Republicans want these children to go to the boys room. Promise they will be "safe"

[Jack4jill]

Wrong, it deals with discrimination based on sex, not gender or gender identity. The dear leader is trying another one of his end runs around congress, saying it does, when there is no such language in the law. Don't believe me look it up.

Leftwing douche bags have always believed that the government can interpret laws to mean whatever they want them to mean.

Judicial interpretation of the law is a constitutionally sanctioned power.

This is a bunch of regressive bureaucrats trying to bend the law to fit their agenda, not a court. Title 9 was passed to ensure equal funding and facilities for mens and womens sports. It has nothing to do with which bathroom mentally ill people use.

T9 is education,. dumbfuck.

"No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance."

So how does making someone with a penis use the men's room violate his rights under Title 9?

Is the person with the penis transgender? T9 deals with gender.

And, if an XX male wants his penis cut off to look female, is he transgender?

 

[Jack4jill]

Leftwing douche bags have always believed that the government can interpret laws to mean whatever they want them to mean.

Judicial interpretation of the law is a constitutionally sanctioned power.

Just one of the many errors in the Constitution.

No, because it's not in the Constitution, it was a power the courts granted themselves. It's unconstitutional.

So you would take away the power of the Court to determine if a state or local ban on handguns was constitutional?

It's job of the courts to determine if a law is constitutionally compliant, not redefine the meaning of laws, that's the job of the legislature.

Redefine like finding that gays are also equal when it comes to getting married?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

The Republicans push their god on everyone,,,,fuck that party.

How are you any different? Your god is the government.

 

[OKTexas]

Judicial interpretation of the law is a constitutionally sanctioned power.

Just one of the many errors in the Constitution.

No, because it's not in the Constitution, it was a power the courts granted themselves. It's unconstitutional.

So you would take away the power of the Court to determine if a state or local ban on handguns was constitutional?

It's job of the courts to determine if a law is constitutionally compliant, not redefine the meaning of laws, that's the job of the legislature.

Redefine like finding that gays are also equal when it comes to getting married?

Faghadist always had the right to get married and millions upon millions did, there was no discrimination.

 

[Jack4jill]

Just one of the many errors in the Constitution.

No, because it's not in the Constitution, it was a power the courts granted themselves. It's unconstitutional.

So you would take away the power of the Court to determine if a state or local ban on handguns was constitutional?

It's job of the courts to determine if a law is constitutionally compliant, not redefine the meaning of laws, that's the job of the legislature.

Redefine like finding that gays are also equal when it comes to getting married?

Faghadist always had the right to get married and millions upon millions did, there was no discrimination.

Just save it. You don't like others being equal to you. You wouldn't have liked when blacks could legally marry whites either. Probably still don't.

 

[Jack4jill]

Funny how no one can ever answer this question?

And, if an XX male wants his penis cut off to look female, is he transgender?

 

[OKTexas]

No, because it's not in the Constitution, it was a power the courts granted themselves. It's unconstitutional.

So you would take away the power of the Court to determine if a state or local ban on handguns was constitutional?

It's job of the courts to determine if a law is constitutionally compliant, not redefine the meaning of laws, that's the job of the legislature.

Redefine like finding that gays are also equal when it comes to getting married?

Faghadist always had the right to get married and millions upon millions did, there was no discrimination.

Just save it. You don't like others being equal to you. You wouldn't have liked when blacks could legally marry whites either. Probably still don't.

Keep talking and showing your total freaking ignorance. I was actually alive and old enough to remember when when these issues were debated. I'm also old enough to see when some folks want to be more equal than others. Rights aren't determined by behavior or mental illness.

 

[OKTexas]

Funny how no one can ever answer this question?

And, if an XX male wants his penis cut off to look female, is he transgender?

They are genetic anomalies, and remain genetic anomalies. Transgender is a regressive invention to demand the normalization of the mentally ill.

 

[Jack4jill]

Funny how no one can ever answer this question?

And, if an XX male wants his penis cut off to look female, is he transgender?

