You are ignoring the fact that many many many intel agencies and people said Sadam wasn't a threat and Sadam didn't have WMDs.

To war in Iraq was a GOP idea and plan, and it was promoted by the GOP. To some how act like the dems are responsible for Iraq is total lunacy...

I notice that you didn't read the link in my post, it supports my position 100%, heck even the democrat's agrees too.... OVERWHELMINGLY!

Wikipedia

The bill was sponsored by Representative Benjamin A. Gilman (Republican, NY-20) and co-sponsored by Representative Christopher Cox (Republican, CA-47). The bill was introduced as H.R. 4655 on September 29, 1998. The House of Representatives passed the bill 360–38 on October 5, and the Senate passed it with unanimous consent two days later. President Clinton signed the Iraq Liberation Act into law on October 31, 1998.[3][4]

bolding mine

Your ignorance is established fact.

See there you go trying to spin the facts. You are reaching in a pathetic attempt to deflect blame.

If you are going to somehow suggest that War in Iraq was a dem idea or a bipartisan idea, that is just a flat lie.

War in Iraq was a GOP plan, and it was executed (terribly I might add) by the GOP...

The life of a republican is to come up with lies and pathetic excuses for the failure of GOP leaders and presidents.

Bwahahahahahahaha!!!

I am a Free Thinking Independent.

Your mental illness is preventing you from seeing this:

The bill was sponsored by Representative Benjamin A. Gilman (Republican, NY-20) and co-sponsored by Representative Christopher Cox (Republican, CA-47). The bill was introduced as H.R. 4655 on September 29, 1998. The House of Representatives passed the bill 360–38 on October 5, and the Senate passed it with unanimous consent two days later. President Clinton signed the Iraq Liberation Act into law on October 31, 1998.[3][4]

I go one more link from the Government website:

It shows in the link WHO voted yea or nay. All 45 Democrats in the Senate voted YES.

H.R. 4655 (105th): Iraq Liberation Act of 1998

View attachment 470479

Stop being a total moron!

yap sure a free thinking independent. Yet all you do is make up pathetic excuses to defend the GOP failure.

OK let's test your "independence"

The political party most responsible for the failure of the war in Iraq:
1. GOP
2. Dem

I will be waiting for your reply...

Ask Saddam Hussein.

Let us know when he replies, jackass.

 

[Markle]

In typical GOP fashion, Trumpers are trying to spin reality on wars and war mongering.

GWB lied to the world and exaggerated the threat of Iraq and convinced idiot republicans we needed to go to war in Iraq, when we clearly didn't. On top of that Bush and the idiot republicans totally fucked up and mismanaged the war and it turned into a mega disaster. The vast majority of the problems in the Mid east today, are the result of Bush and the GOP failure there.

Fox News also pumped and promoted the war, aling with the GOP. Hannity and O'Rielly pumped the war on a daily basis. Most idiot Trumpers forget what they were saying back in 2002/2003/2004...

If you opposed war in Iraq you "hated America" and were labeled "unpatriotic" Even though we were the smart ones, the correct ones (per usual).

The main reason the Mid East is an epic cluster fuck shit show, is because of GWB and the GOP. They got us into Iraq, and they fucked it up, and fucked it up big time. If you opposed War in Iraq, you were labeled "unpatriotic" by Fox News and Republicans. Idiot republicans seem to forget this fact and somehow try to act like they oppose these stupid wars, when they are the ones that started them...
The GOP is the party of war mongering, not the Dems why are republicans suddenly trying to claim the opposite??

A skeptical journalist isn't an unpatriotic one

Over the past 18 months or so, I've received more complaints from readers about "unpatriotic" news coverage than any other issue.

www.latimes.com

10 years after Iraq; don't expect any apologies

Back in March 2003, the acronym "WMD" became the stated reason for America's attack on a sovereign nation that would last nine years with 4,480 U.S. deaths.

onmilwaukee.com

Is it Anti-American to be Anti-War?

