Restaurants are adding labor surcharges to help offset minimum wage increases

[Markle]

A question silly boy boy how many German workers smoke pot like you?

The German populace also drinks a lot more than we do in the US.

 

[Campbell]

People say, "I didn't want Hillary because she would just be the same old same old". Yes, that is true. She would have continued steady growth. She would have continued to protect unions and social security. She would have doubled the debt but so will Trump. She would continue pushing free trade but that's because free trade is inevitable. She would have not won the war on terror but neither will Trump. But she would not have given massive tax breaks to the rich, which Trump will give. She would have insisted on making college affordable and fixing healthcare.

About doubling the debt.......guess who started it:

.....................................................Total U S Debt......................................................

09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)((Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

 

[Markle]

People say, "I didn't want Hillary because she would just be the same old same old". Yes, that is true. She would have continued steady growth. She would have continued to protect unions and social security. She would have doubled the debt but so will Trump. She would continue pushing free trade but that's because free trade is inevitable. She would have not won the war on terror but neither will Trump. But she would not have given massive tax breaks to the rich, which Trump will give. She would have insisted on making college affordable and fixing healthcare.

About doubling the debt.......guess who started it:

.....................................................Total U S Debt......................................................

09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)((Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

Somehow you left this out. I can't imagine how.

 

[August West]

You, who does not buy the union label, does not give any money for unions, does not own a car made by a union have already made it clear you do not support unions, you just pretend you do. You are a fake.

Oh no, I'm not fake. I've never supported unions in any way shape or form. They are as useful today as a buggy whip in a new car.

As for public sector unions, they should never have been allowed to form and should be eliminated.

My brother is a VP who deals with unions. He admits you are dead wrong. That without unions labor would be screwed. And for the record, it is sad labor in Germany is treated better than labor here in America.

Only 18% of Germans are in a union, so how is German workers treated better than the United States workers?

How are they treated better?
Government pension system, govt. healthcare system, govt. education system, etc. apply to everyone in Germany, union or not.

Not sure if that is treated better or not. Just because the government provides something, that does not make it better. We have a government education system, I am not impressed with it.

In the eyes of the German people, the govt. providing the things necessary for a decent life is a good thing. They don`t whine about high taxes when they see a return. Whether you`re impressed with our education system is irrelevant. Like the rest of us, you`re nobody and you need to learn to live with it. If you find paradise let us know.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Oh no, I'm not fake. I've never supported unions in any way shape or form. They are as useful today as a buggy whip in a new car.

As for public sector unions, they should never have been allowed to form and should be eliminated.

My brother is a VP who deals with unions. He admits you are dead wrong. That without unions labor would be screwed. And for the record, it is sad labor in Germany is treated better than labor here in America.

Only 18% of Germans are in a union, so how is German workers treated better than the United States workers?

How are they treated better?
Government pension system, govt. healthcare system, govt. education system, etc. apply to everyone in Germany, union or not.

Not sure if that is treated better or not. Just because the government provides something, that does not make it better. We have a government education system, I am not impressed with it.

In the eyes of the German people, the govt. providing the things necessary for a decent life is a good thing. They don`t whine about high taxes when they see a return. Whether you`re impressed with our education system is irrelevant. Like the rest of us, you`re nobody and you need to learn to live with it. If you find paradise let us know.

And the key word is Return

Where is our return of the trillions of dollars plus on welfare the past 50 years?


.

 

[sealybobo]

My brother is a VP who deals with unions. He admits you are dead wrong. That without unions labor would be screwed. And for the record, it is sad labor in Germany is treated better than labor here in America.

Only 18% of Germans are in a union, so how is German workers treated better than the United States workers?

How are they treated better?
Government pension system, govt. healthcare system, govt. education system, etc. apply to everyone in Germany, union or not.

Not sure if that is treated better or not. Just because the government provides something, that does not make it better. We have a government education system, I am not impressed with it.

In the eyes of the German people, the govt. providing the things necessary for a decent life is a good thing. They don`t whine about high taxes when they see a return. Whether you`re impressed with our education system is irrelevant. Like the rest of us, you`re nobody and you need to learn to live with it. If you find paradise let us know.

And the key word is Return

Where is our return of the trillions of dollars plus on welfare the past 50 years?


.

