Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Right-Wing Response to Paris is Everything Terrorists Could Want
The right-wing response to the Paris terror attacks is predictably hysterical, racist and xenophobic. It’s everything the terrorists could possibly want, and a distraction from a very real threat.
The world is still reeling from the terrorist attacks in Paris, which killed 129 people on Friday. While the rest of the world mourns, the American right-wing is engaging in the usual orgy of racism, xenophobia, jingoism, fear-mongering and saber-rattling.
Perhaps the worst example was two CNN anchors berating the spokesperson for a Muslim outreach group, because he would not agree that all Muslims were collectively responsible for the attacks.
That kind of rhetoric has already led to several threats of violence against Muslims.
- See more at: The Right-Wing Response to Paris is Everything Terrorists Could Want
From the day after 9/11, when some fool murdered a Sikh in a convenience store, it has been obvious that RWs do not want to catch and kill terrorists. They want to kill everyone - children, elderly, innocents - it simply does not make any difference to RWNJs.
Thanks to the brainless, mindless, hysterical hatred from the right, the terrorists have won. Working together with that hysteria, the terrorists have Americans against Americans. RWNJs are openly against our constitution. They pass their lies around as though its fact and the obvious result of that is they have no real idea of what is real.
I don't see any reason to believe the RWs will suddenly become loyal to their own country. Indeed, as true Conservatives become more and more rare, there is no doubt they will get a lot crazier in the future.
I'll bite, what you dream of after mommy puts you to bed?US Navy submarines launching nuclear missiles on the Capitols of Iran, Iraq , Yemen......and Syria.
Arsenals of hydrogen bombs dropped on their encampments and training facilities.
I'll bite, what you dream of after mommy puts you to bed?
Do you by chance have something realistic to say about the fact that nuclear weapons are of no use now but as MAD?
Terror is a tactic, that even we use. It will not be going away.However tragic , Terrorists organizations need to be stopped...... Permanently !
The Right-Wing Response to Paris is Everything Terrorists Could Want
The right-wing response to the Paris terror attacks is predictably hysterical, racist and xenophobic. It’s everything the terrorists could possibly want, and a distraction from a very real threat.
The world is still reeling from the terrorist attacks in Paris, which killed 129 people on Friday. While the rest of the world mourns, the American right-wing is engaging in the usual orgy of racism, xenophobia, jingoism, fear-mongering and saber-rattling.
Perhaps the worst example was two CNN anchors berating the spokesperson for a Muslim outreach group, because he would not agree that all Muslims were collectively responsible for the attacks.
That kind of rhetoric has already led to several threats of violence against Muslims.
- See more at: The Right-Wing Response to Paris is Everything Terrorists Could Want
From the day after 9/11, when some fool murdered a Sikh in a convenience store, it has been obvious that RWs do not want to catch and kill terrorists. They want to kill everyone - children, elderly, innocents - it simply does not make any difference to RWNJs.
Thanks to the brainless, mindless, hysterical hatred from the right, the terrorists have won. Working together with that hysteria, the terrorists have Americans against Americans. RWNJs are openly against our constitution. They pass their lies around as though its fact and the obvious result of that is they have no real idea of what is real.
I don't see any reason to believe the RWs will suddenly become loyal to their own country. Indeed, as true Conservatives become more and more rare, there is no doubt they will get a lot crazier in the future.
The Crusades, leaving Europe to invade the Middle East and slaughter Muslims was a defense? Hmmmm, like Hitler invading Poland was a defense.The plan is to understand what we are up against and make a plan that works for defeating a bad idea with a better one. In a war of ideas, bombs are essentially useless.So the plan is to just sit in the corner and say "not in the face, not in the face" in response to Muslim terror instead of doing something about it because of some vacuous notion of a circle of violence?
Gee, I can't imagine why someone who already despises Western values would be even more emboldened.
We're up against a people who want to cut your throat because we value things like free speech and the ability to choose a religion. You're not going to defeat that with hugs and chanting and drum circles. You defeat that by killing the shit out of them until they either agree to stop trying to cut your throat to keep their cities from being carpet bombed or you wipe them out.
We've been doing that for over 1400 years. How is that workin' for ya?
We haven't been killing them for 1400 years. They have been the ones killing Christians, Jews, pagans, Hindu, Buddhists, and African tribes for 1400 years. The West has defended itself against their invasions a few times, with little result.
Where, chapter and verse, does it say in the New Testament that Christians were allowed to invade Muslim lands and slaughter Muslim men, women, and children? Where does it say they were allowed to force Jews to convert, or die? Do tell...The Crusades, leaving Europe to invade the Middle East and slaughter Muslims was a defense? Hmmmm, like Hitler invading Poland was a defense.The plan is to understand what we are up against and make a plan that works for defeating a bad idea with a better one. In a war of ideas, bombs are essentially useless.
