Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am agnostic and still can recognize how full of crap progressives are about scripture.
Well what do you expect when people pontificate on scriptures they don't read?
I've read them in depth.
Repeatedly.
Used to preach them.
Christians Ignore this part of their bible
Matthew:
42 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink:
43 I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not.
44 Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee?
45 Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me.
Christians don't ignore it.
Dems read it and think Jesus was talking about food stamps
So, like Avatar, you regularly put homeless people up in your home?
The only solution to public support is private support, and we already know that isn't enough.
How many other homeless do you extend the same respite?
What you do for the least of these, you do for me, right?
Do you, therefore, have regular homeless houseguests?
Bet would be the same number s as you?
I'm not the one suggesting charity will be sufficient.
How many other homeless do you extend the same respite?
What you do for the least of these, you do for me, right?
Do you, therefore, have regular homeless houseguests?
Bet would be the same number s as you?
I'm not the one suggesting charity will be sufficient.
How many other homeless do you extend the same respite?
What you do for the least of these, you do for me, right?
Do you, therefore, have regular homeless houseguests?
Bet would be the same number s as you?
I'm not the one suggesting charity will be sufficient.
Bet would be the same number s as you?
I'm not the one suggesting charity will be sufficient.
And yet only charity can help. Because Robbery will never fix the problems.
Well what do you expect when people pontificate on scriptures they don't read?
I've read them in depth.
Repeatedly.
Used to preach them.
When you used to be a Republican?
Bet would be the same number s as you?
I'm not the one suggesting charity will be sufficient.
So you don't then right??
You should look up the def.of hypocrite.
Cons don't believe the bible where Jesus says, "The son of man has no place to rest his head" because they don't like the poor and the homeless. One rich bitch called the cops on the church that had a statue of homeless Jesus on a park bench.
Statue of a homeless Jesus startles a wealthy community | 89.3 KPCC
Christians Ignore this part of their bible
Matthew:
42 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink:
43 I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not.
44 Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee?
45 Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me.
Yes some people clam to be Christians,don't really walk the walk,good bet you don't ether.
Conservatives out pace people like yourself,by miles when it come to charity and helping others,saying anything different,is ether so totally misinformed its almost a crime,or just a flat out lie which do you do?
Real compassionate people,the one that make a difference in life,don't point fingers and accuse people in a blanket statement. Your underbelly is showing pull your pants up.
I'm not the one suggesting charity will be sufficient.
And yet only charity can help. Because Robbery will never fix the problems.
Did the early church "rob" everyone in it by taking all they had and pooling it for the common good?
Or is their a special dispensation for them having followed that model?
I'm not the one suggesting charity will be sufficient.
So you don't then right??
You should look up the def.of hypocrite.
No hypocrisy.
I'm not the one saying charity will solve the problem.
We already know it can't meet the need.
So you don't then right??
You should look up the def.of hypocrite.
No hypocrisy.
I'm not the one saying charity will solve the problem.
We already know it can't meet the need.
No. you're just the one pretending that those who do charity are somehow the bad guys when you do nothing.
I'm not the one suggesting charity will be sufficient.
So you don't then right??
You should look up the def.of hypocrite.
No hypocrisy.
I'm not the one saying charity will solve the problem.
We already know it can't meet the need.
So you don't then right??
You should look up the def.of hypocrite.
No hypocrisy.
I'm not the one saying charity will solve the problem.
We already know it can't meet the need.
It can meet the need. But then the Democrats would lose their voting base.
I would argue that local charities could do more to help the truly poor than any government bureaucracy.
Hell the government can't even make the post office profitable while FedEx and UPS are kicking ass and taking names!
I'm not the one suggesting charity will be sufficient.
So you don't then right??
You should look up the def.of hypocrite.
No hypocrisy.
I'm not the one saying charity will solve the problem.
We already know it can't meet the need.
No hypocrisy.
I'm not the one saying charity will solve the problem.
We already know it can't meet the need.
It can meet the need. But then the Democrats would lose their voting base.
I would argue that local charities could do more to help the truly poor than any government bureaucracy.
Hell the government can't even make the post office profitable while FedEx and UPS are kicking ass and taking names!
Then why aren't they already taking care of it?
They don't have the capacity, and no amount of pleading about the goodness of people of faith will change the math.
So you don't then right??
You should look up the def.of hypocrite.
No hypocrisy.
I'm not the one saying charity will solve the problem.
We already know it can't meet the need.
No. you're just the one pretending that those who do charity are somehow the bad guys when you do nothing.
So you don't then right??
You should look up the def.of hypocrite.
No hypocrisy.
I'm not the one saying charity will solve the problem.
We already know it can't meet the need.
It did during the Great Depression. All government does it make the lower class permanent. The Church stepped in and fed people, housed them in some cases, educated them, and eventually the people who benefited got back on their own feet and when the Church asked for charity it was they who gave it next.
So far the Federal Government has spent over 5 trillion dollars on the "war on poverty" and as is true with all governmental programs the same people who were poor then, are poor now. They just have nice TV's and section 8 housing. There is no incentive for them to advance themselves...they are now nothing more than slaves who's sole job for the plantation owner, is to give the Master their vote.