They are genetic anomalies, and remain genetic anomalies. Transgender is a regressive invention to demand the normalization of the mentally ill.

Another one, who can't answer the question.

"The Six Most Common Karyotypes
The six biological karyotype sexes that do not result in death to the fetus are:

• X – Roughly 1 in 2,000 to 1 in 5,000 people (Turner’s )
• XX – Most common form of female
• XXY – Roughly 1 in 500 to 1 in 1,000 people (Klinefelter)
• XY – Most common form of male
• XYY – Roughly 1 out of 1,000 people
• XXXY – Roughly 1 in 18,000 to 1 in 50,000 births

When you consider that there are 7,000,000,000 alive on the planet, there are almost assuredly tens of millions of people who are not male or female. Many times, these people are unaware of their true sex. It’s interesting to note that everyone assumes that they, personally, are XY or XX. One study in Great Britain showed that 97 out of 100 people who were XYY had no idea. They thought they were a traditional male and had few signs otherwise.

Even today, we irrationally, and rather stupidly, think of someone as a “man” if they look masculine and as a “woman” if the look feminine. It’s entirely arbitrary and can lead to some significant misunderstandings of how the world actually works."
The 6 Most Common Biological Sexes in Humans

 

[Jack4jill]

So you would take away the power of the Court to determine if a state or local ban on handguns was constitutional?

It's job of the courts to determine if a law is constitutionally compliant, not redefine the meaning of laws, that's the job of the legislature.

Redefine like finding that gays are also equal when it comes to getting married?

Faghadist always had the right to get married and millions upon millions did, there was no discrimination.

Just save it. You don't like others being equal to you. You wouldn't have liked when blacks could legally marry whites either. Probably still don't.

Keep talking and showing your total freaking ignorance. I was actually alive and old enough to remember when when these issues were debated. I'm also old enough to see when some folks want to be more equal than others. Rights aren't determined by behavior or mental illness.

How does being able to do exactly the same thing as others make one more equal?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

At least he went to pee and poo in the Right bathroom..not like "those people"



Vehemently Anti-Gay Pastor Arrested On 70 Counts Of Child Porn
A tip sent to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children led police to the Cornerstone Bible Fellowship Church in Arkansas.

 

[OKTexas]

Funny how no one can ever answer this question?

And, if an XX male wants his penis cut off to look female, is he transgender?

They are genetic anomalies, and remain genetic anomalies. Transgender is a regressive invention to demand the normalization of the mentally ill.

Another one, who can't answer the question.

"The Six Most Common Karyotypes
The six biological karyotype sexes that do not result in death to the fetus are:

• X – Roughly 1 in 2,000 to 1 in 5,000 people (Turner’s )
• XX – Most common form of female
• XXY – Roughly 1 in 500 to 1 in 1,000 people (Klinefelter)
• XY – Most common form of male
• XYY – Roughly 1 out of 1,000 people
• XXXY – Roughly 1 in 18,000 to 1 in 50,000 births

When you consider that there are 7,000,000,000 alive on the planet, there are almost assuredly tens of millions of people who are not male or female. Many times, these people are unaware of their true sex. It’s interesting to note that everyone assumes that they, personally, are XY or XX. One study in Great Britain showed that 97 out of 100 people who were XYY had no idea. They thought they were a traditional male and had few signs otherwise.

Even today, we irrationally, and rather stupidly, think of someone as a “man” if they look masculine and as a “woman” if the look feminine. It’s entirely arbitrary and can lead to some significant misunderstandings of how the world actually works."
The 6 Most Common Biological Sexes in Humans

I guess you don't know what an anomaly is. But even your stats refer to these anomalies as male or female, meaning they are variations of the same sex.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Judicial interpretation of the law is a constitutionally sanctioned power.

This is a bunch of regressive bureaucrats trying to bend the law to fit their agenda, not a court. Title 9 was passed to ensure equal funding and facilities for mens and womens sports. It has nothing to do with which bathroom mentally ill people use.

