Republicans want these children to go to the boys room. Promise they will be "safe"

Funny how no one can ever answer this question?

And, if an XX male wants his penis cut off to look female, is he transgender?

They are genetic anomalies, and remain genetic anomalies. Transgender is a regressive invention to demand the normalization of the mentally ill.

Mental illness is highly subjective. The guy who wants to own 100 guns might be said to be mentally ill.

So might a woman who has a hundred dolls, or they might be called collectors. But neither are saying they are something other than nature made them.
 
Funny how no one can ever answer this question?

And, if an XX male wants his penis cut off to look female, is he transgender?

They are genetic anomalies, and remain genetic anomalies. Transgender is a regressive invention to demand the normalization of the mentally ill.

Mental illness is highly subjective. The guy who wants to own 100 guns might be said to be mentally ill.

So might a woman who has a hundred dolls, or they might be called collectors. But neither are saying they are something other than nature made them.
Nature makes lots of mistakes, and we are pretty goddamned good at fixing them. To say transgender people are wrong, you'd have to be able to define how you identity gender, and you cannot.
 
Faghadist always had the right to get married and millions upon millions did, there was no discrimination.
Just save it. You don't like others being equal to you. You wouldn't have liked when blacks could legally marry whites either. Probably still don't.

Keep talking and showing your total freaking ignorance. I was actually alive and old enough to remember when when these issues were debated. I'm also old enough to see when some folks want to be more equal than others. Rights aren't determined by behavior or mental illness.
How does being able to do exactly the same thing as others make one more equal?

What is it you fail to understand that they were already doing "exactly the same thing as others" before the court got involved in a subject it had no jurisdiction in.
Same thing? No, the same thing was to be able to marry the other single adult you love, what gays now have likes others.

Just save it, your childishness bores me.

Why should they be confined to a single adult, isn't love the most important thing? Also people have been getting married through arrangements of convenience, where love had nothing to do with it, should we nullify those marriages?
 
What about boys who “identify” as girls and want to play on the girls’ softball team? Or how about a male coach who "identifies" as female and wants to coach a girls PE class (that includes full access to the girls locker room and showers, of course!)??

..

The cultural Marxists are never satisfied. I give it a month......
 
Funny how no one can ever answer this question?

And, if an XX male wants his penis cut off to look female, is he transgender?

They are genetic anomalies, and remain genetic anomalies. Transgender is a regressive invention to demand the normalization of the mentally ill.

Mental illness is highly subjective. The guy who wants to own 100 guns might be said to be mentally ill.

So might a woman who has a hundred dolls, or they might be called collectors. But neither are saying they are something other than nature made them.
Nature makes lots of mistakes, and we are pretty goddamned good at fixing them. To say transgender people are wrong, you'd have to be able to define how you identity gender, and you cannot.

Can't identify gender, really? Doctors and midwives have been doing exactly that since the dawn of time. Gender is a physical attribute, not psychological. And denial of what you physically are is a mental disorder.
 
T9 is education,. dumbfuck.

"No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance."

While Title IX is best known for its impact on high school and collegiate athletics, the original statute made no explicit mention of sports.[4]

Title IX - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Try reading the whole page, you might not be so ignorant when you're finished.
Maybe everyone should read:
Explaining bathroom bills, transgender rights, and equal protection

From :
Fact Check: Do existing federal civil rights laws already protect transgender people?

The three laws are Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which bans workplace bias based upon sex, and two laws that ban sex bias in programs funded with federal tax dollars: Title IX of a federal educational benefits law passed in 1972, and a 2013 provision of the Violence Against Women Act. Individually, and taken together, those laws – according to Justice Department officials – definitely ban discrimination based on a transgender person’s “gender identity.” (The law that has been applied most expansively in that way is Title VII, primarily because of the energetic use of that law for the past four years by the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in job bias cases.)

Sounds to me as if the DOJ has the weight of earlier decisions on their side. They're attorneys; they're not going to sue if they're sure they'll lose. Bigots should back off. No one is going to be accosted in the women's room and you all know it. Same scare tactics bigots were using before the Civil Rights Act was passed.
All this is doing is further turning us into enemies against fellow Americans.

Right, the weight of decisions made by bureaucrats who are consistently trying to expand their own power. If the folks that support the mentally ill are to be believed, sex and gender are not related, of the laws prohibiting discrimination base on sex wouldn't apply. Simple as that, if trans bias was legal at the time the laws were passed, bending the definitions now makes no sense. Well except in the regressive mind.

But on the other hand, you have no problem extending the 2nd Amendment to weapons that were unknown at the time.

Right, just like you had no problem extending search warrant requirements for telephone records or computer records that were unknown at the time. Damn you regressives are stupid hypocrites.

You're the one who stepped in it.
 