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceab…

www.baltimoresun.com

And republicans since mccain have been itching to bomb Iran.

 

[Markle]

In typical GOP fashion, Trumpers are trying to spin reality on wars and war mongering.

GWB lied to the world and exaggerated the threat of Iraq and convinced idiot republicans we needed to go to war in Iraq, when we clearly didn't. On top of that Bush and the idiot republicans totally fucked up and mismanaged the war and it turned into a mega disaster. The vast majority of the problems in the Mid east today, are the result of Bush and the GOP failure there.

Fox News also pumped and promoted the war, aling with the GOP. Hannity and O'Rielly pumped the war on a daily basis. Most idiot Trumpers forget what they were saying back in 2002/2003/2004...

If you opposed war in Iraq you "hated America" and were labeled "unpatriotic" Even though we were the smart ones, the correct ones (per usual).

The main reason the Mid East is an epic cluster fuck shit show, is because of GWB and the GOP. They got us into Iraq, and they fucked it up, and fucked it up big time. If you opposed War in Iraq, you were labeled "unpatriotic" by Fox News and Republicans. Idiot republicans seem to forget this fact and somehow try to act like they oppose these stupid wars, when they are the ones that started them...
The GOP is the party of war mongering, not the Dems why are republicans suddenly trying to claim the opposite??

A skeptical journalist isn't an unpatriotic one

Over the past 18 months or so, I've received more complaints from readers about "unpatriotic" news coverage than any other issue.

www.latimes.com

10 years after Iraq; don't expect any apologies

Back in March 2003, the acronym "WMD" became the stated reason for America's attack on a sovereign nation that would last nine years with 4,480 U.S. deaths.

onmilwaukee.com

Is it Anti-American to be Anti-War?

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceab…

www.baltimoresun.com

I was in here grappling with the right wingers over Bush's wars, and they're the same people who are such doves now.

The difference? Trump, of course. They're very easily manipulated.

How many wars did Obama start and how many did Trump start?

 

[Mac1958]

In typical GOP fashion, Trumpers are trying to spin reality on wars and war mongering.

GWB lied to the world and exaggerated the threat of Iraq and convinced idiot republicans we needed to go to war in Iraq, when we clearly didn't. On top of that Bush and the idiot republicans totally fucked up and mismanaged the war and it turned into a mega disaster. The vast majority of the problems in the Mid east today, are the result of Bush and the GOP failure there.

Fox News also pumped and promoted the war, aling with the GOP. Hannity and O'Rielly pumped the war on a daily basis. Most idiot Trumpers forget what they were saying back in 2002/2003/2004...

If you opposed war in Iraq you "hated America" and were labeled "unpatriotic" Even though we were the smart ones, the correct ones (per usual).

The main reason the Mid East is an epic cluster fuck shit show, is because of GWB and the GOP. They got us into Iraq, and they fucked it up, and fucked it up big time. If you opposed War in Iraq, you were labeled "unpatriotic" by Fox News and Republicans. Idiot republicans seem to forget this fact and somehow try to act like they oppose these stupid wars, when they are the ones that started them...
The GOP is the party of war mongering, not the Dems why are republicans suddenly trying to claim the opposite??

A skeptical journalist isn't an unpatriotic one

Over the past 18 months or so, I've received more complaints from readers about "unpatriotic" news coverage than any other issue.

www.latimes.com

10 years after Iraq; don't expect any apologies

Back in March 2003, the acronym "WMD" became the stated reason for America's attack on a sovereign nation that would last nine years with 4,480 U.S. deaths.

onmilwaukee.com

Is it Anti-American to be Anti-War?

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceab…

www.baltimoresun.com

I was in here grappling with the right wingers over Bush's wars, and they're the same people who are such doves now.

The difference? Trump, of course. They're very easily manipulated.