You're social security should be delayed by however long you are on welfare. Max five years you can be on welfare. But then someone who takes five years can't draw social security until they are 70

 

[sealybobo]

You, who does not buy the union label, does not give any money for unions, does not own a car made by a union have already made it clear you do not support unions, you just pretend you do. You are a fake.

Oh no, I'm not fake. I've never supported unions in any way shape or form. They are as useful today as a buggy whip in a new car.

As for public sector unions, they should never have been allowed to form and should be eliminated.

My brother is a VP who deals with unions. He admits you are dead wrong. That without unions labor would be screwed. And for the record, it is sad labor in Germany is treated better than labor here in America.

Only 18% of Germans are in a union, so how is German workers treated better than the United States workers?

How are they treated better?
Government pension system, govt. healthcare system, govt. education system, etc. apply to everyone in Germany, union or not.

It's the attitude.. German unions don't try to break a company, the unions want the company to succeed as much as the employees... Here the unions don't give a fuck

It sure is the attitude. In America the executives are cheap greedy dicks. Capitalists. In Germany the execs are more socialist. I work for Germans. They aren't cheap or dicks. And my brother worked in Switzerland for four years. Much slower pace. Home by five weekends off. Much easier being a German worker.

 

[Papageorgio]

Oh no, I'm not fake. I've never supported unions in any way shape or form. They are as useful today as a buggy whip in a new car.

As for public sector unions, they should never have been allowed to form and should be eliminated.

My brother is a VP who deals with unions. He admits you are dead wrong. That without unions labor would be screwed. And for the record, it is sad labor in Germany is treated better than labor here in America.

Only 18% of Germans are in a union, so how is German workers treated better than the United States workers?

How are they treated better?
Government pension system, govt. healthcare system, govt. education system, etc. apply to everyone in Germany, union or not.

Not sure if that is treated better or not. Just because the government provides something, that does not make it better. We have a government education system, I am not impressed with it.

In the eyes of the German people, the govt. providing the things necessary for a decent life is a good thing. They don`t whine about high taxes when they see a return. Whether you`re impressed with our education system is irrelevant. Like the rest of us, you`re nobody and you need to learn to live with it. If you find paradise let us know.

I found my paradise, I hope you find yours. I didn't need government to help me find it.

 

[Papageorgio]

Oh no, I'm not fake. I've never supported unions in any way shape or form. They are as useful today as a buggy whip in a new car.

As for public sector unions, they should never have been allowed to form and should be eliminated.

My brother is a VP who deals with unions. He admits you are dead wrong. That without unions labor would be screwed. And for the record, it is sad labor in Germany is treated better than labor here in America.

Only 18% of Germans are in a union, so how is German workers treated better than the United States workers?

How are they treated better?
Government pension system, govt. healthcare system, govt. education system, etc. apply to everyone in Germany, union or not.

It's the attitude.. German unions don't try to break a company, the unions want the company to succeed as much as the employees... Here the unions don't give a fuck

It sure is the attitude. In America the executives are cheap greedy dicks. Capitalists. In Germany the execs are more socialist. I work for Germans. They aren't cheap or dicks. And my brother worked in Switzerland for four years. Much slower pace. Home by five weekends off. Much easier being a German worker.

I work for an Americans they are cheap or dicks. I'm home by 5:30 and have weekends off, six weeks paid vacation, I don't usually take off more than two weeks off total a year. The rest goes unclaimed. I will sometimes send my vacation time to an employee that has a family need. Great American place to work.

 

[sealybobo]

My brother is a VP who deals with unions. He admits you are dead wrong. That without unions labor would be screwed. And for the record, it is sad labor in Germany is treated better than labor here in America.

Only 18% of Germans are in a union, so how is German workers treated better than the United States workers?

How are they treated better?
Government pension system, govt. healthcare system, govt. education system, etc. apply to everyone in Germany, union or not.

Not sure if that is treated better or not. Just because the government provides something, that does not make it better. We have a government education system, I am not impressed with it.

In the eyes of the German people, the govt. providing the things necessary for a decent life is a good thing. They don`t whine about high taxes when they see a return. Whether you`re impressed with our education system is irrelevant. Like the rest of us, you`re nobody and you need to learn to live with it. If you find paradise let us know.

I found my paradise, I hope you find yours. I didn't need government to help me find it.

