Rightwingers really need to stop comparing the summer riots to the Jan 6th insurrection and here is why

[ThisIsMe]

Where is your evidence of "Democrat money" being behind the riots?

So, a few minutes of searching on my phone turned up this:

Major donors consider funding Black Lives Matter

Activists for the protest movement are meeting in secret with liberal funder club.

www.politico.com

Considering blm and antifa were the big players in the riots, you just need to look at who is funding those groups. There have been speculation of some major money people backing them.

So, what about the rest of my post, the part that we do know ow about, the prominent politicians on record in support of the riots?

 

[IM2]

Not exactly.

Rioting threatening the lives of members of the House. Oh, right, no one was there. Rioters taking selfies and calling mom. Mom, guess where I am?

Yes exactly. It's 20 miles from downtown Boston.

 

[IM2]

So, a few minutes of searching on my phone turned up this:

Major donors consider funding Black Lives Matter

Activists for the protest movement are meeting in secret with liberal funder club.

www.politico.com

Considering blm and antifa were the big players in the riots, you just need to look at who is funding those groups. There have been speculation of some major money people backing them.

So, what about the rest of my post, the part that we do know ow about, the prominent politicians on record in support of the riots?

93 percent of the protests were peaxeful. Most violence came from counter protesters not associated wih either group.

 

[Correll]

Correll wrote: He had a right to advocate for his interests to be considered by Pence. 22JAN11-POST#578

NFBW wrote: He has no such right if (a) his interest is a crime and/or (b) His interest deprives others of their Constitutional Right in any way. Do you Agree? 22JAN11-POST#580

An interest does not deprive other people of anything. Your words make no sense.


We have gone over all of this before. The crux of the matter is your assumption that everyone knows all about very obscure procedures of the Congress relating to the Presidential Election and any disagreement with YOUR reading on it,

is "proof" of the "fact" of....various shit, from "lying" to "crimes" and "fascism" and really, any shit that you feel like throwing at the wall at any moment.


Which is just you being an autistic freak and being an asshole on top of that.

 

[Correll]

93 percent of the protests were peaxeful. Most violence came from counter protesters not associated wih either group.

 

[Orangecat]

The BLM riots never threatened the Republic;

And you think the mostly peaceful protest on 1/6 was an actual threat to the republic? No honest adult thinks that propaganda is true.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Correll wrote: An interest does not deprive other people of anything. 22JAN1-POST#584

NFBW wrote: One of Trump’s potential crimes is the federal crime of Seditious Conspiracy that is set out in 18 United no States Code §2384. Which states:

If two or more persons . . . conspire . . . by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States . . .they shall each be fined or imprisoned not me ore than 20 years, or both.​

The conspiracy interest is ‘stop the steal’ by pressure applied on Pence based on lies to refuse to count the certification of the electors from Arizona Nevada Wisconsin Michigan Pennsylvania and Georgia. - - - Not counting those six states that Biden won is a conspiratorial manipulation of the electoral college numbers based on lies and fraud resulting in Pence officially gaveling Trump the winner. - - - Had it worked Correll every single citizen in the six not-counted states are deprived of their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to have their votes count. - - - The Conspiracy to manipulate the laws of the electoral college process failed because Pence refused to participate. The conspiracy does not need to succeed to be a crime. It’s the intent and engagement in a conspiracy to deprive voters in Georgia Wisconsin Michigan Pennsylvania Arizona Nevada the right to choose a President. 22JAN1-POST#587

 

[Markle]

93 percent of the protests were peaxeful. Most violence came from counter protesters not associated wih either group.

That just goofy.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

MarcATL wrote: Where is your evidence of "Democrat money" being behind the riots? 22JAN11-POST#579’

ThisIsMe wrote: So, a few minutes of searching on my phone turned up this: 22JAN11-POST#581

NFBW wrote: That 2015 report cites DEM donor money going to BLM. Donors support an expression of free speech Correll free speech that Black Lives Matter.
So where is your response to the question as asked? Where is your evidence of "Democrat money" being behind the riots?

You have not answered you have evidence of "Democrat money" being behind the riots? Are you going to answer that direct and specific question? 22JAN12-POST#589

 

[22lcidw]

93 percent of the protests were peaxeful. Most violence came from counter protesters not associated wih either group.

In the late 1960's a TV movie called "Shadow on the Land" was shown. It was about America as a Police State with a National Police Force. It was called the Internal Security Force. Our alphabet federal agencies are becoming a National Police State apparatus. Homeland Security at this point seems to be that with its agencies under it. The FBI seems to be corrupted and with other agencies are running red flag operations. This is larger than us having views that are not exact. They are lying in front of us now.

 

[IM2]

And you think the mostly peaceful protest on 1/6 was an actual threat to the republic? No honest adult thinks that propaganda is true.

The fact you claim 1-6 was mostly peaceful shows us who is posting propaganda.

 

[IM2]

That just goofy.

