Mr. Friscus
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2020
- 5,252
- 5,509
They intended to… and attempted to. Isn’t that what the standards are?But they didn't halt the SCOTUS.
See the difference?
Things are getting VERY specific.. did it have to be on a weekday?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They intended to… and attempted to. Isn’t that what the standards are?But they didn't halt the SCOTUS.
See the difference?
LOL
Hundreds of trials?? Every one was because not a single juror could find them guilty as charged?
And what about all the others who pled guilty. They did that so their lives wouldn't be on danger too?
You sound paranoid and insane.
Nobody was in charge of security of the Capitol and the grounds?
There is plenty of evidence, you just refuse to acknowledge it.There's a grand total of zero evidence that Pelosi knew about Trump's "offer." Which was not really an offer anyway.
You are being a dishonest douche again.You are being coy here.
You forgot to mention that these "procedural grounds" were that Trump's attorneys couldn't produce any actual credible evidence when asked for it, to demonstrate the fraud they were alleging.
Speaking of zero credibility, you don't present any evidence here that the statement is false....other than your (typical) prissy boy queen assertion that it is false.
How about providing some actual credible substance to prove your assertion?
Another EPIC FAIL by intheButtAgain!
Nice moonwalk there.I never said there was an insurrection, so you are wrong on the first part of your premise.
I never blamed an insurrection on Pelosi so the second part of your statement is wrong.
I never said some who took part in the protest, smashed windows, opened locked doors, fought with the Capitol Police are not guilty.
Where do you get off at asking a question that insinuates and have said things I have not said.
MagicMike, you have proved that you have no comprehension or are simply clutching at straws trying to prove your opinion has some basis in fact.
How many Mossad would be put in front of firing squads if patriotic Americans (instead of Zionist Fascist Traitors) were actually put in charge at FBI and DOJ?
LOL… you’re reaching big time. This law was not intended to deal with random rioters. You’re trying to fit a medium shirt into an XL body.Now you’re saying if anything delays a vote, it’s sedition.
It's not just me saying it... I'm just reflecting what the law says about it...
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
and the hip bone is connected to the back bone...Said no one ever.
The Capitol Police Board is responsible for that.
SInce you have NO facts and your precious committee destroyed all their proven FABRICATED “evidence” rather than comply with demands to turn it over, we all know you will just continue to lie and whine. We all know you aren’t capable of handling the truth of the matter. Continue whining....You are welcome to factually dispute the evidence about 1/6 that is in the public sphere. But we both know you can't.
I need evidence to show that we do not have all the information the legislative branch of government has, or more specifically the Speaker of the House.
You are acting the fool
Google is not the arbiter of truth.
You just did,WTF??
Who said anything about google??
And YOU are definitely not the arbiter of truth.
Post a link to a verifiable website confirming your claims.
Yet, there is a leader of congress, the Speaker of the House of Representatives. The person who is 2nd in line to become president, after the vice president.
2nd in line, that alone shows who is in charge and the most powerful person in congress. Tasked with ensuring the security of the Capitol
You just did,
Google is not the arbiter of truth.
Who does the Sergeant at Arms report to and whyBeing second in line to the president does not make the Speaker the leader of Congress.
You're mental. Even funnier, this lie of yours is the foundation of your bullshit. Which now explains why you cling to it so desperately. Because even you know your house of cards collapses without that absurdity
Websites are found with GoogleRetard, I said don't post a link to Google. I said post a link to a verifiable site.
Which one?Who does the Sergeant at Arms report to and why