Really? Go to Mexico or Somalian and try to become successful. Then you'll appreciate what your government did for you

 

[sealybobo]

My brother is a VP who deals with unions. He admits you are dead wrong. That without unions labor would be screwed. And for the record, it is sad labor in Germany is treated better than labor here in America.

Only 18% of Germans are in a union, so how is German workers treated better than the United States workers?

How are they treated better?
Government pension system, govt. healthcare system, govt. education system, etc. apply to everyone in Germany, union or not.

It's the attitude.. German unions don't try to break a company, the unions want the company to succeed as much as the employees... Here the unions don't give a fuck

It sure is the attitude. In America the executives are cheap greedy dicks. Capitalists. In Germany the execs are more socialist. I work for Germans. They aren't cheap or dicks. And my brother worked in Switzerland for four years. Much slower pace. Home by five weekends off. Much easier being a German worker.

I work for an Americans they are cheap or dicks. I'm home by 5:30 and have weekends off, six weeks paid vacation, I don't usually take off more than two weeks off total a year. The rest goes unclaimed. I will sometimes send my vacation time to an employee that has a family need. Great American place to work.

Youre always on usmb I thought you were retired

 

[Papageorgio]

Only 18% of Germans are in a union, so how is German workers treated better than the United States workers?

How are they treated better?
Government pension system, govt. healthcare system, govt. education system, etc. apply to everyone in Germany, union or not.

Not sure if that is treated better or not. Just because the government provides something, that does not make it better. We have a government education system, I am not impressed with it.

In the eyes of the German people, the govt. providing the things necessary for a decent life is a good thing. They don`t whine about high taxes when they see a return. Whether you`re impressed with our education system is irrelevant. Like the rest of us, you`re nobody and you need to learn to live with it. If you find paradise let us know.

I found my paradise, I hope you find yours. I didn't need government to help me find it.

Really? Go to Mexico or Somalian and try to become successful. Then you'll appreciate what your government did for you

Who said I didn't appreciate my government? You make silly assumptions.

 

[Papageorgio]

Only 18% of Germans are in a union, so how is German workers treated better than the United States workers?

How are they treated better?
Government pension system, govt. healthcare system, govt. education system, etc. apply to everyone in Germany, union or not.

It's the attitude.. German unions don't try to break a company, the unions want the company to succeed as much as the employees... Here the unions don't give a fuck

It sure is the attitude. In America the executives are cheap greedy dicks. Capitalists. In Germany the execs are more socialist. I work for Germans. They aren't cheap or dicks. And my brother worked in Switzerland for four years. Much slower pace. Home by five weekends off. Much easier being a German worker.

I work for an Americans they are cheap or dicks. I'm home by 5:30 and have weekends off, six weeks paid vacation, I don't usually take off more than two weeks off total a year. The rest goes unclaimed. I will sometimes send my vacation time to an employee that has a family need. Great American place to work.

Youre always on usmb I thought you were retired

That's the problem, you thought.

 

[August West]

My brother is a VP who deals with unions. He admits you are dead wrong. That without unions labor would be screwed. And for the record, it is sad labor in Germany is treated better than labor here in America.

Only 18% of Germans are in a union, so how is German workers treated better than the United States workers?

How are they treated better?
Government pension system, govt. healthcare system, govt. education system, etc. apply to everyone in Germany, union or not.

Not sure if that is treated better or not. Just because the government provides something, that does not make it better. We have a government education system, I am not impressed with it.

In the eyes of the German people, the govt. providing the things necessary for a decent life is a good thing. They don`t whine about high taxes when they see a return. Whether you`re impressed with our education system is irrelevant. Like the rest of us, you`re nobody and you need to learn to live with it. If you find paradise let us know.

And the key word is Return

Where is our return of the trillions of dollars plus on welfare the past 50 years?


.

Where is the return on the trillions we`ve squandered on military adventures since the end of WW2?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Only 18% of Germans are in a union, so how is German workers treated better than the United States workers?

How are they treated better?
Government pension system, govt. healthcare system, govt. education system, etc. apply to everyone in Germany, union or not.

Not sure if that is treated better or not. Just because the government provides something, that does not make it better. We have a government education system, I am not impressed with it.

In the eyes of the German people, the govt. providing the things necessary for a decent life is a good thing. They don`t whine about high taxes when they see a return. Whether you`re impressed with our education system is irrelevant. Like the rest of us, you`re nobody and you need to learn to live with it. If you find paradise let us know.