While Title IX is best known for its impact on high school and collegiate athletics, the original statute made no explicit mention of sports.[4]

Title IX - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Try reading the whole page, you might not be so ignorant when you're finished.
Maybe everyone should read:
Explaining bathroom bills, transgender rights, and equal protection

From :
Fact Check: Do existing federal civil rights laws already protect transgender people?

The three laws are Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which bans workplace bias based upon sex, and two laws that ban sex bias in programs funded with federal tax dollars: Title IX of a federal educational benefits law passed in 1972, and a 2013 provision of the Violence Against Women Act. Individually, and taken together, those laws – according to Justice Department officials – definitely ban discrimination based on a transgender person’s “gender identity.” (The law that has been applied most expansively in that way is Title VII, primarily because of the energetic use of that law for the past four years by the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in job bias cases.)

Sounds to me as if the DOJ has the weight of earlier decisions on their side. They're attorneys; they're not going to sue if they're sure they'll lose. Bigots should back off. No one is going to be accosted in the women's room and you all know it. Same scare tactics bigots were using before the Civil Rights Act was passed.
All this is doing is further turning us into enemies against fellow Americans.

Right, the weight of decisions made by bureaucrats who are consistently trying to expand their own power. If the folks that support the mentally ill are to be believed, sex and gender are not related, of the laws prohibiting discrimination base on sex wouldn't apply. Simple as that, if trans bias was legal at the time the laws were passed, bending the definitions now makes no sense. Well except in the regressive mind.

But on the other hand, you have no problem extending the 2nd Amendment to weapons that were unknown at the time.

Right, just like you had no problem extending search warrant requirements for telephone records or computer records that were unknown at the time. Damn you regressives are stupid hypocrites.

You're the one who stepped in it.

No you're the one that can't seem to differentiate between reality and regressive fantasy. There are no federal laws on the books that identifies gender or gender identity as needing protection. Until congress decides to include it, this regime can't arbitrarily introduce it as such and compel anyone to comply with their whims. The regime clearly stated it's only a policy mandate and not a law. The supreme court has already ruled that the government can't withhold existing federal funds for refusing to comply with such edicts. See the ACA ruling in regards to State exchanges.
 
jackie-green-transgender-england.png


x_30_dtl_tgkids_preview_120.vembedlarge456.jpg



article-2126033-127E56B5000005DC-399_634x360.jpg


ap-transgender-first-grader-4_3.jpg


46944537.cached.jpg


kim_petrasx400.jpg


kim_1289556c.jpg


ad_194608752-e1454072709301.jpg


Republicans feel they have a winning issue that will help Trump become President. Forcing these young people to use the Men's Room. Republicans insist they would be perfectly safe. And they if they used the Women's Room, they would sexually attack women.

They look very dangerous, don't they?


^^^^^^ will commit suicide at a rate 20 times greater than their peers

Because......they have not been accepted by their families nor tolerated by society. That's partly on you, bigot.

When did society become obligated to accept everyone no matter how screwed up and abnormal they are?

Exactly

We can not be expected to accept anyone who refuse to accept themselves.

This is obviously obsessive compulsive behavior.

No matter what society does, a surgery will not change a Male to a Female.

Why draw the limit there?

People go through all sorts of procedures to alter themselves from what they really are. From breast implants to hair plugs and dyes to tanning booths to tummy tucks to vasectomies to hysterectomies.

None of them look for additional rights though

So, you might want to rethink your dumbfuckery
 
Why do Republicans want this guy:

16miami-web02-master675.jpg


And this guy:


Chaz_Bono_Oprah_600_by_400-600x400.jpg


To use the lady's rest room. I would never want either of these trans men to walk in on my wife or daughter. Why do Republicans?
 
Why do Republicans want this guy:

16miami-web02-master675.jpg


And this guy:


Chaz_Bono_Oprah_600_by_400-600x400.jpg


To use the lady's rest room. I would never want either of these trans men to walk in on my wife or daughter. Why do Republicans?

Because if they have a dick, they're men.

There I go being all scientific and shit n
 
Why do Republicans want this guy:

16miami-web02-master675.jpg


And this guy:


Chaz_Bono_Oprah_600_by_400-600x400.jpg


To use the lady's rest room. I would never want either of these trans men to walk in on my wife or daughter. Why do Republicans?

Because if they have a dick, they're men.

There I go being all scientific and shit n
It's all about looks to these people who can deal only with A's or B's so, operate early and often. Problem solved.
 
Why do Republicans want this guy:

16miami-web02-master675.jpg


And this guy:


Chaz_Bono_Oprah_600_by_400-600x400.jpg


To use the lady's rest room. I would never want either of these trans men to walk in on my wife or daughter. Why do Republicans?

Because if they have a dick, they're men.