T9 is education,. dumbfuck.

"No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance."

While Title IX is best known for its impact on high school and collegiate athletics, the original statute made no explicit mention of sports.[4]

Title IX - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Try reading the whole page, you might not be so ignorant when you're finished.

Maybe everyone should read:
Explaining bathroom bills, transgender rights, and equal protection

From :
Fact Check: Do existing federal civil rights laws already protect transgender people?

The three laws are Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which bans workplace bias based upon sex, and two laws that ban sex bias in programs funded with federal tax dollars: Title IX of a federal educational benefits law passed in 1972, and a 2013 provision of the Violence Against Women Act. Individually, and taken together, those laws – according to Justice Department officials – definitely ban discrimination based on a transgender person’s “gender identity.” (The law that has been applied most expansively in that way is Title VII, primarily because of the energetic use of that law for the past four years by the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in job bias cases.)

Sounds to me as if the DOJ has the weight of earlier decisions on their side. They're attorneys; they're not going to sue if they're sure they'll lose. Bigots should back off. No one is going to be accosted in the women's room and you all know it. Same scare tactics bigots were using before the Civil Rights Act was passed.
All this is doing is further turning us into enemies against fellow Americans.

Right, the weight of decisions made by bureaucrats who are consistently trying to expand their own power. If the folks that support the mentally ill are to be believed, sex and gender are not related, of the laws prohibiting discrimination base on sex wouldn't apply. Simple as that, if trans bias was legal at the time the laws were passed, bending the definitions now makes no sense. Well except in the regressive mind.

But on the other hand, you have no problem extending the 2nd Amendment to weapons that were unknown at the time.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Funny how no one can ever answer this question?

And, if an XX male wants his penis cut off to look female, is he transgender?

They are genetic anomalies, and remain genetic anomalies. Transgender is a regressive invention to demand the normalization of the mentally ill.

Mental illness is highly subjective. The guy who wants to own 100 guns might be said to be mentally ill.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Republicans feel they have a winning issue that will help Trump become President. Forcing these young people to use the Men's Room. Republicans insist they would be perfectly safe. And they if they used the Women's Room, they would sexually attack women.

They look very dangerous, don't they?

^^^^^^ will commit suicide at a rate 20 times greater than their peers

Because......they have not been accepted by their families nor tolerated by society. That's partly on you, bigot.

When did society become obligated to accept everyone no matter how screwed up and abnormal they are?

Exactly

We can not be expected to accept anyone who refuse to accept themselves.

This is obviously obsessive compulsive behavior.

No matter what society does, a surgery will not change a Male to a Female.

Why draw the limit there?

People go through all sorts of procedures to alter themselves from what they really are. From breast implants to hair plugs and dyes to tanning booths to tummy tucks to vasectomies to hysterectomies.

 

[OKTexas]

It's job of the courts to determine if a law is constitutionally compliant, not redefine the meaning of laws, that's the job of the legislature.

Redefine like finding that gays are also equal when it comes to getting married?

Faghadist always had the right to get married and millions upon millions did, there was no discrimination.

Just save it. You don't like others being equal to you. You wouldn't have liked when blacks could legally marry whites either. Probably still don't.

Keep talking and showing your total freaking ignorance. I was actually alive and old enough to remember when when these issues were debated. I'm also old enough to see when some folks want to be more equal than others. Rights aren't determined by behavior or mental illness.

How does being able to do exactly the same thing as others make one more equal?

What is it you fail to understand that they were already doing "exactly the same thing as others" before the court got involved in a subject it had no jurisdiction in.

 

[Jack4jill]

Funny how no one can ever answer this question?

And, if an XX male wants his penis cut off to look female, is he transgender?

They are genetic anomalies, and remain genetic anomalies. Transgender is a regressive invention to demand the normalization of the mentally ill.

Another one, who can't answer the question.

