Papageorgio
The Ultimate Winner
- May 18, 2010
- 61,514
- 18,689
I get it, if a business makes a profit the are greedy. and a $70,000 increase in overhead is no big deal to you. The real world is different though. Being the lib you are you LOVE spending other people's money.$192 times 365 is a right hefty overhead increase.Normally most or all businesses will close, shutdown or file bankruptcy it's because of the products.
When discussing MW increase the anti MW advocate make it sound like 1. Jump from $10 to $15 in one year. 2. Every one start working today making $15..
When in reality a lot of these people already making $13 to $18.
If a restaurant owner has 12 employees working let say 8 hours (mostly don't work 8 hours) making $13/hour now then overnight jump to $15. That is $2/hour increase x 8= $16/employees x 12 employees = At the maximum the owner will cost him extra $192 per day. Big F deal.
All she/he have to do is slightly increase the prices of soda 25 cents there, alcohol 80cents there, menus etc etc etc. Menu prices increases just about every year because of other things like inflation adjustment ----- So what is new now?
At the maximum the owner will cost him extra $192 per day. Big F deal.
How much do they need to increase sales to earn the extra $192 per day that you think is no big deal?
True but that is part of running a business. Most do not open 7 days.
Restaurants can easily recoup that cost by increasing the price of menus, alcoholic or non alcoholic beverages. Menu prices goes up all the time even before the MW increase fiasco.
Let say you and your wife went for a dinner normally will cost you $40 the menu increase to $47, + 2 glasses of red romantic red wine from $12 to $14, Total of $11 increase ( do not ask for toothpick) You might ask for another 2 glasses, that is just the 2 of you. How much is that now? In my case I normally ask for the bottle so I can get horny. How about a group of 3, 4, 6 or more? In 8 hours.
In reality the business owner already figured out how much she/he can increase by percentage to reach that $192 threshold. If computerized he doesn't even need to run a query.
In reality she/he will use a higher threshold like $400. as an example. That is how greedy democrats or republicans business owners does.
I'm talking to you about reality in life here in a NICELY passion. You don't own a business so I do not expect you to understand what the fuck I'm talking about. ALL business owners even Trump or you if you have a chance are greedy. Repeat ALL. ALL business owners will try to maximize profits including Trump. There are no exceptions unless you work for charity.
I never said the $70k overhead is no big deal but I was just giving you a real example how a restaurant owners can easily recover $192. No fucking bid deal.
That has nothing to do with me how people spend their money. Since when do you care how people spend or use their money?
Are you saying that stupid republicans like you really care others?
To make up $192 a day at a restaurant with an average profit margin of 3.6%, which seems to be the norm in the industry, the restaurant would need to produce $5,333.33 a day in added revenue to make up the $192 up. That would be an additional 1.9 million a year in added revenue.
That type of revenue is almost impossible for small restaurant to add without some hikes in pricing. So the small business owner will also eat some of the cost and decline his margins even more.
Large corporations that have several restaurants would have little less impact from this type of labor hike.
I think you will see fewer new restaurants and you will also see the small mom and pop restaurants to continue to disappear and leave us with the big corporations take even a larger market share.
Sad how we complain about big corporations have all the power and yet we keep finding ways to kill off the mom and pops and give the corporations more power.