Sanya Mansour, 93% of Black Lives Matter Protests Have Been Peaceful, New Report Finds, September 5, 2020, 93% of Black Lives Matter Protests Have Been Peaceful, New Report Finds

The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project, Demonstrations & Political Violence In America: New Data for Summer 2020, Demonstrations & Political Violence in America: New Data for Summer 2020 - ACLED

Erica Chenoweth and Jeremy Pressman, Black Lives Matter Protesters Were Overwhelmingly Peaceful, Our Research Finds, Harvard Radcliffe Institute, October 20, 2020 Black Lives Matter Protesters Were Overwhelmingly Peaceful, Our Research Finds | Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University

 

[IM2]

George Floyd would be alive today if he didn't abuse drugs. That's what killed him. You've got somebody that's ingested a lethal dose of a drug that stops your lungs from working. I have zero sympathy for him. The only reason he was even IN Minnesota was that he had to get out of Texas because the cops there knew what a piece of garbage he was. Anyone that threatens to shoot a pregnant woman in the belly during a home invasion looking for drugs isn't worthy of anyone's sympathy!

That's not what the jury said. So shut the fuck up.

 

[IM2]

Bahahahahhaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

Wait... you're serious?

BAHAHSAHSDHHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADHAHDHAHAHAAHAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!

Sanya Mansour, 93% of Black Lives Matter Protests Have Been Peaceful, New Report Finds, September 5, 2020, 93% of Black Lives Matter Protests Have Been Peaceful, New Report Finds

The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project, Demonstrations & Political Violence In America: New Data for Summer 2020, Demonstrations & Political Violence in America: New Data for Summer 2020 - ACLED

Erica Chenoweth and Jeremy Pressman, Black Lives Matter Protesters Were Overwhelmingly Peaceful, Our Research Finds, Harvard Radcliffe Institute, October 20, 2020 Black Lives Matter Protesters Were Overwhelmingly Peaceful, Our Research Finds | Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University

 

[IM2]

So, a few minutes of searching on my phone turned up this:

Major donors consider funding Black Lives Matter

Activists for the protest movement are meeting in secret with liberal funder club.

www.politico.com

Considering blm and antifa were the big players in the riots, you just need to look at who is funding those groups. There have been speculation of some major money people backing them.

So, what about the rest of my post, the part that we do know ow about, the prominent politicians on record in support of the riots?

Sanya Mansour, 93% of Black Lives Matter Protests Have Been Peaceful, New Report Finds, September 5, 2020, 93% of Black Lives Matter Protests Have Been Peaceful, New Report Finds

The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project, Demonstrations & Political Violence In America: New Data for Summer 2020, Demonstrations & Political Violence in America: New Data for Summer 2020 - ACLED

Erica Chenoweth and Jeremy Pressman, Black Lives Matter Protesters Were Overwhelmingly Peaceful, Our Research Finds, Harvard Radcliffe Institute, October 20, 2020 Black Lives Matter Protesters Were Overwhelmingly Peaceful, Our Research Finds | Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University

 

[Markle]

MarcATL wrote: Where is your evidence of "Democrat money" being behind the riots? 22JAN11-POST#579’

ThisIsMe wrote: So, a few minutes of searching on my phone turned up this: 22JAN11-POST#581

NFBW wrote: That 2015 report cites DEM donor money going to BLM. Donors support an expression of free speech Correll free speech that Black Lives Matter.
So where is your response to the question as asked? Where is your evidence of "Democrat money" being behind the riots?

You have not answered you have evidence of "Democrat money" being behind the riots? Are you going to answer that direct and specific question? 22JAN12-POST#589

Do you have the temerity to deny that Democrats pumped at least tens of millions of dollars into BLM?

Really?

 

[IM2]

Well, there are those who would try to justify the riots, which when they became destructive, are not justifiable. John doe operating a pawn shop shouldn't have lost his business because of the protest.

Also, the constitution doesn't say people have a right to riot, it says they have the right to peaceably assemble for the redress of grievances. I support the right to protest when someone has been wronged, but that support ends when people start destroying stuff.

As far as who is behind it, I'm more than positive if you dig, even slightly, you'll find a LOT of Democrat money behind the riots over theist 2 years, not to mention the full support and encouragement of several prominent dems in congress.

Both sides have their faults.

The get your white supremacist buddies in check because they were the problem.

“The vast majority of demonstration events associated with the BLM movement are non-violent In more than 93% of all demonstrations connected to the movement, demonstrators have not engaged in violence or destructive activity.”

“Since Floyd’s killing, dozens of car-ramming attacks by individual perpetrators — in some cases acting independently with no reported affiliation, and in others linked to hate groups like the Ku Klux Klan — have been reported at demonstrations around the country. Other cases have involved those affiliated with the government, such as the military and law enforcement, including an on-duty police officer at a demonstration in Anaheim, California on 25 July; an off-duty police officer at a demonstration in Seattle, Washington on 4 July; an army sergeant at a demonstration in Austin, Texas on 25 July; and an off-duty jail correctional officer at a demonstration in Kokomo, Indiana on 30 May.”

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Trumptards and FOX, trying to compare the two totally different incidences.

ONE was about a person being killed while in police custody.
ONE was about overturning an election.

Like trying to compare hurricane Ida in Louisiana to the Kentucky tornadoes.

 

[IM2]

Do you have the temerity to deny that Democrats pumped at least tens of millions of dollars into BLM?

Really?

They didn't and BLM had little to nothing to do with riots. Furthermore 1-6 was done based on something that did not hapen and all evidence showed there was no steal.

 

[IM2]

Trumptards and FOX, trying to compare the two totally different incidences.

ONE was about a person being killed while in police custody.
ONE was about overturning an election.

Like trying to compare hurricane Ida in Louisiana to the Kentucky tornadoes.

One was about an actual police murder.

One was about an imaginary stolen election.