"The Six Most Common Karyotypes
The six biological karyotype sexes that do not result in death to the fetus are:

• X – Roughly 1 in 2,000 to 1 in 5,000 people (Turner’s )
• XX – Most common form of female
• XXY – Roughly 1 in 500 to 1 in 1,000 people (Klinefelter)
• XY – Most common form of male
• XYY – Roughly 1 out of 1,000 people
• XXXY – Roughly 1 in 18,000 to 1 in 50,000 births

When you consider that there are 7,000,000,000 alive on the planet, there are almost assuredly tens of millions of people who are not male or female. Many times, these people are unaware of their true sex. It’s interesting to note that everyone assumes that they, personally, are XY or XX. One study in Great Britain showed that 97 out of 100 people who were XYY had no idea. They thought they were a traditional male and had few signs otherwise.

Even today, we irrationally, and rather stupidly, think of someone as a “man” if they look masculine and as a “woman” if the look feminine. It’s entirely arbitrary and can lead to some significant misunderstandings of how the world actually works."
The 6 Most Common Biological Sexes in Humans

I guess you don't know what an anomaly is. But even your stats refer to these anomalies as male or female, meaning they are variations of the same sex.

Read the link, and find people who are both male and female, at the same time. You are black and white, nature isn't.

 

[Jack4jill]

Redefine like finding that gays are also equal when it comes to getting married?

Faghadist always had the right to get married and millions upon millions did, there was no discrimination.

Just save it. You don't like others being equal to you. You wouldn't have liked when blacks could legally marry whites either. Probably still don't.

Keep talking and showing your total freaking ignorance. I was actually alive and old enough to remember when when these issues were debated. I'm also old enough to see when some folks want to be more equal than others. Rights aren't determined by behavior or mental illness.

How does being able to do exactly the same thing as others make one more equal?

What is it you fail to understand that they were already doing "exactly the same thing as others" before the court got involved in a subject it had no jurisdiction in.

Same thing? No, the same thing was to be able to marry the other single adult you love, what gays now have likes others.

Just save it, your childishness bores me.

 

[Zander]

Can an NBA player “identify” as a woman and play in the WNBA?

Surely this is coming......

 

[OKTexas]

This is a bunch of regressive bureaucrats trying to bend the law to fit their agenda, not a court. Title 9 was passed to ensure equal funding and facilities for mens and womens sports. It has nothing to do with which bathroom mentally ill people use.

T9 is education,. dumbfuck.

"No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance."

While Title IX is best known for its impact on high school and collegiate athletics, the original statute made no explicit mention of sports.[4]

Title IX - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Try reading the whole page, you might not be so ignorant when you're finished.

Maybe everyone should read:
Explaining bathroom bills, transgender rights, and equal protection

From :
Fact Check: Do existing federal civil rights laws already protect transgender people?

The three laws are Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which bans workplace bias based upon sex, and two laws that ban sex bias in programs funded with federal tax dollars: Title IX of a federal educational benefits law passed in 1972, and a 2013 provision of the Violence Against Women Act. Individually, and taken together, those laws – according to Justice Department officials – definitely ban discrimination based on a transgender person’s “gender identity.” (The law that has been applied most expansively in that way is Title VII, primarily because of the energetic use of that law for the past four years by the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in job bias cases.)

Sounds to me as if the DOJ has the weight of earlier decisions on their side. They're attorneys; they're not going to sue if they're sure they'll lose. Bigots should back off. No one is going to be accosted in the women's room and you all know it. Same scare tactics bigots were using before the Civil Rights Act was passed.
All this is doing is further turning us into enemies against fellow Americans.

Right, the weight of decisions made by bureaucrats who are consistently trying to expand their own power. If the folks that support the mentally ill are to be believed, sex and gender are not related, of the laws prohibiting discrimination base on sex wouldn't apply. Simple as that, if trans bias was legal at the time the laws were passed, bending the definitions now makes no sense. Well except in the regressive mind.

But on the other hand, you have no problem extending the 2nd Amendment to weapons that were unknown at the time.

Right, just like you had no problem extending search warrant requirements for telephone records or computer records that were unknown at the time. Damn you regressives are stupid hypocrites.