We're up against a people who want to cut your throat because we value things like free speech and the ability to choose a religion. You're not going to defeat that with hugs and chanting and drum circles. You defeat that by killing the shit out of them until they either agree to stop trying to cut your throat to keep their cities from being carpet bombed or you wipe them out.
We've been doing that for over 1400 years. How is that workin' for ya?
We haven't been killing them for 1400 years. They have been the ones killing Christians, Jews, pagans, Hindu, Buddhists, and African tribes for 1400 years. The West has defended itself against their invasions a few times, with little result.
Yes. The Muslims had invaded everywhere in the Mediterranean to include Spain, France, and the Italian peninsula. I suppose you think the Christians were supposed to just roll over and let their throats be slashed. Luckily they decided to launch a counterattack. It wasn't much compared to what Muslims had been doing for hundreds of years.
Where, chapter and verse, does it say in the New Testament that Christians were allowed to invade Muslim lands and slaughter Muslim men, women, and children? Where does it say they were allowed to force Jews to convert, or die? Do tell...The Crusades, leaving Europe to invade the Middle East and slaughter Muslims was a defense? Hmmmm, like Hitler invading Poland was a defense.We're up against a people who want to cut your throat because we value things like free speech and the ability to choose a religion. You're not going to defeat that with hugs and chanting and drum circles. You defeat that by killing the shit out of them until they either agree to stop trying to cut your throat to keep their cities from being carpet bombed or you wipe them out.
We've been doing that for over 1400 years. How is that workin' for ya?
We haven't been killing them for 1400 years. They have been the ones killing Christians, Jews, pagans, Hindu, Buddhists, and African tribes for 1400 years. The West has defended itself against their invasions a few times, with little result.
Yes. The Muslims had invaded everywhere in the Mediterranean to include Spain, France, and the Italian peninsula. I suppose you think the Christians were supposed to just roll over and let their throats be slashed. Luckily they decided to launch a counterattack. It wasn't much compared to what Muslims had been doing for hundreds of years.
Do tell, who ordered the Crusades? And were Christians allowed to slaughter people? If so, why did the early Christians refuse to serve in the army of Rome?Where, chapter and verse, does it say in the New Testament that Christians were allowed to invade Muslim lands and slaughter Muslim men, women, and children? Where does it say they were allowed to force Jews to convert, or die? Do tell...The Crusades, leaving Europe to invade the Middle East and slaughter Muslims was a defense? Hmmmm, like Hitler invading Poland was a defense.We've been doing that for over 1400 years. How is that workin' for ya?
We haven't been killing them for 1400 years. They have been the ones killing Christians, Jews, pagans, Hindu, Buddhists, and African tribes for 1400 years. The West has defended itself against their invasions a few times, with little result.
Yes. The Muslims had invaded everywhere in the Mediterranean to include Spain, France, and the Italian peninsula. I suppose you think the Christians were supposed to just roll over and let their throats be slashed. Luckily they decided to launch a counterattack. It wasn't much compared to what Muslims had been doing for hundreds of years.
The Bible has nothing to do with it. It was about pushing back Muslim invasions over the previous 400 years. The armies came from many different kingdoms, it wasn't just one military incursion ordered by the Pope like most liberals like to believe.
Where, chapter and verse, does it say in the New Testament that Christians were allowed to invade Muslim lands and slaughter Muslim men, women, and children? Where does it say they were allowed to force Jews to convert, or die? Do tell...The Crusades, leaving Europe to invade the Middle East and slaughter Muslims was a defense? Hmmmm, like Hitler invading Poland was a defense.We've been doing that for over 1400 years. How is that workin' for ya?
We haven't been killing them for 1400 years. They have been the ones killing Christians, Jews, pagans, Hindu, Buddhists, and African tribes for 1400 years. The West has defended itself against their invasions a few times, with little result.
Yes. The Muslims had invaded everywhere in the Mediterranean to include Spain, France, and the Italian peninsula. I suppose you think the Christians were supposed to just roll over and let their throats be slashed. Luckily they decided to launch a counterattack. It wasn't much compared to what Muslims had been doing for hundreds of years.
The Bible has nothing to do with it. It was about pushing back Muslim invasions over the previous 400 years. The armies came from many different kingdoms, it wasn't just one military incursion ordered by the Pope like most liberals like to believe.
Nukes is a little drastic at this point but leafletting and eliminating Raqqa with conventional weapons might be reasonable.I'll bite, what you dream of after mommy puts you to bed?
Do you by chance have something realistic to say about the fact that nuclear weapons are of no use now but as MAD?
Nuclear weapons deter war, and have the ability to end war.
However tragic to civilians, Terrorists organizations need to be stopped...... Permanently !
We need a landslide win. Nuclear weapons would do that .
Shadow 355
......a left wing American would bend down to pet a rattle snake as it is shaking it's tail...