How many wars did Obama start and how many did Trump start?

Did you think I wouldn't notice you trying to change the subject?

Fail.

 

[jc456]

GWB lied to the world and exaggerated the threat of Iraq and convinced idiot republicans we needed to go to war in Iraq, when we clearly didn't.

Clearly the FACTS prove you wrong but you firmly believe that if you keep on telling a lie, sooner or later it will be believed. You are wrong. Why do you persist? Are you that desperate to divert attention to the trainwreck now happening in the Oval Office?

The United Nations had issued dozens of resolutions condemning Saddam Hussein and finally issuing a Resolution to use force to take down Hussein as did the US Congress. So really, can your lies.

Here is what your fellow Democrats said about Saddam Hussein. You may have forgotten.

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow."
- President Clinton in 1998 “

[…], when I say to Saddam Hussein, "You cannot defy the will of the world", and when I say to him, "You have used weapons of mass destruction before; we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again.”
- President Clinton , Jan. 27, 1998 – State of the Union


"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 .

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

“Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraqis nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.”

“Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.”

“Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.”

- President Bill Clinton, Dec. 16, 1998


"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed."
- Madeline Albright, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "

Update: September 8, 2005 - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser was sentenced to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them..

[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 .

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 .

Former Vice President Joe Biden urged the U.S. government in 1998 to pursue a strategy to ‘dethrone’ Saddam Hussein over allegations the Iraqi strongman was hiding weapons of mass destruction.

Biden, the-then ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was one of President Bill Clinton’s most vocal allies in the battle to pressure Hussein to abide by terms established after the Gulf War requiring Iraq to destroy its stockpile of chemical weapons. - Former Vice President Joe Biden 1998 1998: Joe Biden Urged U.S. to 'Dethrone' Saddam Hussein Over WMDs

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 .


"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 .

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 .

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons but has not yet achieved nuclear capability."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 .

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 .

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003" (Currently President Barack Hussein Obama’s Secretary of State)

I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out."
- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

"Saddam is gone and good riddance," former President Bill Clinton said yesterday, but he urged President Bush to resist trying to get even with nations that opposed the war.

"There are German and French soldiers in Afghanistan today. Does the President want them to come home?" Clinton said at a Manhattan forum on corporate integrity.

Democrats on Iraq + WMD's (Weapons of Mass Destruction)



He [President Clinton] praised Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for their handling of the war, but said Bush should have waited longer before attacking for the "chance that either [Saddam Hussein] would have disarmed or . . . we would have had far more members of the Security Council with us."

Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.

"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.

- Former President Clinton Wednesday, April 16, 2003

"Could Be One of the Great Achievements of This Administration" The vice president said he’d been to Iraq 17 times and visits the country every three months or so. "I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society" he said. "It's impressed me. I've been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences."

- Vice President Joe Biden (D) Feb. 10, 2010

How has the war President Barack Hussein Obama said we SHOULD have been fighting going? How is the Middle East going now that President Obama is President? Oh, Afghanistan just crossed 2,330 American fatalities. Seventy percent of whom died since President Obama took office.




And then the Obama administration wanted to TAKE CREDIT for the Iraq war…whew….

ttp://articles.nydailynews.com/2003-04-16/news/18226075_1_saddam-hussein-president-bush-security-council

We Fought A Good Fight, Clinton Says
BY JOEL SIEGEL
Wednesday, April 16, 2003
"Saddam is gone and good riddance," former President Bill Clinton said yesterday, but he urged President Bush to resist trying to get even with nations that opposed the war.

"There are German and French soldiers in Afghanistan today. Does the President want them to come home?" Clinton said at a Manhattan forum on corporate integrity.

He praised Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for their handling of the war, but said Bush should have waited longer before attacking for the "chance that either [Saddam Hussein] would have disarmed or . . . we would have had far more members of the Security Council with us."

Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.

"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.

If bush lied every one of them did as well. No way around it