There I go being all scientific and shit n
It's all about looks to these people who can deal only with A's or B's so, operate early and often. Problem solved.

No, the looks mean nothing. A surgically altered dick is still a dick. When a male tranny has a period or gives birth give us a call. Until then, they ain't Women.

PERIOD.
 
Why do Republicans want this guy:

16miami-web02-master675.jpg


And this guy:


Chaz_Bono_Oprah_600_by_400-600x400.jpg


To use the lady's rest room. I would never want either of these trans men to walk in on my wife or daughter. Why do Republicans?

Because if they have a dick, they're men.

There I go being all scientific and shit n
It's all about looks to these people who can deal only with A's or B's so, operate early and often. Problem solved.

No, the looks mean nothing. A surgically altered dick is still a dick. When a male tranny has a period or gives birth give us a call. Until then, they ain't Women.

PERIOD.
Looks mean everything. You just said if they have dicks they're men. So, the reverse is also true. Problem solved.
 
Why do Republicans want this guy:

16miami-web02-master675.jpg


And this guy:


Chaz_Bono_Oprah_600_by_400-600x400.jpg


To use the lady's rest room. I would never want either of these trans men to walk in on my wife or daughter. Why do Republicans?

Because if they have a dick, they're men.

There I go being all scientific and shit n
It's all about looks to these people who can deal only with A's or B's so, operate early and often. Problem solved.

No, the looks mean nothing. A surgically altered dick is still a dick. When a male tranny has a period or gives birth give us a call. Until then, they ain't Women.

PERIOD.
Looks mean everything. You just said if they have dicks they're men. So, the reverse is also true. Problem solved.

I said no such thing. But thanks for playing.

A dick has a function that's only available to males.

Surgically altering the form does not alter the function of the system the dick is a part of.
 
Why do Republicans want this guy:

16miami-web02-master675.jpg


And this guy:


Chaz_Bono_Oprah_600_by_400-600x400.jpg


To use the lady's rest room. I would never want either of these trans men to walk in on my wife or daughter. Why do Republicans?

Because if they have a dick, they're men.

There I go being all scientific and shit n
It's all about looks to these people who can deal only with A's or B's so, operate early and often. Problem solved.

No, the looks mean nothing. A surgically altered dick is still a dick. When a male tranny has a period or gives birth give us a call. Until then, they ain't Women.

PERIOD.
Looks mean everything. You just said if they have dicks they're men. So, the reverse is also true. Problem solved.

I said no such thing. But thanks for playing.

A dick has a function that's only available to males.

Surgically altering the form does not alter the function of the system the dick is a part of.
You'd better make up your mind which bathroom people with dicks use, and the opposite.
 
^^^^^^ will commit suicide at a rate 20 times greater than their peers

Because......they have not been accepted by their families nor tolerated by society. That's partly on you, bigot.

When did society become obligated to accept everyone no matter how screwed up and abnormal they are?

Exactly

We can not be expected to accept anyone who refuse to accept themselves.

This is obviously obsessive compulsive behavior.

No matter what society does, a surgery will not change a Male to a Female.

Why draw the limit there?

People go through all sorts of procedures to alter themselves from what they really are. From breast implants to hair plugs and dyes to tanning booths to tummy tucks to vasectomies to hysterectomies.

None of them look for additional rights though

So, you might want to rethink your dumbfuckery

None of them are changing gender identity, a right protected in certain circumstances by Title VII.
 
QUACK!!! QUACK!!
DISTRACT!!! DISTRACT!!
ATTACK!!!ATTACK!! ATTACK!!

Anything to keep from discussing the real issues- immigration, the economy, foreign policy, etc...

Nobody cares about what bathrroom trannies use, not even the trannies.

/thread
 
QUACK!!! QUACK!!
DISTRACT!!! DISTRACT!!
ATTACK!!!ATTACK!! ATTACK!!

Anything to keep from discussing the real issues- immigration, the economy, foreign policy, etc...

Nobody cares about what bathrroom trannies use, not even the trannies.

/thread
If no one cares why do asshole states like NC keep trying to pass laws against them? Apparently someone cares.
 
Because if they have a dick, they're men.

There I go being all scientific and shit n
It's all about looks to these people who can deal only with A's or B's so, operate early and often. Problem solved.

No, the looks mean nothing. A surgically altered dick is still a dick. When a male tranny has a period or gives birth give us a call. Until then, they ain't Women.

PERIOD.
Looks mean everything. You just said if they have dicks they're men. So, the reverse is also true. Problem solved.

I said no such thing. But thanks for playing.

A dick has a function that's only available to males.

Surgically altering the form does not alter the function of the system the dick is a part of.
You'd better make up your mind which bathroom people with dicks use, and the opposite.

I couldn't be more clear.

You seem confused

Perhaps some brain surgery is called for?
 

Forum List

Back
Top