Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Yes. Let's.Let’s turn this around....
I know more about logistics than your pogue ass ever will.
Infantrymen are a resource, you fucking clueless idiot. When one or more of them isn't working, you DX his ass.
It was poor leadership all right but not on my part...... I was the guy getting in the CO and the 1st SGT's faces demanding to know why these guys weren't being Article 15'd or court martialed for dereliction of duty or refusing to follow orders.
And they retaliated by doing nothing and ordering me back outside the wire they almost never left themselves, with these same guys hoping the jihadis would finally get lucky and kill my ass.
Read the book, fucktard.
Under WI law, as soon as Rittenhouse disengaes, his right to self-defense resets.
It doesn't matter what he said to anyone - as soon as he runs, he can defense himself.
To believe otherwise is to believe the people chasing him with the intent to do harm had the right to do so.
Who do you believe the people chasing him with the intent to do harm had the right to do so.
And you sound like a peace time service support pogue who likes to talk shit from thousands of miles away.Probably because they didn't want to ruin a young man's life for something petty.
Honestly, you sound like the kind of NCO was was in danger of being fragged by your own men.
I'd ask which book, but I kind of don't care. We had no business being in Afghanistan after 2005.
And you sound like a peace time service support pogue who likes to talk shit from thousands of miles away.
Never been to see the elephant, never heard a shot fired in anger, never had to walk around the side of a mountain looking for pieces of a 19 year old because the company TOC failed to clear fires and you got one of your own mortars dropped on your position, but quick to talk shit..... that's you.
What would you know about it pogue?Um, yeah, guys who were in real combat don't brag about it.
Frankly, the officers in your command thought you were kind of a POS, and given the stream of crazy most of your posts are, it's amazing they didn't throw you out on a Section 8.
What would you know about it pogue?
The closest you have ever been is watching Saving Private Ryan, lol.
It sounds to me like you're a jealous pogue, who never did shit, lol.Naw, never saw that movie.
But man, it sounds to me like your own men and your superiors didn't respect you, by your own words.
LOLYou haven't established that it was excessive.
You just keep lying and throwing shit up against the wall, hopping something will stick.
He shot Rosenbaum in the back...I hadn't heard that before, do you have a link?
Yes, that would definitely negate any "Self-defense" claims if he shot the man when he was down.
www.documentcloud.org
Juries don't guess like you do. They go by the facts.Possibly not kill. Certainly the intent was hostile and violent. If the jury is full of real people instead of lefty zealots, and they are not lied to be the court, Rittenhouse will be found innocent.
Actually, it only takes one for a hung jury which can lead to another trial. You still need a unanimous vote by the jury to acquit, as well as to convict.Just for the record, I know nothing about the McMichaels you keep on referring to, and I don't care either.
And my ROE briefing was: "You're all NCOs; if you think he needs shooting, shoot him."
We're not debating whether or not he's a hero, that's just you trying to re-frame the discussion to your own advantage.
We're discussing whether or not he was acting in self-defense.
I believe he was. So do a lot of other people.
And it only takes one of us on the jury.
Juries don't guess like you do. They go by the facts.
How so?LOL
He shot him in the back. That's excessive. You can deny that all you want, it won't alter reality.
"Can" lead to another trial..... but usually doesn't.Actually, it only takes one for a hung jury which can lead to another trial. You still need a unanimous vote by the jury to acquit, as well as to convict.
It sounds to me like you're a jealous pogue, who never did shit, lol.
Queuing up the preemptive excusesPlus, if the trial is the least bit fair, acquittal is very likely.
Dumbfuck, your "guess" is what Rosenbaum would have done had he caught Rittenhouse, not that he was chasing him. Your fear is exposed in your spin.Guess? It is a fact that Rosenbaum was chasing Rittenhouse. The "guessing" would be assuming his intent was harmless.
"due to the way he fell, one bullet went into the guy's back"How so?
Explain it to me step by step.
He justifiably fired at the man attacking him, and due to the way he fell, one bullet went into the guy's back; explain to me how that meets the legal definition of "excessive".
I'll wait.
A case of this magnitude would very likely be retried."Can" lead to another trial..... but usually doesn't.
Plus, if the trial is the least bit fair, acquittal is very likely.
Unlike you, normal people don't try to punish other for refusing to allow themselves to be killed.