And the key word is Return

Where is our return of the trillions of dollars plus on welfare the past 50 years?


.

Where is the return on the trillions we`ve squandered on military adventures since the end of WW2?

Kind of obvious even to a liberal like you, we are not speaking Russian are we?


And these

 

[August West]

How are they treated better?
Government pension system, govt. healthcare system, govt. education system, etc. apply to everyone in Germany, union or not.

Not sure if that is treated better or not. Just because the government provides something, that does not make it better. We have a government education system, I am not impressed with it.

In the eyes of the German people, the govt. providing the things necessary for a decent life is a good thing. They don`t whine about high taxes when they see a return. Whether you`re impressed with our education system is irrelevant. Like the rest of us, you`re nobody and you need to learn to live with it. If you find paradise let us know.

And the key word is Return

Where is our return of the trillions of dollars plus on welfare the past 50 years?


.

Where is the return on the trillions we`ve squandered on military adventures since the end of WW2?

Kind of obvious even to a liberal like you, we are not speaking Russian are we?


And theseView attachment 119541

Which adventure was it that kept us from speaking Russian? The search for wmds? Our heroic victory in Granada? You`re pretty damn funny!

 

[Campbell]

People say, "I didn't want Hillary because she would just be the same old same old". Yes, that is true. She would have continued steady growth. She would have continued to protect unions and social security. She would have doubled the debt but so will Trump. She would continue pushing free trade but that's because free trade is inevitable. She would have not won the war on terror but neither will Trump. But she would not have given massive tax breaks to the rich, which Trump will give. She would have insisted on making college affordable and fixing healthcare.

About doubling the debt.......guess who started it:

.....................................................Total U S Debt......................................................

09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)((Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

Somehow you left this out. I can't imagine how.

Shucks!!!

I was just trying to point out that if George W. Bush hadn't immediately started working on tax cuts for the rich we wouldn't even have a national debt:

09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)
09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32(Bill Clinton raised taxes on the rich)
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

 

[Rustic]

People say, "I didn't want Hillary because she would just be the same old same old". Yes, that is true. She would have continued steady growth. She would have continued to protect unions and social security. She would have doubled the debt but so will Trump. She would continue pushing free trade but that's because free trade is inevitable. She would have not won the war on terror but neither will Trump. But she would not have given massive tax breaks to the rich, which Trump will give. She would have insisted on making college affordable and fixing healthcare.

About doubling the debt.......guess who started it:

.....................................................Total U S Debt......................................................

09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)((Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

Somehow you left this out. I can't imagine how.

Shucks!!!

I was just trying to point out that if George W. Bush hadn't immediately started working on tax cuts for the rich we wouldn't even have a national debt:

09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)
09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32(Bill Clinton raised taxes on the rich)
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

George W. Bush is/was a progressive… Shit for brains

 

[danielpalos]

yet, the right wing insists on a "work or die" ethic from the Age of Iron.

"Give a man a fish and he shall eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he shall eat for a lifetime"...
Tell me oh great one, where's the problem?

the Problem is, all y'all seem to have, is Red Herrings.

Says the king of "Red Herrings."

you don't know what you are talking about, like usual.

From you that is a great compliment! Thank you, you never did answer my question earlier in the thread, tells me a lot about you. Have a good day danniboi.

begging the question is not debate, only fallacy.

 

[danielpalos]

You, who does not buy the union label, does not give any money for unions, does not own a car made by a union have already made it clear you do not support unions, you just pretend you do. You are a fake.

Oh no, I'm not fake. I've never supported unions in any way shape or form. They are as useful today as a buggy whip in a new car.

As for public sector unions, they should never have been allowed to form and should be eliminated.

My brother is a VP who deals with unions. He admits you are dead wrong. That without unions labor would be screwed. And for the record, it is sad labor in Germany is treated better than labor here in America.

Only 18% of Germans are in a union, so how is German workers treated better than the United States workers?

How are they treated better?
Government pension system, govt. healthcare system, govt. education system, etc. apply to everyone in Germany, union or not.

It's the attitude.. German unions don't try to break a company, the unions want the company to succeed as much as the employees... Here the unions don't give a fuck

Like at Hostess? It was all management's, fault.